DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Av Week Extra » USAF Buys More JASSM-​​ERs for Flight-​​tests

USAF Buys More JASSM-​​ERs for Flight-​​tests

This arti­cle first appeared in Aerospace Daily & Defense Report.

The U.S. Air Force awarded Lockheed Martin a $23 mil­lion con­tract for 12 extended-​​range Joint Air-​​to-​​Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSM-​​ERs) despite ongo­ing ques­tions about the reli­a­bil­ity of the base­line model.

The con­tract includes the pur­chase of 12 JASSM-​​ERs, stealthy cruise mis­siles which are designed to travel up to 500 nau­ti­cal miles to strike a ground tar­get. Six will be used in devel­op­men­tal flight-​​tests and the remain­ing six are slated for oper­a­tional test­ing, says Alan Jackson, JASSM pro­gram direc­tor for devel­oper Lockheed Martin.

Meanwhile, the Air Force and Lockheed Martin are prepar­ing for Lot 6 accep­tance flight-​​tests; this will demon­strate the capa­bil­ity of the base­line JASSM, which is designed for a 200 nau­ti­cal mile range. The tests are likely to take place in August. “If the next round of mis­siles do not per­form well, then it will not be pos­i­tive for the pro­gram,” David Van Buren, act­ing assis­tant sec­re­tary of the Air Force, told reporters dur­ing a round­table May 15.

Problems with mis­sile reli­a­bil­ity in pre­vi­ous lot accep­tance tests have cast a pall over the pro­gram. Four of 10 mis­siles tested from Lot 5 in February failed to hit their tar­gets. However, the prob­lems with reli­a­bil­ity began more than two years ago. Jackson says the com­pany is com­mit­ted to a 90 per­cent reli­a­bil­ity rate no later than Lot 11.

The root cause of prob­lems with Lot 5 mis­siles was found to be a cable har­ness, which has been redesigned. Jackson says the com­pany is retro­fitting the fix onto other Lot 5 mis­siles at Lockheed Martin’s expense. This change was also built into the Lot 6 mis­siles on the pro­duc­tion line.

Read the rest of this story from our Aviation Week friends at Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

July 9th, 2009 | Av Week Extra | 45664 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/07/09/usaf-buys-more-jassm-ers-for-flight-tests/USAF+Buys+More+JASSM-ERs+for+Flight-tests2009-07-09+12%3A49%3A53Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Congress Orders Army to Field MultiCam (maybe) | The Forested Vales of Afghanistan » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. AMMO says:
    July 10, 2009 at 2:33 am

    Really? JASSM’s again? A great missle, if it ever works. Seriously, this thing is the most tem­pra­men­tal weapon in the inven­tory. When we got our first ship­ment of the base­line JASSM’s from Lockheed, the con­trac­tor was going crazy over “how awe­some these missles are, you could drop them from 30 feet and noth­ing will break, and they will always pass the IBIT test”. Yeah well, half the missles failed, and the first one that got dropped, still in the cas­ket, from 3 feet, broke. If the JASSM-​​ER is any­thing like the old model(which it is, just with a bet­ter engine), they will never get used. Send them back, and open up a CHILI’s at a few over­seas bases.

    Reply
  2. SMSgt Mac says:
    July 13, 2009 at 10:00 am

    So AMMO,
    Are you a Muzzle ‘Ef’fer or BB Stacker at heart? (The worst thing the AF ever did with Munitions Maintenance was phase out the Missile Pu**ies LOL!)
    IYAAYAS!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage