DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » US Sees ‘Test Run’ With Captured Pirates (The Entire Story)

US Sees ‘Test Run’ With Captured Pirates (The Entire Story)

somali-pirates.jpg

The U.S. Coast Guard is using the recent cap­ture of seven pirates in the Gulf of Aden as a test case of how to pur­sue swash­buck­lers world­wide and sub­mit them to inter­na­tional courts.

According to key Coast Guard offi­cials, mar­itime secu­rity experts and mil­i­tary com­man­ders are exam­in­ing ways to safe­guard ships tran­sit­ing the East African waters and pro­vide some sem­blance of order to the largely law­less region between Yemen and Somalia.

“We’re focused on pro­vid­ing what we call a ‘con­se­quence deliv­ery sys­tem,’ ” said Capt. Chuck Michel, head of the Coast Guard’s office of Maritime and International Law. “In the absence of the ter­ri­to­r­ial sov­er­eign stand­ing up, what we’re try­ing to set up is some kind of legal mech­a­nism to make it more painful for the pirates to actu­ally go out and do their activities.”

More piracy cov­er­age com­ing up later on Defense Tech.

Michel said the cap­ture by the Navy of seven pirates who tried to take over the Marshall Islands-​​flagged MV Polaris Feb. 11 is a “test run” of the mech­a­nism that the U.S. mil­i­tary would use in the future to deter more piracy.

“The whole follow-​​on … to actu­ally get­ting them behind bars is an excru­ci­at­ing process,” Michel added dur­ing a Feb. 17 inter­view with mil­i­tary bloggers.

Sailors and Coasties involved in the cap­tures must adhere to inter­na­tional norms for gath­er­ing evi­dence, treat­ment of detainees and trans­port­ing them to courts in coun­tries will­ing to pros­e­cute them. The legal tan­gles are daunt­ing, but it’s now the pol­icy of the Obama admin­is­tra­tion to cur­tail piracy with law enforce­ment mea­sures, Michel said.

“You may actu­ally have Coast Guard and Navy per­son­nel [cap­tur­ing] Somali pirates, who may have attacked a Panamanian ves­sel with a Filipino crew being tried in a Kenyan court,” Michel explained.

Piracy in the Gulf of Aden has become an increas­ingly vis­i­ble prob­lem, with recent high-​​profile cap­tures of a Ukrainian arms ship and a Japanese trans­port ship result­ing in mil­lions in ran­som money paid to sea­far­ing ban­dits tak­ing shel­ter in Somalia. But Michel pointed out that of the nearly 25,000 ships that steamed through the Horn of Africa last year, only 115 were attacked — with 46 captured.

So far this year, about 10 ships have been attacked, with only three cap­tured. While that’s a small num­ber rel­a­tive to the amount of ship­ping tran­sit­ing the Gulf of Aden, it’s an intol­er­a­ble prece­dent if left unchecked.

“You have to take a look at the num­ber of sea­far­ers that were held cap­tive there,” Michel added. “This is not a good thing when you’ve cur­rently got over 100 sea­far­ers being held at gun point. That’s a big deal … and not some­thing the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity should tolerate.”

There are things that ships can do to help pre­vent attacks, said Capt. Mike Giglio, the Coast Guard’s chief of law enforce­ment, who has dis­patched teams of Coasties to accom­pany Navy “visit, board and search” units hunt­ing the maraud­ing buccaneers.

First off, travel fast, offi­cials say; no ships have been boarded trav­el­ing more the 16 knots at night through the area.

Private secu­rity con­trac­tors are an option for “low and slow” ships that can’t steam faster than 16 knots, as are water can­nons, hard-​​to-​​access safe rooms to pro­tect the crew, and stick­ing to routes patrolled by inter­na­tional navies.

Both Michel and Giglio strongly opposed arm­ing “untrained” crews to stave off an attack, warn­ing that could cause more harm than good.

While there are some options to ship­pers try­ing to fend off carbine-​​toting free­boot­ers, it’s going to take mul­ti­ple arms of the law, mil­i­tary and a healthy dose of com­mon sense to curb the problem.

“We’re set­ting up essen­tially a sur­ro­gate legal sys­tem … to actu­ally pro­vide some kind of legal con­se­quences to these pirates,” Michel said. “Absent that, these pirates have every incen­tive to go out and con­tinue doing what they’re doing.”

Be sure to tune in this morn­ing at 1030 EST for our inter­view with secu­rity con­sul­tant Jake Allen in a live podcast.

– Christian

Share |

February 18th, 2009 | Around the Globe | 434612 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/02/18/us-sees-test-run-with-captured-pirates-the-entire-story/US+Sees+%27Test+Run%27+With+Captured+Pirates+%28The+Entire+Story%292009-02-18+13%3A36%3A48Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « US Hopes to Set Piracy Precedent With Polaris Case | Boots on the Ground — With Guest Jake Allen from The Combat Operator » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. TB says:
    February 18, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Did those 18th and 19th cen­tury int’l piracy laws dis­tin­guish between cit­i­zens of a state and non-​​persons? I don’t know any­thing about those laws, but the fact that these pirates come from a failed state might be a legal issue to be sorted out.
    Its good that we’re explor­ing the issues now before we start a Global War on Piracy and end up with hun­dreds of pris­on­ers and shaky legal ground to play with.

    Reply
  2. Byron Skinner says:
    February 18, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    Good Evening Mike,
    I don’t want to get into duel­ing Constitutional quotes here but the copy of the Constitution that I have deals with piracy under Section 8, that expresses the pow­ers of Congress, “To define and pun­ish pira­cies and Felonies com­mit­ted on the high seas, and Offenses against the Laws of Nations.” This is a pretty open ended state­ment as it was intended to be, but surly gives Congress to grant the Navy any author­ity that is nec­es­sary to deal with this prob­lem any­where and against the ves­sels of any state or com­bi­na­tion of states. From what I can find the U.S. Code last dealt with piracy in 1832. I’m sure there has been some laws to deal with spe­cific events such as the Civil War since then, but a revisit to the laws of piracy is long over due.
    Really all this is in the hands of Congress. I know for the past eight years we have had an admin­is­tra­tion that has pub­licly stated that any­thing the President does in legal, John Yo, and an arro­gant President that self appointed him­self as the “Decider in Chief.” This is really a deci­sion that should be made by Congress and not President Obama.
    President Obama has stated many time that he believes in the Constitution and here is a chance to show that he does. Other then for emer­gency and expressly tem­po­rary actions to pro­tect United States lives and prop­erty, the mil­i­tary should back away until Congress pro­vides oper­a­tional guide­lines and expressed author­i­ties.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  3. jsallison says:
    February 20, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    shoot out of hand and toss over the side. Why are we dis­cussing this?

    Reply
  4. Byron Skinner says:
    February 21, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Good Morning jsal­li­son,
    A quick answer to you ques­tion. We as a peo­ple are not Nazis. For any­one inter­ested in where this con­cept can go I would sug­gest read­ing; “Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans”: by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen.
    The United States has a Constitution that not only pro­tects prop­erty rights but also human rights, with­out that we are the same as the law­less pirates. I don’t think that’s what most Americans want to be. Their maybe some excep­tions I’m sure.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Welcome to paralysis induced by political correctness.
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It's too bad a brave soul like you wasn't in that room....
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Zandor, You're obviously and expert on religion and religious...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Cannon, please stop bringing relevant facts and arguments into this. The...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage