Comments on: Say What You Want About the Russians.…

By: ReconTeam

ReconTeam — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:48:31 +0000

How much do you think your average soldier in China gets paid compared to his American counterpart? Or how much their engineers and workers in the factories get paid? Obama has cut missile defense programs, right when they seem they might actually be useful considering how the North Koreans are tossing missles everywhere? We have yet to see the replacement for the FCS MGV program, F-22A production has been cut far too much, the Navy is having all sorts of trouble getting 300+ ships, and there are new programs that need to start now, and that involves funding them. It isn’t a problem with the Democrats, although they are leaning too far to the damn left, it is the idiotic ideas of liberals in general, whose priorities are just wrong.

By: Razer

Razer — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:37:46 +0000

This is the wrong place for this, but I feel I need to. Getting tired of every one of these comment threads during into an "Obama Bash". "...insane liberals want to slash the defense budget down to nothing" There will always be fringe groups that either want the U.S. to become a military state or want to cut military spending to nothing. Those people aren't in power and have no pull in modern politics. Yes, some of them are in Congress, but how many of their proposals are getting any tractions? Military spending is increasing 4% (or 2%, or 9%... really depends who you ask) in 2010. That's higher than the rate of inflation. It's also higher than W. Bush was requesting. Kind of odd to complain about Obama when he's actually requesting more than the previous administration did. The "Obama is cutting spending" is pointed to because the Pentagon requested $60 billion more in 2010 than what was on the Bush plan. The administration declined and instead gave a smaller increase. But that is called a "cut" because it wasn't what the Pentagon requested. The majority of the cuts to that $60 billion amount were made to the ABM program. In 2010, the U.S. will spend over $600 billion on the military. In comparison, the threat most spoken about (China) is spending $100 billion. But that's cool. We can keep on screaming that Obama is gutting the military, despite the fact that it's false, because people gotta be complaining about "liberals" and "Democrats". As for "doing nothing", again I'm confused. Georgia was invaded during the Bush administration. Nothing was done. North Korea was given flowers and candy every time it threatened to spit. And yet people are pointing to Obama asking why he hasn't cleaned up these messes? Hell, this administration's stance on North Korea is stronger than any that has been taken since Reagan. I by no means love Obama. I didn't even vote for the guy. But this parroting of nonesense in every one of these threads is a pain in the ass. Can't we talk about, you know, Defense Tech?

By: John Moore

John Moore — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:06:53 +0000

When trying to sell that new air defence system the s300 i think its called.
Can they get better publicity for it.
So good it took out our own! not sayion thats the reason behing it but they can spin this anyway they want.

By: ReconTeam

ReconTeam — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:36:07 +0000

sameasiteverwas, we are spending far more on entitlement programs these days than military expenditures, and insane liberals want to slash the defense budget down to nothing among their other stupidity.

By: Sgt Oblat

Sgt Oblat — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:45:31 +0000

As the Georgians say — “America stood behind us — well behind us, and just watched”

By: sameasiteverwas

sameasiteverwas — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:18:12 +0000

“We are to end up following the path the Europeans have taken of slowly disarming ourselves. All the while the Russians and Chinese aren’t playing along and don’t buy into the liberal “new-age morality” garbage.“
Yes, that’s why more than 20% of the (enormous) Federal budget goes to DoD and defense-related programs. Because we’re disarming ourselves.

By: ReconTeam

ReconTeam — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:08:04 +0000

Ah the Tu-160, I love our B-1B Lancer, but I wish we had a larger version of it just to show up the Russians.
Of course the liberals in power would never dare build such things, or new armored fighting vehicles, etc. We are to end up following the path the Europeans have taken of slowly disarming ourselves. All the while the Russians and Chinese aren’t playing along and don’t buy into the liberal “new-age morality” garbage.

By: ewok40k

ewok40k — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:50:09 +0000

Europe can buy oil elsewhere, Russia cant get $/E$ elsewhere.
Nobody is going to war with Russsia over Georgia, but Russia would dig itself an economical grave. Again.

By: flying fart prodly joyned

flying fart prodly joyned — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:55:54 +0000

@Crusader
@Because their GPS sucks, they used cluster bombs in civilian areas(just in case but russians dont have a moral problem with that)…—
soo… you both know that much about their millitary Glonass? tell me please more. (aside that russian system is very different to be called GPS)
@Is Georgia a NATO member yet or not?–
why? because you will build a pipeline into USA from there?
@If Russia controls this, they would have a stranglehold on European oil.–
1: EU can live very good without russian oil..
2: Russian Federation calls the 1/3 of European continent own homeland. tell me about european strangeholds now..
AND PLEASE! THIS ALL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A FACT ABOUT GEORGIAN NATIONALISM AND THE TRY TO GET FORMER INDEPENDENT COUNTRIES WITH NON GEORGIAN POPULATION INTO OWN TERITORY AGAIN!

By: ?

Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:25:03 +0000

Looks like their intel is the suck to start a war over a measley 1%. Since when do the Russkies care about civilian casualties anyway? USAF kills more by accident. Their sorty rate must have been pretty pathetic for such a low tally. OTOH, they are probably hard up for avgas. I only saw COIN plinkers on TV — nothing with more than 2 engines flying. So oil it is then.