DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » US Sees ‘Test Run’ With Captured Pirates (The Entire Story)

US Sees ‘Test Run’ With Captured Pirates (The Entire Story)

somali-pirates.jpg

The U.S. Coast Guard is using the recent capture of seven pirates in the Gulf of Aden as a test case of how to pursue swashbucklers worldwide and submit them to international courts.

According to key Coast Guard officials, maritime security experts and military commanders are examining ways to safeguard ships transiting the East African waters and provide some semblance of order to the largely lawless region between Yemen and Somalia.

“We’re focused on providing what we call a ‘consequence delivery system,’ ” said Capt. Chuck Michel, head of the Coast Guard’s office of Maritime and International Law. “In the absence of the territorial sovereign standing up, what we’re trying to set up is some kind of legal mechanism to make it more painful for the pirates to actually go out and do their activities.”

More piracy coverage coming up later on Defense Tech.

Michel said the capture by the Navy of seven pirates who tried to take over the Marshall Islands-flagged MV Polaris Feb. 11 is a “test run” of the mechanism that the U.S. military would use in the future to deter more piracy.

“The whole follow-on … to actually getting them behind bars is an excruciating process,” Michel added during a Feb. 17 interview with military bloggers.

Sailors and Coasties involved in the captures must adhere to international norms for gathering evidence, treatment of detainees and transporting them to courts in countries willing to prosecute them. The legal tangles are daunting, but it’s now the policy of the Obama administration to curtail piracy with law enforcement measures, Michel said.

“You may actually have Coast Guard and Navy personnel [capturing] Somali pirates, who may have attacked a Panamanian vessel with a Filipino crew being tried in a Kenyan court,” Michel explained.

Piracy in the Gulf of Aden has become an increasingly visible problem, with recent high-profile captures of a Ukrainian arms ship and a Japanese transport ship resulting in millions in ransom money paid to seafaring bandits taking shelter in Somalia. But Michel pointed out that of the nearly 25,000 ships that steamed through the Horn of Africa last year, only 115 were attacked — with 46 captured.

So far this year, about 10 ships have been attacked, with only three captured. While that’s a small number relative to the amount of shipping transiting the Gulf of Aden, it’s an intolerable precedent if left unchecked.

“You have to take a look at the number of seafarers that were held captive there,” Michel added. “This is not a good thing when you’ve currently got over 100 seafarers being held at gun point. That’s a big deal … and not something the international community should tolerate.”

There are things that ships can do to help prevent attacks, said Capt. Mike Giglio, the Coast Guard’s chief of law enforcement, who has dispatched teams of Coasties to accompany Navy “visit, board and search” units hunting the marauding buccaneers.

First off, travel fast, officials say; no ships have been boarded traveling more the 16 knots at night through the area.

Private security contractors are an option for “low and slow” ships that can’t steam faster than 16 knots, as are water cannons, hard-to-access safe rooms to protect the crew, and sticking to routes patrolled by international navies.

Both Michel and Giglio strongly opposed arming “untrained” crews to stave off an attack, warning that could cause more harm than good.

While there are some options to shippers trying to fend off carbine-toting freebooters, it’s going to take multiple arms of the law, military and a healthy dose of common sense to curb the problem.

“We’re setting up essentially a surrogate legal system … to actually provide some kind of legal consequences to these pirates,” Michel said. “Absent that, these pirates have every incentive to go out and continue doing what they’re doing.”

Be sure to tune in this morning at 1030 EST for our interview with security consultant Jake Allen in a live podcast.

– Christian

Share |

February 18th, 2009 | Around the Globe | 434612 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/02/18/us-sees-test-run-with-captured-pirates-the-entire-story/US+Sees+%27Test+Run%27+With+Captured+Pirates+%28The+Entire+Story%292009-02-18+13%3A36%3A48Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « US Hopes to Set Piracy Precedent With Polaris Case | Boots on the Ground — With Guest Jake Allen from The Combat Operator » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. TB says:
    February 18, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Did those 18th and 19th century int’l piracy laws distinguish between citizens of a state and non-persons? I don’t know anything about those laws, but the fact that these pirates come from a failed state might be a legal issue to be sorted out.
    Its good that we’re exploring the issues now before we start a Global War on Piracy and end up with hundreds of prisoners and shaky legal ground to play with.

    Reply
  2. Byron Skinner says:
    February 18, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    Good Evening Mike,
    I don’t want to get into dueling Constitutional quotes here but the copy of the Constitution that I have deals with piracy under Section 8, that expresses the powers of Congress, “To define and punish piracies and Felonies committed on the high seas, and Offenses against the Laws of Nations.” This is a pretty open ended statement as it was intended to be, but surly gives Congress to grant the Navy any authority that is necessary to deal with this problem anywhere and against the vessels of any state or combination of states. From what I can find the U.S. Code last dealt with piracy in 1832. I’m sure there has been some laws to deal with specific events such as the Civil War since then, but a revisit to the laws of piracy is long over due.
    Really all this is in the hands of Congress. I know for the past eight years we have had an administration that has publicly stated that anything the President does in legal, John Yo, and an arrogant President that self appointed himself as the “Decider in Chief.” This is really a decision that should be made by Congress and not President Obama.
    President Obama has stated many time that he believes in the Constitution and here is a chance to show that he does. Other then for emergency and expressly temporary actions to protect United States lives and property, the military should back away until Congress provides operational guidelines and expressed authorities.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  3. jsallison says:
    February 20, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    shoot out of hand and toss over the side. Why are we discussing this?

    Reply
  4. Byron Skinner says:
    February 21, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Good Morning jsallison,
    A quick answer to you question. We as a people are not Nazis. For anyone interested in where this concept can go I would suggest reading; “Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans”: by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen.
    The United States has a Constitution that not only protects property rights but also human rights, without that we are the same as the lawless pirates. I don’t think that’s what most Americans want to be. Their maybe some exceptions I’m sure.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      RE: "The JOE discusses at length perilous...
      SMSgt Mac
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I'm sure they will solve...
      STemplar
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      So there is your Affordable Weapon....
      drm
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just found out that Taiwan's...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just keep in mind that the current...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      For once I have to agree with Byron Skinner....
      pfcem
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      f-22 article by bill sweetMan (page no. 102):...
      popular science
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Thunder350, There is no 'out of control' cost increase....
      pfcem
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      I would like to see any conclusive data showing the...
      @Earlydawn
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      King of Fighters F-22 Gets Killed by Humble T-38 Training...
      gizmodo
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage