<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: BREAK-BREAK: Ospreys Grounded (Update)</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:12:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: GHD Straighteners</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-97768</link> <dc:creator>GHD Straighteners</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-97768</guid> <description>buy cheap nokia n95 experience without nokia mobile learning is better than learning without excperi-ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose headphones is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the apple touch past. http://www.leadsoftstore.com/ </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buy cheap nokia n95 experience without nokia mobile learning is better than learning without excperi-ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose headphones is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the apple touch past. <a
href="http://www.leadsoftstore.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.leadsoftstore.com/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JonA</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-97764</link> <dc:creator>JonA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:37:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-97764</guid> <description>Oblat says &quot;The objective of the Osprey program is to get the entire fleet of 138 into service before any of them are tested in combat.&quot;
I guess he hasn&#039;t heard that the problems werediscovered on four Ospreys operated out of Al Asad Air Base, Iraq, by Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 266.
In other words, the Osprey is already in the combat zone, and has been there since VMM-263 first deployed to Iraq with Ospreys in September 2007... a year and a half ago! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oblat says “The objective of the Osprey program is to get the entire fleet of 138 into service before any of them are tested in combat.“<br
/> I guess he hasn’t heard that the problems werediscovered on four Ospreys operated out of Al Asad Air Base, Iraq, by Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 266.<br
/> In other words, the Osprey is already in the combat zone, and has been there since VMM-263 first deployed to Iraq with Ospreys in September 2007… a year and a half ago!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg J.</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-82725</link> <dc:creator>Greg J.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-82725</guid> <description>I wondered where that bolt went? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered where that bolt went?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-82724</link> <dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:29:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-82724</guid> <description>Looks like Ospreys may have a design problem.
&quot;Fifth V-22 with loose bolts points to design problem&quot;
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/03/26/324440/fifth-v-22-with-loose-bolts-points-to-design-problem.html </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Ospreys may have a design problem.<br
/> “Fifth V-22 with loose bolts points to design problem“<br
/> <a
href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/03/26/324440/fifth-v-22-with-loose-bolts-points-to-design-problem.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/03/26/324440/fifth-v-22-with-loose-bolts-points-to-design-problem.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: exphrog</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-97763</link> <dc:creator>exphrog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:04:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-97763</guid> <description>Red stripes happen all the time in every military aircraft.  They usually have nothing to do with the aircraft itself, but something like a bad lot of replacement parts, a procedure in a manual revealed to be faulty, etc.  This is a non-event.
I&#039;m one of those who may be flying the V-22 to a &quot;hot&quot; zone.  I have no reservations about it.  It is the most capable rotorcraft in the world, bar none. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red stripes happen all the time in every military aircraft.  They usually have nothing to do with the aircraft itself, but something like a bad lot of replacement parts, a procedure in a manual revealed to be faulty, etc.  This is a non-event.<br
/> I’m one of those who may be flying the V-22 to a “hot” zone.  I have no reservations about it.  It is the most capable rotorcraft in the world, bar none.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Valcan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-82722</link> <dc:creator>Valcan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-82722</guid> <description>ITs a new system....it has kinks....like alot of new systems. IF our first helicopters had killed there pilots a few times or had maintanence problems would it have been better for the US to say oh well f&#039;it to dangerous helicopters...what a stupid idea... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITs a new system.…it has kinks.…like alot of new systems. IF our first helicopters had killed there pilots a few times or had maintanence problems would it have been better for the US to say oh well f’it to dangerous helicopters…what a stupid idea…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Valcan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-82721</link> <dc:creator>Valcan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:58:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-82721</guid> <description>OH shiz....a f22 has crashed in cali </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH shiz.…a f22 has crashed in cali</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wembley</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-97762</link> <dc:creator>Wembley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:35:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-97762</guid> <description>Move along, nothing to see here...
..this time.
Any Osprey optimist want to place odds on one of these &quot;minor problems&quot; killing someone? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move along, nothing to see here…<br
/> ..this time.<br
/> Any Osprey optimist want to place odds on one of these “minor problems” killing someone?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-97761</link> <dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-97761</guid> <description>Check out flightglobal, it&#039;s Osprey day there.
http://www.flightglobal.com/home/default.aspx </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out flightglobal, it’s Osprey day there.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.flightglobal.com/home/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.flightglobal.com/home/default.aspx</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/03/24/break-break-ospreys-grounded-update/comment-page-1/#comment-97760</link> <dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:06:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4408#comment-97760</guid> <description>US Marine Corps aviation branch plans to invest in fighter jets, helicopters, transports and UAVs
&quot;First, he says, a wave of recent news reports have confused the USMC&#039;s policy about a purported re-engining programme for the Rolls-Royce 1107C-powered Bell Boeing MV-22.
It is true that the 1107C&#039;s reliability has fallen short of original expectations, says Trautman, but a power-by-the-hour deal signed several years ago ensures that the USMC has all the engines it needs at a predetermined cost.
The real issue being debated is not re-engining, but repricing the maintenance deal with R-R, which has suffered financially due to the 1107C&#039;s reliability problems, he says.
The USMC acknowledges it needs to pay R-R a higher price to compensate for the 1107C&#039;s lower reliability levels. The USMC says it is currently seeing an &quot;on-wing&quot; time of around 450h for the engine.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Marine Corps aviation branch plans to invest in fighter jets, helicopters, transports and UAVs<br
/> “First, he says, a wave of recent news reports have confused the USMC’s policy about a purported re-engining programme for the Rolls-Royce 1107C-powered Bell Boeing MV-22.<br
/> It is true that the 1107C’s reliability has fallen short of original expectations, says Trautman, but a power-by-the-hour deal signed several years ago ensures that the USMC has all the engines it needs at a predetermined cost.<br
/> The real issue being debated is not re-engining, but repricing the maintenance deal with R-R, which has suffered financially due to the 1107C’s reliability problems, he says.<br
/> The USMC acknowledges it needs to pay R-R a higher price to compensate for the 1107C’s lower reliability levels. The USMC says it is currently seeing an “on-wing” time of around 450h for the engine.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/25 queries in 0.015 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-20 06:51:01 -->