<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Wednesday — Fire for Effect</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/#comment-82492</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:33:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4396#comment-82492</guid> <description>saw this and thought about how the USAF does not use the F-117 anymore </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saw this and thought about how the USAF does not use the F-117 anymore</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WJS</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/#comment-97565</link> <dc:creator>WJS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:06:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4396#comment-97565</guid> <description>I thought for sure the commercial would have F-22&#039;s in it but who says the bombers are over the US anyway.  Just in the feeling of the  commercial I&#039;d have to give it an A+.  That&#039;s a good one. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought for sure the commercial would have F-22’s in it but who says the bombers are over the US anyway.  Just in the feeling of the  commercial I’d have to give it an A+.  That’s a good one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Foreign.Boy</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/17/wednesday-fire-for-effect-5/#comment-82490</link> <dc:creator>Foreign.Boy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4396#comment-82490</guid> <description>Menh... The Army &amp; The Marines have the best in my opinion.  I also think its Ironic to have &#039;bombers&#039; doing patrols over U.S. instead of &#039;fighters&#039;. I also find the commercial very odd. I think that its plain creepy &amp; voyeuristic. The commercials that would have been good would be selling the speed. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Menh… The Army &amp; The Marines have the best in my opinion.  I also think its Ironic to have ‘bombers’ doing patrols over U.S. instead of ‘fighters’.<br /> I also find the commercial very odd.<br /> I think that its plain creepy &amp; voyeuristic.<br /> The commercials that would have been good would be selling the speed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 674/679 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 03:05:43 -->
