Comments on: DEVELOPING: Army Abandons Flexible Armor Search — For Now

By: angel

angel — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000

That’s OK!But take a closer look following link,It’s great to DVD and PSP converter for mac!
DVD Ripper for Mac,
Mac DVD Ripper Suite,
Mac DVD Converter Ultimate Suite,
Mac DVD Copy,
Mac DVD Creator,
Mac DVD to iPod Converter,
Mac DVD to iPhone Converter,
Mac DVD to MP4 Converter,
Mac DVD to Apple TV Converter,
Mac DVD to PSP Converter,
Mac DVD to BlackBerry Converter,
Mac DVD Audio Ripper,
Edit DVD,
Vob Converter for Mac,
VOB to iPod Converter for Mac,
VOB to Apple TV Converter for Mac,
VOB to PSP Converter for Mac,
VOB to MPEG4 Converter for Mac,
VOB to M4V Converter for Mac,
VOB to 3GP Converter for Mac,
VOB to MPG Converter for Mac,
VOB to AVI Converter for Mac

By: CW4

CW4 — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:58:25 +0000

I don’t know how we ever fought before we had all the body armor.…oh, yeah, we got shot at and shot back. Now you practically have to get a field grade approval to return fire.….or risk a Congresscritter charging you with murder.

By: LCpl Cole

LCpl Cole — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:09:55 +0000

As a Marine 0311 I will probably end up carrying this new body armor in a combat enviroment, and I can tell you that walking around with an extra twenty pounds is pretty much out of the question. Most of the people that I serve with do not carry all of the plates they have now because they make them so much slower. I have not worn this armor but even if it does offer more mobility I cant see wearing it if it adds an extra twenty pounds over the current vest with all the SAPIs and that includes front, back, and side. And if you are wearing all of those I don’t think that the new vest will offer that much more protection. Personally if you consider all of the weight in a vest containing all the plates, and the extra weight is only 5–10 pounds I would perfer it but an extra 20 would not be worth the added mobility. But then again what do I know I’m just a lowly E-3 and it’s the Generals who get to make those decisions.

By: PFC MUNSON

PFC MUNSON — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:28:20 +0000

I think the idea is great but me being a dismounted 11B who is going to be walking everywhere I go an extra 20 pounds beside my saw and all the useless BS I have will be quite a bit I think the main thing they should be trying to do is slimming the wieght down, we dont have too much of a problem of our vests now not working but they are already too heavy allot of people dont even use all of there plates because they are so heavy now

By: smade

smade — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:45:47 +0000

http://www.ccm.udel.edu/STF/index.html
I believe they’re looking into Shear Thickening Fluid (STF). Dragon Skin is awesome, but it’s heavy and that makes it “old hat.” Of course, STF is probably “old hat” compared to what the boyz in the back room have already cooked up. Who knows?

By: TB

TB — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:28:41 +0000

noseeum, if I spent all my time sitting in a vehicle and never had to move, sure I wouldn’t mind it so much. But when I’m on a foot patrol 20 extra pounds is 20 extra pounds, regardless of where it comes from.
As far as replacing the discs, the way they are setup now the discs are glued together underneath several layers of packaging and other materials. If my SAPI plate is damaged, I can pull it out of the pouch and replace it. Unless there’s a redesign, you have to do surgery to replace a dragonskin disc.

By: noseeum

noseeum — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:04:28 +0000

Yea, it weighs more because it gives so much more coverage. That’s not making it into the arguments, I see. Just for driving around in circles until something goes boom or somebody shoots at you, I’d rather have the better protection. Replacing a couple discs instead of the entire plate is also a plus, certainly it keeps your costs down. As far as failures go, the whole plate will fail after so many hits, and pending the dispersion of the hits can fail locally much sooner. Discs do not allow total failure on quite so large a scale.

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:40:02 +0000

I mean, I’d love for us to have a next generation body armor that offers significant improvements over the Interceptor, but this seems reminiscent of the endless debates over new rifles, and 5.56 vs 6.8 or 7.62 rounds. Lots of people arguing with little in the way of objective numbers to back them up.

By: Christian

Christian — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:10:29 +0000

TB,
The guy you’re talking about isn’t an advisor to Neal, he’s the former director of DoD Operational Test and Evaluation office Phil Coyle. He was speaking for himself in both the NBC show and hearing. He works for the Center for Defense Information these days I think…
Brian:
Pretty much, yep…

By: TB

TB — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:15:35 +0000

I can't remember the guy's name, but the advisor to Neal who helped administer the tests shown on Dateline also went before Congress and told them Dragonskin "wasn't ready for prime time." Speaking as someone who might fight in this tech someday, I don't care if I can run through nonstop machinegun fire and not get hurt. If it weighs too much to effectively fight, then its too heavy. Period. I've tried on the current Dragonskin, and it weighs as much as my Interceptor, ammo, and water combined.