DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » Company Says No ‘Flesh-​​Eating’ Ground Drones

Company Says No ‘Flesh-​​Eating’ Ground Drones

EATER.jpg

The Pentagon has shown it has a great appetite for drones and robots — every­thing from missile-​​firing UAVs to pro­to­type patrol-​​bots guard­ing air base perimeters.

But a Maryland com­pany work­ing on a pro­gram for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, DARPA, has the idea of giv­ing the robots their own appetites, let­ting them feed on bio­mass as a means of fuel­ing themselves.

But as the image of flesh-​​eating drones refu­el­ing off the bat­tle­field dead has spread in recent days, Cyclone Power Technologies of Florida, the com­pany devel­op­ing the robot’s engine, has issued a state­ment about the Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot’s — aka EATR — diet.

It is veg­e­tar­ian, the com­pany said in a press state­ment released Thursday, in response to sto­ries with head­lines such as “Dawn of the corpse-​​eating robots?” and “Pentagon con­tracts com­pany for flesh-​​eating robots.”

“We com­pletely under­stand the public’s con­cern about futur­is­tic robots feed­ing on the human pop­u­la­tion, but that is not our mis­sion,” Harry Schoell, chief exec­u­tive offi­cer of Cyclone, said in the state­ment. “We are focused on demon­strat­ing that our engines can cre­ate usable, green power from plen­ti­ful, renew­able plant mat­ter. The com­mer­cial appli­ca­tions alone for this earth-​​friendly energy solu­tion are enormous.”

EATR is being devel­oped by Robotic Technology Inc. of Maryland under a pro­gram spon­sored by DARPA. EATR is envi­sioned as a robotic plat­form able to con­duct long-​​range, long-​​endurance mis­sions with­out the need for man­ual or con­ven­tional refu­el­ing, Cyclone explained in its statement.

Cyclone said RTI’s EATER will be able to find, ingest and extract energy from bio­mass — that is, “twigs, grass clip­pings and wood chips — small, plant-​​based items for which RTI’s robotic tech­nol­ogy is designed to forage.

“Desecration of the dead is a war crime under Article 15 of the Geneva Conventions, and is cer­tainly not some­thing sanc­tioned by DARPA, Cyclone or RTI,” the com­pany said.

– Bryant Jordan

Share |

July 17th, 2009 | Bizarro | 464052 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/07/17/company-says-no-flesh-eating-ground-drones/Company+Says+No+%27Flesh-Eating%27+Ground+Drones2009-07-17+13%3A35%3A40jnoonan You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « ‘Cross Strait’ Relations Changing | India’s Ammo Storage Problem » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. atacms says:
    July 17, 2009 at 9:01 am

    I think it’s good that they responded, but at the same time a bit pathethic too that they had to respond to inane and idi­otic com­ments posted on teh net.
    Just because some­thing says bio­mass, some idiots thought they’d be funny and argue that this would then mean that it would eat human flesh.
    Who would even think of desig­ing such a thing?!

    Reply
  2. A. Nonymous says:
    July 17, 2009 at 9:36 am

    It’s com­fort­ing to know that the Soylent Green Corporation isn’t diver­si­fy­ing into energy generation.

    Reply
  3. Rip says:
    July 17, 2009 at 10:56 am

    I recall a Si-​​Fi short story from my youth, many years ago, wherein a future bat­tle­field was pop­u­lated by tiny swarm­ing robots (per­haps today they would be char­ac­ter­ized as micro-​​UGV). They were mobile, equipped with sen­sors (ther­mal, opti­cal, odor sens­ing, radi­o­log­i­cal) to locate liv­ing human beings. Their busi­ness was the gnaw­ing down by high speed rotary blades of any “enemy” human they located. Think mini-​​battle bots. The enemy was dif­fer­en­ti­ated because the friendly’s wore a spe­cial­ized iso­topi­cally mixed “dog tag”.
    So some­body already thought of this idea years ago. Another been there, done that. (TGIF)

    Reply
  4. Byron Skinner says:
    July 17, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    This doesn’t deem to be a very well thought out tech­nol­ogy, but again it came form the pur­vey­ors of fic­tion FOX NEWS.
    Two ques­tions. First where does it sh** and sec­ond how will it wipe itself. UAV’s with inflamed hem­or­rhoids could be a bat­tle field night­mare.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  5. kim scholer says:
    July 17, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Not being car­nivo­rious doesn’t garu­an­tee any­thing — Hitler was a vegetarian.

    Reply
  6. conlad says:
    July 17, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    What’s next? Wheat-​​eating Humvees? Just imag­ine how much for­rage your MBT would need?

    Reply
  7. Jim MacAvoy says:
    July 17, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    Well if it can be pro­grammed to injest towel-​​heads only.…

    Reply
  8. Jim MacAvoy says:
    July 17, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    “ingest”. My bad.

    Reply
  9. Crusader says:
    July 17, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    Oh Jim, that was not nice. Haven’t you heard from our own home grown Taliban, Obama Hussein, that it’s not polit­i­cally cor­rect to call them Towel-​​Heads?
    They are Hair-​​Challenged Arabians…

    Reply
  10. SWell says:
    July 17, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    It’s fun to joke about it but bio­mass is bio­mass, what­ever the form. The arti­cle I read stated the unit would be pro­grammed to look for twigs, grass, etc… If it can be pro­grammed to look for one type of fuel it can be pro­grammed to look for another.

    Reply
  11. P.Prendergast says:
    July 17, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    Would it be cheaper to mount a cam­era to a horse??

    Reply
  12. bdwilcox says:
    July 17, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    “This doesn’t deem to be a very well thought out tech­nol­ogy, but again it came form the pur­vey­ors of fic­tion FOX NEWS.“
    –Yeah, totally unlike that favorite lib­eral news source, CNN, where its chief new exec­u­tive, Eason Jordan, admit­ted cov­er­ing up Saddam Hussein’s atroc­i­ties.
    http://​www​.hon​estre​port​ing​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​c​r​i​t​i​q​u​e​s​/​C​N​N​s​_​I​r​a​q​i​_​C​o​v​e​r​-​U​p​.​asp
    People in glass houses…

    Reply
  13. Clueless-in-DC says:
    July 17, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    Yeah, CNN, which proudly broad­casted the run­ning toll of how many US troops were killed in Iraq, and con­sis­tently broad­casted how this (bogus) Mosque was bombed or that (faked) wed­ding party was attacked. If CNN cov­ered WWII we would have never won…
    Yet they do not keep a run­ning total of how many babies are mur­dered in the US every day… Around 4,200 US troops died in Iraq to date. Over 800,000 abor­tions were per­formed in 2003 alone. That is like 200 Iraq wars…
    This cur­rent pres­i­dent is appaled by Gitmo, CIA tor­ture and call­ing this con­flict the “War on Terror”. Yet fully sup­ports the mur­der­ing of infants.
    Maybe he sup­ports “green” energy gen­er­a­tion off of baby bio-​​mass.…

    Reply
  14. stephen russell says:
    July 17, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Very Radical idea, bio­fuel robot, now how about cars, planes & trains. very Radical.
    Unique
    Produce more for Civie Apps.
    Way 2 Cool.
    Great for SyFy movie alone.
    See Military Channel​.com

    Reply
  15. flying fart prodly joyned says:
    July 18, 2009 at 4:10 am

    @stephen rus­sell
    i bet there is much of biogras inside of Irak and Afghanistan. imag­ine that thing doing the “Scorched Earth” strat­egy just by feed­ing itself.. i see the angry iraki sheeps at US congress.……

    Reply
  16. deusvolt says:
    July 18, 2009 at 10:42 am

    ||Would it be cheaper to mount a cam­era to a horse?? || P.Prendergast at July 17, 2009 09:13 PM
    Best com­ment I seen on the boards, since for­ever! Loled!

    Reply
  17. Anon says:
    July 18, 2009 at 11:56 am

    I liked that com­ment about mount­ing a cam­era to a horse too. Sometimes the best solu­tions are the sim­plest.
    This inven­tion reminds me of so many of the other “Rube Goldberg” ideas that the com­pa­nies that feed the mil­i­tary are con­stantly com­ing up with. They’ve always got to have some­thing new, flashy, and high-​​tech, even if no one really needs it.

    Reply
  18. Bambooviper says:
    July 18, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    I’m still try­ing to fig­ure out why the coun­tries with all the oil are the bad guys that start attacks on us so we can go in and steal their oil? Huuummmm!

    Reply
  19. Bambooviper says:
    July 18, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    And why do we spend so much on tak­ing lives and so lit­tle on sav­ing them.

    Reply
  20. Greg says:
    July 19, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    Reminds me of the movie “Screamers”. I would not care if a robot fed off my dead body. After all I would be dead and would not care what hap­pened to my husk. Feeding war­bots sounds bet­ter then just plain rot­ting in the ground or being cre­mated so my ashes get scat­tered to do noth­ing.
    If these things are veg­e­tar­i­ans chances are they will be sick allt he time just like every veg­e­tar­ian I have ever come across. Meat it does the body or war­bot good.

    Reply
  21. Galactic Cannibal says:
    July 19, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    And what’s wrong with using a 8 ounce slug of NUKE mate­r­ial to power this puppy. It could then oper­ate in the bat­tle field for a mim­i­mum of 1000 years or until it was stopped.

    Reply
  22. Richard Justis says:
    July 19, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    There is noth­ing wrong with this planet, it is the sick bast**ds that inhabit it.

    Reply
  23. c.w.v. says:
    July 19, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    To-​​atacms-​​July 17, 2009-09:01 Hrs.
    Who Indeed ??????

    Reply
  24. murc says:
    July 19, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    Bambooviper said:
    “And why do we spend so much on tak­ing lives and so lit­tle on sav­ing them.“
    really…thats what you think!?
    from my cal­cu­la­tions we could have saved bil­lions of dol­lars and thou­sands of lives had we just nuked all of iraq’s major cities.….But we didn’t.

    Reply
  25. freefallingbomb says:
    July 20, 2009 at 4:34 am

    If this robot is her­biv­o­rous, NOT a car­ni­vore /​ man-​​eater (but since that’s what its U.S. American man­u­fac­turer assures, that actu­ally means NOTHING ), then how does it move around in the desert? Where does it chip wood and grass there?
    Plus: Aren’t the plan­ets (nat­ural and arti­fi­cial) green and arable areas over­bur­dened enough to be addi­tion­ally con­sumed by sense­less, self-​​sustaining, U.S. American “Life-​​digesting machines”?
    (Shouldn’t we first set free a few of these robots in the U.S.A.‘s best pre­served land­scapes them­selves?)
    Continuing this line of thought, will the U.S. Nazi Forces also label and use the Humans which they over­run in the future as “live fuel” (as opposed to “fos­sile fuel”) ?
    Sincerely, only U.S. Americans could — and DO — invent such a sick, SACRILEGIOUS shit.

    Reply
  26. DanHartong says:
    July 20, 2009 at 10:51 am

    Yeah, either some­body saw Charlton Heston on late night cable in “Soylent Green” or they saw the “new War of the Worlds” before Tom Cruise’s char­ac­ter got out the grenades.
    That would be a REAL pun­ish­ment for wear­ing an enemy uni­form in a war zone!!

    Reply
  27. DanHartong says:
    July 20, 2009 at 10:52 am

    How about we get them to run on spent brass and IED remains??
    RM1

    Reply
  28. dbeast says:
    July 20, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    I am sim­ply aston­ished at the level of big­otry and igno­rance that has been posted here.

    Reply
  29. Ron says:
    July 20, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    *If this robot is her­biv­o­rous, NOT a car­ni­vore /​ *man-​​eater (but since that’s what its U.S. *American man­u­fac­turer assures, that actu­ally *means NOTHING ), then how does it move around in *the desert? Where does it chip wood and grass *there?
    Do you really care for an answer or are you con­tent just to bash the US? If you’ve every been to a desert, you would know that there is ALWAYS some form of plant life. Not much I’ll grant you, but there is plant life.
    *Plus: Aren’t the plan­ets (nat­ural and *arti­fi­cial) green and arable areas over­bur­dened *enough to be addi­tion­ally con­sumed by sense­less, *self-​​sustaining, U.S. American “Life-​​digesting *machines”?
    *(Shouldn’t we first set free a few of these *robots in the U.S.A.‘s best pre­served land­scapes *them­selves?)
    *Continuing this line of thought, will the U.S. *Nazi Forces also label and use the Humans which *they over­run in the future as “live fuel” (as *opposed to “fos­sile fuel”) ?
    Please spare us the US Nazi Forces Drivel, When was the last time the US MILITARY invaded a coun­try to expand its ter­ri­tory? How about 1898 dur­ing the Spanish — American war, well before you and prob­a­bly your par­ents were even born. When was the last time the US tried to exter­mi­nate an entire race? NEVER! Before you dare to com­pare the US mil­tary to the 3rd Reich, have the courage and hon­esty to have some facts in hand before you make a state­ment like this.
    *Sincerely, only U.S. Americans could — and DO — *invent such a sick, SACRILEGIOUS shit.
    Really? ONLY Americans “Could and Do” ? Hmmmmm
    Lets take a look at that state­ment shall we.
    Who invented :
    The “Judas Cradle” The Spanish
    The “Chair of Torture” Europe
    The “The Rack” England
    The “Brazen Bull” Greece
    The “Iron Maiden” China
    The “Pear of Anguish” Pick a EUROPEAN coun­try
    The “Land Mine” China
    The “Suicide Bomber” Tiawan
    Face it, his­tory shows that EVERY nation invents things. I’m sure that some­one where you live has invented some­thing that was unre­al­is­tic at some point in his­tory.
    So, to sum up. While the idea of a “Self Sustaining” drone vehi­cle of this nature DOES raise con­cerns, the TECHNOLOGY involved in its cre­ation is inter­est­ing. Bio Fuel that can be picked up off the ground has poten­tial. If the bags that I put grass clip­pings in could power my car or my home, I would say that it has poten­tial. If the leaves I rake up every year can fuel my lawn­mower, THAT has poten­tial.
    Posted by: freefalling­bomb at July 20, 2009 04:34 AM

    Reply
  30. Phil White says:
    July 20, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    The level of igno­rance in some of these responses is amazing!

    Reply
  31. ehran says:
    July 20, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    When was the last time the US tried to exter­mi­nate an entire race? NEVER!
    they made a good faith effort to erad­i­cate the amer­i­can indian for a num­ber of years. the his­tory of the us gov’t inter­ac­tion with native amer­i­cans makes for some pretty grim reading.

    Reply
  32. james says:
    July 21, 2009 at 12:19 am

    Great idea, not con­vinced it’s the right appli­ca­tion.
    This tech­nol­ogy would be ideal for recov­er­ing waste bio­mass from remote loca­tions (e.g. forestry thin­nings) for con­ver­sion into biocrude (via fast pyrol­y­sis). It resolves a lot of the trans­port cost issues asso­ci­ated with raw bio­mass recov­ery as well as asso­ci­ated labour costs.
    I’m assum­ing the bots are not gold plated and ridicu­lously over-​​engineered.

    Reply
  33. freefallingbomb says:
    July 21, 2009 at 7:38 am

    To the poster “Ron”:
    .….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…
    I wrote: “Sincerely, only U.S. Americans could — and DO — invent such a sick, SACRILEGIOUS shit.“
    You answered: “Really? ONLY Americans ‘Could and Do’ ? Hmmmmm. Lets take a look at that state­ment shall we.
    Who invented :
    The ‘Judas Cradle’ The Spanish
    The ‘Chair of Torture’ Europe
    The ‘The Rack’ England
    The ‘Brazen Bull’ Greece
    The ‘Iron Maiden’ China
    The ‘Pear of Anguish’ Pick a EUROPEAN coun­try
    The ‘Land Mine’ China
    The ‘Suicide Bomber’ Taiwan“
    .….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…
    1) I know the list, most of it at least. But you for­got some­thing. Most of these coun­tries (and the oth­ers too) already moved past the Dark Ages.
    2) All those old tor­ture /​ exe­cu­tion /​ mil­i­tary devices which you listed can­not threaten planet Earth, only indi­vid­ual Humans. Since you poor U.S. American haven’t the faintest clue “what” I meant with “planet Earth” : We Euros call it “Nature”. European sci­en­tists believe we need it to live.
    3) Your “peace­ful her­bi­vores” have diges­tive bac­te­ria that break down long chains of hydro-​​carb mol­e­cules (that com­pose straw, fibres and other cel­lu­lose) into short = highly ener­getic (“explo­sive”) mol­e­cules (like glu­cose, whose energy is stored in our A.T.P.). But the Military know how to turn these bac­te­ria vir­u­lent, totally out-​​of-​​control = lit­er­ally omniv­o­rous, enabling them to break down meat and all other LIVE tis­sue too. Sooo, will the “E.A.T.R.“‘s engine sto­ically refuse the occa­sional mouth­ful of pro­tein in the desert just to keep rov­ing on or will it include a back-​​up of anthrax-​​like strains, to go 100 % “multi-​​fuel” (= to har­vest Humans, in High U.S. American think /​ speak) ?
    4) I said it before: On the long run, the biggest, most exis­ten­tial threat to the U.S.A. isn’t some Oriental coun­try or the “Axis of Evil” of this sea­son, it’s the way you U.S. Americans your­selves drift men­tally, psy­cho­log­i­cally hope­lessly apart from nor­mal Humans. I can see it com­ing, you don’t. Three prime exam­ples: Electing & even RE-​​electing W …??! Too scared to pro­nounce the obvi­ous Truth about 11 /​ 9 ? Speculating with an unpro­voked nuclear first strike against Russia???? Etc. . Don’t laugh, weep.

    Reply
  34. Prof. Herbie Vore says:
    July 21, 2009 at 7:52 am

    The train­ing of robots is not a sim­ple task and the com­plex­i­ties of what we con­sider to be ordi­nary human tasks should not be under­es­ti­mated. The soft­ware under­ly­ing the mul­ti­ple task man­age­ment can become enor­mously long, with oppor­tu­ni­ties for errors, of course.
    I have man­aged to train 3 of my bet­ter robots to have “break­fast” with me every morn­ing. While I have what you would rec­og­nize as an American country-​​style break­fast, my three electro-​​mechanical friends have a some­what more spe­cial­ized, and I should stress, chem­i­cally related to veg­e­tar­ian diet. They can now mimic my human eat­ing move­ments while recharg­ing them­selves or per­form­ing minor recy­cling activ­i­ties. Just for safety’s sake, I have imprinted them with the title “Herbivore” in at least 50 places within their pro­grams.
    The only prob­lem I’ve noticed lately has been that they appear to watch my food, par­tic­u­larly the eggs and sausages, with great inter­est as I eat them. However, I don’t take this star­ing as any pos­si­ble dan­ger, and they even smile and say, “Thank you, Herbie”, at the end of each meal.
    There’s noth­ing to worry about. I can’t imag­ine any ‘night­mare sce­nario’ of some­thing, any­thing that could go wrong with my pow­er­ful metal­lic friends who were built to have a taste for human tasks. In fact, I’m exper­i­ment­ing with giv­ing them extra work while putting them on a very restricted diet, some­thing that would anger any human, but all they seem to do is qui­etly con­fer with one another more fre­quently.
    Sincerely,
    Dr. Herbie Vore
    Robotologist

    Reply
  35. Thorolf says:
    July 21, 2009 at 11:03 am

    For those stri­dent Europeans here who are so hor­ri­fied at the USA and its mil­i­tary, I say this..
    The NEXT time Europe is being CONQUERRED, do NOT beg us to please come and save you , as we had to do TWICE in the last 100 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Do NOT whine about the Muslims tak­ing over your cow­ardly con­ti­nent because you are too polit­i­cally cor­rect to stop them!
    Do NOT com­plain when Iran has Nukes in a few years and the mis­siles to deliver them to all European coun­tries who refuse to covert to Islam!
    And do NOT ask us to care about Russia grow­ing as large and arro­gant as they were in the past as they start to look at Europe as their next area to be attacked!
    We will just dis­solve all the alliances and defense treaties we have with all European coun­tries, and then let YOU show us how to be BIG and BRAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  36. David says:
    July 21, 2009 at 11:09 am

    I think the robot is pretty cool. Although make you want to envi­sion the worst that could hap­pen and that would be Terminator style appli­ca­tions.
    However I just want to point to the anti-​​Military mouthing off on here. No mat­ter what else you say about what the USA has done in the past, who over the last cou­ple years has been rou­tinely cut­ting REPORTERS, CIVILIANS and OTHER NON COMBAT PEOPLES head off? That would be Muslim Extremist such as the Taliban and oth­ers. Sure we’ve had a few mishaps along the way. But you don’t know the true cost of human life. All the media wants us to know are our Soldiers deaths and any civil­ians we acci­den­tally kill. Never do we hear of entire vil­lages wiped out by Taliban as a show of force to try and cow other vil­lagers into submission.

    Reply
  37. Mick says:
    July 21, 2009 at 11:26 am

    I love to ingest biomass!

    Reply
  38. Terminator says:
    July 21, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    And I’m sure these lit­tle bug­gers won’t eat corpses, or liv­ing humans, or turn on their mas­ters either… Everything the gov­ern­ment gets involved with gets screwed up, so why would this be any dif­fer­ent?!??
    And, if you robotic geniuses go for­ward with autonomous deci­sion mak­ing robots, whats to stop them from decid­ing that all humans are the enemy and attack­ing us too?
    And don’t tell me there will be safe­guards and secu­rity. I’ve worked in IT for 26 years and I KNOW very well that errors are in ANY com­plex sys­tem and tech­nol­ogy that accesses any­thing else can be hacked!
    Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should!
    Think about it…

    Reply
  39. Crusader says:
    July 21, 2009 at 8:14 pm

    Some of the mouthi­est anti-​​Americans that post here are French. That just blows my mind. You should all bow down to America/​ England three times a day and thank us that you don’t speak German…

    Reply
  40. Ron says:
    July 22, 2009 at 9:12 am

    To freefalling­bomb,
    I’m not say­ing that the US is per­fect, although I believe we are a damn sight closer than most oth­ers.
    You wrote, 1) I know the list, most of it at least. But you for­got some­thing. Most of these coun­tries (and the oth­ers too) already moved past the Dark Ages.
    To that I say, your right, that WAS the mid­dle ages. My argue­ment still stands, the US is NOT the only coun­try that “could — and DO — invent such a sick, SACRILEGIOUS shit.”. I was hop­ing you would real­ize that EVERY COUNTRY has made devices that were mis­takes at best and ter­ri­ble at worst.
    You stated “2) All those old tor­ture /​ exe­cu­tion /​ mil­i­tary devices which you listed can­not threaten planet Earth, only indi­vid­ual Humans. Since you poor U.S. American haven’t the faintest clue “what” I meant with “planet Earth” : We Euros call it “Nature”. European sci­en­tists believe we need it to live.“
    Again, I con­cede that you are cor­rect, we DO need the planet earth to sur­vive. In your orig­i­nal state­ment you also said “Plus: Aren’t the plan­ets (nat­ural and arti­fi­cial) green and arable areas over­bur­dened enough to be addi­tion­ally con­sumed by sense­less, self-​​sustaining, U.S. American “Life-​​digesting machines”?
    (Shouldn’t we first set free a few of these robots in the U.S.A.‘s best pre­served land­scapes them­selves?)”. Since I am curi­ous, just what is the pop­u­la­tion den­sity for your coun­try?
    France 279 per square mile
    Spain 229 per square mile
    Germany 237 per square Km
    Etc…
    In America it is 85 per square mile. You APPEAR to be speak­ing out in defense of the planet, how about this. You get your own coun­tries prob­lems fixed BEFORE you try to tell us how to fix ours. WHY can’t you “Europeans” get YOUR prob­lems fixed instead of com­plain­ing about every­thing we do? Are you just upset that we HAVE done a bet­ter job of tak­ing care of the envi­ron­ment than you have? Are you upset that we HAVE learned to Reduce, reuse and recy­cle bet­ter than you have? Are you upset that we have a MUCH bet­ter stan­dard of liv­ing than you do? Or is it that you are just upset that WE, “the evil amer­i­cans” have a MUCH bet­ter stan­dard of liv­ing than you do? AND BEFORE you ask, YES, I have been to Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
    You state, “3) Your “peace­ful her­bi­vores” have diges­tive bac­te­ria that break down long chains of hydro-​​carb mol­e­cules (that com­pose straw, fibres and other cel­lu­lose) into short = highly ener­getic (“explo­sive”) mol­e­cules (like glu­cose, whose energy is stored in our A.T.P.). But the Military know how to turn these bac­te­ria vir­u­lent, totally out-​​of-​​control = lit­er­ally omniv­o­rous, enabling them to break down meat and all other LIVE tis­sue too. Sooo, will the “E.A.T.R.“‘s engine sto­ically refuse the occa­sional mouth­ful of pro­tein in the desert just to keep rov­ing on or will it include a back-​​up of anthrax-​​like strains, to go 100 % “multi-​​fuel” (= to har­vest Humans, in High U.S. American think /​ speak) ?“
    As I said ear­lier “While the idea of a “Self Sustaining” drone vehi­cle of this nature DOES raise con­cerns, the TECHNOLOGY involved in its cre­ation is inter­est­ing. Bio Fuel that can be picked up off the ground has poten­tial. If the bags that I put grass clip­pings in could power my car or my home, I would say that it has poten­tial. If the leaves I rake up every year can fuel my lawn­mower, THAT has poten­tial.” That should make a planet pro­tec­tor happy, this is another exam­ple of poten­tial tech­nol­ogy used to reduce the harm to the planet. I AM NOT ADVOCATING THE DRONE VEHICLE, I am merely point­ing out the POTENTIAL ben­e­fits of the devices power sup­ply.
    And Finally, you had this to say“4) I said it before: On the long run, the biggest, most exis­ten­tial threat to the U.S.A. isn’t some Oriental coun­try or the “Axis of Evil” of this sea­son, it’s the way you U.S. Americans your­selves drift men­tally, psy­cho­log­i­cally hope­lessly apart from nor­mal Humans. I can see it com­ing, you don’t. Three prime exam­ples: Electing & even RE-​​electing W …??! Too scared to pro­nounce the obvi­ous Truth about 11 /​ 9 ? Speculating with an unpro­voked nuclear first strike against Russia???? Etc. . Don’t laugh, weep“
    Hmmm So you hate GEORGE W. BUSH, too bad some of us liked the mans poli­cies. Just how is he rel­e­vant to your com­ments about US inven­tions and the envi­ron­ment? or is this just another European attack on our Government?
    And the OBVIOUS truth about 9/​11? PLEASE elighten me. Oh, let me guess, we should bend over back­ward to APPEASE the mil­i­tant mus­lims, like Europe? Perhaps we should pay them to leave us alone, like Europe. Or MAYBE we should just con­vert to the MUSLIM religon, like …The Europeans. PLEASE tell me that you peo­ple aren’t that fool­ish? PLEASE tell me we WON’T have to save your coun­tries AGAIN!
    Speculation about Nuclear war with Russia, YEP WE DID that and we still do it. Thanks to Europeans and Asians we are now spec­u­lat­ing about Nuclear war with Iran, Pakistan, India, North Korea.…. Etcetera. AND yes, BEFORE you get all indig­nant and say “America built and used the Nuke first” you are right, WE did. If if comes down to it, I PRAY TO GOD (not Allah) THAT WE WILL AGAIN if it is required! And yes, the prospect scares the hell out of me.
    I do weep, I weep for the short sighted peo­ple in Europe who REFUSE to learn from their past and con­tinue to make the same mis­takes that caused the last 2 world wars. America isn’t a per­fect coun­try, we make mis­takes, the dif­fer­ence between our coun­tries is that we tend NOT to make the same mis­take twice.

    Reply
  41. freefallingbomb says:
    July 22, 2009 at 10:13 am

    To the poster “Ron”:
    .….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…
    You wrote (among all your other sub­jec­tive or false claims) : “Are you upset that we have a MUCH bet­ter stan­dard of liv­ing than you — Europeans — do? Or is it that you are just upset that WE, ‘the evil amer­i­cans’ have a MUCH bet­ter stan­dard of liv­ing than you do?“
    AAAAARRGGHHHH what a spec­tac­u­lar train derail­ment!
    “Mercer’s 2009 Quality of Living sur­vey high­lights — Global
    Last updated: 28 April 2009
    European cities dom­i­nate the top of the rank­ing
    Vienna scores high­est for over­all qual­ity of liv­ing, Baghdad the low­est
    Singapore ranks top for city infra­struc­ture; London ranks eighth
    The qual­ity of liv­ing rank­ings are based on a point-​​scoring index, which sees Vienna score 108.6, and Baghdad 14.4. Cities are ranked against New York as the base city with an index score of 100.“
    I repeat: “Cities are ranked against New York as the BASE CITY with an index score of 100.“
    Etc. in:
    http://​www​.mer​cer​.com/​r​e​f​e​r​e​n​c​e​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​.​h​t​m​?​i​d​C​o​n​t​e​n​t​=​1​1​2​8​060
    U.S. American, you gotta wish to live in a nor­mal coun­try (with a nor­mal Politics and a nor­mal every day life) first before hav­ing the right to live in a “rich” coun­try. But even Pakistani and Kongobongo immi­grants become more European after two gen­er­a­tions than you U.S. Americans do… Or do you really think that Paris and Venice were still like Venice and Paris if only U.S. Americans lived in it?
    .….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…
    I was about to mince down every other sin­gle claim and word in your answer in exactly the same way, just to kill time (a bor­ing excer­cise, I know), when I saw phrases like “Or MAYBE we should just con­vert to the MUSLIM religon”, with “Muslims” even writ­ten in cap­i­tal let­ters… That’s when I saw how utterly you lost rea­son. You can­not pos­si­bly win against me.
    Normally only the wrongest of all races, the Jews, “argue” like you.
    .….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…
    P.S.:
    You wrote: “Bio Fuel that can be picked up off the ground has poten­tial. If the bags that I put grass clip­pings in could power my car or my home, I would say that it has poten­tial. If the leaves I rake up every year can fuel my lawn­mower, THAT has poten­tial.“
    And in rela­tion to the “E.A.T.R.“‘s fuel source, Nature itself:
    I couldn’t help but to APPRECIATE the irony that a Jew like you has no bet­ter use for bio­mass than to burn it…
    Hey, I like you! On sec­ond thought, maybe we should build that “E.A.T.R.” some day!

    Reply
  42. Our Sponsor says:
    July 22, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    And Now a word from our Sponsor.…
    Tired of tak­ing over a coun­try and hav­ing to clean up after­words? Burial costs got you down? Need a self sus­tain­ing killing unit with­out long resup­ply con­voy lines?
    Try the EATR robot! It slices, it dices and purees with­out the fuss and dis­gust… Act now and we will also throw the handy onion chop­per attach­ment and a set of ginsu knives!!! All for the low low price of $19,995…
    We now return you to the Rob & Free Falling Bomb show.

    Reply
  43. freefallingbomb says:
    July 23, 2009 at 8:57 am

    To the poster “Ron”:
    You wrote: “So, instead of using the Bio-​​Mass I col­lect every week to fuel my home or Car, I should do what?“
    Excuse me?? But didn’t you write in the post before that: “Are you upset that we (U.S. Americans) HAVE learned to Reduce, reuse and recy­cle bet­ter than you have?“
    (P.S.: As a Jew, NEVER say “we”. That’s pre­ten­tious, as well as phys­i­cally impossible)

    Reply
  44. freellingbomb says:
    July 23, 2009 at 9:06 am

    To the poster “his­to­rian”:
    You wrote: “Was it not the French who helped you against Britain? Some might even say there would not be a U.S if not for French sol­diers, weapons and money.“
    You couldn’t pos­si­bly be more right about that. Just look at South Africa and Australia, who never received any (French or other) mil­i­tary aid against per­fid­i­ous Albion: Today, in the 21st Century, they’re still “sub­jects to the Queen” instead of Democracies, like the British them­selves, no kid­ding!
    (I never said that the U.S.A. were an exem­plary Democracy, though…)
    P.S.: Still, there is “some­thing” seri­ously wrong with Wikipedia’s “Quality-​​of-​​Life Index”: Countries like Austria (nr. 20 on that list) and Germany (nr. 26 on that list) DO NOT have a worse qual­ity of life than for exam­ple a banana repub­lic like “Portugal” (nr. 19) .
    And why on Earth is Canada (nr.14) one place BEHIND the U.S.A. (nr. 13, of course) as well, instead of 50 places ahead of the U.S.A.?! Etc.
    Here is the link again:
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​Q​u​a​l​i​t​y​-​o​f​-​L​i​f​e​_​I​n​dex
    The link to the list itself:
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​Q​u​a​l​i​t​y​-​o​f​-​L​i​f​e​_​I​n​d​e​x​#​T​h​e​_​E​c​o​n​o​m​i​s​t​_​I​n​t​e​l​l​i​g​e​n​c​e​_​U​n​i​t​.​E​2​.​8​0​.​9​9​s​_​q​u​a​l​i​t​y​-​o​f​-​l​i​f​e​_​i​n​d​e​x​.​2​C​_​2​005
    P.S.: Isn’t “Sven” a Scandinavian name, “Nr. 3″ ?

    Reply
  45. Ron says:
    July 23, 2009 at 9:13 am

    Norway?! Beautiful coun­try, been there sev­eral times. Parlimentary democ­racy under a con­sti­tu­tional monar­chy, and the King rules until he dies. And this king thing, hows that work­ing out for you?
    Lets see if I remem­ber my his­tory cor­rectly. Yes France did sup­ply pow­der and ammu­ni­tion to amer­ica (unless my mem­ory is going too, I think we paid almost $1 mil­lion dol­lars for a shipload)and yes, France did “acco­mo­date” amer­i­can frigates on the high seas. As I recall France did send about 6000 sol­diers to fight with us, but they didn’t win a war and give us back our coun­try. I con­cede also that their Navy was busy destroy­ing British ship­ping, still, not the same as los­ing your coun­try and hav­ing some one else give it back.
    Now, back to the orig­i­nal topic.
    Could the power cell from this machine be adapted to power say an elec­tri­cal gen­er­a­tor? A Car? Etc… I’m sure that there is more to it, but it sounds like you just drop in some Bio-​​Mass and the thing pow­ers this robot. How much power does it pro­duce? Besides the “EATR”, what other appli­ca­tions has the com­pany devel­oped for the use of the power cell?

    Reply
  46. STC says:
    July 24, 2009 at 8:52 am

    Well, I read all the com­ments and found most of them inter­est­ing. However, when I see peo­ple writ­ing things about Jews and Nazis as was done here, I won­der if these are their true ideas and thoughts or if they are only try­ing to gen­er­ate a heated response.

    Reply
  47. Bambooviper says:
    July 30, 2009 at 12:07 am

    Blow up each oth­ers toys?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      batvette: A lot of JSF money was spent before the meltdown....
      Charles
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? I dunno what...
      Charles
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Senator McCain says, “ Sticks and stones may break my bones...
      Alton
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Jimbo thats pretty much all the british government...
      Valcan
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      I hope so; flexible armor may save lives because...
      Marcase
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage