<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday — Fire for Effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:26:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/#comment-82492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4396#comment-82492</guid>
		<description>saw this and thought about how the USAF does not use the F-117 anymore
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saw this and thought about how the USAF does not use the F-117 anymore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WJS</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/#comment-97565</link>
		<dc:creator>WJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4396#comment-97565</guid>
		<description>I thought for sure the commercial would have F-22&#039;s in it but who says the bombers are over the US anyway.  Just in the feeling of the  commercial I&#039;d have to give it an A+.  That&#039;s a good one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought for sure the commercial would have F-22’s in it but who says the bombers are over the US anyway.  Just in the feeling of the  commercial I’d have to give it an A+.  That’s a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foreign.Boy</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/#comment-82490</link>
		<dc:creator>Foreign.Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4396#comment-82490</guid>
		<description>Menh... The Army &amp; The Marines have the best in my opinion.  I also think its Ironic to have &#039;bombers&#039; doing patrols over U.S. instead of &#039;fighters&#039;.
I also find the commercial very odd.
I think that its plain creepy &amp; voyeuristic.
The commercials that would have been good would be selling the speed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Menh… The Army &amp; The Marines have the best in my opinion.  I also think its Ironic to have ‘bombers’ doing patrols over U.S. instead of ‘fighters’.<br />
I also find the commercial very odd.<br />
I think that its plain creepy &amp; voyeuristic.<br />
The commercials that would have been good would be selling the speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

