<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Tactical Impact: Stalingrad</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jimss</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-98063</link> <dc:creator>jimss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:47:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-98063</guid> <description>Not to worry, the Russians (as most other countries) had similar bolt-action&gt;sub-machine arrangements (FIX BAYONETS!). Though the Germans did have the MG34/42 that would own the streets. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to worry, the Russians (as most other countries) had similar bolt-action&gt;sub-machine arrangements (FIX BAYONETS!). Though the Germans did have the MG34/42 that would own the streets.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jake</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-98062</link> <dc:creator>jake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:15:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-98062</guid> <description>Neat, but agree that it&#039;s a &quot;sky  is blue&quot; show for the informed. How did the weapons stack up vs. the competition? Also, I didn&#039;t realize Andy Richter could shoot... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat, but agree that it’s a “sky  is blue” show for the informed. How did the weapons stack up vs. the competition? Also, I didn’t realize Andy Richter could shoot…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gruntdoc91</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-98061</link> <dc:creator>gruntdoc91</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:23:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-98061</guid> <description>everyone stop complaining. at least its on t.v. and not some hezbollah like obama fest (i.e. cnn, msnbc etc.) im glas to get watch any gun being fired by professionals on t.v. and not the same ole prime time hold my glock sideways gangbanger crap. its a natural balance to the way liberals portray guns on a daily basis. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everyone stop complaining. at least its on t.v. and not some hezbollah like obama fest (i.e. cnn, msnbc etc.) im glas to get watch any gun being fired by professionals on t.v. and not the same ole prime time hold my glock sideways gangbanger crap. its a natural balance to the way liberals portray guns on a daily basis.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-98060</link> <dc:creator>mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:47:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-98060</guid> <description>The &#039;real&#039; impact at Stalingrad was not from these popguns, it was from the 5,000 Soviet artillery pieces of General Voronov, aka Stalin&#039;s &#039;High Priest of the Cannon&#039;. They were not quite hubcap-to-hubcap like the legend says, but averaged three to four hundred to a mile dug in along the Volga and the Don. The barrage started in late November.  General Voronov was quoted as saying &quot;There are only two salvations from this hurricane of fire </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ‘real’ impact at Stalingrad was not from these popguns, it was from the 5,000 Soviet artillery pieces of General Voronov, aka Stalin’s ‘High Priest of the Cannon’.<br /> They were not quite hubcap-to-hubcap like the legend says, but averaged three to four hundred to a mile dug in along the Volga and the Don. The barrage started in late November.  General Voronov was quoted as saying “There are only two salvations from this hurricane of fire</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: KragCulloden</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-83119</link> <dc:creator>KragCulloden</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:46:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-83119</guid> <description>That was pathetic. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was pathetic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kaltes</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-83118</link> <dc:creator>kaltes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:36:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-83118</guid> <description>So basically we get to see 2 old guys playing with guns at a firing range while stating the &quot;sky is blue&quot;-level obvious. ANYONE could have done this. Anyone with a shred of common sense could have done the same. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically we get to see 2 old guys playing with guns at a firing range while stating the “sky is blue”-level obvious. ANYONE could have done this. Anyone with a shred of common sense could have done the same.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bdwilcox</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-98059</link> <dc:creator>bdwilcox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:41:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-98059</guid> <description>Kalashnikov loved the STG44, too, obviously. ;) The FG-42 was an impressive weapon for its time, as well. BTW, the MP-40 was a reworked MP-38.  The MP-38 used too many machined parts so they redesigned it as the MP-40 to use almost all stamped metal parts. Grandma likes it :o) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--K3X6rptE4 </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kalashnikov loved the STG44, too, obviously. ;)<br /> The FG-42 was an impressive weapon for its time, as well.<br /> BTW, the MP-40 was a reworked MP-38.  The MP-38 used too many machined parts so they redesigned it as the MP-40 to use almost all stamped metal parts.<br /> Grandma likes it :o)<br /> <span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/--K3X6rptE4/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-98058</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:55:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-98058</guid> <description>Ive fired the MP40 subgun in :gunstorelasvegas.com &amp; it was smooth firing &amp; nil recoil, BUT gun had to get serviced constantly pre post firing. Nice work, Gun tends to Jam? Fee to shoot 35.00, GunStore, Las Vegas NV. Tropicana Blvd. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive fired the MP40 subgun in :gunstorelasvegas.com &amp; it was smooth firing &amp; nil recoil, BUT gun had to get serviced constantly pre post firing.<br /> Nice work, Gun tends to Jam?<br /> Fee to shoot 35.00,<br /> GunStore, Las Vegas NV.<br /> Tropicana Blvd.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ptsfp</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-83115</link> <dc:creator>Ptsfp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:36:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-83115</guid> <description>Gotta love the German engineering though. The MP40 and the Stg44 are just impressive weapons. Thank goodness that Hitler hated the Stg44. I wonder how things would have been different if they had used it instead of the k98... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love the German engineering though. The MP40 and the Stg44 are just impressive weapons.<br /> Thank goodness that Hitler hated the Stg44. I wonder how things would have been different if they had used it instead of the k98…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bdwilcox</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/04/03/tactical-impact-stalingrad/#comment-98057</link> <dc:creator>bdwilcox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:26:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4427#comment-98057</guid> <description>Like I said, they should have called this show &quot;Common Sense 101&quot;. They should also teach the hosts to look at camera cues so they face the camera when speaking. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said, they should have called this show “Common Sense 101″.<br /> They should also teach the hosts to look at camera cues so they face the camera when speaking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 747/751 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:45:11 -->
