Comments on: Sestak Possible For SecNav? http://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Maria Sciandrahttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-223231 Maria Sciandra Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:58:04 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-223231 Im glad I located this site, I couldnt obtain any info on this matter prior to. I also run a niche site and if you are ever serious in a little bit of visitor writing for me you should feel free to let me know, im always look for people to check out my website. Please stop by and leave a comment sometime! Im glad I located this site, I couldnt obtain any info on this matter prior to. I also run a niche site and if you are ever serious in a little bit of visitor writing for me you should feel free to let me know, im always look for people to check out my website. Please stop by and leave a comment sometime!

]]> By: starhttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-94799 star Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:37:19 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-94799 ?? ???? ?? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ????? ? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ?????? sod ??? ???? ??? ?? ????? ????? ???? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?DVD ?DVD ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??
????
??
???? ??
????
??????
?? ??????
???
???
????
???? ?????
?
?? ??????
?? ??????
?? ??????
??? ??????
?? ??????
sod
???
???? ???
?? ????? ?????
????
?? ??
?? ??
?? ??
?DVD
?DVD
?? ??
?? ??
???? ??
???? ??
???? ????
??? ????
??? ????
??? ????

]]> By: starhttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-94798 star Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:36:29 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-94798 ???????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ????????
???????
???????
???????
???????
???????
???????
???????
????????
???????
???????
???????
???????
????????
???????
???????
???????
????????
???????

]]> By: starhttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-94797 star Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:35:29 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-94797 ?? ???? ?? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ????? ? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ?????? sod ??? ???? ??? ?? ????? ????? ???? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?DVD ?DVD ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??
????
??
???? ??
????
??????
?? ??????
???
???
????
???? ?????
?
?? ??????
?? ??????
?? ??????
??? ??????
?? ??????
sod
???
???? ???
?? ????? ?????
????
?? ??
?? ??
?? ??
?DVD
?DVD
?? ??
?? ??
???? ??
???? ??
???? ????
??? ????
??? ????
??? ????

]]> By: bdwilcoxhttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-94792 bdwilcox Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:06:50 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-94792 "Curt Weldon was unseated by Sestak because Curt Weldon was a seriously corrupt whack job. Some of his more impressive moments was holding a coronation* for the Reverend Sun Myung Moon in a Senate building and visiting Libya to give an award to Khadafy. *No, I'm not kidding." -Weldon was joined by a bevy of both Democrat and Republican Congressman who attended the event to praise Moon's efforts toward world peace. The AP reported that Weldon, amongst others, didn't know there was going to be a coronation ceremony and wouldn't have attended if they knew. Weldon was involved with Libya after Libya gave up its WMD programs and came clean about them to the US. That's why he was in Libya. I guess your Democrat buddies in this picture are a bunch of whackjobs, too. http://www.upi.com/topic/Curt_Weldon/ Once again Total, you demonstrate you can't be trusted. “Curt Weldon was unseated by Sestak because Curt Weldon was a seriously corrupt whack job. Some of his more impressive moments was holding a coronation* for the Reverend Sun Myung Moon in a Senate building and visiting Libya to give an award to Khadafy.
*No, I’m not kidding.“
–Weldon was joined by a bevy of both Democrat and Republican Congressman who attended the event to praise Moon’s efforts toward world peace. The AP reported that Weldon, amongst others, didn’t know there was going to be a coronation ceremony and wouldn’t have attended if they knew.
Weldon was involved with Libya after Libya gave up its WMD programs and came clean about them to the US. That’s why he was in Libya. I guess your Democrat buddies in this picture are a bunch of whackjobs, too.
http://www.upi.com/topic/Curt_Weldon/
Once again Total, you demonstrate you can’t be trusted.

]]> By: Totalhttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-94791 Total Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:10:31 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-94791 Curt Weldon was upseated by Sestak due to heavy campaigning by Bill Clinton Curt Weldon was unseated by Sestak because Curt Weldon was a seriously corrupt whack job. Some of his more impressive moments was holding a coronation* for the Reverend Sun Myung Moon in a Senate building and visiting Libya to give an award to Khadafy. *No, I'm not kidding. "f you think you can't get people to work for you without profanity-laced tirades, you're not a leader." George Patton would likely disagree with you. Curt Weldon was upseated by Sestak due to heavy campaigning by Bill Clinton
Curt Weldon was unseated by Sestak because Curt Weldon was a seriously corrupt whack job. Some of his more impressive moments was holding a coronation* for the Reverend Sun Myung Moon in a Senate building and visiting Libya to give an award to Khadafy.
*No, I’m not kidding.
“f you think you can’t get people to work for you without profanity-laced tirades, you’re not a leader.“
George Patton would likely disagree with you.

]]> By: bdwilcoxhttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-94790 bdwilcox Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:57:20 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-94790 Curt Weldon was upseated by Sestak due to heavy campaigning by Bill Clinton (the Sestak/Curt Weldon election was the only one mentioned by Clinton in his infamous 60 minutes tirade) because Weldon was the main push investigating Able Danger, the intelligence program that identified Mohammed Atta as a suspect long before 9/11. This was a direct tie between Clinton and his culpability for 9/11 through a failure of intelligence gathering instigated by Gorelick's wall between intelligence/police matters erected to shield Clinton from Chinagate. Sestak is a Clinton puppet and Weldon was targeted for destruction through his daughter by Clintonites still embedded in the Justice department. Curt Weldon was upseated by Sestak due to heavy campaigning by Bill Clinton (the Sestak/Curt Weldon election was the only one mentioned by Clinton in his infamous 60 minutes tirade) because Weldon was the main push investigating Able Danger, the intelligence program that identified Mohammed Atta as a suspect long before 9/11. This was a direct tie between Clinton and his culpability for 9/11 through a failure of intelligence gathering instigated by Gorelick’s wall between intelligence/police matters erected to shield Clinton from Chinagate.
Sestak is a Clinton puppet and Weldon was targeted for destruction through his daughter by Clintonites still embedded in the Justice department.

]]> By: Emashttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-79546 Emas Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:56:54 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-79546 Don't be too impressed by Sestak beating Curt Weldon. Weldon was/is up to his ears in a corruption probe- his daughter was making big bucks in some company Weldon may/not have ties to- Don’t be too impressed by Sestak beating Curt Weldon. Weldon was/is up to his ears in a corruption probe– his daughter was making big bucks in some company Weldon may/not have ties to–

]]> By: solomonhttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-79543 solomon Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:42:48 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-79543 hey Roy thats a pretty sick comment there buddy. hey Roy thats a pretty sick comment there buddy.

]]> By: Springboardhttp://defensetech.org/2008/12/05/sestak-possible-for-secnav/#comment-88683 Springboard Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:53:56 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4225#comment-88683 Isn't there a rule that former military nominees for the service secretaries need to have been retired from active duty for at least five years? Something about civilian leadership, ya know? Sestak left the Navy...in 2005, right? So...he can't do it. Isn’t there a rule that former military nominees for the service secretaries need to have been retired from active duty for at least five years? Something about civilian leadership, ya know?
Sestak left the Navy…in 2005, right? So…he can’t do it.

]]>