<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At Least Someone Gets to be Camouflaged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:26:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EddieG_USMC</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186324</link>
		<dc:creator>EddieG_USMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186324</guid>
		<description>I think the Marine Corps got the right idea and had two uniforms for thier intended envoronments. Yet the Army just went &quot;dumbass&quot; with uniforms. I thin kthey thaught that they would save money with just one type of camoflauge. But duhh, you need two types for woodland/jungle and desert. The MARPAT was trademarked for many reasons, so civilians can&#039;t wear it and try to go on to a Marine Corps installation and blow it up (for one example). There are copies but they are not the same. The Army just looked like a bunch of cactus in Iraq all four times I went. Also the Army training needs to be better. I would like to have the knowledge that the U.S. armed forces are fit and not fat. Also the money issue, we all can use more equipment and a better weapon than the M-16A2 5.56mm. Something with more stopping power, like the 6.8mm.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Marine Corps got the right idea and had two uniforms for thier intended envoronments. Yet the Army just went “dumbass” with uniforms. I thin kthey thaught that they would save money with just one type of camoflauge. But duhh, you need two types for woodland/jungle and desert. The MARPAT was trademarked for many reasons, so civilians can’t wear it and try to go on to a Marine Corps installation and blow it up (for one example). There are copies but they are not the same. The Army just looked like a bunch of cactus in Iraq all four times I went. Also the Army training needs to be better. I would like to have the knowledge that the U.S. armed forces are fit and not fat. Also the money issue, we all can use more equipment and a better weapon than the M-16A2 5.56mm. Something with more stopping power, like the 6.8mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUDITH RYGA</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186322</link>
		<dc:creator>JUDITH RYGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186322</guid>
		<description>LOOKING FOR CAP MAC,ERIN E.McMcall/ANYONE SEE HIM OR PASS THE WORD/ ON SITE NANE IS NOT THE ONE HE GAVE ME/IT IS GYPSPYWILDTHING PLEASE PASS WORD/SEMPER FI THANHS GUYS
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOOKING FOR CAP MAC,ERIN E.McMcall/ANYONE SEE HIM OR PASS THE WORD/ ON SITE NANE IS NOT THE ONE HE GAVE ME/IT IS GYPSPYWILDTHING PLEASE PASS WORD/SEMPER FI THANHS GUYS<br />
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angel</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186321</link>
		<dc:creator>angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186321</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s OK!But take a closer look following link,It&#039;s great to DVD and PSP converter for mac!
DVD Ripper for Mac,
Mac DVD Ripper Suite,
Mac DVD Converter Ultimate Suite,
Mac DVD Copy,
Mac DVD Creator,
Mac DVD to iPod Converter,
Mac DVD to iPhone Converter,
Mac DVD to MP4 Converter,
Mac DVD to Apple TV Converter,
Mac DVD to PSP Converter,
Mac DVD to BlackBerry Converter,
Mac DVD Audio Ripper,
Edit DVD,
Vob Converter for Mac,
VOB to iPod Converter for Mac,
VOB to Apple TV Converter for Mac,
VOB to PSP Converter for Mac,
VOB to MPEG4 Converter for Mac,
VOB to M4V Converter for Mac,
VOB to 3GP Converter for Mac,
VOB to MPG Converter for Mac,
VOB to AVI Converter for Mac
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s OK!But take a closer look following link,It’s great to DVD and PSP converter for mac!<br />
DVD Ripper for Mac,<br />
Mac DVD Ripper Suite,<br />
Mac DVD Converter Ultimate Suite,<br />
Mac DVD Copy,<br />
Mac DVD Creator,<br />
Mac DVD to iPod Converter,<br />
Mac DVD to iPhone Converter,<br />
Mac DVD to MP4 Converter,<br />
Mac DVD to Apple TV Converter,<br />
Mac DVD to PSP Converter,<br />
Mac DVD to BlackBerry Converter,<br />
Mac DVD Audio Ripper,<br />
Edit DVD,<br />
Vob Converter for Mac,<br />
VOB to iPod Converter for Mac,<br />
VOB to Apple TV Converter for Mac,<br />
VOB to PSP Converter for Mac,<br />
VOB to MPEG4 Converter for Mac,<br />
VOB to M4V Converter for Mac,<br />
VOB to 3GP Converter for Mac,<br />
VOB to MPG Converter for Mac,<br />
VOB to AVI Converter for Mac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186320</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186320</guid>
		<description>What about using the best camoflague pattern available for all troops who operate in a similar environment. I was in SOCOM before and we did have leeway on uniform usage and alterations which made them more functional, lighter, and useful in our missions. Why not use what works best for all and not allow the trademarking/copywriting. Class A&#039;s are different but on the battlefield, I dont want to be distinguished from the environment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about using the best camoflague pattern available for all troops who operate in a similar environment. I was in SOCOM before and we did have leeway on uniform usage and alterations which made them more functional, lighter, and useful in our missions. Why not use what works best for all and not allow the trademarking/copywriting. Class A’s are different but on the battlefield, I dont want to be distinguished from the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186319</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186319</guid>
		<description>What about using the best camoflague pattern available for all troops who operate in a similar environment. I was in SOCOM before and we did have leeway on uniform usage and alterations which made them more functional, lighter, and useful in our missions. Why not use what works best for all and not allow the trademarking/copywriting. Class A&#039;s are different but on the battlefield, I dont want to be distinguished from the environment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about using the best camoflague pattern available for all troops who operate in a similar environment. I was in SOCOM before and we did have leeway on uniform usage and alterations which made them more functional, lighter, and useful in our missions. Why not use what works best for all and not allow the trademarking/copywriting. Class A’s are different but on the battlefield, I dont want to be distinguished from the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-77825</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-77825</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty funny that most people who cry about UCP aren&#039;t with the Army...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s pretty funny that most people who cry about UCP aren’t with the Army…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.T.</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186318</link>
		<dc:creator>N.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186318</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree with Wes but for the fact that MARPAT blobs out at a distance into a single-shade human silhouette, like UCP and Multicam...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d agree with Wes but for the fact that MARPAT blobs out at a distance into a single-shade human silhouette, like UCP and Multicam…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitor</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186317</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186317</guid>
		<description>By digital camo, they mean a camo pattern generated by computers, so they decided that a computer knew better how to deceive our vision?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By digital camo, they mean a camo pattern generated by computers, so they decided that a computer knew better how to deceive our vision?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186316</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186316</guid>
		<description>MARPAT should be available to Army troops for Jungle area use. I&#039;m a former Marine, but the Corps copywriting MARPAT so no other service can use it is an apallingly bad decision. We are talking about saving lives, people.
If the Black in MARPAT was eliminated and replaced by Tan, it would come very close to being a Universal Pattern. If the whitish &quot;Tan&quot; in the ACU was replaced by the Coyote color in MARPAT, it would be even better.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARPAT should be available to Army troops for Jungle area use. I’m a former Marine, but the Corps copywriting MARPAT so no other service can use it is an apallingly bad decision. We are talking about saving lives, people.<br />
If the Black in MARPAT was eliminated and replaced by Tan, it would come very close to being a Universal Pattern. If the whitish “Tan” in the ACU was replaced by the Coyote color in MARPAT, it would be even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C4Casey</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/15/at-least-someone-gets-to-be-camouflaged/#comment-186315</link>
		<dc:creator>C4Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4123#comment-186315</guid>
		<description>The only thing I hate more than the Army uniforms is the Air Force ABU. It&#039;s ugly, too heavy, and sticks out like a sore thumb in a woodland enviroment. I don&#039;t see why the military can&#039;t just let troops wear BDU&#039;s for woodland areas, DCU&#039;s for desert areas, and ACU&#039;s or ABU&#039;s for urban enviroments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I hate more than the Army uniforms is the Air Force ABU. It’s ugly, too heavy, and sticks out like a sore thumb in a woodland enviroment. I don’t see why the military can’t just let troops wear BDU’s for woodland areas, DCU’s for desert areas, and ACU’s or ABU’s for urban enviroments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

