<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Body Armor Recalled by Army</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Rich Cash</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/#comment-96359</link> <dc:creator>Rich Cash</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:57:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4315#comment-96359</guid> <description>I like the reports on the new Dragon Skin, but would like to see some of our troopers in Afghanistan check the Dragon Skin out and I would rely on their final judgement, but fat chance for that to happen.  I also like the new H&amp;K 416 Assault Rifle, since when I observed this rifle covered in a bucket of sand and also let it submerged in water without, after which the rifle fired without any malfunction, I was sold, since I don&#039;t know of any other rifle, that wouldn&#039;t blow apart. If they made the H&amp;K 416 with the Barrett 6.8 cal. shell, that would be a one shot-one kill Kick-Axx rifle. Check it out, wish I had this one, back in Nam. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the reports on the new Dragon Skin, but would like to see some of our troopers in Afghanistan check the Dragon Skin out and I would rely on their final judgement, but fat chance for that to happen.  I also like the new H&amp;K 416 Assault Rifle, since when I observed this rifle covered in a bucket of sand and also let it submerged in water without, after which the rifle fired without any malfunction, I was sold, since I don’t know of any other rifle, that wouldn’t blow apart. If they made the H&amp;K 416 with the Barrett 6.8 cal. shell, that would be a one shot-one kill Kick-Axx rifle. Check it out, wish I had this one, back in Nam.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CBA Co.</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/#comment-81176</link> <dc:creator>CBA Co.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4315#comment-81176</guid> <description>We think current OTVs and Body Armor is highly satisfactory and hope to someday develop new forms of materials to achieve advancement in the Human Armor industry. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We think current OTVs and Body Armor is highly satisfactory and hope to someday develop new forms of materials to achieve advancement in the Human Armor industry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/#comment-96358</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:44:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4315#comment-96358</guid> <description>I wonder if this means the Army will pull the SAPI plates in question as IG approved plates are distributed, so that they</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this means the Army will pull the SAPI plates in question as IG approved plates are distributed, so that they</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/#comment-96357</link> <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:24:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4315#comment-96357</guid> <description>For those of you that think the recall is taking away the new carriers, you might want to take another look.  This recall is only for the SAPI plates.  I wish it was for everything so the Army would finally take advantage of the better quality vests that are available. I agree with David. I used the IOTV in Afghanistan in &#039;08. At first I liked it, but after a few missions, I hated it.  Like David said, the only good thing about it was the belly band that took the wieght off the shoulders. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you that think the recall is taking away the new carriers, you might want to take another look.  This recall is only for the SAPI plates.  I wish it was for everything so the Army would finally take advantage of the better quality vests that are available.<br /> I agree with David. I used the IOTV in Afghanistan in ’08. At first I liked it, but after a few missions, I hated it.  Like David said, the only good thing about it was the belly band that took the wieght off the shoulders.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: david</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/#comment-96356</link> <dc:creator>david</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:13:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4315#comment-96356</guid> <description>I used this vest in afghanistan in &#039;07 when it was first introduced. It is crap, limited mounting surface, didn&#039;t like the over-the-head donning method and the quick release kept coming undone and myself and a few other joe&#039;s almost had it completely come apart while out on missions and it&#039;s a pain to put back together! The only good thing about this vest is the belly band that helps take the weight off the shoulders and distribute the load more efficiently. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used this vest in afghanistan in ’07 when it was first introduced. It is crap, limited mounting surface, didn’t like the over-the-head donning method and the quick release kept coming undone and myself and a few other joe’s almost had it completely come apart while out on missions and it’s a pain to put back together!<br /> The only good thing about this vest is the belly band that helps take the weight off the shoulders and distribute the load more efficiently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kevin</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/#comment-96355</link> <dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:12:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4315#comment-96355</guid> <description>yeah, can we please get dragon skin, i think not dying would be worth the extra tax bucks </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, can we please get dragon skin, i think not dying would be worth the extra tax bucks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Taggart</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/#comment-81171</link> <dc:creator>Chris Taggart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:20:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4315#comment-81171</guid> <description>Too all those who wanted better protection I built it and now here is real Body Armor LS Armor from CombatBodyArmor Co....anybody can comment to me... http://s566.photobucket.com/albums/ss106/ctaggart3/?action=view&amp;current=LevelIIIX-SAPITestCombatBodyArmo-7.flv </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too all those who wanted better protection I built it and now here is real Body Armor LS Armor from CombatBodyArmor Co.…anybody can comment to me…<br /> <a href="http://s566.photobucket.com/albums/ss106/ctaggart3/?action=view&#038;current=LevelIIIX-SAPITestCombatBodyArmo-7.flv" rel="nofollow">http://s566.photobucket.com/albums/ss106/ctaggart3/?action=view&amp;current=LevelIIIX-SAPITestCombatBodyArmo-7.flv</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vitor</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/01/29/body-armor-recalled-by-army/#comment-81170</link> <dc:creator>Vitor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:00:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4315#comment-81170</guid> <description>*Waits for Dragon Skin fans* </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Waits for Dragon Skin fans*</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 721/725 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:56:03 -->
