<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gates’ Supplemental Plea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/01/07/gates-supplemental-plea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/07/gates-supplemental-plea/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfcem</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/07/gates-supplemental-plea/#comment-95710</link>
		<dc:creator>pfcem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4270#comment-95710</guid>
		<description>William A. Peterson,
The deficit did not get this high on defense spending.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William A. Peterson,<br />
The deficit did not get this high on defense spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William A. Peterson</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/07/gates-supplemental-plea/#comment-95709</link>
		<dc:creator>William A. Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4270#comment-95709</guid>
		<description>Sven, OF COURSE it should be funded by the Secretary of State&#039;s budget...
But, no one would vote for that!
So, instead, it gets lumped in with a huge supplemental, and anyone who dares to vote against it is opposed to &quot;funding our troops&quot;!
How do you think the deficit got this high in the first place?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sven, OF COURSE it should be funded by the Secretary of State’s budget…<br />
But, no one would vote for that!<br />
So, instead, it gets lumped in with a huge supplemental, and anyone who dares to vote against it is opposed to “funding our troops”!<br />
How do you think the deficit got this high in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbymike</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/07/gates-supplemental-plea/#comment-95708</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbymike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4270#comment-95708</guid>
		<description>Add $1 trillion to the defense budget build new nukes, missiles and bombers. Turn the Middle East into a parking lot. Save trillions on defense in the future, simple.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add $1 trillion to the defense budget build new nukes, missiles and bombers. Turn the Middle East into a parking lot. Save trillions on defense in the future, simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drake</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/07/gates-supplemental-plea/#comment-95706</link>
		<dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4270#comment-95706</guid>
		<description>After hearing that the Obama administrations expects us to be running trillion dollar deficits for years (don&#039;t quote me on that)and this, I&#039;m thinking that the only way to provide adequate military spending, and also fund Obama initiatives without going further into the red on the books is continue to do this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After hearing that the Obama administrations expects us to be running trillion dollar deficits for years (don’t quote me on that)and this, I’m thinking that the only way to provide adequate military spending, and also fund Obama initiatives without going further into the red on the books is continue to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Ortmann</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/07/gates-supplemental-plea/#comment-95704</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Ortmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4270#comment-95704</guid>
		<description>Most of that doesn&#039;t look like it needs to be funded before the next normal budget.
&quot;$1.4 billion to reimburse Pakistan, Jordan and </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of that doesn’t look like it needs to be funded before the next normal budget.<br />
”$1.4 billion to reimburse Pakistan, Jordan and</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

