DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Door Kickers » Inside the Shot Heard ‘Round the World

Inside the Shot Heard ‘Round the World

maersk-life-boat.jpg

We’ve got some details trick­ling in about the specifics of the SEAL sniper shots on the pirates hold­ing the Maersk-Alabama’s cap­tain, Richard Phillips.

The Combat Operator’s Jake Allen — not a for­mer SEAL, but a Marine infantry offi­cer and pri­vate mil­i­tary con­trac­tor and secu­rity con­sul­tant with sourc­ing in the Teams — had no detailed infor­ma­tion on the actual shot, but described the over­all tech­niques used by the SEAL team.

First of all, mul­ti­ple sources indi­cate this was con­ducted by SEAL Team VI, aka Naval Special Warfare Development Group, aka “DevGru.” This is the naval equiv­a­lent of Delta Force.

Allen says the team likely were on the intel of the inci­dent very soon after news hit the wires about the cap­ture and were already well in advance of devel­op­ing a plan to res­cue Phillips before they deployed to the USS Bainbridge.

It’s unclear why the team decided to para­chute onto the scene under cover of dark­ness from a C-​​17 with rafts. One pos­si­bil­ity is that this was a far more covert entry than sim­ply land­ing on the destroyer via heli­copter, or Allen says it could have been due to range restrictions…did the DevGru guys travel straight from Little Creek, Va.? Probably.

There was no rest and relax­ation or get­ting rid of the jet­lag for the team, Allen esti­mates, they were plan­ning and rehers­ing shortly after arriv­ing aboard the Bainbridge. Delay is, how­ever, in their favor, Allen said, since food was run­ning out, sleep was short and the weather was wors­en­ing for the ill-​​trained pirates who prob­a­bly were begin­ning to real­ize they bit off more than they could chew.

Whether it was luck or plan­ning, clearly the idea to tow the life boat behind the Bainbridge and reel it into closer range made a sniper take­down much more of a rea­son­able pos­si­bil­ity than any other tac­tic, sources say. A shot of 80–90 feet — even at night and in rolling seas — is a cake­walk for DevGru SEALs.

“These guys can put three rounds onto the head of a quar­ter at that range,” Allen told me.

And let’s not get car­ried away with the sea state, says DT con­trib­u­tor Joe Buff. A multi-​​thousand ton destroyer is a pretty sta­ble plat­form in any but the most tumul­tuous sea states and makes dial­ing in a shot on an admit­tedly toss­ing life raft more doable — a smart plat­form for the Team to oper­ate from.

We also have some infor­ma­tion — uncon­firmed, though we’re work­ing on it — about how the shots were taken and what was used. Our firearms expert Eric Poole who writes for Tactical-​​Life posits that the snipers were using the MK-​​11 .308 sniper sys­tem man­u­fac­tured by Knights Armament Co. This weapons is awe­some, by the way (I’ve shot it a few times myself) and, if this is indeed what the shoot­ers used, would mark a major, high-​​profile depar­ture from legacy think­ing about snip­ing which holds bolt-​​action rifles as the Gold Standard or marksmanship.

Poole fig­ures the DevGru frog­men removed the “over­pow­ered” standard-​​issue Leupold scopes and opted for the Aimpoint CCO aug­mented by the PVS-​​14 night vision monoc­u­lar. Though the SEAL ver­sion of the MK-​​11 Mod 0 is issued with supres­sors, it’s unclear whether the oper­a­tors used them, but I’d bet a mil­lion bucks they did.

One other ques­tion (among many) remains open…were there three shots or four? Poole rea­sons, and Allen and I agree, that some­one had to shoot through the lifeboat win­dow first, then fire the kill shots. My lim­ited knowl­edge of bal­lis­tics leads me to believe the snipers could not rely on the effec­tive­ness of the one win­dow shot to actu­ally strike the tar­get where it was aimed based in the poten­tial deflec­tion of hit­ting that prob­a­bly plas­tic (glass) window.

Poole, Allen and Buff agree that this oper­a­tion was metic­u­lously planned and flaw­lessly exe­cuted. The DevGru SEALs devel­oped the sit­u­a­tion (with their inter­a­gency part­ners in the FBI and other OGAs), planned an attack and exe­cuted when the oppor­tu­nity pre­sented itself (and I don’t buy this “the cap­tain was in dan­ger” line the Pentagon and White House is try­ing to sell here…you mean to tell me Phillips hadn’t had a gun pointed at his back any­time before this?)…It was a kick butt oper­a­tion car­ried out by one of the best coun­tert­er­ror­ist units in the world and they deserve a huge HooYah from all of us…

– Christian

Share |

April 14th, 2009 | Door Kickers | 444537 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/04/14/inside-the-shot-heard-round-the-world/Inside+the+Shot+Heard+%27Round+the+World2009-04-14+19%3A20%3A11Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Boots on the Ground — Pirates vs. SEALs | Secretary Gates and the F-​​22 Raptor » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. John says:
    April 14, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    HooYah

    Reply
  2. Renaldo says:
    April 14, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    A USAF Special Tactics Team Parachuted in with the SEALS. Any knowl­edge about that. It was men­tioned by a USN 3 Star dur­ing a press inter­view. Not sure which net­work. CNN?

    Reply
  3. wacsog10 says:
    April 14, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    My, oh, my, just what do we have here?
    A wan­nybe with a key board killer com­mando?
    A ” Combat oper­a­tor aka Jake Allen, who is not a for­mer Seal” is quoted as giv­ing us infor­ma­tion that is ” not detailed” espe­cially about the over­all tech­niques.
    However to go on with the story we are informed that “Deg Gru” might have, or, might have not been around the area.
    When this sort of crap is writ­ten, espe­cially when it is prob­a­bly all writ­ten by a couch pota­toe WRMF dork, it becomes an insult to the men that did the job.

    Reply
  4. TDS4S says:
    April 14, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Wacsog, get a grip. The author is noty as cool as you. He gets paid to write about defense tech. He’s try­ing to put together a story about the defense tech used in this case. Not too many details out there so yes, he’s writ­ten an arti­cle based on a bunch of guesses. Best he could do. And when (if) the details come in, they won’t really be all that amaz­ing — basi­cally some guys got shot in the head with rifles — so if you don’t care then skip the arti­cle. Unless post­ing insults just makes you feel bet­ter about your­self?
    And Polaris… Try Googling “Law Enforcement Tech” or “Rational Choice Theory Among the Desperately Poor Tech” if you want to read arti­cles about the root causes of crime. The name of this web­site should be a hint that you won’t find those arti­cles here. This is mostly arti­cles about defense tech.
    But just in case you are too busy post­ing snotty com­ments, let me save you some time: the root causes of piracy are the same as the root causes of all crime — the ben­e­fits out­weigh the costs. The solu­tion is the same too — make the cost out­weigh the ben­e­fit. If that’s too expen­sive (or dis­taste­ful), then put up with the crime.

    Reply
  5. Valcan says:
    April 14, 2009 at 10:12 pm

    Reader update: ALI DDG line back up.…..
    http://​www​.defense​news​.com/​s​t​o​r​y​.​p​h​p​?​i​=​4​0​3​7​1​4​1​&​a​m​p​;​c​=​A​M​E​&​a​m​p​;​s​=​TOP
    Ok why dont they just update the burk line with the Zumwalt tech?
    “In fis­cal 2011, the Navy plans to order another ship for Northrop, DDG 114, and a ship for Bath, DDG 115. The three Burkes will be deliv­ered with an advanced new upgrade of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense sys­tem, hav­ing been designed with “open” sys­tems that can accept reg­u­lar soft­ware upgrades with­out the need for new com­put­ers.
    The Navy’s arrange­ment pro­vides “sig­nif­i­cant sta­bil­ity” for the ship­build­ing indus­trial base, Doss said, and ensures the U.S. will keep alive two ship­yards that can build big sur­face com­bat­ants. The ship­yards’ rep­re­sen­ta­tives in Congress praised the arrange­ment last week, although law­mak­ers must still approve the Navy’s plans in this year’s budget.”

