DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Mumbai terrorist attacks-C4I

Mumbai terrorist attacks-C4I

mumbai-google.jpg

C4I stands for Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence. The ability to have full C4I integration is unarguably the singular element needed to significantly improve tactical, operational and strategic effectiveness. History has proven C4I to be a critical aspect of military and law enforcement actions.

But these lessons have been studied by terrorists who have now integrated C4I into their operational plans. This has become even more evident since Indian authorities announce they discovered five BlackBerry cell phones that forensic experts have discovered were used during the two day siege.

Experts tell us that integrated command, control, communications, computers and intelligence capabilities within the multiple terrorist groups that luanched the Mumbai operation significantly enhanced their abilities and allowed the terrorists to coordinate their sinister efforts. The terrorist used the live TV streams and news broadcasts from Indian and foreign media to their advantage during the two day siege. By monitoring these broadcasts, they were able to have near real time surveillance of what was going on the thwart their attacks. According to Brian at Spy-Ops, “The terrorists had information superiority and that was achieved by simply using a commercial off-the-shelf product, including BlackBerry smart phones.”

The terrorists also had access to satellite imagery during the preparatory stages of the attack. Evidence shows that satellite imagery from Google Earth was downloaded and used in the attack. This is yet another case of COTS products being used to aide in the planning and execution of the attacks. If that’s not bad enough, investigators learned that the terrorists also relied on satellite phones and GPS — two more COTS products — to navigate their way and coordinate timing to their targets.


We live in a high-tech society with capabilities previously only available to the military now in the hands of the general public. This group of terrorists was technologically sophisticated. One thing is a given and that is that law enforcement and military leaders are rethinking their policies surrounding media access to ongoing events. One sure bet would be that the media parameter will be pushed out and away from direct line-of-site visual access to the scene of the event. It is also possible that cell phone jammers will be used to disrupt communications “5“among the actors at similar events. The availability of high tech COTS products creates an enhanced challenge to counter-terrorist efforts around the world. Counter-terrorist units must be equipped with the latest technology in order to combat the action of terrorists.

There are over 154 known terrorist groups in 56 countries throughout the world.

International and domestic terrorist events totaled 14,499 in 2007.

INTEL: The average dollars required to fund a terrorist attack are in the hundreds or low thousands, not hundreds of thousands.

INTEL: Indian investigators suspect the terrorists that carried out the Mumbai attacks may have British links after examining BlackBerry phones they used to monitor news reports.

INTEL: The captured terrorist — Azam Amir Kasab told police that he was shown video footage of the targets and Google Earth images before the attacks.

INTEL: Robot drones, mine detectors and sensing devices are now common on battlefields abroad and at the scene of terrorist attacks.

INTEL: The Indian security forces, including the elite special-forces unit known as “Black Cats,” had little access to high tech equipment including night-vision goggles or thermal-imaging capability

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

December 8th, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 422710 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/12/08/mumbai-terrorist-attacks-c4i/Mumbai+terrorist+attacks-C4I2008-12-08+13%3A04%3A27Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « 7 December 1941 | Urban Warfare Mumbai Style » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Camp says:
    December 8, 2008 at 4:18 pm

    While I appreciate the concepts the article is attempting to achieve. I think it’s pushing things a tad too far, to claim these tangos had a real C4I structure & “information superiority”.
    In regards to law enforcement. Cell phone jammers (area jamming) will more than likely play an increasing role in future events, but probably not just on the side of the police. A solid real-time intel asset that law enforcement has, are it’s citizens with cell-phones. And cutting off possible sources of info, as well as the bad guy doesn’t make much sense. And not to mention, that police officers often rely upon their own cell phones for work, because the department issued equipment can simply suck.
    A real challenge for police & counter-terrorism units, will be to find a way of quickly localizing, identifying, & taking control of a tangos specific comms link. It’s plausible, to create a program that would automatically correlate time, events, and signals in order to identify & track suspected devices in an area. Although, pushing actionable information forward to the appropriate line units (without creating information overload) will still be a battle within itself. But if one were able to do so, the “bad guys” “technological advantage” could quickly become their “Achilles heal”.
    C2I, C3I, C4I, C4ISR, C4ISTAR, RIP, BGP, BFG, WTF… does the world really need more abbreviations?
    Anyone remember the name of this little program? 8O)
    http://​hardocp​.com/​i​m​a​g​e​.​h​t​m​l​?​i​m​a​g​e​=​M​T​I​y​N​z​U​0​M​T​A​3​N​0​5​T​M​E​l​P​T​0​F​w​R​E​p​f​M​V​8​z​X​2​w​u​a​nBn

    Reply
  2. stephen russell says:
    December 8, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    Time to update Indian Armed forces with latest systems & drones, Apaches or Hueycobras & estd SEAL force in US Emb?
    Concealed carry time
    & super encrypt data?
    Or face Mumbai 2 someplace in the world?

    Reply
  3. SpyGuy says:
    December 9, 2008 at 4:57 pm

    Well some good poins and some spy want-a-bes. RIP? Give me a freeking break. The US intel community is so far ahead of what you are talking about it is not funny.
    India does need to update their response and intel capabilities big time!

    Reply
  4. Byron Skinner says:
    December 9, 2008 at 11:12 pm

    Good Evening Spy Guy,
    If the U.S. is so far ahead of the terrorists how come they are winning. Al Qaeda can has struck at will any place at the time of its choice. The U.S. by its own admission has said that is unable to predict any al Qaeda actions either time or place.
    American Intelligence is to fractured and bureaucratically fractured to deal with the open ended, nimble and flexible operational organization that al Qaeda has built. To many self interest in the CIA and DoD cripple U.S. efforts.
    Although I think the recent prediction of an al Qaeda CBR attack some place in the world by 2013 is over the top, there almost certainly will be more conventional terrorists attacks before that date.
    The U.S. will only be able to react to what has taken place. The only saving grace here is that al Qaeda lacks the where with all in several critical are to carry out a CBR attack that would be more or as even as effective as what they did on 9/11 and now in Mumbai. There will be bodies and property damage but nothing that can’t be cleaned up.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  5. Spyguy says:
    December 10, 2008 at 6:23 pm

    They have not struck the U.S. no have they? We continue to capture and kill terrrorists all over the world. Finally NO ONE CAN PREDICT WHAT IS IN THE MINDS OF EVIL MEN!

    Reply
  6. Bingo games in the UK says:
    January 20, 2009 at 7:49 am

    Last week’s terrorist attack on Mumbai was unsettling partially exposed the vulnerability of one of the worlds largest growing cities.
    Could the violent acts could actually strengthen counter-terrorism strategies the US? The Takeaway explores this with Paul
    Cruickshank. Cruickshank says that it may be more difficult to pull off this type of attack in the United States because we are
    protected by geography and demography.On 26th Dec we lose 100 people who pays for these lives.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
    • Cancel Cyber Command
    • Rough Week for F-35
    • Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer (Part 3)
    Recent Comments
    • Multicam on the Loose
      The New Zealand SAS wear multicam in Afghanistan, their pictures...
      Pat Griffith
    • Rough Week for F-35
      Why don't we give congress and the senate a raise then they can...
      CHOPS
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Part 2 An excellent example is the habit of labling the JSF...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      An excellent example is the habit of labling the JSF program as...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      An excellent example is the habit of labling the JSF program as...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Part 2 An excellent example is the habit of labling the JSF...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Part 1 One of the problems with the 'whole story' is...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
      And that is exactly why Vietnam is now starting to...
      Tim
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Not to cavil, but the F-35 program cost will not breach the...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Re: Q1 thru Q4: Do you know if there's a paper trail to show...
      TMB
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage