DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Extra! Extra! » Reporter’s Notebook: Murtha Speaks

Reporter’s Notebook: Murtha Speaks

murtha.jpg

As you all well know, I’ve been dog­ging Rep. John Murtha, the pow­er­ful chair­man of the House Appropriations Committee’s defense sub­com­mit­tee, pretty hard ever since his fly-​​off-​​the-​​handle accu­sa­tion of mur­der by a squad of Marines in Haditha back in mid-​​2006.

Well, I ner­vously attended a round­table inter­view this morn­ing in DC with Murtha and a group of the country’s top defense writ­ers — fig­ur­ing I might get the cold shoul­der from the Democratic Bull. But I was sur­prised to find that he was remark­ably can­did, brew­ing with news and even friendly. A far cry from the con­fronta­tional chair­man I’d pep­pered with ques­tions in the past.

He said a lot of stuff on defense tech issues — info we’re going to build into longer sto­ries in the com­ing hours — but what I thought I’d do is give you all a data dump of the basics of what he said…a sort of tear out of the pages of my reporter’s note­book, if you will:

Tanker — Murtha said he was strongly in favor of a split buy because he thought no mat­ter who “wins” a rec­om­pete, there will be yet another protest that will delay the field­ing and ham­per global reach efforts. He wants a pro­duc­tion through­put of three planes per month which he says even with the split buy, will save money in the long run because of the near crush­ing main­te­nance costs of keep­ing the KC-​​135s aloft. Murtha had just met with DefSec Gates the pre­vi­ous day, and though Gates has said pub­licly he’s against a split buy, Murtha said “I don’t know that he’s against it” hint­ing that the White House might be dri­ving that argu­ment and Gates might have some flex­i­bil­ity on the issue.

Raptor — Lots here. First, Murtha is against the shut down of the F-​​22 line for what he says are purely national secu­rity issues. He says he’s going to try and find $3.2 bil­lion (my notes said $20B but i re-​​listened to the record­ing and he said $3.2B — not sure why I wrote $20B) to build 20 more next year and has asked Gates to pro­vide him with some national secu­rity threat esti­mates that would jus­tify NOT buy­ing more Raptors. Murtha says he’s con­cerned about a ris­ing China com­pet­ing for energy resources in the com­ing years and noted that “World War II started because we cut off Japan’s energy sup­ply” (though I gather some his­to­ri­ans would object to that char­ac­ter­i­za­tion). Murtha said he’s 50/​50 on whether he can get the money for more F-​​22s, but he said “Lockheed has given up” on get­ting the extra orders.

Also, Murtha touched on the issue of an export ver­sion of the F-​​22 — prin­ci­pally to Japan who says only the F-​​22 can meet its range and speed require­ments for a new inter­cep­tor. Murtha said Sen. Daniel Inouye is work­ing with Japan to come up with the cash needed to “de-​​militarize” the F-​​22 (to remove the secret gad­gets and giz­mos from the US ver­sion) which he esti­mates will be around $300 mil­lion. Murtha thinks that’s way too opti­mistic and that gut­ting the F-​​22 for export will cost more along the lines of $1 billion.

Murtha said he’s wor­ried about the high cost of main­tain­ing the Raptor as well — that it might be dif­fi­cult to bring that cost under con­trol and will con­tribute to major sticker shock among law­mak­ers (and a White House) who are look­ing for money to spend elsewhere.

F-​​35 — Murtha said he was just as wor­ried about the long term costs of the F-​​35 and the delays in pro­duc­tion and tech­no­log­i­cal matu­rity with that pro­gram as he is with the tra­vails of the F-​​22. He said that even though the JSF is a pri­or­ity for the Obama admin­is­tra­tion, his com­mit­tee may not give them the requested money for 2010. “I’m for the F-​​35. I’m for buy­ing the F-​​35. But I’m not nec­es­sar­ily for buy­ing it this year.”

EFV — Murtha was stunned when his staff learned that the EFV had an alu­minum under­body that would be warm but­ter to a mine or IED when ashore. He told the com­man­dant that the EFV pro­gram was “on the bub­ble” and that he’d bet­ter get con­trol of it and make good on the bil­lions invested in the pro­gram already. Murtha talked to Gates about the EFV as well at his meet­ing the pre­vi­ous day and revealed that Gates has his crit­i­cal eye on the pro­gram as well. “This has been going on for 25 years, this research, and it’s expen­sive as hell. You can’t keep spend­ing money on research and then come to us and say you’re just going to can­cel the pro­gram. That’s just not acceptable.”

VH-​​71 (Prez Helo) — The bot­tom line is that Murtha wants to make use of the $3.2 bil­lion already spent on the pro­gram to field at least some por­tion of the fleet that’s already been built or is close to being fin­ished. He said there are nine chop­pers either built or nearly built that we should field. He also lev­eled sharp crit­i­cism at the Secret Service for load­ing down the pro­gram with unnec­es­sary require­ments — “We con­tinue to try to con­vince the admin­is­tra­tion on the VH-​​71. … This was Secret Service who said we need all these things on this air­plane. … They said they were going to push it off to the Obama admin­is­tra­tion and there was so much bad pub­lic­ity about it, I think they reacted to the pub­lic­ity.” Murtha said he tried to con­vince White House offi­cials and Pentagon brass to keep the pro­gram and try to see how the Congress could sal­vage the money already spent. They report­edly told him “okay, okay” then they went ahead and can­celled it.

We’re slic­ing and dic­ing more of the round­table for DT, DoD Buzz and Military​.com so stay tuned for more.

– Christian

Share |

June 24th, 2009 | Extra! Extra! | 454737 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/06/24/reporters-notebook-murtha-speaks/Reporter%27s+Notebook%3A+Murtha+Speaks2009-06-24+14%3A36%3A29Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « How M.A.D. is Kim Jong Il? | Worried Murtha Checking MV-​​22 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. really? says:
    June 24, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Wait, $20 bil­lion for 20 more Raptors? Or $1 bil­lion each?

    Reply
  2. Christian says:
    June 24, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Good catch “really?”…my notes say $20B for some rea­son, but the record­ing says $3.2B…guess I con­fused 20 air­craft with $20B…thanks for mak­ing a note of it…

    Reply
  3. John says:
    June 24, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    I’ve stopped lis­ten­ing to what this blow­heart has to say along time ago. He’s lost all cred­i­bil­ity in most people’s eye’s.

    Reply
  4. DC2 Jennings says:
    June 24, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    Christian,
    Way to stand your ground. I am sure Murtha has dealt with worse than you so I wouldn’t worry too much.
    I still love the F-​​22 and the air supe­ri­or­ity it brings. I wish we could mate some of the equip­ment being installed on the F-​​35 and do away with the plan alto­gether. But alas, that would just push the price tag of the Raptor up more.
    The EFV is and will con­tinue to be a waste of money. There has to be a new tech­nol­ogy that will allow this APC to do the things we are requir­ing it to do. Therefore, this beast should be can­celled because it will never live up to expec­tac­tions.
    I agree with Murtha on the VH-​​71. Fit out the 9 base­line helos already ordered. I think we are even look­ing at “stan­dard” con­fig­u­ra­tion H-​​60s to sup­ple­ment these air­craft and allow us to retire all of the older helos cur­rently shut­tling the POTUS around.
    DC2

    Reply
  5. Mark says:
    June 24, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    Murtha=Jackass

    Reply
  6. DC2 Jennings says:
    June 24, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Mark,
    He may be a jack­ass. But under­stand that they have a very pow­er­ful kick. Listen to what he says and hope­fully it makes sense. Otherwise look out. Other than the KC-Xv2.0, I don’t have any heartache with what he says.
    At least he wants to spend money of defense.
    DC2

    Reply
  7. Bambooviper says:
    June 24, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    Like him or not, he is an old Marine with a his­tory and a brain, he is good for this coun­try if you ever get the words from his mouth with­out some­one putting the old twist on them. Semper Fi Murtha, and hang in there and fight for us. BV

    Reply
  8. bdwilcox says:
    June 24, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    F– Murtha.
    “Like him or not, he is an old Marine with a his­tory and a brain, he is good for this coun­try if you ever get the words from his mouth with­out some­one putting the old twist on them.“
    –Benedict Arnold was a great gen­eral, too. As for spin, Murtha’s own words indict him.
    Let me say again:
    F– Murtha.
    Watch your brave old marine here:
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​h​M​e​d​V​W​U​s​SFU
    Oh, and F– Murtha.

    Reply
  9. Pat Johnson says:
    June 24, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    Screw Murtha ! That guy is a worth­less pogue who needs to be fired then sued. I served in the Marines and this Murtha idiot, I have ZERO RESPECT for. None.

    Reply
  10. Valcan says:
    June 24, 2009 at 9:55 pm

    This does make me won­der. Who thought mak­ing the bot­tum of the EFV alu­minum was a good idea?
    Oh good its bam­boo,
    Like they said f’ murtha hes a a$$hole and one of the worst with pork bar­rel spending.

    Reply
  11. jim says:
    June 24, 2009 at 11:50 pm

    Murtha is a patriot. He is a much bet­ter man than that draft-​​dodging, Saudi-​​loving, suck-​​ass: George W.

    Reply
  12. Bill says:
    June 25, 2009 at 4:28 am

    (Quote)Murtha is a patriot.
    Posted by: jim at June 24, 2009 11:50 PM(Quote) Jim, you are an idiot that needs to change tv channels!

    Reply
  13. DC2 Jennings says:
    June 25, 2009 at 6:50 am

    Valcan,
    I think they did it to save weight. The cur­rent AAV7 is made entirely of alu­minum. The old M113 is made of alu­minum too.
    Don’t make no sense to me though.
    DC2

    Reply
  14. Dennis Rick says:
    June 25, 2009 at 6:53 am

    Who ever said Murtha is a good guy must be one of those that he called stu­pid in his own home state and still got re-​​elected.…
    As the say­ing goes, “Stupid is, Stupid does”.

    Reply
  15. Phil says:
    June 25, 2009 at 8:11 am

    Since when does being an old Marine make him a good rep­re­sen­ti­tive of the peo­ple. As mem­ory serves me, Murtha has been on the take for years Yet because he’s a demo­c­rat that’s over­looked.
    Murtha is a worth­less piece of debris and those peo­ple in west­ern PA who vote for him aren’t much bet­ter. They’re just stu­pid. I’m from PA and have some first hand knowl­edge of what I’m talk­ing about.

    Reply
  16. Phillip Smith says:
    June 25, 2009 at 8:42 am

    Murtha! he needs to go screw him­self. Murtha is a worth­less pogue who needs his ASS KICKED then VOTED OUT and then SUED by every MARINE that Murtha called a KILLER. I served in the ARMY but grew up around Marines and was impressed by them, But Murtha I have NO RESPECT FOR MURTHA IF HE WAS ON FIRE I WOULD NOT CROSS THE STREET TO HELP PUT OUT THE FIRE, MIGHT SELL TICKETS TO RISE MONEY FOR THE MARINE TOY DRIVE.
    Be you a Marine, Sailor, Soldier, Airman, National Guard, or Coast Guard or Reserve
    THESE ARE THE MEN AND WOMEN THAT KEEP US FREE, NOT CONGRESS IT IS THE MILITARY.
    I SALUTE YOU ALL JOB WELL DONE.….

    Reply
  17. Gildas says:
    June 25, 2009 at 8:42 am

    That com­ment is empty, does not tell me any­thing and is noth­ing but an attack on the per­son.
    Why are his ideas bad? I don’t give a hoot about the guy. I need pol­icy com­ments… Not “my neigh­boor is an ass­hole because he always was” rant.
    G

    Reply
  18. Drake1 says:
    June 25, 2009 at 10:28 am

    This guy talks out of both sides of his mouth like every other politi­cian no mat­ter the affiliation.

    Reply
  19. JEFF says:
    June 25, 2009 at 10:38 am

    The EFV wasn’t designed to be a con­voy defense vehi­cle and there­fore didn’t NEED to have MRAP-​​like mine pro­tec­tion. Watch Murtha, he speaks with a forked tongue.

    Reply
  20. Sven Ortmann says:
    June 25, 2009 at 10:40 am

    Gildas;
    Ad hominem, straw­man argu­ment, card stack­ing — most pawns of the American right don’t know much more. Their reper­toire is really that lim­ited.
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​A​d​_​h​o​m​i​nem
    About Murtha: He should learn what “sunk costs” are. Earlier expenses are irrel­e­vant as argu­ment. You need to ignore the con­sid­er­a­tion of sunk costs in order to avoid fool­ish deci­sions as much as pos­si­ble.
    Gates doesn’t need to jus­tify NOT to spend tax­payer money. He needs to jus­tify expenses only — Murtha got it com­pletely wrong.
    EFV: No mat­ter how the project looks right now; it needs to be scrapped. The whole con­cept is idiotic.

    Reply
  21. JimH says:
    June 25, 2009 at 10:45 am

    The prob­lem, folks, is that Jack Murtha has no cred­i­bil­ity in any­thing he says since we con­stantly have to ask, how is this posi­tion going to ben­e­fit Jack Murtha and the peo­ple that con­tribute money to him and his family?

    Reply
  22. bdwilcox says:
    June 25, 2009 at 11:07 am

    “Ad hominem, straw­man argu­ment, card stack­ing — most pawns of the American right don’t know much more. Their reper­toire is really that lim­ited.“
    –Ad Hominem my ass:
    http://​www​.willisms​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2​0​0​6​/​1​0​/​t​h​e​_​j​a​c​k​_​m​u​r​t​h​a​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.wnd​.com/​i​n​d​e​x​.​p​h​p​?​f​a​=​P​A​G​E​.​v​i​e​w​&​a​m​p​;​p​a​g​e​I​d​=​7​9​526
    http://​www​.wnd​.com/​i​n​d​e​x​.​p​h​p​?​f​a​=​P​A​G​E​.​v​i​e​w​&​a​m​p​;​p​a​g​e​I​d​=​4​0​298
    http://​sweet​ness​-light​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​/​j​a​c​k​-​m​u​r​t​h​a​-​d​-​a​l​-​q​a​e​d​a​-​w​e​-​c​a​n​t​-​win
    http://​www​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​3​0​9​2​5​2​41/
    http://​cen​sure​murtha​.com/
    And these are just the tip of the ice­berg.
    FYI, there are these things called Google and Bing that help you do five sec­onds of research before accus­ing oth­ers of being automa­tons. Seems like you protest too much.

    Reply
  23. DOUG says:
    June 25, 2009 at 11:27 am

    Has any­one checked this guys “mil­i­tary” record? I think he was a deskjock in VN, and the rest of his “illus­tri­ous career was in the reserves! He’s a sor­ryass excuse for a so called “mil­tary retiree!

    Reply
  24. pedestrian says:
    June 25, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    Take this Russia, you dirty losers
    BREAKING NEWS: Kyrgyz spits in Russia’s face
    Kyrgyzstan has decided to scale down to non-​​lethal use, but allowed US mil­i­tary to con­tinue to oper­ate from Manas for logis­tics of Afghanistan. Russian for­eign min­istry got p*ssed off crit­i­ciz­ing Kyrgyz played a dirty trick. Russia was spit in the face too hard that they have threaten to make a cor­re­spond­ing response. US has wel­comed the final revert of Kyrgyz deci­sion on use of Manas air port. Find out more about the fun Russia los­ing face.
    http://​www​.space​war​.com/​r​e​p​o​r​t​s​/​K​y​r​g​y​z​s​t​a​n​_​c​h​a​n​g​e​s​_​m​i​n​d​_​o​n​_​U​S​_​A​f​g​h​a​n​_​b​a​s​e​_​9​9​9​.​h​tml

    Reply
  25. Byron Skinner says:
    June 25, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    Other then the EFV most of the issues have been decided, Rep. Murtha is just try­ing to show that he is rel­e­vant, President Obama will veto the whole DoD bud­get if it doesn’t have what Sec, Gates wants, it real sim­ple.
    The EFV should be can­celed. The state­ment that Rep. Murtha was shocked that the under plate of the EFV was alu­minum and would “Melt like but­ter to an IED/(EFR)” makes one won­der what marine Corps he was in. I know it’s unrea­son­able to expect a Congressman to know about Navel Engineering or even basic met­al­lurgy but his “sur­prise” is curi­ously rev­el­ing about his abil­ity to real­is­ti­cally assess­ments, and pass judge­ment on even the most basic weapon sys­tems.
    Congressman Murtha has traded on his exploits and expe­ri­ences as a Marine Officer (Colonel) as a Congressman, but he has worn out any value of that knowl­edge. It’s time the House Democrats find a younger, and more knowl­edge­able of cur­rent tech­nol­ogy, Veteran mil­i­tary offi­cer to lead this com­mit­tee.
    The dual roles of an amphibi­ous land­ing vehi­cle and an Armored Personal Carrier are vastly dif­fer­ent. The mis­guided use by the Marines of the AAV& Amphibious Vehicle in the Anbur was a costly in Marine lives lost in these totally unsuited vehi­cles.
    The amphibi­ous war­fare mis­sion of the Marines will con­tinue and the AAV7 is an aging plat­form and not suited for over the hori­zon land­ing oper­a­tions, it’s just to slow to cover the increased dis­tances at sea. The Marines should build a ded­i­cated amphibi­ous vehi­cle that I’m sure would cost less then the $10 mil­lion per copy price tag of the EFV and buy a ded­i­cated AFV, per­haps an already devel­oped “off the shelf” vehi­cle, the com­bined costs of the two should be far less then the EFV.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  26. JH says:
    June 25, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    Thanks for ask­ing him about the boon­dog­gle FCS…

    Reply
  27. Will says:
    June 25, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Murtha chairs the Defense Subcommittee of the HAC because he has senior­ity so he gets his choice of assign­ment. It works the same way for Reps & for Dems & it’s not going to change.
    USMC gen­er­als decided that the Corps needs vehi­cles that can get to the beach on their own rather than by way of an LCAC. Anybody know why?

    Reply
  28. Byron Skinner says:
    June 25, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    Good Afternoon Will,
    Lets see the gen­er­als want the EFV, why. Oh gee Will, let me make a wild guess here, could it be that many of those now retired, and soon to be, U.S.M.C. Generals are now, pr will be, or in the case of the 25 years of the devel­op­ment of the EFV have been employed by BAE/​General Dynamics/​FMC or the other pre merge com­pa­nies and make a fac­tor of 2X or 3X or more then what they were paid on active duty.
    As fort Rep. Murtha, as you say the Democrats are still on the senior­ity sys­tem, maybe it’s time to change.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  29. gildasd says:
    June 25, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    Ad Hominen it is…
    BdWilcox, of the links pro­vided, only MSNBC tries to neu­tral and stick to the facts. The oth­ers are just too busy being par­ti­san to give mean­ing­full info.
    All in all, we still are learn­ing about a man, politi­cian, who not as dis­creet about his slease as oth­ers are.
    Does that teach me any­thing about his cur­rent pro­pos­als? No. Nothing. Bullshit info.
    Thanks Will and Byron for the insight.
    (PS the best warfight­ers I ever saw, or heard about, where also near crim­i­nals in all aspect themselves…)

    Reply
  30. bdwilcox says:
    June 25, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    “Ad Hominen it is…
    BdWilcox, of the links pro­vided, only MSNBC tries to neu­tral and stick to the facts. The oth­ers are just too busy being par­ti­san to give mean­ing­full info.“
    –I see. To you “Ad Hominem” = “Facts you don’t agree with.” Your response sounds rather ad hominem itself. Once again, thou doth protest too much.

    Reply
  31. jim says:
    June 25, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    Gildas asked: “Ex marine chaps, please explain why his ideas are bad, not why you don’t like his shirt. I want and need to know why some ex mil­i­tary don’t like his IDEAS and PROGRAM.“
    #1 — You are wrong. The great major­ity of for­mer Marines know that Murtha is a damn fine con­gress­man who has the best inter­ests of the mil­i­tary and coun­try at heart.
    #2 — The major­ity of the peo­ple here throw­ing insults at Murtha are not for­mer or cur­rent Marines or for­mer or cur­rent mem­bers of any mil­i­tary ser­vice. They are feather mer­chants, sand crabs, and dit­to­heads that par­rot the words of Limbaugh and LGF.
    #3 — The rea­sons Limbaugh and the whackos try to put him down are pri­mar­ily:
    a] Back in 2005 he sub­mit­ted a res­o­lu­tion in Congress call­ing for the rede­ploy­ment of U.S. troops from Iraq and that we estab­lish an “over-​​the-​​horizon” pres­ence in coun­tries nearby to Iraq.
    b] Also in 2005 at a press con­fer­ence, he brought up the Haditha inci­dent pre­vi­ously reported in the press. Even though his state­ments were based on a report pre­pared by the mil­i­tary, he was lam­basted — per­haps right­fully so or per­haps not — for men­tion­ing it before the indi­vid­u­als had their day in court.
    c] In 2006, Murtha was incor­rectly quoted as say­ing that the U.S. was a greater threat to world peace than North Korea or Iran. He never said that. O’Reilly apol­o­gized to Murtha for repeat­ing the untruth, but Drudge, Limbaugh, Tucker Carlson, and Newt Gingrich did not.
    #4 — BTW, there are no ex-​​Marine-​​chaps, there are Marines and former-​​Marines.

    Reply
  32. Rhyno327 says:
    June 26, 2009 at 8:54 am

    I really don’t have much respect for Murtha. I really dis­like Spector too. They are there too long, and need to GO. Sell the F-​​22 to the Japanese. Why not? It would keep the line run­ning and give an ally a great capa­bil­ity. We WILL need capa­ble allies in Asia one day soon. Same with Australia. The Chi-​​coms are ramp­ing up, and the Russians will ALWAYS behave like Soviets. Not to men­tion NK and Iran. As for the EFV, did not know the bot­tom was ALUMINUM. Its also flat. I don’t think I would want to be in one of those in an urban envi­ron­ment. There’s gotta be a bet­ter way.

    Reply
  33. KR says:
    July 5, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    Murtha, He has proven that he talks out of both sides of his mouth and his party the same. They are in charge now so what­ever hap­pens is the Dems fault. Murtha has got to go.

    Reply
  34. Bill D says:
    July 6, 2009 at 5:44 am

    Both the F-​​22 and JSF are obso­lete. The F-​​117 has been retired and for good rea­son. The B-​​2 is now obso­lete and will be retired soon as well. We need addi­tional nodal con­nec­tiv­ity and a larger stick. Not JSF or F-​​22 they are now worth­less and every­one knows this as a fact. Both of these plat­forms have went via the way of the Dinosaur. Stop Spending Billions of Dollars on obso­lete plat­forms!!!!!!
    BD
    USAF, Ret.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No one is saying that christains never do violent things we do all faiths...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Hey look its zandor trying to make people think this is a hate site or...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It is sort of puzzeling that a room filled with highly trained US Army...
      Zandor
    • Keep it Simple
      Dear Big Daddy; Your last post is a laugh. You carried 100 lbs for 20 miles?...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage