DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Friday Funnies » “Say My Name!” (Updated)

“Say My Name!” (Updated)

Noonan put this in yesterday’s Fire for Effect but I felt it worthy of a deeper dive, as it were, especially considering it’s Friday (and this has been a LONG week). So what do you guys (and girls) think? Was the Senator correct to attempt this bitch slapping of General Walsh or was she out of line?

Naturally the “who earned his or her title more” arguments might ensue, so let us offer the official bios of both parties:

Read Senator Boxer’s official bio here.

Read Brigadier General Walsh’s bio here.

So, to sum up, Boxer - career politician who loves nothing so much as a good hearing in a comfortable caucus room; Walsh - lifelong patriot who has traveled the planet rebuilding regions devastated by disasters both natural and man-made.

It’s not even close, is it? We salute you, m’am … er, Senator …

– Ward

Share |

June 19th, 2009 | Friday Funnies | 4540137 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/06/19/say-my-name-updated/%22Say+My+Name%21%22+%28Updated%292009-06-19+13%3A05%3A30 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Thursday — Fire for Effect | Air Force Puts the Brakes on Solar Project » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Alvin Raef says:
    June 21, 2009 at 9:31 am

    Although I am no Fan of Senator Boxer, I will make a leap of faith that she was justified in her remarks. If the General was addressing the other male senators as

    Reply
  2. Total says:
    June 21, 2009 at 10:30 am

    “You know when you argue with an idiot you look like an idiot too?“
    Ah, so I won’t argue with you, then.

    Reply
  3. Chris says:
    June 21, 2009 at 11:07 am

    Mz Boxer needs to understand that respect is earned — not voted on. She needs to understand she is nothing more than a public “SERVANT” and NOT a very good one at that.….….….….…
    I do so pity MR Boxer.…

    Reply
  4. JustPlainJason says:
    June 21, 2009 at 11:11 am

    What upsets me about this is the complete lack of tact used by the senator. She knows that he has been trained to address superiors and civilians as ma’m and sir. All she had to do is say “call me senator please” and he would have done it.
    Now personally I don’t believe that any member of congress or the president deserves a title. They may hold the office, but they don’t hold a title. Having a title sets them apart from the people they represent. The constitution starts with We the People… The people outrank the all of government. If any senator asks me to refer to them as Senator I would politely decline and ask them to point out the section of the constitution that grants them the title.
    In my opinion no senator has the right to be called senator…but thats just me.

    Reply
  5. Ron says:
    June 21, 2009 at 11:42 am

    She worked hard and earned the right to be called senator?
    Last i checked , most career polititions,only work hard at raising millions of dollers to in effect be able to outspend and hence most of the time, basically buy the election. hmm, polititions work hard? Absolutely not, not in my eyes. Whine and complain as children? yes. Sale us down the river for their own good? yes!
    Those in the military in my opinion, have earned the most respect in the is country. Boxer , ma’am, you are an egomaniac who does not deserve anything.

    Reply
  6. Frank R. Reyes says:
    June 21, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    Being from California and being a Combat Veteran I truly Respect the fact that B.G. Walsh upheld the tradition that was tought to all military personel to show Respect to congresional and senitorial personel. Having seen and heard what MS. Boxer said, I believe that she herself was out of line in trying to exsert what she belives is her so called polictical power. I have never seen any High ranking Officer show any type of disepect to any political cadre of any kind.
    OooooRaww General Walsh in for being what many of us Veterans call a Trus Gentelman and Officer.

    Reply
  7. Total says:
    June 21, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    “What upsets me about this is the complete lack of tact used by the senator.“
    Oh Good Lord, we’re back to this? I swear, this is the most sensitive, weepy comment thread I’ve seen in quite a while. “She was *mean* to him! Sob!” My toddler handles (supposed) impoliteness better than you folks.

    Reply
  8. TJ says:
    June 21, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    He earned his by service to his Country. Boxer earned hers by service to her wallett.

    Reply
  9. RON says:
    June 21, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    Seems to me California needs to rethink some of their political choices!!!!

    Reply
  10. Pat says:
    June 21, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    A Military protocol member of her staff could have alleviated this whole incident.
    For those “ignorant” in military protocol, a Military member presents themselves in Military bearing and conduct 24–7 more so in civilian “situation”. Ooooorah, Gen Walsh!!!

    Reply
  11. JustPlainJason says:
    June 21, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    Total why don’t you look up the meaning of tact. I don’t think it means what you think it means.
    I believe that I have given you more attention than you deserve.

    Reply
  12. Peteo says:
    June 22, 2009 at 7:34 am

    The late-term abortion queen.
    The most odious loathsome Lefty in the US Senate.

    Reply
  13. Bill Aiello says:
    June 22, 2009 at 8:03 am

    What do expect from a Politacian in the first place. Name the last one who put there life on the line took a job that pays less then it should syffer moving having your child go to 17 different schools. Ms Boxer is like a lot of babyboomers take take take never give back it’s all about me. The other side to that is the babyboomers who did serve. I’m sure she’ll be relected by those people who think the serice is for those other people

    Reply
  14. NeoConVet says:
    June 22, 2009 at 10:30 am

    I admire the good General for keeping his cool when most of us would have rather flipped her “the bird”! But in reflection I should not have been surprised that the bozos we have for a legislative body would actually demand the royalty approach as if it really means anything today.

    Reply
  15. 7749674 says:
    June 22, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    The chip on her shoulder outweighed her common courtsey. When someone makes a breach of ediquite you don’t rub it in, in public. She lacks compassion.

    Reply
  16. S. Schauer says:
    June 22, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    Poor Barbi got her wittle feelings hurt, this bed wetting Liberal and her buddy/lover Palosi have not earned squat as far as respect, much less a political title for serious Americans concerned for Americans.… She is a travisty, a scar on politics and a sham, and needs to show respect for a man that has earned everything he has to include his rank and the option to call Barbi ma’am or B*tch…

    Reply
  17. mark says:
    June 22, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    Senator;
    You need to remember you ar ea public servent. Therefore you work for me and the rest of the citizens of the US. If you do not respect us, we will not respect you and you will lose your job.

    Reply
  18. Larry Jacobs says:
    June 23, 2009 at 12:55 am

    Why did she not address him as General at the begining of her question? He has worked a lot harder and went thru a lot more than her to get his title!!! I think she should be voted out at the next election.

    Reply
  19. DTK says:
    June 23, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    I wrote to Sen. Boxer regarding her blathering to Gen. Walsh. Here is her response to me:
    ===================================================
    Dear Mr. Kelley:
    Thank you for contacting me regarding the recent Senate hearing with Brigadier General Michael Walsh. I appreciate hearing from you on this matter.
    Shortly after the hearing, I called General Walsh, and we had a friendly and productive conversation. We expressed our respect for one another and our determination to work together to protect our nation and communities from natural disasters.
    Thank you again for writing to me. Please feel free to contact me in the future about this or any other issue of concern to you.
    Barbara Boxer
    United States Senator
    =====================================================
    I was surprised to even get a response, as she is not my Senator And she does not represent me as I am from Missouri.

    Reply
  20. bdwilcox says:
    June 23, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    That form letter response can be filed under “spin-control”.

    Reply
  21. Charles says:
    June 24, 2009 at 6:56 am

    I’m sure it was directed for some congressional page to write that response to you.

    Reply
  22. Alex says:
    June 24, 2009 at 10:08 am

    (D) California. Big surprise there, eh comrades?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      The USA is close to bankruptcy, the FED manipulates...
      Vitor
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      The GD/Austal version is still in...
      Shipbuilder
    • Brits Getting into the 7.62 vs 5.56 debate
      You don't need optics for 400M, The US used to...
      Ryan
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Sa they are saying mobile air power from helicopters are...
      Brian
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
      Your math and chinese destoyers is wrong...
      Brandon
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Maybe it is worth it even though its so far over budget as long...
      Brandon
    • Exoskeletons Make You Tough
      Runescape Gold , Runescape powerleveling package , Runescape...
      metin2u
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      And who exactly are you...
      Jack Frost
    • Multicam on the Loose
      The ol’boy in multicam could be an Air Force CCT. Not...
      Luke Bradshaw
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Use Google to look for Harrier or VAAC Harrier – by comparison...
      Hx2
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage