DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Politricks » Dep. SECDEF Out

Dep. SECDEF Out

From Defense Link:

Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England said today that he will not be stay­ing with Secretary Gates in the Obama Administration. I con­grat­u­late President-​​Elect Obama for retain­ing Bob Gates as sec­re­tary, angordon england.jpgd I salute Bob Gates for his con­tin­ued com­mit­ment, England said.
However, its time for me to leave. When I came into gov­ern­ment in early 2001, I antic­i­pated serv­ing for two to four years. After almost eight years, its now time for me to turn over the reins to a suc­ces­sor. Also, its most appro­pri­ate for the new admin­is­tra­tion to name its own deputy.
England said he will stay for some time past Jan. 20, if requested, to assure a smooth tran­si­tion.
England added, Its been an aston­ish­ing time to serve the nation under President Bush and along­side Secretaries Don Rumsfeld and Bob Gates, each of whom I greatly admire. I thank the brave men and women of our mil­i­tary, and their fam­i­lies, for their ser­vice and sac­ri­fice, and for the honor of serv­ing them.

Aside: Probably a fair share of cel­e­brat­ing over at Lockheed right now (and not just because they landed a ginor­mous satel­lite con­tract), England was one of the staunchest oppo­nents of the F-​​22.
–John Noonan

Share |

December 3rd, 2008 | Politricks | 42217 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/12/03/dep-secdef-out/Dep.+SECDEF+Out2008-12-03+22%3A11%3A32 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « 60 MPH, With a Gun and No Driver | Who’s Going to Get Voted Off This Island » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Gabriel Rom says:
    December 3, 2008 at 9:53 pm

    Have been look­ing around your site, like the lay­out, love the con­tent.
    Would you like to trade links with a bipar­ti­san pol­i­tics blog offer­ing a uniquely youth per­spec­tive.
    ThePurpleYouth
    http://​www​.thep​ur​p​ley​outh​.com
    Or just let me know at Quash100 [at] gmail​.com

    Reply
  2. corinne says:
    December 3, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    I’d be inter­ested to know if you think this new illu­mi­nati gov­ern­ment will be against nuclear weapons along with F-​​22s?

    Reply
  3. Hibby says:
    December 3, 2008 at 11:14 pm

    Illuminati huh? Anyways, I do know Vice President Elect Biden just received a breif­ing on nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion and the nuclear mis­siles bud­get will prob­a­bly be hit.
    I have to ask, what’s wrong with the nuclear weapons we already have? We could already end life on earth if we decided to fire them off.

    Reply
  4. Nied says:
    December 3, 2008 at 11:45 pm

    Well Illuminati and spam aside. This makes me cau­tiously opti­mistic. With England out and Richard Danzig in as a vir­tual SecDef under­study, I’m hope­ful we’ll get a lit­tle more change in the DoD (which hope­fully includes a few more F-​​22s).

    Reply
  5. Greg says:
    December 4, 2008 at 10:22 am

    I have to agree this is a good devel­op­ment also. I under­stand most of the peo­ples reser­va­tions about the f-​​22 costs. But what should we do about the future? The f-15’s are pretty darn old at this point, do we buy sev­eral hun­dred­more advanced f-​​15e/​k to replace the 600 c’s or do we buy the 381 f-22’s the air­force has requested, or do we com­pro­mise down the mid­dle. Bottom line, the c should either be upgraded if pos­si­ble which it seems not since one split in half in mid air, or we buy more jets, but some­thing has to give, we can’t devote our entire defense bud­get to these 2 wars and for­get about future advi­sories because we think we have advanced past world wars.

    Reply
  6. ??????? ?????? says:
    May 6, 2009 at 12:54 am

    ????????? 
    ??????? ?????????
    ??????? ??????
     ??? ?????? 
     ????? ??????
    ????? ?????? 
    ?????? ?????? 
    ??? ??????
     ?????? ??????
    ????????
    ?????? ???? ?
    ???? ????????
    ??? ?????? 9 ??????
    ??? ?????? 8 ??????
    ??? ?????? ???? 
    ??? ????? ??? ??????
    ????? ?????? ?????
    ??????? ?????? ????? ???? ??????
    ??????? ?????
    ??????? ???? ????????
    ??????? ?????
    ??????? ???????
    ??????? ????
    ??????? ??? ???
    ??????? ???????
    ?????? ?????? ??????? ??
    ?????? ?????? ????
    ?????? ?????? ?????
    ?????? ???????? ????
    ????? ???? ??? ????? ??? ????
    ?????  ?????
    ????? ????? ????????
    ????? ????? ?????????  ?????
    ??? ??? ?????
    ??????? ???? ?????
    ?????? ??? ????
    ????? ??????
    ?????? ???????
    ??????? ???? ??????
    ??????? ???? ??????
    ??????? ???? ????
    ??????? ??? ?????
    ??????? ?????  ???????
    ????? 
    ??????? ???? ????
    ??????? ????????? ???????
    ??????? ???? ???
    ??????? ??? ????????????
    ???
    ??????? ????? ???????
    ??????? ????? 2009
    ??????? ?????
    ??????? ????? ?????
    ??????? ???? ????????
    ??????? ???????
    ??????? ???????? ?? ????
    ??????? ???? ?????
    ??????? ???? ???
    ??????? ????? ????
    ??????? ??????
    ??????? ???? ????
    ??????? ????????
    ??????? ?????
    ??????? ??? ????
    ??????? ????? ?????
    ??????? ???? ??????
    ??????? ???? ??????  2009
    ??????? ???? ???
    ??????? ?????? ???? ???
    ??????? ????? ???
    ???????? ??????
    ??????? ???? +???????
    ??????
    ???? ???? ???????? ?? ????
    ?????? ???????? ?????? ,
    ?????? ?????? ??????
    ??????
    ???? ??????? ????????? ????????
    ??????
    ???? ?????? ??????? ?????????
    ?????? ???? ?????????
    ??????? ??????
    ??????
    ???????? ?????? ???? ??????
    ????? ??? ??????? + ????
    ?????????
    ??? ?????? ?????
    ????????? ??? ????????
    ????? ????? [ ?????? *
    ?????????] ????????
    ????? ??? ?????????
    ????????
    ?????
    ??? ???????? ??????? ??????
    ?????
    ?????? ????? ??? ??? ????????
    ???
    ????? ????? ??? ?????? ??????
    ?????
    ????? ????? ??????
     
    ?????
    ????? ??????? + ?????? ??????????
    ??? ????? ??? ???? ??????
    ?????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ???
    ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? 8.5 & 9.0

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage