Comments on: Dep. SECDEF Out

By: ??????? ??????

??????? ?????? — Wed, 06 May 2009 05:54:42 +0000

?????????
??????? ?????????
??????? ??????
??? ??????
????? ??????
????? ??????
?????? ??????
??? ??????
?????? ??????
????????
?????? ???? ?
???? ????????
??? ?????? 9 ??????
??? ?????? 8 ??????
??? ?????? ????
??? ????? ??? ??????
????? ?????? ?????
??????? ?????? ????? ???? ??????
??????? ?????
??????? ???? ????????
??????? ?????
??????? ???????
??????? ????
??????? ??? ???
??????? ???????
?????? ?????? ??????? ??
?????? ?????? ????
?????? ?????? ?????
?????? ???????? ????
????? ???? ??? ????? ??? ????
????? ?????
????? ????? ????????
????? ????? ????????? ?????
??? ??? ?????
??????? ???? ?????
?????? ??? ????
????? ??????
?????? ???????
??????? ???? ??????
??????? ???? ??????
??????? ???? ????
??????? ??? ?????
??????? ????? ???????
?????
??????? ???? ????
??????? ????????? ???????
??????? ???? ???
??????? ??? ????????????
???
??????? ????? ???????
??????? ????? 2009
??????? ?????
??????? ????? ?????
??????? ???? ????????
??????? ???????
??????? ???????? ?? ????
??????? ???? ?????
??????? ???? ???
??????? ????? ????
??????? ??????
??????? ???? ????
??????? ????????
??????? ?????
??????? ??? ????
??????? ????? ?????
??????? ???? ??????
??????? ???? ?????? 2009
??????? ???? ???
??????? ?????? ???? ???
??????? ????? ???
???????? ??????
??????? ???? +???????
??????
???? ???? ???????? ?? ????
?????? ???????? ?????? ,
?????? ?????? ??????
??????
???? ??????? ????????? ????????
??????
???? ?????? ??????? ?????????
?????? ???? ?????????
??????? ??????
??????
???????? ?????? ???? ??????
????? ??? ??????? + ????
?????????
??? ?????? ?????
????????? ??? ????????
????? ????? [ ?????? *
?????????] ????????
????? ??? ?????????
????????
?????
??? ???????? ??????? ??????
?????
?????? ????? ??? ??? ????????
???
????? ????? ??? ?????? ??????
?????
????? ????? ??????

?????
????? ??????? + ?????? ??????????
??? ????? ??? ???? ??????
?????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ???
??? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? 8.5 & 9.0

By: Greg

Greg — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:22:17 +0000

I have to agree this is a good development also. I understand most of the peoples reservations about the f-22 costs. But what should we do about the future? The f-15’s are pretty darn old at this point, do we buy several hundredmore advanced f-15e/k to replace the 600 c’s or do we buy the 381 f-22’s the airforce has requested, or do we compromise down the middle. Bottom line, the c should either be upgraded if possible which it seems not since one split in half in mid air, or we buy more jets, but something has to give, we can’t devote our entire defense budget to these 2 wars and forget about future advisories because we think we have advanced past world wars.

By: Nied

Nied — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:45:51 +0000

Well Illuminati and spam aside. This makes me cautiously optimistic. With England out and Richard Danzig in as a virtual SecDef understudy, I’m hopeful we’ll get a little more change in the DoD (which hopefully includes a few more F-22s).

By: Hibby

Hibby — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:14:59 +0000

Illuminati huh? Anyways, I do know Vice President Elect Biden just received a breifing on nuclear proliferation and the nuclear missiles budget will probably be hit.
I have to ask, what’s wrong with the nuclear weapons we already have? We could already end life on earth if we decided to fire them off.

By: corinne

corinne — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:52:41 +0000

I’d be interested to know if you think this new illuminati government will be against nuclear weapons along with F-22s?

By: Gabriel Rom

Gabriel Rom — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:53:14 +0000

Have been looking around your site, like the layout, love the content.
Would you like to trade links with a bipartisan politics blog offering a uniquely youth perspective.
ThePurpleYouth
http://www.thepurpleyouth.com
Or just let me know at Quash100 [at] gmail.com