DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Army Awards JLTV Contracts

Army Awards JLTV Contracts

jltv.jpg

The Army announced yesterday that it had awarded contracts worth $166 million to three industry teams to develop the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, also variously known as the Humvee replacement, although this vehicle will be much more than the ubiquitous Humvee. The winners are Lockheed Martin; General Tactical Vehicles (a joint venture between General Dynamics Land Systems and AM General, manufacturer of the Humvee); and BAE Systems.

The contracts are for the technology development phase of the protracted DOD production process, expected to take 27 months, when each team will produce at least seven prototypes. The idea is to build a family of JLTVs sharing common parts but available in different configurations such as a six seat infantry carrier, a four seat recon, command and control, heavy weapons carrier and ambulance. Once the prototypes are tested, the Army will hold yet another competition to down select one or more winners for the System Development and Demonstration phase. Full scale production is expected in 2013.

The Army and Marines have not finalized the total number of JLTVs they ultimately want to buy, but an Army press release said the request for proposals included a projected production quantity of 60,000 over eight years. The ultimate production number will almost certainly be much higher. Former Army Vice Chief Gen. Richard Cody, in an appearance before a House appropriations subcommittee last year, said the Army intends for the JLTV to replace 130,000 of the services Humvees. Australia decided this week to join the JLTV program and might buy up to 4,200 vehicles.

The joint Army-Marine Corps JLTV will strike a balance between performance, payload and protection, said Col. John Myers, Project Manager with the Armys Joint Combat Support Services, in the Army press release. Unlike the Humvee, which was originally designed as a rear area and garrison vehicle and was converted into a passable fighting vehicle by slapping armor and weapons onto it, the JLTV will be designed from the ground up as a fighting vehicle incorporating lessons learned from the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Whereas the costly and lumbering MRAP vehicles (versions of which cost up to $1.2 million each) were always viewed as stop-gap to provide better protection against the scourge of roadside bombs in Iraq, the Army and Marines view JLTV as a long-term solution. To please the expeditionary focused Marines, the JLTV will be lighter than the Humvee, weighing between 3,500 and 5,100 pounds. A fully armored Humvee weighs 12,000 pounds and more. The JLTV is expected to be more resistant to mine blasts than the Humvee, will ride higher off the ground to provide added clearance and will incorporate a V-shaped hull that deflects blasts outward.

The vehicles must be light and compact enough to be carried underneath the Armys CH-47 Chinook workhorse cargo lifter and the Marines CH-53 Super Stallion heavy lifter, and two JLTV vehicles must fit inside the Air Forces C-130. The target cost per vehicle is $200,000 to $250,000, according to a May 2006 Office of Naval Research JLTV industry day conference finding. An armored Humvee costs around $150,000.

– Greg Grant

Share |

October 30th, 2008 | Ground Vehicles | 41519 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/10/30/army-awards-jltv-contracts/Army+Awards+JLTV+Contracts2008-10-30+12%3A29%3A36Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « So Where’s all that DoD Money Gonna Go? | The Enemy Among Us » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. JEFF says:
    October 30, 2008 at 8:57 am

    Does anybody know where you can find some pictures of these JLTVs? I only know what Lockheed entry looks like but have no clue on the General Tactical Vehicle or BAE entry.
    Also, what are the chances this program gets axed when Obama wins? I’m going 35% chance of it getting axed.

    Reply
  2. Steve Field says:
    October 30, 2008 at 9:16 am

    Jeff,
    My name is Steve Field and I work in communications at BAE Systems. The photo in this post is of the BAE Systems-Navistar JLTV, which we call the Valanx.
    You can find more images of our vehicle in the multimedia section of our site, http://​www​.thevalanx​.com.
    Steve

    Reply
  3. Chris says:
    October 30, 2008 at 10:10 am

    Greg, where do you get 3500 — 5500 pounds? The JLTV is more robust and is armored. Apparently you can’t do math.
    Also, Jeff, you aren’t going to see the JLTV models until they are in production or unless the manufacturer “wants” you to see them

    Reply
  4. Tamir Eshel says:
    October 30, 2008 at 11:00 am

    FEFF, You can find photos and commentary on today’s Defense Update items on the JLTV program and recent displays at AUSA 2008 http://​www​.defense​-update​.com

    Reply
  5. JEFF says:
    October 30, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    Steve and Tamir,
    Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I appreciate it, I can finally put a clear picture to each entry.
    Just off looks alone BAE’s entry looks the part. Lockheed’s looks almost MRAPish huge.

    Reply
  6. stephen russell says:
    October 30, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    Can we drive one?
    If civilianized or NOT?
    Like to drive one.

    Reply
  7. Mad says:
    October 31, 2008 at 7:51 am

    Batmobile.

    Reply
  8. jim says:
    January 22, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Looking at the evolution of the JLTV program to date (and the broader future USA/USMC procurement discussions), does anyone have any insight or comment on why Loockheed did not act when BAE bought Armor Holdings. It seems that Armor was/is pretty important to Lockheed’s ambitions to be a player in the ground vehicle space. Now Lockheeds “team mate” is a division of a competitive bidder? Jim

    Reply
  9. Gene says:
    February 18, 2009 at 5:21 am

    Well, once again the Army is looking at threshold items and not Objective Item contracting. Just like the MRAP there will be many different vehicles that dont defeat the larger threats. Unfortunately for the soldier our politicians and people who have not been on the ground fighting the battle are making the decisions. I am here in Iraq and see first hand what even the smallest of threat does to an MRAP. Dont get me wrong, I have also seen where soldiers were blown up in an MRAP and survived with no injuries only to get into another MRAP 4 hours later and be back out there doing their job!!!! I think the amount of damage is done not necessarily by the size of the threat but where it (the vehicle) takes the hit. So unless you can equip a vehicle with a new armor package to defeat all threats you wont defeat the threat our soldiers are facing. I seriously doubt you will get any vehicle in the 2000 to 5000 lb range to defeat the modern threats in todays war on terror. Its like the old addage, 50 pounds of crap in a 5 pound bag. Mark my words, the vehicles will range in the 15 to 20,000 pound range and wont be air mobile other than inside a big plane. get real, wake up and smell the dust in Iraq/Afghanistan and you will understand the fight we are facing daily. check out the Protector at http://​www​.protectedvehicles​.com and you will see a vehicle that can defeat all threats and is very fast and mobile. God Bless our soldiers and the fight they take to the enemy every day!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C...
      Jim
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      With the exception of his Boeing Tanker blindspot ;-) ...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i heard recently that rules of engagement in...
      mad mike
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or...
      bduff509
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: But their advantage is reduced by daytime...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And to get back on topic…Don’t think...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: "shown your contempt for every service...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      135,000,000 $ each for a fighter aircraft that's...
      Joseph
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage