DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Video Lounge » Tactical Impact: Stalingrad

Tactical Impact: Stalingrad

Larry Vickers and Aaron Roberts from Tactical Impact examine the weaponry used by Wehrmacht soldiers in Stalingrad — taking a look at the advantages and disadvantages of long gun vs. a submachine gun in an urban fight.

Thought you might enjoy a little Friday afternoon vid sesh…

– Christian

Share |

April 3rd, 2009 | Video Lounge | 442711 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/Tactical+Impact%3A+Stalingrad2009-04-03+19%3A00%3A15Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Is NLOS Worth It? | Epic Fail: North Korean Bottle Rocket Assumes Underwater Trajectory » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Todd says:
    April 3, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    fun video, but I would think that their conclusions are no brainers.
    Long gun in building bad, SMG in building good
    SMG outdoors bad, Long gun outdoors good
    ya don’t say!

    Reply
  2. bdwilcox says:
    April 3, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    Like I said, they should have called this show “Common Sense 101″.
    They should also teach the hosts to look at camera cues so they face the camera when speaking.

    Reply
  3. Ptsfp says:
    April 3, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    Gotta love the German engineering though. The MP40 and the Stg44 are just impressive weapons.
    Thank goodness that Hitler hated the Stg44. I wonder how things would have been different if they had used it instead of the k98…

    Reply
  4. stephen russell says:
    April 3, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    Ive fired the MP40 subgun in :gunstorelasvegas​.com & it was smooth firing & nil recoil, BUT gun had to get serviced constantly pre post firing.
    Nice work, Gun tends to Jam?
    Fee to shoot 35.00,
    GunStore, Las Vegas NV.
    Tropicana Blvd.

    Reply
  5. bdwilcox says:
    April 3, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    Kalashnikov loved the STG44, too, obviously. ;)
    The FG-42 was an impressive weapon for its time, as well.
    BTW, the MP-40 was a reworked MP-38. The MP-38 used too many machined parts so they redesigned it as the MP-40 to use almost all stamped metal parts.
    Grandma likes it :o )
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=–K3X6rptE4

    Reply
  6. kaltes says:
    April 4, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    So basically we get to see 2 old guys playing with guns at a firing range while stating the “sky is blue”-level obvious. ANYONE could have done this. Anyone with a shred of common sense could have done the same.

    Reply
  7. KragCulloden says:
    April 4, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    That was pathetic.

    Reply
  8. mike says:
    April 4, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    The ‘real’ impact at Stalingrad was not from these popguns, it was from the 5,000 Soviet artillery pieces of General Voronov, aka Stalin’s ‘High Priest of the Cannon’.
    They were not quite hubcap-to-hubcap like the legend says, but averaged three to four hundred to a mile dug in along the Volga and the Don. The barrage started in late November. General Voronov was quoted as saying “There are only two salvations from this hurricane of fire

    Reply
  9. gruntdoc91 says:
    April 4, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    everyone stop complaining. at least its on t.v. and not some hezbollah like obama fest (i.e. cnn, msnbc etc.) im glas to get watch any gun being fired by professionals on t.v. and not the same ole prime time hold my glock sideways gangbanger crap. its a natural balance to the way liberals portray guns on a daily basis.

    Reply
  10. jake says:
    April 4, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    Neat, but agree that it’s a “sky is blue” show for the informed. How did the weapons stack up vs. the competition? Also, I didn’t realize Andy Richter could shoot…

    Reply
  11. jimss says:
    April 5, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    Not to worry, the Russians (as most other countries) had similar bolt-action>sub-machine arrangements (FIX BAYONETS!). Though the Germans did have the MG34/42 that would own the streets.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      With the exception of his Boeing Tanker blindspot ;-) ...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i heard recently that rules of engagement in...
      mad mike
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or...
      bduff509
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: But their advantage is reduced by daytime...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And to get back on topic…Don’t think...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: "shown your contempt for every service...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      135,000,000 $ each for a fighter aircraft that's...
      Joseph
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Why not bring in dirgibles( the original...
      mike rose
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Just give Burt Rutaan a Million bucks and he will...
      Dale
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage