DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Av Week Extra » Aurora Studies Future Fuel-Saving Options

Aurora Studies Future Fuel-Saving Options

This article first appeared in Aerospace Daily & Defense Report.

Aurora Flight Sciences is developing technology demonstration plans for the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) with the target of identifying ways to reduce air mobility fleet fuel usage 90 percent by 2030–2035.

The study is being conducted under the Revolutionary Configurations for Energy Efficiency (RCEE) program, which is being funded with Recovery Act stimulus money. In June, Boeing and Lockheed Martin were awarded RCEE contracts to study aft-body drag reduction.

Aurora says its study begins with an analysis of airlift and tanker aircraft “to determine the best fleet composition, aircraft performance attributes and technology requirements to meet the aggressive goals.“

Technologies will be evaluated in aerodynamics, structures, propulsion, subsystems and operations. Downselected technologies will be modeled with increasing fidelity, with the goal of drawing up plans to guide AFRL research.

Aurora says it is evaluating multiple aircraft configurations and propulsion-airframe integration alternatives, including distributed multi-engine propulsion systems. The company is part of an MIT-led team studying similar configurations for NASA, for 2030–2035-timeframe commercial transports.

Be sure to check out the newest Russian attack sub, a test of the Israeli Barak and some hot vids from US attack helos in Afghanistan from our friends at Aviation Week, exclusively on Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

July 29th, 2009 | Av Week Extra | 46607 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/07/29/aurora-studies-future-fuel-saving-options/Aurora+Studies+Future+Fuel-Saving+Options2009-07-29+19%3A44%3A03jnoonan You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « A SUPER FAST, (SUPER LOUD) MINISUB | Thurs — Fire for Effect » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Vitor says:
    July 29, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    Too ambitious, seems to be biting more than it could chew, I have my doubts it will do a third of what it intends.

    Reply
  2. irtusk says:
    July 29, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    > identifying ways to reduce air mobility fleet fuel usage 90 percent by 2030–2035.
    this is a very easy goal to accomplish:
    reduce air mobility flights by 90%

    Reply
  3. JN says:
    July 30, 2009 at 5:14 am

    This is a great idea. I think the largest amount of savings is going to come from optimizing fleet composition and distribution of those aircraft. 90% is probably lofty, but its worth it in the long run if they can get anywhere near that. This really strikes me as a tranformative project, that if successful will make substantial impacts.

    Reply
  4. JN says:
    July 30, 2009 at 6:16 am

    I was thinking about this, if they went the radical approach of utilizing something like the Walrus, that would certainly achieve the goal, if you could over look the short comings of derrigables.

    Reply
  5. A. Nonymous says:
    July 30, 2009 at 10:05 am

    I can save AFRL $10 million dollars and 2 years of wasted time. If you want to save that much fuel, use dirigibles and WIGEs instead of C-130s and C-17s. Now AFRL can spend that money figuring out how to keep dirigibles from being shot down by MANPADS, rifles, and kids with slingshots.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      You are senile. The...
      jaythehistorian
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      F-35 has not been canceled…The F-22 has. Alternate engine...
      Robert
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Is General Dynamics LCS still in the...
      Wildcard
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      NLOS-PAM is important to the LCS for some...
      Will
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Well, that's a lot more stable than any AV-8B...
      Cranky Observer
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Isn't this the reason why the Navy went with a...
      @Earlydawn
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      It's a reduction in spending compared with...
      gmanaz
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Perfect, just in time for the program's cancellation.
      John
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I don't doubt that...
      Wildcard
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      It looked like a Transformer at the end!
      Wes
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage