<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Moray Eel Hunter</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: RESET POINT</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-190591</link> <dc:creator>RESET POINT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-190591</guid> <description>IMHO It&#039;s better to spend the precious funds on surface and subsurface barriers. There are too many varibables Harbor defense Units face when attempting to counter skilled intruders.  Many factors within a given harbor  would simply &quot;throw this unit off&quot; thus rendering it counterproductive. My opinion! Been there done that </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO It’s better to spend the precious funds on surface and subsurface barriers.<br /> There are too many varibables Harbor defense Units face when attempting to counter skilled intruders.  Many factors within a given harbor  would simply “throw this unit off” thus rendering it counterproductive. My opinion! Been there done that</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: reset point</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-189549</link> <dc:creator>reset point</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:04:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-189549</guid> <description>This UNIT Must be tested successfully against Skilled Combat Swimmers in order to merit any weight. There should be no staged and chorographed  excerise  to favor the unit.  Simply stated,  unrestricted mission plans by &quot;swimmers&quot; of proven mettle. IMHO, all too often questionable technology gets pushed thru at TAX PAYERS EXPENSES.speaking in blunt terms, substandard inventors=substandards products!!.THAT&#039;S MY OPINION! &quot;THERE IS NO SUBSITUTE FOR EXPERIENCE! BE THERE DONE THAT! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This UNIT Must be tested successfully against Skilled Combat Swimmers in order to merit any weight. There should be no staged and chorographed  excerise  to favor the unit.  Simply stated,  unrestricted mission plans by “swimmers” of proven mettle. IMHO, all too often questionable technology gets pushed thru at TAX PAYERS EXPENSES.speaking in blunt terms, substandard inventors=substandards products!!.THAT’S MY OPINION!<br /> “THERE IS NO SUBSITUTE FOR EXPERIENCE! BE THERE DONE THAT!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: smiley</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-189523</link> <dc:creator>smiley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-189523</guid> <description>Airborne UAVs are virtually unrestricted (in flight) and thus impose hardships for the enemy. As for an Underwater drone,  to conduct it&#039;s intended mission is rather unrealistic. For one, Salt water wreaks havoc on electrical units much less submerged robots (Spells maintenance nightmares and wasted man hours and $$$$$). 2ndly- unmanned submeged drones tend to mire up in natural &quot;in water debree and obstacles&quot;. Countless examples!! 3rdly- Unmanned drones are unable to transit is tight areas to include creeks, rivers, swamps. ETC ETC ETC. Good intent but IMHO, WASTE OF PRECIOUS FUNDS!   Skilled combat swimmers  would laugh! there is no subsitude for the human element to verify, engage and confirm. IMHO </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Airborne UAVs are virtually unrestricted (in flight) and thus impose hardships for the enemy. As for an Underwater drone,  to conduct it’s intended mission is rather unrealistic. For one, Salt water wreaks havoc on electrical units much less submerged robots (Spells maintenance nightmares and wasted man hours and $$$$$).<br /> 2ndly– unmanned submeged drones tend to mire up in natural “in water debree and obstacles”. Countless examples!!<br /> 3rdly– Unmanned drones are unable to transit is tight areas to include creeks,<br /> rivers, swamps. ETC ETC ETC.<br /> Good intent but IMHO, WASTE OF PRECIOUS FUNDS!   Skilled combat swimmers  would laugh!</p><p>there is no subsitude for the human element to verify, engage and confirm.<br /> IMHO</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blah</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-188004</link> <dc:creator>Blah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:28:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-188004</guid> <description>Hmm, Wonder how this unit performs against natural and man made barriers  (smiling)  ... Much less in areas of limited space.  Suppose it might sport as a potentail  tool. But far from the SOLUTION to counter well skilled subsurface intruders.  Sound mission  plans in union with &quot;REAL toadmen&quot; can easliy counter all anti swimmer measures.  :0 (No matter the technical Advances) The water Has a unique way of affording total deniability  :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm,<br /> Wonder how this unit performs against natural and man made barriers  (smiling)  … Much less in areas of limited space.  Suppose it might sport as a potentail  tool. But far from the SOLUTION to counter well skilled subsurface intruders.  Sound mission  plans in union with “REAL toadmen” can easliy counter all anti swimmer measures.  :0 (No matter the technical Advances) The water Has a unique way of affording total deniability  :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Valcan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-88973</link> <dc:creator>Valcan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:55:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-88973</guid> <description>The same idea applied to a small boat, to warn off small boats from getting into the wrong places, would be really useful. Can imagine how they&#039;d also be useful for anti-piracy work in the Indian Ocean. Posted by: Will at May 6, 2009 11:27 AM --------------- Good idea but they would just lean over and shoot it :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same idea applied to a small boat, to warn off small boats from getting into the wrong places, would be really useful. Can imagine how they’d also be useful for anti-piracy work in the Indian Ocean.<br /> Posted by: Will at May 6, 2009 11:27 AM<br /> —————<br /> Good idea but they would just lean over and shoot it :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-84367</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:21:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-84367</guid> <description>Must for harbor defense &amp; sent out in fleets or squadrons for Recovery by Yard craft. Add IR &amp; NV for missions. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must for harbor defense &amp; sent out in fleets or squadrons for Recovery by Yard craft.<br /> Add IR &amp; NV for missions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-88972</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:19:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-88972</guid> <description>Must for harbor defense alone &amp; for marine sciences studies worldwide. Must have this with IR NV capable &amp; GPS plotting system &amp; mini Radar, sonar units. Must send out in fleets? Reusable &amp; Recoverable by Harbor Yard boats alone </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must for harbor defense alone &amp; for marine sciences studies worldwide.<br /> Must have this with IR NV capable &amp; GPS plotting system &amp; mini Radar, sonar units.<br /> Must send out in fleets?<br /> Reusable &amp; Recoverable by Harbor Yard boats alone</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Will</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-88971</link> <dc:creator>Will</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:27:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-88971</guid> <description>The same idea applied to a small boat, to warn off small boats from getting into the wrong places, would be really useful.  Can imagine how they&#039;d also be useful for anti-piracy work in the Indian Ocean. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same idea applied to a small boat, to warn off small boats from getting into the wrong places, would be really useful.  Can imagine how they’d also be useful for anti-piracy work in the Indian Ocean.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas L. Nielsen</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-88970</link> <dc:creator>Thomas L. Nielsen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:55:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-88970</guid> <description>As for &quot;....so it&#039;s likely whatever interceptor drone eventually is built and fielded will also come with a lethal option.&quot;, this one&#039;s a no-brainer: Just scale the thing up about 10 times, so it can eat people :-) Regards &amp; all, Thomas L. Nielsen Denmark </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for “.…so it’s likely whatever interceptor drone eventually is built and fielded will also come with a lethal option.”, this one’s a no-brainer: Just scale the thing up about 10 times, so it can eat people :-)<br /> Regards &amp; all,<br /> Thomas L. Nielsen<br /> Denmark</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Valcan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/05/05/moray-eel-hunter/#comment-88969</link> <dc:creator>Valcan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:02:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4477#comment-88969</guid> <description>gsak, Dude didnt you know owning nukes is evil unless your a evil phycotic dictator or a jihadi? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gsak,<br /> Dude didnt you know owning nukes is evil unless your a evil phycotic dictator or a jihadi?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 01:35:00 -->
