DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Catch the "Buzz" » Marines Fund Non-Lethal Heat Ray

Marines Fund Non-Lethal Heat Ray

Marines Fund Non-lethal Heat Ray

Reporters can be really dumb. There I was in front of Raytheons booth at the Association of the US Armys conference with a little button under my thumb. I hit the button. My lower thoracic area got very hot, very fast. So I waited for the machine to recycle and hit the button again. This time the pain was more intense I wasnt screaming or anything and my skin felt like it was about to catch fire.

I didnt do this just to make you all chuckle. The idea was to see what the Marines will probably buy from Raytheon with $25 million buried deep in the summer supplemental spending bill. The Marines havent signed the contract yet but negotiations are well under way for five nonlethal Silent Guardian systems . It looks as if the system will be used in Afghanistan to help protect high value assets as well as bases.

The system beams millimeter wave energy at the speed of light for more than 250 meters and penetrates the top layer of the skin. As soon as you move away from the beam the pain stops, although there is a nagging sensation of pain for few moments afterwards. The antenna covers a full 360 degrees and the beam can be used to sweep across a crowd or to target one person at a time. Its got safety cutoffs so it doesnt cause permanent damage, according to John Patterson, a Raytheon spokesman.

The Silent Guardian is one variant of Raytheons Active Denial Systems, most of which provide area-wide protections against weapons such as missiles.

Non-lethals have been in development for a very long time. The first big burst of enthusiasm hit in the mid-1990s when the Pentagon created its first non-lethal office. Most of those technologies foundered such as sticky foam among concerns that non-lethals might hurt people, which always seemed ironic given that high velocity bullets and bombs are considered legal.

In addition to the Marines, the National Institute of Justice is investigating development of a much smaller version of Silent Guardian for police and other homeland security forces.

– Colin Clark

Share |

October 9th, 2008 | Catch the "Buzz" | 411319 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/10/09/marines-fund-non-lethal-heat-ray/Marines+Fund+Non-Lethal+Heat+Ray2008-10-09+11%3A54%3A48Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « IAR Additions | Big Boys Battle For JLTV Billions » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. stephen russell says:
    October 9, 2008 at 8:23 am

    Amen & about Time, test this on the US Mex border & Iraq.
    Must make mobile for riot use.
    For US Embassies.
    Radical.
    Use on ships vs pirates?

    Reply
  2. Stu says:
    October 9, 2008 at 11:08 am

    Considering the picture, I’d say it’s already mobile, if that is this heat ray thing. But it is about time, good for riot control without a doubt, and protecting bases.

    Reply
  3. Ed says:
    October 9, 2008 at 12:02 pm

    They need to make this thing have a longer range than 250 meters. A guy with an AK can shoot further, they should make the range about 400 meters or more that way it might be able to stop a would be attacker, possibly even a sniper at a range a bit longer than most of our soldiers are zeroed to shoot at. Give them the non-lethal reach out and touch someone approach.

    Reply
  4. Vercingetorix says:
    October 9, 2008 at 6:34 pm

    “…which always seemed ironic given that high velocity bullets and bombs are considered legal.“
    Yep, I love the snark you hear about nonlethals from the bien pensants such as tasers and this system; anything short of giving out free BJs to terrorists/criminals is entirely too much force for that crowd.

    Reply
  5. Scathsealgaire says:
    October 9, 2008 at 7:44 pm

    I can think of some good applications of this to create better kill zones.…
    Just because it’s non-lethal, doesn’t make it useless tactically. :D

    Reply
  6. CTR1(SW) says:
    October 10, 2008 at 6:53 am

    This sounds remarkably like the Air Force / Army “Active Denial” system. Their system has already been deployed to Iraq.
    I too “put my finger on the pain button,” but I was at an air show at Kirkland AFB several years ago.
    Are the Marines are reinventing the wheel?

    Reply
  7. c dooley says:
    October 10, 2008 at 7:41 am

    My car used to have a govenor too! I like it!

    Reply
  8. RUSSell Hayes says:
    October 10, 2008 at 11:06 am

    I AGREE TEST THIS ON OUR SOUTHERN BORDER FIRST , OF COURSE CONSIDERING THE FOOD THEY EAT„, THEY MIGHT THINK IT WAS A REAL “” GOOD “” CASE HEARTBURN

    Reply
  9. Stu says:
    October 10, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    Are caps really necessary?

    Reply
  10. J says:
    October 11, 2008 at 3:48 pm

    What will this thing to somebody“s Eyes?
    Try it on the border first..

    Reply
  11. CG says:
    October 11, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    1:TEST THIS ON OUR SOUTHERN BORDER FIRST , OF COURSE CONSIDERING THE FOOD THEY EAT„, THEY MIGHT THINK IT WAS A REAL “” GOOD “” CASE HEARTBURN.
    2:Amen & about Time, test this on the US Mex border.
    3:WHY TEST IT ON PEOPLE THAT ARE DOING THE JOBS WE DON’T WANT TO DO BECAUSE OF THE LOW PAY?

    Reply
  12. mole says:
    October 12, 2008 at 4:40 am

    it is only non-lethal because they just do not havve the power to make it lethal..
    and believe — they will make it deadly as quickly as they can.

    Reply
  13. PHIL says:
    October 13, 2008 at 7:07 am

    Why not use it in the prison system? A minimum secrity prison would be a great testing ground.

    Reply
  14. Brian says:
    October 13, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    My suggestion would be to test this thing out on all of the hippie war protesters first, and after we fry all of them, use it on the fence jumpers along our southern border and then in the military prison camps to make the enemy sing.

    Reply
  15. jim says:
    October 14, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    The only danger that is ever present with a ‘non-lethal’ weapon is that some muppet operating the thing may think it is actually non-lethal and go nuts on someone with it. Consider your fists. They are non-lethal. But if you just kept beating someone in the face you could kill them pretty quick.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      A lot of these comments are missing the mark –...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      And the attitude that gets the USAF continually...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      You're still confused. You're arguing...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      First, what’s wrong with have a variety of...
      Mrcjis
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I agree. More organic precision fire, like the...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      This has been thoroughly covered in DefenseTech:...
      SMSgt Mac
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      It looks like a Russian firm may offer an Il-96 tanker plane:...
      Brian H
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      1. DoD contracts of this sort are 'cost...
      SMSgy Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      LIke I've said before it's the insistence of a...
      Dean
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      How are you going to land an F-22 on a Marine...
      Lee Gibson
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage