DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Confronting UnRestricted Warfare

Confronting UnRestricted Warfare

coleman-unrestricted.jpg

When you examine UnRestricted Warfare (URW) a work published by Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui of the Peoples Liberation Army, you will find that there are multiple modalities that can be used in this type of conflict. We have examined this concept and identified 15 modalities of UnRestriced warfare. Examining the URW construct, we found that cyber warfare is directly related to three of the fifteen modalities — information & media warfare, telecommunications & network warfare and technology warfare and is supportive of ever other modality.

The concept of URW brings to light alternative methods of attack that can be launched by a small group of individuals on anyone from anywhere in the world against a stronger and more powerful nation. There are no declarations of war; no uniforms — just inflicted damage on an adversary. The blind, sucker-punch attacks are not designed to control areas but rather to influence public opinion, political policies and the opinions of the mass population. When contemplating URW, it is important not to fall victim to singularity. It is uncommon for only one modality to be used in an assault or an attack. Multi-modal attacks will become the modus operandi of URW warriors.

The nature and characteristics of the threat that UnRestricted Warfare poses continues to raise concerns for military leaders, law enforcement and security experts around the world. The angst has grown to the point where subject matter experts will assemble on March 24–25 at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL) to discuss the strategic imperatives and identify integrated strategy, analysis, and technology options that enhance interagency cooperation to respond to four distinct modalities of attack-cyber, resource, economic and financial and terrorist threats.

UnRestricted Warfare represents the tactics of choice in the age of globalization. In URW domain there are no rule, no limits and nothing is forbidden. We can expect our adversaries to employ these modalities to wage integrated URW attacks that exploit their targets diverse areas of vulnerability. Nations must rapidly retool, retrain and reevaluate their defenses against each of these fifteen modalities.

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

March 3rd, 2009 | Cyber-warfare | 436513 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/03/03/confronting-unrestricted-warfare/Confronting+UnRestricted+Warfare2009-03-03+14%3A06%3A22Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Tues — Fire for Effect | Of MRAPs, IEDs and M1114s » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. stephen russell says:
    March 3, 2009 at 10:09 am

    THis is the new threat to the West & the US.
    URW is the next Ongoing world war.
    24/7 War ON all Fronts.
    Must be Ready & have DoD able & ready or lose this war.
    Then add terrorist strikes amid the above.
    & triple Hacking assults on cybersystems.

    Reply
  2. Carl says:
    March 3, 2009 at 11:29 am

    This is the future of conflict. The bad news is the future is here today. QUESTION — could a foreign power be manipulating our stock market?

    Reply
  3. Joel says:
    March 3, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    I doubt we get to blame another power for our economic woes, however don’t be surprised if some of the rogue regimes out there with stronger economies use some of that economic capital to manipulate weaker markets.
    And don’t be surprised if most or all of those modalities get lumped together as terrorism.

    Reply
  4. Brian says:
    March 3, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    Watch out. Don’t let that big chunk of sky hit you in the head.

    Reply
  5. Oblat says:
    March 3, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    >Watch out. Don’t let that big chunk of sky hit you in the head.
    I think thats covered under 3) Enviromental Warfare
    But Kevin is missing a whole pile of important one for instance:
    16) Consultant Warfare — One of the greatest threats facing the DoD as we speak.
    Not to mention
    17) Pet Warfare
    18) Customer Warfare
    19) Bathroom Warfare
    What I want to know is when I look at my self in the mirror each morning who’s to blame and how we are going to retaliate.

    Reply
  6. Drake says:
    March 3, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    Yes, many of those tactics have been in use even before there were nation states, but it misses the point of what the book was trying to do, which was to broaden the outlook of Chinese miltary planners on how to deal with the U.S.‘s perceived strengths(in my humble opinion).

    Reply
  7. Byron Skinner says:
    March 3, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    Is their anyone here old enough to have read this before. Welcome to” Mao’s Little Red Book 2.1″.
    Anybody who grew up in the 60’s and had any political awareness what so ever has read “The Little Red Book”, it was a small book that came with a bright red vinyl cover, meant to be carried in one’s pocket and to read the inspirational messages of Chairman Mao, when ever he/she wasn’t involved in working for the people.
    Towards the end of the 60’s a companion vol. came out by Cho En Lai called “The People’s War”. It wasn’t much of a seller, only a few dozen million.
    It is said that “The Little Red Book was the most popular book of the decade with better then double the sales of all types of the Bible.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  8. PeterB says:
    March 3, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    Actually…
    TDS4S at March 3, 2009 01:58 PM
    No, I dont think it is about how the Chinese will “attack” America!
    I think it is rather more about how China is vulnerable to attack.
    Both from Nation States, like America, but also (and more likely) from none nation state actors.

    Reply
  9. demophilus says:
    March 3, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    @ Oblat:
    You forgot 20) PowerPoint slide warfare and 21) Warfare warfare.
    But I guess 20) is part of 7) and 8), and 21) is part of 6). Or, maybe warfare warfare is “restricted” warfare, kinda. Seems “international law warfare” would be, too.
    WADR, I think maybe someone needs to bone up on the perils of Aristotelianism, or excess categorization. Like, try drawing a Venn diagram of these 15 modalities, and see where that takes you.
    Sometimes it’s better to use fuzzier logic, and not overthink the problem, if there is one.
    And if there really is some massive, covert, unrestricted war between the US and China, what would you call hanging a lot of bad paper on them, and then inflating our currency via a “stimulus” bill to make it all worthless? Would that be modality 2), 4), 9), 10), 11), or 15)?
    Would it be a masterstroke of pure genius, or just a Chinese fire drill?

    Reply
  10. Ted says:
    March 3, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    Well it appears that the non-professional filter is not working on here. I hate when that happens!!! You guys need to grow up or go back to Facebook with the rest of the kids!

    Reply
  11. bdwilcox says:
    March 3, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    Carl, you could be right:
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​8​t​f​R​Q​I​L​8​IKE

    Reply
  12. FAB7766 says:
    March 4, 2009 at 11:46 am

    YOU FOOLS ARE arguing and the BOOK IS PUBLISHED ALREADY!!!! GO Read it!

    Reply
  13. Karthik says:
    November 7, 2009 at 4:19 am

    URW concepts are not their own it is taken ancient Indian books / Text

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Every person posting here has made good points,...
      eyes_up
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Re: LAAR–just expand the UAV programs
      bjackson
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      As an European living in Germany I would have love to see...
      fightingirish
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Even if you reduced the buy to zero you’d still be...
      Blight
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage