DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Av Week Extra » Aussie AF Wants 100 F-35s

Aussie AF Wants 100 F-35s

The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) is stepping up its lobbying efforts for a full order of 100 F-35 Lightning IIs, a number that has been officially endorsed but could easily be trimmed in a defense white paper due next year.

The chief of the air force, Air Marshal Mark Binskin, strongly defends the choice of Lockheed Martin’s F-35 as its next fighter, arguing that it will be part of an integrated airpower system and the country could not hope to find better.

He also endorses the Boeing 737 Airborne Early Warning & Control Wedgetail and Airbus A330 tankers – both on order for Australia but running late – as the best equipment available.

The F-35 will be the best multirole fighter in the world, Binskin says, and will be able to beat advanced Russian fighters because it will be backed by other superior equipment and superior personnel.

“It will have the best radar, the best defensive system of any of those aircraft in the world,” Binskin said in a speech reported by the Australian Associated Press.

“It will be supported by the best airborne early warning and control aircraft and the best tanker in the world and flown, maintained and supported by the best people in the world,” he reportedly said. “I’ve got to tell you: the system ain’t going to get any better than that.“

The air force regards the Wedgetails as critical. As Boeing has suffered delays in developing the electronics, including an e-scan radar and advanced passive radio detection equipment, the service has said that it cannot afford to get less capability from them than it has specified — a clear sign that the six aircraft on order are at the center of its planning.

While holding F-35s in high esteem, the air force also says its studies show a need for a large quantity of them. “No matter how you model it, the modeling keeps coming back to 100,” Binskin said.

Read the rest of this story, learn how to drive to your mom’s house without, well, driving; see the latest in armed guard towers and check out the Army’s balloon drones from our friends at Aviation Week exclusively on Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

December 5th, 2008 | Av Week Extra | 422415 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/aussie-af-wants-100-f-35s/Aussie+AF+Wants+100+F-35s2008-12-05+13%3A57%3A50Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Ultimate M16/M4 Mag | Sestak Possible For SecNav? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Greg says:
    December 5, 2008 at 9:44 am

    I don’t think it will. I think the FCS will take the first hit. I think drawing down in Iraq will see the most significant savings though, enabling these programs to continue.

    Reply
  2. C. Foskey says:
    December 5, 2008 at 10:43 am

    F-35 would not lose funding and definitely not be canceled before the F-22. Its exportable technology, and can make money.

    Reply
  3. Maurice says:
    December 5, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    I have suggested long ago that if automakers want to get back on top, retrofit some of the factories of lackluster selling cars to build military aircraft parts. As for the F-35, what the heck is the hold-up? Are they still having a problem with VSTOL? And just a quick question, if the AF gets the F-35 AND the F-22, will they get rid of everything except tankers and the B-52’s?

    Reply
  4. non says:
    December 6, 2008 at 1:10 am

    The dilemma with the recession is that if you do cut programs like the JSF (btw all programs are different), thousands of people will be out of work, making the problem worse.

    Reply
  5. JH says:
    December 6, 2008 at 2:42 am

    A330 is best tanker, folks you heard it.

    Reply
  6. Han Solo says:
    December 6, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    Let me sum up this position in just one sentence.
    NOBODY EVER GOT FIRED FOR BUYING IBM.

    Reply
  7. Han Solo says:
    December 6, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    Let me sum up this position in just one sentence from an old business saying.
    “Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.”

    Reply
  8. pfcem says:
    December 7, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    ***
    While holding F-35s in high esteem, the air force also says its studies show a need for a large quantity of them. “No matter how you model it, the modeling keeps coming back to 100,” Binskin said.
    ***
    This is true for the F-22 as well. Despite how great the F-22 is, you still need a given number (381 under the current USAF stucture) of them to do all that it is expected to do.

    Reply
  9. 0p0 says:
    December 25, 2008 at 12:02 am

    ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    • Author Steven Pressfield Blogs Afghan Visit With Gen. Mattis
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    Recent Comments
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Toad – Precision rounds are not meant to and...
      dragon6actual
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      The flare at the end of the cannon is to reduce...
      dragon6actual
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      "The Infantry Company seldom engages target...
      dragon6actual
    • Aegis v2.0
      Hey Horge Maybe we should've sent Hilter and the Emperor of Japan a dozen...
      Rick
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Roland, China will not make a peace treaty...
      Benj2
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Shot out.
      dragon6actual
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Earth to Byron – Currently, the max SGLI is...
      dragon6actual
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      You sort of prove my point there. Cigarettes started fueling...
      Nadnerbus
    • Is the F-35 Militarily Vital?
      With SDD completion now 4 years behind schedule, the unit...
      Weaponhead
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      The (at the time) Soviet Union poured countless...
      dragon6actual
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage