<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: New Armor Passes Tough Test</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-221904</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-221904</guid> <description>Hey Allan: looks like military getting interested&gt; very highly in your system/Skallar.Armor.. I&#039;ll leave it up to experts like you for The Flexible Body Armor but  I HAVE A GREAT concept for Squad protection maybe helpful to accompany any human body armor for very good usage in conflict..email me sometime...Chris CBA Systems Co. I am out of the Human wearable body armor {forever}, but find my systems have huge value in &quot;&quot;&quot;shielding&quot;&quot;&quot; due to low cost and very very lite weight. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Allan: looks like military getting interested&gt; very highly in your system/Skallar.Armor.. I’ll leave it up to experts like you for The Flexible Body Armor but  I HAVE A GREAT concept for Squad protection maybe helpful to accompany any human body armor for very good usage in conflict..email me sometime…Chris CBA Systems Co. I am out of the Human wearable body armor {forever}, but find my systems have huge value in “”“shielding””” due to low cost and very very lite weight.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bonez</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-221885</link> <dc:creator>Bonez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:31:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-221885</guid> <description>Sorry Blackard, but the future weapons tests were a hoax.  It was made to entertain, it has very little actual application. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Blackard, but the future weapons tests were a hoax.  It was made to entertain, it has very little actual application.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Barrett Blackard</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-187083</link> <dc:creator>Barrett Blackard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:34:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-187083</guid> <description>The Military Channel had a segment about Dragon Skin Vest some time ago, they  shot different serveral different size and type of bullets at it and none penatrated the vest; but when I watched a dummy with a dragon skin vest layed down on a hand granade the the grenade detonated and the vest was not penatrated. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Military Channel had a segment about Dragon Skin Vest some time ago, they  shot different serveral different size and type of bullets at it and none penatrated the vest; but when I watched a dummy with a dragon skin vest layed down on a hand granade the the grenade detonated and the vest was not penatrated.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-89638</link> <dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-89638</guid> <description>I hope these manufacturers keep up the great research and can get this stuff fielded at a reasonable price.  I&#039;ve worn the standard armor for a while and its good, but but upgrades like this improve the morale of our warfighters. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope these manufacturers keep up the great research and can get this stuff fielded at a reasonable price.  I’ve worn the standard armor for a while and its good, but but upgrades like this improve the morale of our warfighters.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: al fant</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-85111</link> <dc:creator>al fant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:13:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-85111</guid> <description>which is the best bullet proof vest on the market then </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which is the best bullet proof vest on the market then</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: flying fart proudly joyned</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-89635</link> <dc:creator>flying fart proudly joyned</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-89635</guid> <description>from Germans that bought from the Chinese-- wait, WHAT?! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from Germans that bought from the Chinese–<br /> wait, WHAT?!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: flying fart proudly joyned</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-85108</link> <dc:creator>flying fart proudly joyned</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-85108</guid> <description>@Sideshow China to help Indonesia develop defense technology http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/04/01/china-help-indonesia-develop-defense-technology.html </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sideshow<br /> China to help Indonesia develop defense technology<br /> <a href="http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/04/01/china-help-indonesia-develop-defense-technology.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/04/01/china-help-indonesia-develop-defense-technology.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sideshow Flob</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-89632</link> <dc:creator>Sideshow Flob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:07:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-89632</guid> <description>The Aussies have taken a giant step backward with their new armour system. The recently sacked Defence Minister had a Chinese girlfriend who was tight with the PLA and it&#039;s procurement and supply branch in Beijing. She was also a major stakeholder in an Aussie listed firm that suppplies all the new contract body armour to Aussie military forces. Problem is, the armour is Chinese and Vietnamese manufactured and is at best, last generation stuff. Yes, they are made of Dyneema, not kevlar and are reported to be quite thin and fragile Even the trauma plates are only rated for a single hit - by 7.62 x 39!!! To add insult to injury, the vests are not compatible with Aussie issue webbing and LBV so soldiers are having to buy their own stuff to try and make what they have, work. So, Aussies are stuck with old school vests supplied by a possible future enemy who will know how to defeat the armour - all in the name of cost cutting. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Aussies have taken a giant step backward with their new armour system.<br /> The recently sacked Defence Minister had a Chinese girlfriend who was tight with the PLA and it’s procurement and supply branch in Beijing.<br /> She was also a major stakeholder in an Aussie listed firm that suppplies all the new contract body armour to Aussie military forces.<br /> Problem is, the armour is Chinese and Vietnamese manufactured and is at best, last generation stuff.<br /> Yes, they are made of Dyneema, not kevlar and are reported to be quite thin and fragile<br /> Even the trauma plates are only rated for a single hit — by 7.62 x 39!!!<br /> To add insult to injury, the vests are not compatible with Aussie issue webbing and LBV so soldiers are having to buy their own stuff to try and make what they have, work.<br /> So, Aussies are stuck with old school vests supplied by a possible future enemy who will know how to defeat the armour — all in the name of cost cutting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: flying fart proudly joyned</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-89631</link> <dc:creator>flying fart proudly joyned</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:15:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-89631</guid> <description>the army is opening their eyes and dragon skin as great as it sounded was a lot heavier and it did NOT have a quick release on it so if you were to fall in a giants puddle like an ocean or a river, youd have an issue, also they wanted too much for it. but at least there looking into other options finally...-- thx and but look, we got another colourful scuttlebutt based on &quot;maybe i saw it with my own eyes..&quot; and everyone blogger is jumping on it like we got another &quot;the best of the best for our best...&quot; Eahh army, marines and navy, lets change all trainings, tactics, maintenance and planing becuz we got the chance to get the new super duper gear! but what is it in reality? nothing more than pure rumor done by the producer of this gear.. i will start to belive him first, when we will get it cheaper, better and tested by army itself. before that; nice to know he is working on it but just let the blow(!) flying proudly away.. --Do you prefer chicken or pork with your fried rice, comrade?-- Cubanian cuisine is not my taste. @The Cenobyte thx dude.. @Drewb hmmmm.. you was reading all my post for red-not-average-joe spelling? what should i say? ...sooo, do you like fish sticks? (fishsticks in average-joeish) http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/bigboxshots/9/584639_37600_front.jpg </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the army is opening their eyes and dragon skin as great as it sounded was a lot heavier and it did NOT have a quick release on it so if you were to fall in a giants puddle like an ocean or a river, youd have an issue, also they wanted too much for it. but at least there looking into other options finally…–<br /> thx and but look, we got another colourful scuttlebutt based on “maybe i saw it with my own eyes..” and everyone blogger is jumping on it like we got another “the best of the best for our best…” Eahh army, marines and navy, lets change all trainings, tactics, maintenance and planing becuz we got the chance to get the new super duper gear!<br /> but what is it in reality? nothing more than pure rumor done by the producer of this gear.. i will start to belive him first, when we will get it cheaper, better and tested by army itself. before that; nice to know he is working on it but just let the blow(!) flying proudly away..<br /> –Do you prefer chicken or pork with your fried rice, comrade?–<br /> Cubanian cuisine is not my taste.<br /> @The Cenobyte<br /> thx dude..<br /> @Drewb<br /> hmmmm..<br /> you was reading all my post for red-not-average-joe spelling? what should i say?<br /> …sooo, do you like fish sticks? (fishsticks in average-joeish)<br /> <a href="http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/bigboxshots/9/584639_37600_front.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/bigboxshots/9/584639_37600_front.jpg</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Cenobyte</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/06/04/new-armor-passes-tough-test/#comment-89630</link> <dc:creator>The Cenobyte</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4518#comment-89630</guid> <description>Spelling? Really? We are going to bitch about Spelling on here now? Albert E. (U might remember him as the E=mc2 guy) couldn&#039;t spell to save his life. I can&#039;t spell worth a darn, luck for me my father was smarter than guys like Drewb and realized that Spelling is not a great indication of intelligence or potental, so I went to private school (Where idiots that can&#039;t get over the fact of a few spelling mistakes as long as they could understand the information where not allowed) and I did great, have a great job, make great money, and don&#039;t have to deal with guys like Drewb (Although I did fire a guy for marking the spelling mistakes on one of my Engs reports before sending it up the line) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spelling? Really? We are going to bitch about Spelling on here now? Albert E. (U might remember him as the E=mc2 guy) couldn’t spell to save his life. I can’t spell worth a darn, luck for me my father was smarter than guys like Drewb and realized that Spelling is not a great indication of intelligence or potental, so I went to private school (Where idiots that can’t get over the fact of a few spelling mistakes as long as they could understand the information where not allowed) and I did great, have a great job, make great money, and don’t have to deal with guys like Drewb (Although I did fire a guy for marking the spelling mistakes on one of my Engs reports before sending it up the line)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 03:07:27 -->
