DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » ARH Death Hits Bell Hard

ARH Death Hits Bell Hard

bread-linezs.jpg

Our boy Bob Cox at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram alerted DT to his story on the downstream effects of the ARH kill.

Bell Helicopter cuts 500 jobs, mostly in Fort Worth

Faced with the loss of a big defense contract and an impatient corporate parent with a sagging stock price, Bell Helicopter announced Wednesday that it was cutting 500 jobs, mostly from its Fort Worth operations.

The job cuts, which began Tuesday, follow in the wake of the Pentagons Oct. 16 decision to cancel the Armys $5 billion-plus contract with Bell to develop the ARH-70A Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter.

All but about 30 of the layoffs will come from personnel at Bells Fort Worth-area facilities, with the rest from the ranks of its Amarillo work force.

Bell spokesman Joseph LaMarca Jr. said senior Bell executives had been evaluating the companys personnel requirements since the ARH cancellation and concluded that more cuts were needed beyond the 280 people directly assigned to the program.

“It allows us to shape our organization in such a way as to make it a more competitive, very streamlined, lean organization,” LaMarca said.

The layoffs and terminations were being made at all levels, including 40 out of about 200 upper-management positions, which LaMarca described as vice presidents and directors.

Significant numbers of engineers, marketing and other white-collar personnel were included in the cuts, but LaMarca said only about 20 manufacturing workers.

Several dozen managers were notified Tuesday that they were being dismissed, and the rest of those laid off were told Wednesday.

The laid-off Bell employees will receive 60 days of pay and benefits in accordance with federal law, severance pay and outplacement services.

The company was holding meetings with the laidoff and terminated employees to explain the severance package.

Not all of the people working on the ARH program were laid off, LaMarca said. “You have good people you want to keep, with skills you want, so you have to make some other adjustments.”

The Bell layoffs are one of the largest in Tarrant County recently and could foreshadow further cuts by companies as the U.S. economy slides into what many observers say will be the most severe recession in at least two decades.

The Dallas-Fort Worth area added a net 54,300 jobs in the 12 months ending in September, said Bernard Weinstein, head of the Center for Economic Research and Development at the University of North Texas in Denton, but he says that kind of performance probably isnt in the cards for 2009.

“Like it or not, were part of the national economy,” Weinstein said. “The national economy is in a recession. Well feel it too.”

At least two of the positions Bell cut were reportedly senior managers assigned to Bell Agusta Aerospace, Bells joint venture with Italys AgustaWestland helicopter manufacturer to develop the BA609 civilian tilt-rotor aircraft.

The Star-Telegram reported in July that Bell officials enthusiasm for that program had cooled significantly and that the company would likely turn over a larger share of the development effort to Agusta.

LaMarca said discussions with Agusta over the future of the BA609 were continuing.

Read the rest of this story and other gouge on Texas-based aviation developments at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

– Christian

Share |

October 30th, 2008 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 41538 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/10/30/arh-death-hits-bell-hard/ARH+Death+Hits+Bell+Hard2008-10-30+16%3A54%3A26Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Enemy Among Us | DoD Gear Chief Speaks Out » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Roy Smith says:
    October 30, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    Here is a stupid question,why couldn’t they put the surveillance mast of the OH-58 Kiowa on to the body of the ARH helicopter? Why did it have to be a whole new surveillance podt under the body design? It seems like they only need to update the helicopter portion of the OH-58 Kiowa. What the hell,did the new helicopter itself not work? If it was just a problem with the pod,scrap the pod. The ARH was going to be armed just like the OH-58,there was no difference there,right? Wasn’t the ARH based on the Bell 417 commercially based helicopter? Why the hell couldn’t this version(or whatever version was used) be used to upgrade the OH-58 Kiowa?

    Reply
  2. Roy Smith says:
    October 30, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    What you are witnessing is the shrinking of the aviation industry into one big corporation,monopolies be damned. Bell will no doubt have to merge with Sikorsky in the U.S. to survive. You will also see the same thing with Northrop Grumman,Lockheed,& Boeing having to merge to survive. Of course all of these companies will have to partner with the U.S. Government,who will also have a major share in the stocks of these companies,& who will have CONTROLLING interest in the surviving companies. This will be a fascist economy,just like what you see in Japan & the European Union.

    Reply
  3. Roy Smith says:
    October 30, 2008 at 4:18 pm

    For those who think I’m nuts using the phrase “fascist economy,” they need to look up specifically “fascist economy,” ignore all of the “nationalist” BS,or “Right Wing” BS. Under the definition of “fascist economy,” even the USSR practiced a “Fascist Economy.”

    Reply
  4. Chris says:
    October 30, 2008 at 6:46 pm

    Well this is what they get for not staying on schedule and within budget.

    Reply
  5. Hibby says:
    October 30, 2008 at 8:57 pm

    I know we all want programs to run smoothly, stay in the budget, and be on time. And we hate when exciting programs fall behind, run over budget, and seem to be bungled on a regular basis. People are especially critical of NASA, which I find slightly unfair, but none-the-less true.
    The only way to keep this cycle from continueing is to punish companies by going in another direction or giving competitors a shot. But it sucks when workers lose their job because of it.

    Reply
  6. hoverlover says:
    October 30, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    Schedule and budget are issues in every DoD program and the initial cause is typically the DoD and their floating requirements.
    Believe it or not this is actually for the better.

    Reply
  7. Roy Smith says:
    October 31, 2008 at 7:42 am

    What? No opinion on the prospect of Bell Textron being forced to merge with or be absorbed by Sikorsky? This would create one big monopoly in the U.S. for helicopters,both military & civilian,& pretty much end the “capitalist” system concerning competition between two companies. Add the U.S. Government into the mix as “senior partner” who severely regulates both the building of,& shades of the former USSR,how many get built & what model each of helicopters.
    The same will go for Northrop Grumman,Lockheed Martin,& Boeing as far as military & civilian aircraft goes. Again,the U.S. Government will be “senior partner” in this arrangement & severely regulate both the building & how many get built.
    The automobile industry is already headed in this direction,& the U.S. Government(or rather the Central Bankers) has already taken over the banking & other financial industries. Capitalism is officially dead in the USA!!!!
    You need to stop pissing & moaning over the “small stuff” & look at the BIG PICTURE.
    What if the DOD simply cancelled the ARH to cause this “government controlled” merger to take place? The same can be said with other military programs & projects whose cancellation would put the companies responsible for building them to be at the brink of bankruptcy(& ripe for merger acquisition AND under Government Control​.It would be like putting Bell Telephone back together again by causing the “forced” merger of the smaller companies created after its breakup).

    Reply
  8. stephen russell says:
    October 31, 2008 at 8:19 am

    Bell can reuse the Idle plant for these or sell plant for these below:
    Voc Tech Ed Training Center
    Mall
    Museum
    Parking garage complex
    X Plane Test Center
    Venture Business Seedbank
    GunRange
    Aircraft Sim Trainer for pilots.
    Copter Modification Center
    Kit Copter Plant
    Kit Plane & Car Plant
    Auto Customizing center
    Offices
    VTOL Port for cityarea.
    Bell Copters Musuem Center
    TV & Movie Prod center
    from 1 plant.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
    • Cancel Cyber Command
    Recent Comments
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      BTW: We mustn’t forget Heritage's links to...
      Anon E Moose
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      First Member: "Whaat? Oh. Hmmm. Very well then....
      Anon E Moose
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      First Member of the People's Liberation Front of...
      Anon E Moose
    • Gimme Some Skin!
      its about time someone made a tactical pen priced at what there really worth...
      alva
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      If there is a contract with the cost per plane written on it, and...
      Roland
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
      The 82nd has not had M551s assigned since...
      FormerDirtDart
    • Come One – Come All
      Yes, let's put all our experimental cyber eggs into one big...
      irv
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      Yes the F35 program has taken longer than...
      jeff
    • Giant Blimp, Deflated
      anyone else notice the Kamov KA-29 in flight over the blimp? Was this a...
      guest
    • Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer (Part 2)
      I keep seeing comments about the troops not...
      Guest
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage