DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Contingency Ops » Picture of the Day: Canada Invades

Picture of the Day: Canada Invades

Canucks in Florida.jpg

04/25/2009 — Canadian soldiers storm a beach in Mayport, Fla., April 25, 2009, during an amphibious assault demonstration. The service members are participating in the 50th annual multinational exercise UNITAS Gold, which involves participation from Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Germany, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay and the United States. The two-week long exercise includes realistic scenario-driven training opportunities such as live-fire exercises, shipboard operations, maritime interdiction operations and special warfare. (DoD photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Alan Gragg, U.S. Navy/Released)

Courtesy my friend John Donovan, who writes: [Dammit!] We demand the immediate withdrawal of your forces!
–John Noonan

Share |

April 29th, 2009 | Contingency Ops | 447033 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/04/29/picture-of-the-day-canada-invades/Picture+of+the+Day%3A+Canada+Invades2009-04-29+23%3A14%3A42lowe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Combat Advising (Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Counterinsurgency) | Close Encounters of the Pirate Kind » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Scathsealgaire says:
    April 29, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    Damn it Canada, I asked you to invite us if you invaded the US, how rude.

    Reply
  2. Sic says:
    April 29, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    Yeah, I’m sure it took some real arm twisting to convince that crew to invade a pristine Florida beach.

    Reply
  3. murc says:
    April 29, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    PHOTOSHOP ALERT!
    everybody knows Canada doesn’t have a military.
    lol

    Reply
  4. Fil says:
    April 29, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    I live in Canada and the first thing I thought was, “wait, we have amphibious capability?”

    Reply
  5. Nick says:
    April 29, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    As much crap as we give our funny neighbors to the north, there’s no other country that will stick by us through thick and thin when our other “allies” (hello Brits) weasel on out.

    Reply
  6. Foreign.boy says:
    April 29, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    Geez, I wouldn’t want to be in flordia in full combat gear.… too hot.
    “I live in Canada and the first thing I thought was, “wait, we have amphibious capability?”“
    YA! +1!
    About weaseling out.…
    To be honest, the current government only represents 30% of the voting population.… if things were a little different Canada would probably be out of Afghanistan.

    Reply
  7. ExurbanKevin says:
    April 29, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    Canada withdraw completely from Florida?
    You realize that would ruin that state’s economy, right?
    Well, from November to March, at least…
    Tell you what: You be nice and send up some Krispy Kremes, and we’ll trade you for some Tim Horton’s.
    Do it. Don’t force us to hit you with Celine Dion again.
    Nobody wants that.

    Reply
  8. elizzar says:
    April 30, 2009 at 12:08 am

    re: Nick — i hardly feel you can accuse us brits of weaseling on you considering our ever-present status on the front lines in afghanistan and iraq (the latter until recently) — we may have got some things wrong in basra, but that is the nature of conflict, and the usa doesn’t have a perfect record either — both militaries learn and evolve, which is what makes them powerful. our increased commitment to combat power in afghanistan keeps us clearly the second largest contributor in theatre, at a time when we as a country are seriously buggered, and our military could ideally do with a few non-active years to reset and recover. (for the record i opposed our involvement in iraq, we should have concentrated purely on ‘stan from the start). i also note and respect the fighting commitment of the canadian, dutch and australian troops, who along with the usa and uk put their lives (and lose them) on the front lines every day. the real shame is the lack of nato war-fighting commitment from the larger eu nations such as france and germany. i guess one could argue if the citizens of these countries oppose something so strongly, in a democracy that is how it works, and that is what we are (supposedly) fighting to preserve after all, isn’t it?

    Reply
  9. darren says:
    April 30, 2009 at 3:35 am

    Brits=weasals NOT
    who is the largest contributor at the minute, beside the U.S. Britain!!!
    WHo gave the most troops beside the u.s. to the initial invasions Britain!!!
    After all the horror & public statements of support died down who remained, loyal to the u.s. Britain.
    This all happened during most of this decade.
    Maybe you should appreciate, your friends more and not be, so negative. We’re pulling the bulk of our forces out of Iraq, and sending thousands more to afganistan, where there needed.

    Reply
  10. Ryan says:
    April 30, 2009 at 3:48 am

    wrong camo :)

    Reply
  11. scathsealgaire says:
    April 30, 2009 at 5:35 am

    @ExurbanKevin
    I would invade Canada for some Tim Hortons. I wish we could swap all the F@CKING Starbucks for just 1 Tim hortons in NZ.

    Reply
  12. soonergrunt says:
    April 30, 2009 at 8:50 am

    @ExurbanKevin
    Surely you know the US policy regarding WMDs?
    If you use Celine Dion, we will be forced to retaliate!
    Of course, I understand that Creed is getting back together, so maybe we could use that instead of nukes…

    Reply
  13. canuck mike says:
    April 30, 2009 at 9:05 am

    if we start playing celine dion and creed the taliban are going to get a lot of new recruits just on the whole no-music thing… I wonder how I’d look with a beard…

    Reply
  14. CR says:
    April 30, 2009 at 9:22 am

    We have no better friend that the UK…who else could have withstood the best Hitler could throw at them and still keep a stiff upper lip!
    Cheers mates, love you guys across the pond! Remember the Dunkirk spirit!

    Reply
  15. Jones says:
    April 30, 2009 at 9:31 am

    These Canadians are perfectly lined up for a machine gun turkey shoot.
    Where did they learn this brilliant formation?
    The Canadians should stay in Canada. That way they won’t get mowed down like field mice beneath a mower when they get someplace where people shoot.
    What a pathetic display.
    I bet that if an old retired guy living nearby had set off a single fire cracker, these big bad Canadians would have been swimming back to their boat as fast as they could.

    Reply
  16. dziban303 says:
    April 30, 2009 at 9:58 am

    I always love the thoughtful, intelligent and enlightening remarks on defensetech, to say nothing of the superior commentary by the editors.

    Reply
  17. John Moore says:
    April 30, 2009 at 10:34 am

    I am CANDIAN, yes we have basically no military but what we do have is great dedication and pride.
    U can count on CA to have your back in thik and thin so watch who u bash, enough enemies out there no reason to bash allies.
    And yeah I agree about the camo issue frig it goes on and on and on we starting in afgan with green go figure.
    US and CA are good friends so why bash your peaceful neighboure casue if it wasent this way there is no way your resources could be used as they are thats one big ass border you’d have to defend.

    Reply
  18. CR says:
    April 30, 2009 at 11:11 am

    ” Although only one Canadian unit reached its D-Day objective, the first line of German defences had been completely smashed. By evening, Canadian troops had progressed further inland than any of their Allies.“
    *Sigh*.…so sad that people have forgetten what our Canadian friends sacraficed to help liberate Europe along side US trops.

    Reply
  19. formerROKA says:
    April 30, 2009 at 11:30 am

    I wonder if the better position is to be prone:
    http://​www​.nationalsalute​.com/​i​m​a​g​e​s​/​p​e​r​f​o​r​m​e​r​s​/​2​0​0​7​/​a​m​p​h​i​b​i​o​u​s​_​a​s​s​a​u​l​t​_​0​1​.​jpg
    http://z.about.com/d/miami/1/0/U/4/amphibious_assault_02.jpg
    Maybe these guys didn’t want their cammies to be soiled. :)

    Reply
  20. bdwilcox says:
    April 30, 2009 at 11:46 am

    “I am CANDIAN“
    –Does that mean you’re from the land of John Candy?

    Reply
  21. bobbymike says:
    April 30, 2009 at 11:49 am

    Please do not judge a military by its politicians. I don’t know of one national military that funds itself. No bucks no Buck Rogers.
    Canada is doing a great job in A-stan. American special forces have complimented them on their bravery and small unit tactics, which are the key to the fight there. Canadian spec ops troops Joint Task Force II are fighting along side Delta and Seal teams.
    Also, I far as I know a Canadian sniper has the longest confirmed kill in A-stan actually taking out a machine gun postion that was pinning down US troops. 2300 meter shot!

    Reply
  22. Alexander says:
    April 30, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Americans, Canadians, British … we were all once part of the same family. And to be honest, we sort of still are to some degree.
    Though I would have to say Australia > Canada.
    But, any one of those would be close and trusted allies.

    Reply
  23. Alexander says:
    April 30, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    Americans, Canadians, British … we were all once part of the same family. And to be honest, we sort of still are to some degree.
    Though I would have to say Australia > Canada.
    But, any one of those would be close and trusted allies.

    Reply
  24. soonergrunt says:
    April 30, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    And if the Creed doesn’t work, I’ve no doubt that we could very easily scare up some Pat Boone or Carpenters recordings.
    You Canucks are doomed. Nobody beats America in the battle of cheesy, over-sentimental sugar-pop!

    Reply
  25. Jones says:
    April 30, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    These dorks should stay in Canada, and do what they do best.
    Shoot at fish, and trap seals.
    End of story.

    Reply
  26. Jarhead says:
    April 30, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Dude, I think its awesome we got some of are allies 2 train with us. The Brits and Canucks, and to a lesser extent the Aussies and Kiwies are probaly the best allies we got, to bad Obama’s gonna blow all that to h**l.

    Reply
  27. jsallison says:
    April 30, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    damn, now if they make it to the Ohio river DoD just might try to get my fat dime a dozen tanker has-been butt back in harness…

    Reply
  28. Scathsealgaire says:
    April 30, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    @Jarhead
    As a Kiwi, don’t worry about us and Obama. We like him better than Bush, and we helped under Bush. So we wont be backing out now.
    Having said that, we are now under a Right-wing governement that was AGAINST helping when this whole thing started(they were in the opposition benches) and they seem to be trying to weasel-out now they are Government. We were under a Centre-Left Government when this whole thing started and they wanted to help.
    We Kiwis are a weird bunch. Our Labour party(centre-left) agrees with spreading Democracy, and National(Right-wing) don’t because they don’t like how much it costs.

    Reply
  29. canadian eh says:
    May 1, 2009 at 8:58 am

    Awesome… the invasion has begun! Bet ya never saw that coming! Just wait for the Northern Front… attack beavers and moose cavalry. lol.
    “wait, we have amphibious capability?”-
    No, Canada does not have an amphibious capability. Our soldiers train to be able to perform amphibious assaults but the government has not yet ponied up the dough to get us the ships. There is a project in the works, originally due for 2010 but there were issues with the cost and it was put on a back burner, the Joint Support Ship, that would be able to carry a company and a half of light infantry, but the ships are multi-role, and mainly intended for supplying other ships at sea. Some purpose-built amphibious assault ships are also a part of a $30+ billion navy modernization project, but they are by no means at the top of the wish list and the Canadian government is very stingy with military spending. There was talk a few years ago about establishing a maritime special operations unit at esquimalt; I don’t know what happened to that, but I think the concept was assimilated into CSOR (canadian special operations regiment).
    It’s nice to be able to train with allies because we don’t have much equipment, and what we do have is deployed overseas and VERY busy. Thanks guys, come north sometime… stronger beer and therefore, the women appear prettier.

    Reply
  30. elizzar says:
    May 1, 2009 at 9:30 am

    re: Ed — do you mean the dieppe (not calais) raid of 1942? some interweb sourced facts ..:
    “The Dieppe Raid of August 19, 1942 was one of the worst disasters of the Second World War. Nine-hundred-and-seven Canadian lives were lost on that day and 1,946 other Canadians were captured and forced to spend the remainder of the war as prisoners. The troops involved totalled 6,100 of whom roughly 5,000 were Canadians, the remainder being British Commandos and 50 American Rangers. The raid was supported by eight Allied destroyers and 74 Allied air squadrons (eight belonging to the Royal Canadian Air Force).“
    what this fails to say, though, is that the failure was a major wake-up for the Allies idea for D-Day and it informed many of the later correct decisions (mass air support, ship bombardment, artificial harbours, the scale of the thing). There’s a very convincing argument that without dieppe, normandy would have failed. so thanks again canada :-)
    oh and having just returned form a brief visit to vancouver, what a nice city and country you have, and yes the beer was good!

    Reply
  31. Recon_Team says:
    May 1, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    The C7A1s you guys had were sexier than these new C7A2s.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      The USA is close to bankruptcy, the FED manipulates...
      Vitor
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      The GD/Austal version is still in...
      Shipbuilder
    • Brits Getting into the 7.62 vs 5.56 debate
      You don't need optics for 400M, The US used to...
      Ryan
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Sa they are saying mobile air power from helicopters are...
      Brian
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
      Your math and chinese destoyers is wrong...
      Brandon
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Maybe it is worth it even though its so far over budget as long...
      Brandon
    • Exoskeletons Make You Tough
      Runescape Gold , Runescape powerleveling package , Runescape...
      metin2u
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      And who exactly are you...
      Jack Frost
    • Multicam on the Loose
      The ol’boy in multicam could be an Air Force CCT. Not...
      Luke Bradshaw
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Use Google to look for Harrier or VAAC Harrier – by comparison...
      Hx2
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage