DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Pentagon Slammed by Cyber Attack

Pentagon Slammed by Cyber Attack

cyber-attack.jpg

The Pentagon has suf­fered a direct hit from a cyber attack. The weapon used is said to be a hybrid com­puter worm/​virus. Insiders say the hybrid rapidly spread through the thou­sands of inter­con­nected defense com­puter net­works. A com­puter worm is dif­fer­ent from a com­puter virus. A worm is thought to be more dan­ger­ous because it can run itself where as a virus needs a host pro­gram to run. The DoD responded quickly and has taken steps to slow the advance­ment of the worm/​virus by quar­an­ti­ning net­works and sys­tems until the worm/​virus can be removed.

Cyber inves­ti­ga­tors have not pin­pointed the entry point for the worm/​virus, but insider sources point to remov­able stor­age devices as the most likely point of infec­tion. This seems to be sup­ported by the fact that U.S. Strategic Command has banned the use of remov­able media (thumb dri­ves, CDRs/​DVDRs, floppy disks) on all DoD net­works and com­put­ers effec­tive imme­di­ately. This inci­dent has been deemed so severe that unprece­dented defen­sive mea­sures have been insti­tuted to pro­tect the mil­i­tary systems.

Oddly enough, all Internet users are being warned to stay vig­i­lant by secu­rity experts who believe that Monday, Nov. 24 is poised to be the worst day of the year for com­puter attacks.

Security experts at Spy-​​Ops I spoke with said, “If this can hap­pen to the Department of Defense it can hap­pened to any orga­ni­za­tion.” They went on to say that the cost of this attack could eas­ily reach into the bil­lions of dol­lars if the worm/​virus destroys data. If that’s not bad enough, one expert went on to say that the night­mare sce­nario is if the mali­cious code alters data rather than delet­ing it — a much more dif­fi­cult prob­lem to resolve.

News of the cyber attack came on the heels of today’s release of the “Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World” doc­u­ment by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The doc­u­ment stated that non-​​military means of war­fare, such as cyber, eco­nomic, resource, psy­cho­log­i­cal and information-​​based forms of con­flict will become more preva­lent in con­flicts over the next two decades.

While the source of the attack remains clas­si­fied, the usual cast of char­ac­ters comes to mind. At the head of the list are of course China and the RBN — Russian Business Network. If the attack is found to be spon­sored by another coun­try, could this be con­sid­ered an act of cyber war?

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

November 20th, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 419722 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/11/20/pentagon-slammed-by-cyber-attack/Pentagon+Slammed+by+Cyber+Attack2008-11-21+03%3A04%3A38Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Big Three/​National Security Risk Myth | Friday — Fire for Effect » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nick Smith says:
    November 21, 2008 at 12:14 am

    Absolutely. A well-​​placed EMP burst ought to get our point across to them, that we don’t like what they’re try­ing to do to us.

    Reply
  2. jon says:
    November 21, 2008 at 2:37 am

    This arti­cle and all the arti­cles that men­tion it seem kind of amus­ing to me because they are basi­cally describ­ing a reg­u­lar data secu­rity inci­dent in pretty much any cor­po­rate envi­ron­ment in the US. These things hap­pen every day and gen­er­ally tend to push the com­pa­nies into mak­ing the exact same pol­icy deci­sions regard­ing remov­able media. It is extremely likely that this attack came from nowhere nefar­i­ous, more likely just some­one did some­thing stu­pid with a usb drive. These inci­dents are why there are so many secu­rity ven­dors sell­ing end­point secu­rity solu­tions right now. It is about as com­mon as dirt. What is sad is that the DoD seems to be just as clue­less as your basic non-​​financial com­pany where secu­rity poli­cies tend to be lax.

    Reply
  3. Kevin says:
    November 21, 2008 at 8:37 am

    Nick
    I have to say I am kind of think­ing the same thing!
    Jon
    The only dif­fer­ence is that you would think DoD would know bet­ter and have dis­abled the USB ports to pre­vent this on their inter­nal networks!

    Reply
  4. mark says:
    November 21, 2008 at 8:54 am

    I’m dis­ap­pointed. This arti­cle points to a sen­sa­tion­al­ist report that doesn’t say *any­thing*. Besides that, it’s old news. Wired (i.e. Noah Schachtman) reported this three days ago and pro­vided more infor­ma­tion about the virus (which isn’t a new one) and the response to it.
    Let’s try and stay on rea­son­able extrap­o­la­tion here, not sensationalism

    Reply
  5. Brian says:
    November 21, 2008 at 11:45 am

    Damn it. For once I agree with Roy. This post is try­ing to sen­sa­tion­al­ize.
    Here’s the deal on cyber attack. It’s never going to be an act of war. Never. Until bombs drop, it’s not war. Until ground troops invade, it’s not war. Until mis­siles launch, it’s not war. Could a cyber attack pre­cede a nor­mal attack? Sure. But a cyber attack on its own will not jus­tify retal­i­a­tion with real weapons. The American pub­lic will never accept blow­ing up Moscow and risk­ing a nuclear exchange (or even blow­ing up Tehran and risk­ing higher oil prices) sim­ply because some­one hacked Barack Obama’s Myspace page.

    Reply
  6. TLo says:
    November 21, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    Skynet.

    Reply
  7. Bill says:
    November 21, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    The real ques­tion that every­one SHOULD be ask­ing is “This is NOT a new attack, it has been in the wild for 3 years??? Why did anti-​​virus soft­ware com­pletely fail to neu­tral­ize this worm?” The government/​military are not as clue­less as some seem to think. Their secu­rity is taken seri­ously, is of high qual­ity and is per­va­sive. The com­menter up above is prob­a­bly cor­rect in that the worm got on the net by some­one doing some­thing stu­pid. But, IMHO, given that 99%+ sys­tems are pro­tected via anti-​​virus soft­ware, updates are reg­u­lar and enforced, the fact that this worm had invaded far enough to cause the dras­tic mea­sures named, strikes seri­ous sus­pi­cion at the av man­u­fac­tur­ers. If this were a pre­vi­ously unknown/​unseen virus/​worm, okay, I could see the ner­vous­ness… that causes havoc… but one that is three years old, and at that based on a worm that is much older? It seems to me that any prop­erly writ­ten av code should have rec­og­nized its footprint/​signature/​behaviour and shut it down imme­di­ately… So, who dropped the ball and why? And more impor­tantly, if we can­not trust a com­pany that we PAY to pro­tect our equip­ment for such at the gov­ern­ment level… what REAL pro­tec­tion does the aver­age civil­ian have?

    Reply
  8. DMAN says:
    November 21, 2008 at 1:54 pm

    Brian, you say it wont be an act of war until bombs drop, mis­siles are launched, and that we would never respond with mil­i­tary force. Then you com­pare destroy­ing the cap­i­tal city of a major nuclear power(and a non-​​nuclear one, but still a cap­i­tal city) because of a myspace hack.
    But what if it was not just a myspace hack? What if sev­eral amtrack trains derail all of a sud­den? How about the ILS sys­tems in a major air­port in inclement weather go down? or worse real alti­tude is reset to below ground level?
    And what if the mil­i­tary response was not the com­plete destruc­tion of a cap­i­tal city, but(assuming we could accu­rately trace it) a tar­geted strike on a hos­tile intel­li­gence HQ? Or the sev­er­ing of all fiber optic cables car­ry­ing inter­net into a coun­try?
    I believe that cyber­war­fare is very much like espi­onage. It is very deni­able. I believe we should become a lit­tle more active on the offen­sive and coun­terof­fen­sive end. “Im sorry china that all the elec­tric­ity in one of your provinces went down when we traced back the attack on the pen­ta­gon. Must have been some crim­i­nal hack­ers over here. We will do our best to catch them.“
    The line will be crossed not when bombs drop, but when some­one actu­ally dies as a result of a cyber­at­tack. And then mil­i­tary action IMHO becomes a dis­tinct possibility.

    Reply
  9. The Cenobyte says:
    November 21, 2008 at 2:47 pm

    What part of some­one being dumb and bring­ing an infected thumb drive or CD/​DVD into work is a cyber attack? Attack assumes that some­one picked a tar­get and went after it. In this case a worm that has no idea what net­work its run­ning on and doesn’t care. 99% of the time these things are iso­lated early and eas­ily leav­ing you with machines on net­work seg­ments than need to be cleaned. It’s a pain the ass but it’s not an attack out to get us.

    Reply
  10. Chris says:
    November 21, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    I for one think the coun­try owes Kevin grat­i­tude and thanks for what he has done to pro­tect our nation against this threat that every­one is under­es­ti­mat­ing and over­look­ing! Some of you bone­heads on here are so caught up in your own minds that it is sick­en­ing. You closed minds are a big part of the prob­lem! Most of you think you know it all and YOU DON’T!!! Kevin — tell them all to go to H –ll and just keep on with the Security Intelligence advi­sories you pub­lish through your com­pany. Then their lit­tle minds won’t be over taxed by inform­ing them of what is going on.

    Reply
  11. Dave in America says:
    November 21, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    Who is in-​​charge off pro­tec­ing the nations com­puter sys­tems, How can this hap­pen? You all know that this is just the begin­ing and a test of what is com­ing from the other side of the earth. We bet­ter spend some of these bil­lions on pro­tect­ing our coun­tries com­put­ers and secrects. The chi­nese are devel­op­ing more advanced weapons and bet­ter com­puter pro­grams years ahead of our America.… It makes me sick!

    Reply
  12. Ptsfp says:
    November 22, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    I still believe that we need to treat cyber attacks like we treat espi­onage. Foreign enti­ties pen­e­trate our sys­tems to gather Intel or to sab­o­tage. We in turn do the same to them.
    Russia had its spies in our nuclear devel­op­ment pro­gram. We put spy cam­eras in the Russian embassy’s Xerox machines in the 60’s. This is just the evo­lu­tion of it.
    Well, now instead of just gath­er­ing intel­li­gence, like the spy cam, cyber attacks take it a step fur­ther and allow offen­sive attacks.
    I believe that we treat these attacks like espi­onage and respond in kind. Russia attacks the white house web­site and replaces Obama’s face with Hillary’s; we in turn hack into the Kremlin web­page and put Hitler’s mus­tache on Putin.

    Reply
  13. TED says:
    November 23, 2008 at 11:46 pm

    Everyone (as it relates to “Brian”)
    NEVER argue with a fool! Bystanders can’t tell who is who!
    What a closed mind!
    What if they attack the trans­porta­tion and cause two trains to crash into each other — OPEN YOUR MIND!

    Reply
  14. radio guy says:
    November 24, 2008 at 7:52 pm

    Anti-​​virus soft­ware !! Are you seri­ous? They are not 100% effec­tive. Besides, why the heck does the Pentagon use Windows !! Store sen­si­tive data on the worlds worst OS ? Military intel­li­gence, indeed.

    Reply
  15. sdag says:
    November 24, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    DVD Converter Mac is a pow­er­ful DVD con­verter for Mac OS users to rip DVD to all pop­u­lar video and audio for­mats with var­i­ous cus­tomized set­tings and con­vert video among all pop­u­lar video and audio for­mats with per­fect 1:1 ratio on Mac. In fact, the DVD Converter Mac is a DVD Converter for Mac Ultimate which includes 4 out­stand­ing mul­ti­me­dia appli­ca­tions: DVD Ripping Mac, DVD Creater for Mac, Copy DVD on Mac and Mac Video Converter.With the DVD Converter Mac, you can con­vert MP4, M4V, MPA, MPG, MPEG, MOV, 3GP, 3GP2, FLV, VOB, DAT, TS, TP, TRP, M2TS, AVI to DVD and even burn DVD movie on Mac.That’s sure pow­er­fully, hurry to see it!DVD Converter for Mac.Now let’s see another con­verter soft­ware is Mac AVI Converters.Mac AVI Converters is a pow­er­ful and ver­sa­tile Video/​Audio Conversion util­ity for Mac OS X users to con­vert video files from one for­mat to another and extract or save the audio tracks on Mac OS X (includ­ing OS X 10.5 Leopard). The Mac AVI Converters helps you con­vert AVI to video for­mats like, DivX, MPEG, MPG, FLV, DAT, MOV, ASF, FLV, etc. It can also extract audio from video to MP3, WMA, AC3, AAC, M4A, WAV, OGG, 3GP, etc.The Mac AVI Converters can also con­vert MPEG1, MPEG2, MP4, 3GP, 3G2, MOV, Mpeg TS/​TP (for HD Video) for­mats, too.With such pow­er­ful and ver­sa­tile AVI con­verter for Mac, you can eas­ily play­back AVI video files on any pop­u­lar video play­ers, like iPod, PSP, Apple TV, Archos, iRiver, Creative Zen, PS3 or other portable MP4 play­ers. Try Mac AVI Converter for free.That’s a turely chance,hurry to see it!AVI Converter for Mac.

    Reply
  16. sag says:
    November 24, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    DVD Converter Mac is a pow­er­ful DVD con­verter for Mac OS users to rip DVD to all pop­u­lar video and audio for­mats with var­i­ous cus­tomized set­tings and con­vert video among all pop­u­lar video and audio for­mats with per­fect 1:1 ratio on Mac. In fact, the DVD Converter Mac is a DVD Converter for Mac Ultimate which includes 4 out­stand­ing mul­ti­me­dia appli­ca­tions: DVD Ripping Mac, DVD Creater for Mac, Copy DVD on Mac and Mac Video Converter.With the DVD Converter Mac, you can con­vert MP4, M4V, MPA, MPG, MPEG, MOV, 3GP, 3GP2, FLV, VOB, DAT, TS, TP, TRP, M2TS, AVI to DVD and even burn DVD movie on Mac.That’s sure pow­er­fully, hurry to see it!DVD Converter for Mac.Now let’s see another con­verter soft­ware is Mac AVI Converters.Mac AVI Converters is a pow­er­ful and ver­sa­tile Video/​Audio Conversion util­ity for Mac OS X users to con­vert video files from one for­mat to another and extract or save the audio tracks on Mac OS X (includ­ing OS X 10.5 Leopard). The Mac AVI Converters helps you con­vert AVI to video for­mats like, DivX, MPEG, MPG, FLV, DAT, MOV, ASF, FLV, etc. It can also extract audio from video to MP3, WMA, AC3, AAC, M4A, WAV, OGG, 3GP, etc.The Mac AVI Converters can also con­vert MPEG1, MPEG2, MP4, 3GP, 3G2, MOV, Mpeg TS/​TP (for HD Video) for­mats, too.With such pow­er­ful and ver­sa­tile AVI con­verter for Mac, you can eas­ily play­back AVI video files on any pop­u­lar video play­ers, like iPod, PSP, Apple TV, Archos, iRiver, Creative Zen, PS3 or other portable MP4 play­ers. Try Mac AVI Converter for free.That’s a turely chance,hurry to see it!AVI Converter for Mac.

    Reply
  17. BAM says:
    November 26, 2008 at 8:42 pm

    Kevin — you sir are an unsung hero! You have alerted the nation to the threat that has man­i­fested itself in the cyber attacks on the Whitehouse and the Department of Defense. You will never know how much value and ben­e­fit your writ­ing on this blog has brought to our nation.

    Reply
  18. UNDERC0VER says:
    December 2, 2008 at 3:08 pm

    == The Pentagon ==
    The Pentagon is a build­ing that is design in a tri­an­gle shape. This design have pro­tec­tion build­ing but it failed on 11 sep­tem­ber when air­plane crash in Building. The Pentagon is a mil­i­tary that is sup­port by U.S Defence.
    The per­son­nel of Pentagon are tough guy that play at sol­diers. Pentagon give employee to much rights on the com­puter. Security Pentagon net­work is often as leak! The Pentagon block IP ADDRESS ouf out­side of USA can not vis­ited web­site. Pentagon is scared of cyber­at­tact of out­site. Its pop­u­lar by hack­ers out of whole world to look in to secret’s of USA Defense com­put­ers! Only sad news is that Secret Service arrest you bring in The HELL of Guantanamo Bay a mil­i­tary prison that like on a con­cen­tra­tion camp! Some say that this tor­ture of George W Bush. Some sol­diers take there USB drive at home
    and for­get that there child’s down­load mal­ware on com­puter that in infected daddy USB Drive.
    Some naughty boy make for dad a real fake USB drive that like on US Defence and drop it in daddy ruck­sack. When dad go to his work and plu­gin USB drive on com­puter that are con­nect on Pentagon Network. Now the mal­ware infected Network of Pentagon but don’t take care a Special Defense Firewall of U.S Defense have block the access inside that make con­nec­tion to out­side. This fire­wall work fully auto­matic on a auto­matic pilote. The infected com­puter are now offline on network!

    Reply
  19. Michael Aprile says:
    July 22, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    Don’t fall for it. We have been duped again. This sup­posed cyber attack is a hoax, orches­trated from the Obama admin­is­tra­tion. They are embark­ing on try­ing to shove an over 1 tril­lion dol­lar health­care pro­gram down the throats of the American peo­ple. What bet­ter way to con­vince the mil­lions of peo­ple on gov­ern­ment dis­abil­ity and other pro­grams that they need the government’s pro­gram than to tell them that all their med­ical records were trag­i­cally lost in cyber space. They will not have a “choice” but to give up and give in. Right now, the bill is not very pop­u­lar and is in trou­ble to be pos­si­bly turned down. There are a major­ity of Democrats in the Senate and House,but many of the Democrats are plan­ning to vote it down. However, this cyber hoax is just what they need to make it hap­pen. No one will know any bet­ter, because all of it is highly clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion. Think strong about this. Don’t be fooled.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Time to bring military clothing into the 21st century. I...
      bobbymike
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : But beam-riding isn't used by bombers...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      To the poster "Charles" : Part I :...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage