DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Av Week Extra » Aussie AF Wants 100 F-​​35s

Aussie AF Wants 100 F-​​35s

The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) is step­ping up its lob­by­ing efforts for a full order of 100 F-​​35 Lightning IIs, a num­ber that has been offi­cially endorsed but could eas­ily be trimmed in a defense white paper due next year.

The chief of the air force, Air Marshal Mark Binskin, strongly defends the choice of Lockheed Martin’s F-​​35 as its next fighter, argu­ing that it will be part of an inte­grated air­power sys­tem and the coun­try could not hope to find bet­ter.

He also endorses the Boeing 737 Airborne Early Warning & Control Wedgetail and Airbus A330 tankers – both on order for Australia but run­ning late – as the best equip­ment avail­able.

The F-​​35 will be the best mul­ti­role fighter in the world, Binskin says, and will be able to beat advanced Russian fight­ers because it will be backed by other supe­rior equip­ment and supe­rior per­son­nel.

“It will have the best radar, the best defen­sive sys­tem of any of those air­craft in the world,” Binskin said in a speech reported by the Australian Associated Press.

“It will be sup­ported by the best air­borne early warn­ing and con­trol air­craft and the best tanker in the world and flown, main­tained and sup­ported by the best peo­ple in the world,” he report­edly said. “I’ve got to tell you: the sys­tem ain’t going to get any bet­ter than that.“

The air force regards the Wedgetails as crit­i­cal. As Boeing has suf­fered delays in devel­op­ing the elec­tron­ics, includ­ing an e-​​scan radar and advanced pas­sive radio detec­tion equip­ment, the ser­vice has said that it can­not afford to get less capa­bil­ity from them than it has spec­i­fied — a clear sign that the six air­craft on order are at the cen­ter of its plan­ning.

While hold­ing F-​​35s in high esteem, the air force also says its stud­ies show a need for a large quan­tity of them. “No mat­ter how you model it, the mod­el­ing keeps com­ing back to 100,” Binskin said.

Read the rest of this story, learn how to drive to your mom’s house with­out, well, dri­ving; see the lat­est in armed guard tow­ers and check out the Army’s bal­loon drones from our friends at Aviation Week exclu­sively on Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

December 5th, 2008 | Av Week Extra | 422415 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/aussie-af-wants-100-f-35s/Aussie+AF+Wants+100+F-35s2008-12-05+13%3A57%3A50Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Ultimate M16/​M4 Mag | Sestak Possible For SecNav? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Greg says:
    December 5, 2008 at 9:44 am

    I don’t think it will. I think the FCS will take the first hit. I think draw­ing down in Iraq will see the most sig­nif­i­cant sav­ings though, enabling these pro­grams to continue.

    Reply
  2. C. Foskey says:
    December 5, 2008 at 10:43 am

    F-​​35 would not lose fund­ing and def­i­nitely not be can­celed before the F-​​22. Its exportable tech­nol­ogy, and can make money.

    Reply
  3. Maurice says:
    December 5, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    I have sug­gested long ago that if automak­ers want to get back on top, retro­fit some of the fac­to­ries of lack­lus­ter sell­ing cars to build mil­i­tary air­craft parts. As for the F-​​35, what the heck is the hold-​​up? Are they still hav­ing a prob­lem with VSTOL? And just a quick ques­tion, if the AF gets the F-​​35 AND the F-​​22, will they get rid of every­thing except tankers and the B-52’s?

    Reply
  4. non says:
    December 6, 2008 at 1:10 am

    The dilemma with the reces­sion is that if you do cut pro­grams like the JSF (btw all pro­grams are dif­fer­ent), thou­sands of peo­ple will be out of work, mak­ing the prob­lem worse.

    Reply
  5. JH says:
    December 6, 2008 at 2:42 am

    A330 is best tanker, folks you heard it.

    Reply
  6. Han Solo says:
    December 6, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    Let me sum up this posi­tion in just one sen­tence.
    NOBODY EVER GOT FIRED FOR BUYING IBM.

    Reply
  7. Han Solo says:
    December 6, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    Let me sum up this posi­tion in just one sen­tence from an old busi­ness say­ing.
    “Nobody ever got fired for buy­ing IBM.”

    Reply
  8. pfcem says:
    December 7, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    ***
    While hold­ing F-​​35s in high esteem, the air force also says its stud­ies show a need for a large quan­tity of them. “No mat­ter how you model it, the mod­el­ing keeps com­ing back to 100,” Binskin said.
    ***
    This is true for the F-​​22 as well. Despite how great the F-​​22 is, you still need a given num­ber (381 under the cur­rent USAF stuc­ture) of them to do all that it is expected to do.

    Reply
  9. 0p0 says:
    December 25, 2008 at 12:02 am

    ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage