DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Politricks » Obama’s 100 Days Report Card

Obama’s 100 Days Report Card

FL_100daysLARGE_042909.jpg

EDITOR’S NOTE: The combined reporting and brain power of the entire Military​.com/Defense Tech/DoD Buzz team was brought to bear last week to compile a report card for President Barack Obama’s first 100 days as it related to the military and national security. I invite you to read the excerpt here and continue with the comprehensive story on Military​.com. And I’d also be interested to read your opinion on his performance so far.

In his campaign for president, Barack Obama pledged a swift end to the war in Iraq, a new commitment to the defeat of al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, a strong emphasis on veterans’ care and military families and a critical look at Pentagon spending, strategy and conduct in the war on terrorism.

Since his inauguration 100 days ago, Obama has made good on his promise for sweeping change in the military, a new tone in the White House’s relationship with troops and a personal investment in easing the burden of military service.

But so far his record has been met with controversy, both for its marked consistency with the policies of George W. Bush and for its radical break from the past that some see as reckless.

Obama was quick to apologize for American conduct in the war on terrorism and relations with some of its allies during his trip to Europe in early April. He called for “mutual respect” toward Iran, which commanders in Iraq say supplies deadly roadside bombs to insurgents. And he has agreed to the release of reportedly gruesome photos of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal, an action that some insiders claim will worsen morale in a military service only now recovering from the tarnished public perception stemming from that terrible chapter.

Likewise, in his first 100 days Obama has met several times with veterans organizations to assure them of his personal investment in their care. He’s taken on the largest defense firms with a sweeping Pentagon budget reform that slashes costly programs at a time of economic turmoil. And he’s proven immensely popular with troops in the field; for instance, last month he was given a standing ovation from those serving in Iraq even as he asked them for continued long-term commitments to Afghanistan.

And Obama hasn’t needlessly rocked any boats during his first 100 days either, keeping Robert Gates as Defense Secretary, holding off needless controversy over a hasty repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” sexual orientation policy, and continuing the Bush administration’s controversial strategy of fighting al Qaeda and Taliban forces with covert Predator drone strikes in Pakistani territory.

– Christian, Colin, Bryant, Greg and Bryan

Share |

April 29th, 2009 | Politricks | 446737 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/04/29/obamas-100-days-report-card/Obama%27s+100+Days+Report+Card2009-04-29+13%3A55%3A34Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « No Robot in the Loop Here! | We Report, You Decide » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. DC2 Jennings says:
    April 29, 2009 at 9:36 am

    I personally think he has done an admirable job given all of the economic stresses we as a nation currently find ourselves in.
    The fact that he has gone around apologizing for America’s past transgressions will strike some as weak, which I can agree with to an extent. But I think it has been done as a result of the heavy handedness of the past administration. Hopefully we can get the apologies out of the way and work to get the world straight again.
    Keeping Robert Gates was a necessary move. He is pushing the military to transform itself and how it conducts business (literallY). I don’t know how many times we have heard from how many adiminstrations that they are going to change the procurement processes.
    It also seems to me that he cares more about veterans and their care than any other adiminstration. Hopefully he will continue to take care of those that served and lost something in the process.
    With regards to the prisoner abuse issues and pictures. They were going to come out some time or another. Might as well get all the dirty laundry aired out so that we don’t have these issues popping up any more. I think that was his (and Gates) reasoning on this matter. When I hear about Abu Ghraib my thoughts linger on the people that lost their careers (or dignity) because nobody of authority wanted to admit these soldiers were ordered to do these things. That goes for the female Colonel (I believe that was her rank) forced to retire to Ms. England that was only doing what she was told.
    We have a long ways to go in his tenure as President. At least he isn’t going about things ignorantly like Clinton did.
    DC2

    Reply
  2. vision says:
    April 29, 2009 at 9:42 am

    Needlessly rocking boats, eh? How about releasing hundreds of “interrogation photos?” We all know that the politically-inspired release of these photos will ingnite anti-American Islamic extremism and will translate into more American deaths on the battlefield needlessly. Perhaps even inspire a few more 9/11’s. Now why would a president want that?

    Reply
  3. wes says:
    April 29, 2009 at 9:47 am

    Oops– I tried to get in before the emotionally invested Obama Cheer Apologist Squad, who will explain how his Weakness is actually Strength, or something…too late; the the usual suspects have chimed in already.
    Whatever. So okay, Obama worshippers, tell us how his draconian cuts of the military, as well as his public embrace of DICTATORS will result in anything but a weakened military and thus the rise of anti-democratic movements worldwide. Go ahead, tell us.
    Specificaly: what more “shovel ready” program exists than the F-22?
    Instead ACORN gets $5 billion.
    When you get your Third World cesspit, I hope you enjoy it.

    Reply
  4. Wes says:
    April 29, 2009 at 10:14 am

    It’s all Bush’s fault!

    Reply
  5. CR says:
    April 29, 2009 at 10:36 am

    This is nothing more than chum for the wackos that log on here.….

    Reply
  6. Wembley says:
    April 29, 2009 at 10:55 am

    He’s right about Iran: without that mutual respect all you’re going to get is a war — and the Iranians don;t want one any more than the US.
    He’s right about Abu Ghraib: that boil has to eb lanced, and those pictures will come out sooner or later. Better do it now, just whent he page has been turned.
    And he’d right about the defense budget: anyone who thinks these are ‘draconian cuts’ needs a reality check.
    So far, so good. But when you inheirit this lot, it’s going to be an uphill struggle every inch of the way.

    Reply
  7. Wes says:
    April 29, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    “But when you inheirit this lot, it’s going to be an uphill struggle every inch of the way.
    Posted by: Wembley at April 29, 2009 10:55 AM“
    “It’s all Bush’s fault!
    Posted by: Wes at April 29, 2009 10:14 AM”

    Reply
  8. Wes says:
    April 29, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    “This is nothing more than chum for the wackos that log on here.….
    Posted by: CR at April 29, 2009 10:36 AM“
    Typical liberal: demonize your enemy. If they don’t march in lock step with Leftist ideology, they must be mentally deficient. Thoughtcrime, anyone?
    That is the difference between Liberals and Conservatives: we think you are wrong, you think we are evil.

    Reply
  9. joe says:
    April 29, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    Wes,
    ACORN will NOT get $5 billion stimulus money
    http://​www​.factcheck​.org/​a​s​k​f​a​c​t​c​h​e​c​k​/​d​o​e​s​_​t​h​e​_​s​t​i​m​u​l​u​s​_​b​i​l​l​_​i​n​c​l​u​d​e​_​a​_​5​2​.​h​tml

    Reply
  10. Ryan says:
    April 29, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    @John Moore
    After everything that’s happened in the last 100 days, the only thing you can think of is that he’s a bad gift-giver and requires a teleprompter? Now that’s some substantive criticism.
    @vision
    The idiocy of your argument is astonishing. The fact that we tortured people was already well known. If you go to any part of the Muslim world and ask them about Guantanamo Bay/Abu Ghraib/etc. you’re going to get an earful about the evil Americans. So Obama takes steps to close Guantanamo, acknowledges our history of torture, and makes a clear break from the ridiculous arguments that were used to justify it, and somehow that’s going to INCREASE Anti-Americanism? And you call the release of the torture memo “politically-inspired”. How about “humanity-inspired”? It’s downright immoral, if you know people were being tortured needlessly, to keep your mouth shut about it.

    Reply
  11. Ryan says:
    April 29, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    @West
    During the Cold War, when Russia was threatening annihilation of the US with a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons, and working actively to subvert US interests all over the globe, US Presidents routinely met with Russian leaders and (gasp!) shook their hands. Compare that to Hugo Chavez, who has no nuclear weapons and no military capability to harm the US. A handshake does not mean “I agree with everything you stand for.” It’s the bare-minimum token of civility necessary to start the diplomatic process.
    Also, I laughed out loud when you said there’s no more “shovel-ready” program than the F-22. How about hurricane preparedness on the Gulf Coast, repairing our crumbling infrastructure, drought relief projects, new roads, new bridges, new schools, new hospitals? You know, those things require actual shovels. The only “shovel-ready” part of the F-22 program involves piles of taxpayer money and a giant firepit.

    Reply
  12. Drake1 says:
    April 29, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    I give him generally good marks, but I

    Reply
  13. CR says:
    April 29, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    Wes,
    I guess I have to reveal that I’m a registered Republican…am I still a ‘typical liberal’?
    Smart…paint with a broad brush…good job!

    Reply
  14. tiger says:
    April 29, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    Obama does not even know where his own plane is.… Sorry, but I think it goes down hill from here. Defense is not one of his pet projects.

    Reply
  15. Ron says:
    April 29, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    I know this about politicans both sides can not be trusted it should be up to the people to run the government not the government to run the people.
    I love my country but hate the government we have they have thrown out the constution and put there own agenda in place.

    Reply
  16. 9/11, I still remember says:
    April 29, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    Oh where to start…
    For the religious Chrisitan voters that he somehow deceived: One of his early acts was to allow funding for abortions, and secondly allowing federal funding on embryonic stem cell research. So much for him being the second coming of the Messiah…
    So far he has provided major support for the Palestinians. He bowed to the Saudi King, then lied about it. He has been very anti-Israel and has earmarked federal funds for Hamas. He even banned the phrase, “Global war on terror”. Did anyone check his birth certificate??
    He has been pushing to take guns out of American hands with the weak excuse that we are supplying the Mexican drug cartels with weapons. He even lied there too about the percentage of weapons that have been found in Mexico that came from the US. He wants a national registry of guns and wants to place serial numbers on bullets so when they do grab guns, they know exactly who has them.
    He totally ignored the nationwide Tea Parties, claiming he knew nothing about themm. He has place “Janet Reno the Second” in charge of the Department of Homeland Security, to keep an eye on all of you right wing vet terrorists that want to stand up for your constitutional rights.
    Last, but not least, he made the power hungry Hillary Clinton the secretary of state.
    God save us all.…

    Reply
  17. CR says:
    April 29, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    Boy with a screen name like “9/11, I still remember” you must be a REAL American…

    Reply
  18. 9/11, I still remember says:
    April 29, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    I’m a New Yorker…
    And CR means Certified Retard?

    Reply
  19. Drake1 says:
    April 29, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    “The combined reporting and brain power of the entire Military​.com/​D​e​f​e​nse Tech/DoD Buzz team was brought to bear last week to compile a report card for President Barack Obama’s first 100 days as it related to the military and national security.“
    Please keep the discussion on military and national security, not domestic politics.

    Reply
  20. chrisram says:
    April 29, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    “Certified Retard”…ouch.…boy that hurts…you know how to land a zinger I tell you.…nicely done again!

    Reply
  21. Ryan says:
    April 30, 2009 at 2:57 am

    @subnuc
    If the pirate situation had ended badly, you would have screamed bloody murder that Obama was responsible. Since it turned out well, you say he’s “taking the credit”. No matter what Obama does, people like you will never be happy.

    Reply
  22. Wes says:
    April 30, 2009 at 9:31 am

    “I guess I have to reveal that I’m a registered Republican…am I still a ‘typical liberal’?
    Smart…paint with a broad brush…good job!
    Posted by: CR at April 29, 2009 02:20 PM“
    Arlen Specter was a registered Republican too.

    Reply
  23. CR says:
    April 30, 2009 at 11:13 am

    Yeah, then he wised up Wes.…

    Reply
  24. DC2 Jennings says:
    May 1, 2009 at 7:03 am

    Wes and Valcan,
    You guys really crack me up. You will defend all of the conservatives of this great nation, including W. And you will attack anyone that has thoughts other than yours to no end.
    Do you really think Obama would be POTUS or even allowed to run without providing a birth certificate? REALLY? That is just lame and does not focus at all on the topic of this post. I guess your conspiracy theories only apply when it is the diabolical liberals running the show. Look at the posts on this blog. The only people that believe in intimidation and deception are the hard line right wingers.
    One thing that nobody is discussing, and I hope Christian starts a post on it, is Abu Ghraib. There were I believe 8 enlisted soldiers court martialed or reprimanded in some way because of torture and inhumane treatment of prisoners. One of those soldiers is still in prison today. General Karpinski was reduced in rank to Colonel and forced to retire. All because they did things approved by the Justice Dept in classified memos or were unaware of what was going on. This didn’t happen when a Democrat was President.
    You say that it is the liberals that don’t care about the military and hate those that serve. Again, I counter that it is a bipartisan feeling. W didn’t care about those serving any more than Obama does. The fact that he let these soldiers go through this ordeal without revealing the truth or saving them from prosecution is a prime example.
    I guess in your eyes if you have a ® after your name and you throw money at the Defense Dept then you are American.
    Amazing.
    DC2

    Reply
  25. Wes says:
    May 1, 2009 at 10:33 am

    If money is to be thrown at anybody…yes, let it be the military rather than lazy welfare loosers or ACORN.

    Reply
  26. CR says:
    May 1, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    Excellent point DC2…but don’t forget you have to wear a flag pin on your lapel…otherwise you’re a traitor.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      It's a reduction in spending compared with...
      gmanaz
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Perfect, just in time for the program's cancellation.
      John
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I don't doubt that...
      Wildcard
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      It looked like a Transformer at the end!
      Wes
    • New F-35B Hover Video
      Harrier has been transonic and stealthy for decades?
      Matt
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      If this system is so important to...
      DennisBuller
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      I don't know why we pay a single dollar to...
      nraddin
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Bring back the hydrofoils!
      Flapjack
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      The program has only started recently, and my point it should...
      Flapjack
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Hellfire missiles for the helicopter...
      ohwilleke
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage