<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Tactical Impact: Speed vs. Accuracy</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Rhyno327</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97696</link> <dc:creator>Rhyno327</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97696</guid> <description>Vickers is a fine marksman. Very informative, accuracy is key. I would like to see the 6.8mm be the standard round, but its not gonna happen. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vickers is a fine marksman. Very informative, accuracy is key. I would like to see the 6.8mm be the standard round, but its not gonna happen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Deepy</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97695</link> <dc:creator>Deepy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:37:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97695</guid> <description>I am telling U, almost all ammunition is basically highly penetrating, only M855 cannot get through 5 cm of concrete ;) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am telling U, almost all ammunition is basically highly penetrating, only M855 cannot get through 5 cm of concrete ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ptsfp</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97694</link> <dc:creator>Ptsfp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:43:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97694</guid> <description>Yeah, the &quot;Tour of Duty&quot; show on the Military channel showed an officer with an AK clip confiscated from some Taliban. Sure enough it was full of black tip ammo. Also my brother-in-law had one go through a steel MG shield and it just missed him by an inch or two. I just didn&#039;t realize that Armor Piercing ammo was that common in Iraq/ Afghan. Left over from the Russkies I guess... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the “Tour of Duty” show on the Military channel showed an officer with an AK clip confiscated from some Taliban. Sure enough it was full of black tip ammo. Also my brother-in-law had one go through a steel MG shield and it just missed him by an inch or two.<br /> I just didn’t realize that Armor Piercing ammo was that common in Iraq/ Afghan. Left over from the Russkies I guess…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Deepy</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97693</link> <dc:creator>Deepy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:15:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97693</guid> <description>To Sven: - First round isnt propably gonna penetrate but it will seriously damage integrity of the plate. Therefore second or third round might be able to punch through. To Ptsfp: - AK round is basically high-powered penetrating round. It doesnt break, it doesnt shatter, it doesnt mushroom, it just penetrates therefore its far more penetrating than M4 round (i take standard round, not some hardcore penetrator). Video: I dont get it, these guys R supposed to be top-class, they use HK416 and they dont even get a goddamn compensating muzzle brake? Our guys in cz army can shoot better on full auto than this and even with vz58 using 7,62x39. Who doesnt believe here is a video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvC_oQmqUKE (full auto - 02:41) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Sven:<br /> – First round isnt propably gonna penetrate but it will seriously damage integrity of the plate. Therefore second or third round might be able to punch through.<br /> To Ptsfp:<br /> – AK round is basically high-powered penetrating round. It doesnt break, it doesnt shatter, it doesnt mushroom, it just penetrates therefore its far more penetrating than M4 round (i take standard round, not some hardcore penetrator).<br /> Video:<br /> I dont get it, these guys R supposed to be top-class, they use HK416 and they dont even get a goddamn compensating muzzle brake? Our guys in cz army can shoot better on full auto than this and even with vz58 using 7,62x39. Who doesnt believe here is a video.<br /> <span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/rvC_oQmqUKE/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span><br /> (full auto — 02:41)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ptsfp</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97692</link> <dc:creator>Ptsfp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:29:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97692</guid> <description>Thanks Sven, Yeah, that is what I thought. I didn&#039;t think they would all have AP rounds. Unless Iran was supplying them or they were large stashes of ex-Iraq stuff. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sven,<br /> Yeah, that is what I thought. I didn’t think they would all have AP rounds.<br /> Unless Iran was supplying them or they were large stashes of ex-Iraq stuff.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sven Ortmann</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97691</link> <dc:creator>Sven Ortmann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:58:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97691</guid> <description>@Ptsfp: AP cartridges with very hard and dense material are quite expensive, but normal steel-core bullets aren&#039;t. The latter may be in wide-spread use. 7.62x39 AP shouldn&#039;t be able to penetrate level IV plates anyway. The video is too limited in its scope. It&#039;s not just about hitting and saving ammo. It&#039;s also about different training levels, psychological effect, sights, weapon type and distance. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ptsfp:<br /> AP cartridges with very hard and dense material are quite expensive, but normal steel-core bullets aren’t. The latter may be in wide-spread use. 7.62x39 AP shouldn’t be able to penetrate level IV plates anyway.<br /> The video is too limited in its scope. It’s not just about hitting and saving ammo. It’s also about different training levels, psychological effect, sights, weapon type and distance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: P.J. Busche</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97690</link> <dc:creator>P.J. Busche</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:39:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97690</guid> <description>Outstanding video.  Every infantryman  and indfantry officer should see this one. P.J. Busche SSgt, USMC retired Semper Fidelis </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding video.  Every infantryman  and indfantry officer should see this one.<br /> P.J. Busche<br /> SSgt, USMC retired<br /> Semper Fidelis</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Camp</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97689</link> <dc:creator>Camp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97689</guid> <description>Me thinks, it&#039;s time to visit the range, and get away from this damn computer! &quot;.50 BMG Vs. 18 Hard Drives&quot; ~HardOCP http://www.viddler.com/explore/HardOCP/videos/32/169.142/ (Starts off with pics &amp; music, then shows the vid.) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me thinks, it’s time to visit the range, and get away from this damn computer!<br /> ”.50 BMG Vs. 18 Hard Drives” ~HardOCP<br /> <a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/HardOCP/videos/32/169.142/" rel="nofollow">http://www.viddler.com/explore/HardOCP/videos/32/169.142/</a><br /> (Starts off with pics &amp; music, then shows the vid.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jim</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-97688</link> <dc:creator>jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 05:29:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-97688</guid> <description>Very well produced video... but I was kind of expecting something a little bit more interesting from delta vets... If that is representative of the rest of the show,  I wouldn&#039;t be watching anymore. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well produced video… but I was kind of expecting something a little bit more interesting from delta vets…<br /> If that is representative of the rest of the show,  I wouldn’t be watching anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/20/tactical-impact-speed-vs-accuracy/#comment-82631</link> <dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:10:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4402#comment-82631</guid> <description>Given the collective experience of the hosts maybe their trying to tailor it to people like me who don&#039;t have basic knowleadge of firearms and tactics. I liked what I saw and hope they&#039;ll increase the depth. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the collective experience of the hosts maybe their trying to tailor it to people like me who don’t have basic knowleadge of firearms and tactics. I liked what I saw and hope they’ll increase the depth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 747/751 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:54:14 -->
