DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » Raytheon to Launch UAV from Submarine

Raytheon to Launch UAV from Submarine

This arti­cle first appeared at AviationWeek​.com.

Raytheon plans to launch a small unmanned air vehi­cle from a sub­merged U.S. Navy sub­ma­rine early next year to demon­strate its con­cept for extend­ing the boat’s sen­sor range in lit­toral oper­a­tions.

Last month the com­pany demon­strated its UAV launch con­cept under Phase 1 of the Submarine Over the Horizon Organic Capabilities (Sothoc) pro­gram funded by the Office of Naval Research and the Submarine Force.

The con­cept uses a sub­ma­rine launch vehi­cle (SLV) con­tain­ing the elec­tri­cally pow­ered UAV and stored on board as an all-​​up round. Ejected from the sub­merged submarine’s trash dis­posal unit, the SLV is weighted to descend to a safe dis­tance from the boat, then shed the weight and inflate a float col­lar.

The col­lar is pulsed to con­trol the rate of ascent. As it approaches the sur­face, the SLV deploys a water drogue to pro­vide sta­bi­liza­tion and a vane to align it into the wind. The tube then piv­ots to a 35-​​degree angle and ejects the UAV.

“The SLV is a method of get­ting a UAS to the sur­face dry, then tran­si­tion­ing it to the air,” says Jeffrey Zerbe, Raytheon’s Sothoc pro­gram direc­tor.

The deploy­ment con­cept was demon­strated in September at the Naval Undersea Warfare Center’s shal­low water test range at Narragansett Bay, R.I., where two SLVs were deployed over the side of a sur­face ship.

“The vehi­cles descended to 80 feet reverted to pos­i­tive buoy­ancy, floated to the sur­face, sta­bi­lized in vari­able sea states, aligned into the wind, and then launched an inert rep­re­sen­ta­tive UAS at pre­cise ori­en­ta­tion and veloc­ity,” accord­ing to Raytheon.

In early November, Zerbe says, the com­pany plans to con­duct a sec­ond “over-​​the-​​side” demon­stra­tion from a ship off Point Mugu, Calif. This time the SLV will deploy an actual UAV, which will then con­duct a full mar­itime inter­dic­tion mis­sion pro­file.

This will be fol­lowed early next year by a launch from a sub­merged sub­ma­rine, prob­a­bly a Los Angeles-​​class boat off Hawaii, under Phase 2 of the pro­gram, says Zerbe. Raytheon has already demon­strated inte­gra­tion of its multi-​​vehicle con­trol soft­ware into the submarine’s BYG-​​1 com­bat sys­tem, he says.

Read the rest of this story, see how LMCo is push­ing an LCS for allies, read why our broth­ers Down Under want lighter tac­ti­cal vehi­cles and dis­cuss whether AFRICOM is a good idea from our friends at Aviation Week exclu­sively on Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

October 29th, 2008 | Drones | 41474 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/10/29/raytheon-to-launch-uav-from-submarine/Raytheon+to+Launch+UAV+from+Submarine2008-10-29+12%3A53%3A07Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « UPDATED: SEALs Wearing New High-​​Speed Fighting Threads | The Blood Stopper System » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. unmannedanimal says:
    October 29, 2008 at 9:40 am

    it’s exhil­a­rat­ing to see the progress being made in unmanned sys­tems by the navy. this par­tic­u­lar launch reminds me instantly of the cor­morant morphing-​​wing project lock­heed worked on for a while; i had a brief aca­d­e­mic inter­est in the project last sum­mer and got a chance to talk with some of the folks who worked on it. the cor­morant was designed to fit in the mis­sile tubes of tri­dent subs, this design goes out through the garbage chute. pretty soon they’ll be able to make their own holes in the hull!
    uavs have been so impor­tant on the ground that the push now is how to best share access to them. the navy has been able to diverge and explore multi-​​agent, multi-​​modal sen­sor nets (PLUSnet et. al.) to rede­fine ocean sens­ing. low angle of obser­vance solu­tions are “on the hori­zon”.
    it’s a won­der­ful time to dig robots.

    Reply
  2. stephen russell says:
    October 29, 2008 at 9:26 pm

    Radical, to counter pirates & Recon pre SEAL Ops.
    Must have for those SSGNs & SSNs.
    Nice option.
    Give Real Time feed to C3I Ops,

    Reply
  3. campbell says:
    October 30, 2008 at 5:15 am

    launch­ing any­thing from a sub does increase pos­si­bil­ity of subs’ detec­tion, slight per­haps, but real.
    instead: in August, Navy requested info from man­u­fac­tur­ers about lighter-​​than-​​air craft; air­ships as UAVs which would have week loi­ter time. That length of time allows the air­ship to travel from loca­tions thou­sands of miles away from areas of interest…thus pro­tect­ing subs’ loca­tion
    more impor­tantly, the same request also sought infor­ma­tion on MANNED air­ships, from small sin­gle man sized up to craft that would carry 500 tons.
    Carrying a pilot instead of being “unmanned”, puts human brain where a robot cur­rently in in UAVs, increases capa­bil­i­ties a thou­sand­fold.
    Large,MANNED rigid, amphibi­ous air­ships (NO BLIMPS!)would be able to carry spe­cial ops forces from state­side to any loca­tion on earth, within 72 hours. Large rigid air­ships can carry bat­tal­ion sized units/​hundreds of tons of cargo to any des­ti­na­tion on earth, includ­ing front lines, from stat­estide, within 72 hours, with no fuel needs/​costs.
    mil­i­taryair­ships dot blogspot dot com

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You aren't. You're just annoying. Like a paper cut between...
      bdwilcox
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      Zandor, Don't you have to go play in traffic or play...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Welcome to paralysis induced by political correctness.
      bdwilcox
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage