DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » The Cyber Attack Danger

The Cyber Attack Danger

penatagon.jpg

Many nations are under constant cyber attack. The United States seems to be ground zero for the vast majority of the cyber attacks launched be their digital enemies around the world. A former CIA official provided the following statistics. In 2007 there were 37,000 reported breaches of government and private systems. In addition, there were nearly 13,000 direct assaults on federal agencies and 80,000 attempted computer network attacks on Defense Department systems.

In addition who could forget the U.S. Air Force commercial showing a picture of the pentagon and saying this building gets 6 million cyber attacks a day.

Cyber attacks are now expected to cause maximum damage because of the professional tools being used by the attackers. According to the cyber threat report released by Intelomics, the following list identifies the cyber attack techniques that have seen a significant increase in their level of sophistication.

  • Internet social engineering attacks
  • Wireless and wired network sniffers
  • Packet spoofing
  • Hijacking sessions
  • Automated probes and scans
  • GUI intruder tools
  • Automated widespread attacks
  • Widespread denial-of-service attacks
  • Executable code attacks (against browsers)
  • Techniques to analyze code to identify vulnerabilities
  • Widespread attacks on DNS infrastructure
  • Widespread attacks using NNTP to distribute attack
  • “Stealth” and other advanced scanning techniques
  • Windows-based remote controllable Trojans (Back Orifice)
  • Email propagation of malicious code
  • Wide-scale Trojan distribution
  • Distributed attack tools
  • Distributed denial of service attacks
  • BotNets and Zombies
  • Anti-forensic techniques
  • Wide-scale use of worms
  • Man-in-the Middle plus Man-in-the-Browser exploitation

Cyber threats are now demanding immediate attention because of the increased dangers they pose to commercial and government entities and national security. The Congressional Research Service study found the economic impact of cyber attacks on businesses has grown to over $226 billion annually. Despite the significant impact, there is no clear framework for business executives to assess the financial impact of their cyber risks. According to two new surveys, the threat to corporate computer systems from cyber attacks is getting worse, despite stronger corporate defenses. Some cyber security measures might include more restrictive hiring practices, restricting remote working arrangements, increasing monitoring of flexible work hours and telecommuting as well as restriction on access by trading partners, vendors and consultants. In addition, organizations must also increase computer security awareness training for information technology workers as well as the general systems/computer user community.

A cyber attack special investigator at Intelomics said, “the reports of attacks, breaches and system compromises that make the news are only the tip of the iceberg. The vast majority of these attacks go undisclosed and thus are not covered by the media.”

Most nations do not have adequate IT security to protect against targeted cyber attacks. Technolytics have warned before that these cyber attackers are well financed and have an arsenal of highly sophisticated weapons that not only circumvent current security controls, but leverage anti-forensic techniques that remove evidence of their attacks. The United States, European Union, United Nations and NATO must act and act now. In view of the current situation I would like to suggest they seriously consider the following actions and move immediately to adopt and implement these measures.

1. Establish a cyber threat operating committee under the United Nations Security Council.
a. This cyber threat operating committee must be closely linked in a collaborative relationship with the Counter-Terrorism Committee.
2. Create a framework to determine what constitutes an act of cyber war and create a legal framework that addresses international criminal cyber acts.
3. Proactively create a framework of actions that can quickly be levied against cyber aggressors.
a. These actions must include both economic and military sanctions as well as suspension of connectivity to the Internet backbone by both physical communications cables and via satellite.
4. Create a cyber peacekeeping force that is a rapid response asset to assist in repelling any offensive cyber-based aggression.

In the interest of global peace, economic integrity and stability, I believe that the United States, European Union, United Nations and NATO must proactively send a stern warning to those who choose to use cyber weapons against other nations, that there will be severe consequences of such actions.

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

October 20th, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 413013 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/10/20/the-cyber-attack-danger/The+Cyber+Attack+Danger2008-10-20+13%3A13%3A22Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « DoD Cancels Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter | The New Powell Doctrine » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. spyguy says:
    October 20, 2008 at 9:21 am

    I could not agree more with your blog posting. The quest is — WHY hasent the U.S. Government, UN and NATO alread recognized this and taken action?
    WHY?

    Reply
  2. tonycliton says:
    October 20, 2008 at 3:42 pm

    I don’t think we know the true level of threat. The military likes to exaggerate, as do IT professionals.
    “who could forget the U.S. Air Force commercial showing a picture of the pentagon and saying this building gets 6 million cyber attacks a day.” What defines an attack? IT professionals sometimes will count every extraneous packet as an attack, even just a ping. By that definition, your home network is probably attacked hundreds of times a day.
    The list of techniques is just that, a list of potential attacks. Citing Back Orifice shows that it’s a list that nobody has updated in a long time — Back Orifice hasn’t been prevalent for many years.
    Yes, attackers are getting more sophisticated; apparently faster than the people who make that list, but is that news? I believe there is a threat, but it needs to be defined before it can be remediated.

    Reply
  3. angel says:
    October 21, 2008 at 3:22 am

    That’s OK!But take a closer look following link,It’s great to DVD and PSP converter for mac!
    DVD Ripper for Mac,
    Mac DVD Ripper Suite,
    Mac DVD Converter Ultimate Suite,
    Mac DVD Copy,
    Mac DVD Creator,
    Mac DVD to iPod Converter,
    Mac DVD to iPhone Converter,
    Mac DVD to MP4 Converter,
    Mac DVD to Apple TV Converter,
    Mac DVD to PSP Converter,
    Mac DVD to BlackBerry Converter,
    Mac DVD Audio Ripper,
    Edit DVD,
    Vob Converter for Mac,
    VOB to iPod Converter for Mac,
    VOB to Apple TV Converter for Mac,
    VOB to PSP Converter for Mac,
    VOB to MPEG4 Converter for Mac,
    VOB to M4V Converter for Mac,
    VOB to 3GP Converter for Mac,
    VOB to MPG Converter for Mac,
    VOB to AVI Converter for Mac

    Reply
  4. Larry says:
    October 21, 2008 at 1:33 pm

    As a systems administrator within DOD, I can tell you that foreign government regularly and frequently attack our cyber networks. At one time I managed a DOD firewall, and it’s logs almost on a weekly basis would show HUGH port scans and attempts to get in. There is a MASSIVE campaign of cyber warefare that is taking place daily against DOD.

    Reply
  5. Dennis says:
    October 21, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    Overall I think Russia and China have screwed the pooch.
    They spent a great deal of time and energy making these systems to infiltrate and jam computer systems, and then uses them foolishly tipping their hand.
    “Jamming” a country over a statue? Jamming a country the size of Connecticut in a war they could not possibly lose?
    Stupidity.
    In the end we will have better computer hacking and jamming than they ever will.…

    Reply
  6. Nik says:
    October 22, 2008 at 7:28 am

    Do you have a source citation for the CRS report? The $226 billion figure sounds about as scientific as most similar estimates…

    Reply
  7. Kevin says:
    October 22, 2008 at 7:35 pm

    CRS reference link
    http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/press-conference-financial-impact-cyber/story.aspx?guid=%7BE23459E1-5DAC-4098–9788-37D131AE0537%7D&dist=hppr

    Reply
  8. angel says:
    October 23, 2008 at 1:07 am

    That’s OK!But take a closer look following link,It’s great to DVD and PSP
    converter for mac!
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​r​i​p​p​e​r​-​s​u​i​t​e​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​s​u​i​t​e​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​o​p​y​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​r​e​a​t​o​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​i​p​o​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​i​p​h​o​n​e​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​m​p​4​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​a​p​p​l​e​-​t​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​p​s​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​b​l​a​c​k​b​e​r​r​y​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​a​u​d​i​o​-​r​i​p​p​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​h​o​w​-​t​o​-​e​d​i​t​-​d​v​d​-​t​r​i​m​-​v​i​d​e​o​-​c​r​o​p​-​t​a​k​e​-​e​f​f​e​c​t​s​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/,
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​i​p​o​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​a​p​p​l​e​-​t​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​p​s​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​p​e​g​4​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​4​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​3​g​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​p​g​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​a​v​i​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml

    Reply
  9. Carl says:
    October 23, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    Mr Coleman you are right and have been right. The business world is just now beginning to wake up and realize the threat that a cyber attack poses to their organization. For the small and medium size business, a cyber attack could very well drive them out of business. The briefings on this blog have given me all the evidence I need and I am taking action.

    Reply
  10. Patrick says:
    October 24, 2008 at 7:13 am

    Having worked in IT, and studied cyber-security, I can tell you that the majority of internal systems are usually using very weak security. As mentioned by Ptsfp, passwords are kept simple and rarely if ever changed.
    Most have the idea that as long as they put firewalls up to protect them from the outside, that they are safe.
    The Network admin in Calif. proved that completely false, and he wasn’t truly being malicious.
    Additionally, I remember hearing a report a few yrs back on cyber attacks against DOD targets. The real surprise in the report was that for every attack on a directly owned DOD site, there were 2 or 3 on contractors for the DOD, contractors that had a trust relationship with the DOD computer systems. Which meant that as soon as the contractors networks were compromised, the DOD information they had access to was also compromised.
    Ultimately, it isn’t the flashy cyberwars with estonia, or against any other country, the real threat is the patient, invisible attack that sneaks in, stays as long as necessary to get as much information as possible, and then leaves.
    “Ruining” hardware in order to cover ones tracks has become easier too. Every datacenter expects a hard drive crash every so often. So what if that crash just wiped out all evidence of an intruder in the system.
    I could keep going…but don’t want to bore you too much.

    Reply
  11. Pregnant Pause says:
    November 21, 2008 at 10:35 pm

    Think about this, pretty much every PC and all the associated gear such as hard drives, monitors and thumb drives used on DoD systems are produced in China. What are the implications? Built in worm in thumb drives? Built in viruses? What malware might be lurking on the products the DoD buys from China? Hey, just asking.
    One last thought. Until a few years ago one of the US premier test and evaluation organizations used Mac’s. They made that choice locally. When the DoD installed it’s own system Mac was replaced by Macroshaft.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Has anyone calculated out the per unit cost once you...
      Blight
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I have always loved this idea. More survivable,...
      nraddin
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      As an old ex-USAF cop, I am way out of my league...
      Sgt Ken
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Actually every time one of these articles goes up on...
      TMB
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      A lot of these comments are missing the mark –...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      And the attitude that gets the USAF continually...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      You're still confused. You're arguing...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      First, what’s wrong with have a variety of...
      Mrcjis
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I agree. More organic precision fire, like the...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      This has been thoroughly covered in DefenseTech:...
      SMSgt Mac
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage