http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Sat, 26 May 2012 04:14:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-90825 Lally Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:15:42 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-90825 Ok, this is getting to me. If none of the combatants are part robot/human, then it's not a cyber attack. Same for cybercrime or cyberspace. Cyberspace is fiction, used in appropriately 10 years ago when reporters didn't know better. Instead, we have The Internet. Internet attack is a simple, straightforward term. Same as "Air Attack" or "Sea Attack." Ok, this is getting to me.
If none of the combatants are part robot/human, then it’s not a cyber attack. Same for cybercrime or cyberspace. Cyberspace is fiction, used in appropriately 10 years ago when reporters didn’t know better.
Instead, we have The Internet. Internet attack is a simple, straightforward term. Same as “Air Attack” or “Sea Attack.”

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-90824 piliy Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:51:11 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-90824 Have you seen:Wordpress before? They have literal ping back choices etc....And my https,from them never works???? I'm smelling a worm then. Have you seen:Wordpress before? They have literal ping back choices etc.…And my https,from them never works???? I’m smelling a worm then.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-90823 piliy Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:48:33 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-90823 Haa,I'm glad I have no confidence in GOV info! Haa,I’m glad I have no confidence in GOV info!

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-90822 Spy Guy Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:38:34 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-90822 The The

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-90821 JKL Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:10:26 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-90821 Turns out it originated in the UK, not North Korea: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jul/15/hacking-usa Short Link: http://tinyurl.com/mx8gqy Turns out it originated in the UK, not North Korea:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jul/15/hacking-usa
Short Link:
http://tinyurl.com/mx8gqy

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-90819 rick Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:36:36 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-90819 Considering how far the US is behind in science, tech and math this should not surprise anyone. We need to make it a priority that we have skilled thinkers in this country. If some nation decides to take down key networks we are in a world of hurt. For example all of our Nuke Plants are monitored by one key office in Atlanta. What if you attack that location and create a false warning. Considering how far the US is behind in science, tech and math this should not surprise anyone. We need to make it a priority that we have skilled thinkers in this country. If some nation decides to take down key networks we are in a world of hurt. For example all of our Nuke Plants are monitored by one key office in Atlanta. What if you attack that location and create a false warning.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-90817 Chris Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:25:15 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-90817 These attacks are associated with war, as we have seen when Russia used them, along with a conventional military campaign, against Georgia. However, I wonder how much disinformation the governmental bodies use with these attacks. After all, wouldn't showing our full capability in a relatively minor attack by N. Korea be a bad move? Doing so would allow them to plan a better attack when a large conflict erupted. These attacks are associated with war, as we have seen when Russia used them, along with a conventional military campaign, against Georgia.
However, I wonder how much disinformation the governmental bodies use with these attacks. After all, wouldn’t showing our full capability in a relatively minor attack by N. Korea be a bad move? Doing so would allow them to plan a better attack when a large conflict erupted.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-86489 Karl Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:51:33 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-86489 I wish we could have a filter for the brainless comments that add NO value and their posters that do not have the capacity to professionally debate the critical issue that this blog brings up! By the way there is a typo It says flying fart and should be brainless fart! I wish we could have a filter for the brainless comments that add NO value and their posters that do not have the capacity to professionally debate the critical issue that this blog brings up!
By the way there is a typo
It says flying fart and should be brainless fart!

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-86488 flying fart prodly joyned Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:26:09 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-86488 North Korean launches illegal missiles and nuclear bombs without consequence.-- North Korean launches illegal missiles..-- --..launches illegal missiles..-- --..illegal missiles..-- WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.. dude you save my day! North Korean launches illegal missiles and nuclear bombs without consequence.–
North Korean launches illegal missiles..–
–..launches illegal missiles..–
–..illegal missiles..–
WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.. dude you save my day!

]]> http://defensetech.org/2009/07/13/us-ignored-warnings-of-cyber-attack/#comment-86487 flying fart prodly joyned Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:23:52 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4573#comment-86487 @JOhn Moore what kind of trol-shit ar you smoking again? @JOhn Moore
what kind of trol-shit ar you smoking again?

]]>