    Reply
  6. Edward Liu says:
    April 14, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    @Renaldo: My under­stand­ing is that it’s fairly com­mon for USAF STS teams to insert with Seals, Army Special Forces, or Delta. They just don’t nor­mally get the cool news cov­er­age that Delta or the Seals tend to get. I don’t think any com­bat con­trollers they brought in would be call­ing in airstrikes on the lifeboat, but they are also trained at air-​​traffic con­trol and comms, both of which would have been use­ful skills to have in the sit­u­a­tion (would the Bainbridge have had ATC-​​trained sailors on board since it isn’t an air­craft car­rier?). If they had parares­cue jumpers, then I can imag­ine that a PJ was angling to be first on the lifeboat to pro­vide med­ical assis­tance if necessary.

    Reply
  7. Long John Silver says:
    April 14, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    The root cause for the ongo­ing piracy cri­sis is that there are no con­se­quences for piracy. Shoot enough pirates, and there is no piracy prob­lem.
    The entire point in invent­ing inter­na­tional law was to put a shiny happy face on exe­cut­ing pirates. When the world returns to first prin­ci­ples and starts shoot­ing pirates, piracy will go away.

    Reply
  8. Jack says:
    April 14, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    Polaris — why don’t you help them You seem to be so con­cerned about the crim­i­nals over there. I’m sure they’d “love” to have you ;-)

    Reply
  9. Sam says:
    April 14, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    Polaris,
    You make a good point. I was think­ing the same thing. How long would it take for Americans or any other nation­al­ity liv­ing in the same con­di­tions to do exactly the same thing? There used to be European pirates as well.

    Reply
  10. ProjectThor says:
    April 15, 2009 at 7:38 am

    Polaris IS a troll and pos­si­bly one of those E-​​jihadist/​American hater/​Eurotrash com­men­ta­tors that float to the sur­face, like a turd in a cesspool. Seems like he/​she/​it has noth­ing bet­ter to do than to try to get Americans wound up.
    Polaris, if you REALLY want to do some­thing for your cause, take a trip to Iraq, strap on some Semtex and go paint an Abrams with your­self.
    Have a nice day.

    Reply
  11. theboogyman says:
    April 15, 2009 at 8:43 am

    This is more of a state­ment than a response… did we need to send in our boys in chutes? why not? did we need to snipe em? sure why not… It seems the costs involved out­weigh a nor­mal ratio­nal response… and i think thats exactly what they wanted to show, and say.

    Reply
  12. McKellar says:
    April 15, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    Could the MV-​​22 Osprey have landed on a stan­dard LAMPS III helo deck? Are the Ospreys use­ful for VERTREP, or are we just stuck with the H-60’s?
    Also, has this inci­dent changed any­thing in terms of pro­cure­ment? People men­tion buy­ing a few extra Burkes, but aren’t the LCS designs meant for this kind of work? Has any­body thought about build­ing some corvettes or patrol craft using off-​​the-​​shelf designs (e.g. Saar V)? More Coast Guard cut­ters? Anything being brought out of moth­balls, like that minesweeper fleet we got laid up somewhere?

    Reply
  13. Mausers Rule says:
    April 15, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    Polaris was just ask­ing a question.

    Reply
  14. Long Dong Silver says:
    April 15, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Actually it was Renaldo. Polaris, don’t you know it is the Age of Aquarius!

    Reply
  15. Long Dong Silver says:
    April 15, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Actually it was Renaldo. Polaris, don’t you know it is the Age of Aquarius!

    Reply
  16. AbleFable says:
    April 15, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    The next hijacked ship will not be so lucky. The “pirates” have an extreamly humane record. Look it up before declar­ing them evil ter­ror­ist ani­mals. I think they have focused solely on the cargo and ran­som in the past. This is not an ide­o­log­i­cal issue, it’s busi­ness. Do you think they will play nice any­more? The next sailors may be pre-​​emtively killed, there would be no need for res­cue, DevGru… or whomever. just a cargo ship at sea. No media story, no glory no hostage = safer hijack­ing. Obama just con­de­mend some future sailors to death by show­ing off his machismo. He will learn even­tu­ally that you can never quench the American reichs thirst for blood.

    Reply
  17. Valcan says:
    April 15, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    And btw just because we may not agree with you doesnt give you the right to call us rednecks.…..plus you shouldnt be like that im a red­neck most red­necks i know are per­fectly nice ppl. :)

    Reply
  18. Sam says:
    April 16, 2009 at 4:04 am

    Maybe if the pirates die in increas­ingly large num­bers each time a US flagged ves­sel is jacked they will con­clude it might be a good idea to let those be. I don’t think we’ve arrived at that point yet, unfor­tu­nately. It’s prob­a­bly going to take another major inci­dent fol­lowed by some bomb­ing. Dunno if Obama will do that but I expect the ques­tion to be answered.

    Reply
  19. theboogyman says:
    April 16, 2009 at 6:44 am

    Polaris
    you are a troll. your also a pretty une­d­u­cated guy it seems. how does design­ing subs show you any­thing in the real world other than blue prints. Go back to the books dude, you got no place here.

    Reply
  20. BrownWater says:
    April 16, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    The US Navy has been bat­tle­ing piracy since the 1800’s. These guys had a choice and they chose the “easy” route and became theives. All this crap about they haven’t killed before etc..is retarted. Just because they didn’t kill before doesn’t mean they wouldn’t have killed sooner or later.
    DEV did an excel­lent mis­sion and the marks­man who took the shot’s is a mas­ter of his craft.

    Reply
  21. C-Low says:
    April 17, 2009 at 10:51 am

    “(and I don’t buy this “the cap­tain was in dan­ger” line the Pentagon and White House is try­ing to sell here…you mean to tell me Phillips hadn’t had a gun pointed at his back any­time before this?)…It “
    Hey tighten up those lips. With our new peace-love-&-happiness leader in charge this is the best we can expect so lets not lose our last straw. Weak stan­dard cop out orders can be made to func­tion as long as we keep the sto­ry­line and have aggres­sive com­man­ders in the field will­ing to put their a*s on the line in case it goes south (in which case of course pres would blame all on overzeal­ous com­man­der and the “he autho­rized twice” talk would have been denied”.
    It is sad not hav­ing lead­er­ship will­ing to put their balls on the block but it is what we got.

    Reply
  22. Polaris says:
    April 17, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    “you are a troll. your also a pretty une­d­u­cated guy it seems. how does design­ing subs show you any­thing in the real world other than blue prints. Go back to the books dude, you got no place here“
    Hey “the­bo­ogy­man” (does any­body still say “dude” any­more ?) jesus — you are a ser­ial idiot. I’d like to know what qual­i­fies an obvi­ously low-​​information moron like your­self to be an expert on strate­gic defense issues like this.
    I thought this was a defense-​​related site, not a red-​​neck mili­tia page. FYI I’ve been around the world watch­ing some pretty tense “sit­u­a­tions” that you and your couch wouldn’t believe.
    Basically, how about F*ck off.

    Reply
  23. theboogyman says:
    April 18, 2009 at 6:42 am

    @Polaris
    Suuuuure, design­ing subs is the most adven­tur­ous job in the world, im pretty sure in the next bond movie they are ditch­ing him in favor of a ass faced sub designer who is a clos­est homo obsessed with long thick phal­lic black objects… why? because it is the most excit­ing and adven­tur­ous job in the whole world. Everyone knows that all deltas and PJ’s once wanted to get in to the high stakes world of sub design, but blew it dur­ing selec­tion and had to go do on the ground work instead.
    Go shove a sub where the sun don’t shine you American hat­ing, inel­e­gant, red­neck obsessed freak.

    Reply
  24. Woody says:
    April 24, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    You’re all dorks who have no idea what they’re talk­ing about

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage