<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Air Bag Armor in the Works</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Charlette Gowan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-197218</link> <dc:creator>Charlette Gowan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:28:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-197218</guid> <description>check out iron man 2 on-line at http://movies.neverseen.net</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out iron man 2 on-line at <a href="http://movies.neverseen.net" rel="nofollow">http://movies.neverseen.net</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rocketman</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-186705</link> <dc:creator>Rocketman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-186705</guid> <description>Good Morning Ladies and Gents, Time for me to &quot;chime in&quot; a little again. There are the bag components which are admittedly a challenge engineering wise to get out and in place in time. However, we have discovered  an energetic that I can only say is &quot;faster&quot; than any conventional 29K FPS. This new energetic would do  two things, assist in rapid deployment. But heres the catch and I can&#039;t get to far into how it works, suffice it to say theres another secret component that has not been, nor will it be shown in public....... Best, David Woroner, SCI </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Ladies and Gents, Time for me to “chime in” a little again.<br /> There are the bag components which are admittedly a challenge engineering wise to get out and in place in time. However, we have discovered  an energetic that I can only say is “faster” than any conventional 29K FPS. This new energetic would do  two things, assist in rapid deployment. But heres the catch and I can’t get to far into how it works, suffice it to say theres another secret component that has not been, nor will it be shown in public.……<br /> Best, David Woroner, SCI</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CorE$kilLZ</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91857</link> <dc:creator>CorE$kilLZ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:39:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91857</guid> <description>I am all for inivative thinkers &amp; thinking. It is ideas like this that pave the way for next  gen logistics. Yeah there are challengs ahead;lets face it this is not ABC, 123. But that does not mean it can&#039;t or souldn&#039;t be done. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for inivative thinkers &amp; thinking.<br /> It is ideas like this that pave the way for next  gen logistics. Yeah there are challengs ahead;lets face it this is not ABC, 123. But that does not mean it can’t or souldn’t be done.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CorE$kilLZ</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91856</link> <dc:creator>CorE$kilLZ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:37:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91856</guid> <description>I am all for inivative thinkers &amp; thinking. It is ideas like this that pave the way for next  gen logistics. Yeah there are challengs ahead;lets face it this is not ABC, 123. But that does not mean it can&#039;t or souldn&#039;t be done. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for inivative thinkers &amp; thinking.<br /> It is ideas like this that pave the way for next  gen logistics. Yeah there are challengs ahead;lets face it this is not ABC, 123. But that does not mean it can’t or souldn’t be done.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M167A1</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91854</link> <dc:creator>M167A1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:11:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91854</guid> <description>Hmmmm  creative at least and like reactive armor is probibily going to be only a one shot deal, but its worth further study. I can see how the system might be gamed with flares or a two stage charge. This might be a real challenge for the programmers. What fun a haji could have setting off airbags with flares... a laugh a second particulary if you put the real IED around the next corner... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm  creative at least and like reactive armor is probibily going to be only a one shot deal, but its worth further study.<br /> I can see how the system might be gamed with flares or a two stage charge. This might be a real challenge for the programmers.<br /> What fun a haji could have setting off airbags with flares… a laugh a second particulary if you put the real IED around the next corner…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: coolhand77</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91853</link> <dc:creator>coolhand77</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:30:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91853</guid> <description>It probably wouldn&#039;t help against an EFP anymore than reactive armor helps against depleted uranium sabot loads out of a 120mm smooth bore.  However, against a standard IED or an RPG/shaped charge warhead, it MIGHT work...the question is how well. I say get it operational, and then give it to the Marines to test to destruction.  If you can&#039;t acceptably Marine proof it, scrap it, otherwise, its another tool in the box that might save lives. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably wouldn’t help against an EFP anymore than reactive armor helps against depleted uranium sabot loads out of a 120mm smooth bore.  However, against a standard IED or an RPG/shaped charge warhead, it MIGHT work…the question is how well.<br /> I say get it operational, and then give it to the Marines to test to destruction.  If you can’t acceptably Marine proof it, scrap it, otherwise, its another tool in the box that might save lives.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anon</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91852</link> <dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:35:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91852</guid> <description>I&#039;ve got a much better idea than armor, and I&#039;m not kidding. Force fields are what we really need. I realize the tech isn&#039;t there yet, but it is as inevitable as the sun rising tomorrow morning; it will happen someday. Let&#039;s hope it happens sooner rather than later. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve got a much better idea than armor, and I’m not kidding. Force fields are what we really need.<br /> I realize the tech isn’t there yet, but it is as inevitable as the sun rising tomorrow morning; it will happen someday. Let’s hope it happens sooner rather than later.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DW</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91851</link> <dc:creator>DW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:24:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91851</guid> <description>Good Evening Folks. I must admit I always I learn from your posts and would never dismiss or put them down. Ive learned better. May I offer some &quot;clarity&quot; to this post? First, I hope it makes you think. If it does, than its all good. ok? :) Heres the thing folks, Im only showing you a little tiny piece of the final product. It I showed you the &quot;final,&quot; you may see it differently. The bags are a consideration, and I know how to make them properly with certain wave killing other components. Im surprised I don&#039;t see more written about the &quot;sensing components&quot; of the system, rather than the &quot;stick out armor?&quot; Without detection of proper assignment, it won&#039;t work you see? So, give that a little thought. I only am writing this because I belive so much &quot;in the people, to teach me as well, people Ive never even met.&quot; I am wide open, and appreciate your continued comments. May I throw in a little &quot;Hot Sauce&quot; to spice things up? If the system is designed to handle handle overpressure waves (calculated at lets just say, &quot;over 20K FPS,&quot; &lt; would it not make a little logic to expect something (an EFP, moving at a max V of 4K FPS to easily be handled?) The reason I am &quot;chiming in&quot; is I wanna get more feedback, I don&#039;t claim to be george genious, just a guy with an idea. But an EFP is much slower, (which it is ) then lets stay focused on the &quot;blast over, under, over pressures....You are mostly made of &quot;water&quot;, yes, blood is water, basically. So, what about lungs? and any other air spaces? Just some food for thought ok? Thank you for your time and patience with me. I know Im, umm...... lets just say not the &quot;easiet guy to figure out.&quot; I got a note tonite from a company asking me if I had a &quot;learning disability? I answered them........ I said of course I do! I got my diploma, pissed on it and asked em if they liked the smell...... :) &quot;f*ck peace!&quot; An American Bad Ass, Outcomm....... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Evening Folks. I must admit I always I learn from your posts and would never dismiss or put them down. Ive learned better.<br /> May I offer some “clarity” to this post? First, I hope it makes you think. If it does, than its all good. ok? :)<br /> Heres the thing folks, Im only showing you a little tiny piece of the final product. It I showed you the “final,” you may see it differently. The bags are a consideration, and I know how to make them properly with certain wave killing other components.<br /> Im surprised I don’t see more written about the “sensing components” of the system, rather than the “stick out armor?” Without detection of proper assignment, it won’t work you see? So, give that a little thought. I only am writing this because I belive so much “in the people, to teach me as well, people Ive never even met.” I am wide open, and appreciate your continued comments.<br /> May I throw in a little “Hot Sauce” to spice things up? If the system is designed to handle handle overpressure waves (calculated at lets just say, “over 20K FPS,” &lt; would it not make a little logic to expect something (an EFP, moving at a max V of 4K FPS to easily be handled?) The reason I am “chiming in” is I wanna get more feedback, I don’t claim to be george genious, just a guy with an idea. But an EFP is much slower, (which it is ) then lets stay focused on the “blast over, under, over pressures.…You are mostly made of “water”, yes, blood is water, basically. So, what about lungs? and any other air spaces? Just some food for thought ok? Thank you for your time and patience with me. I know Im, umm.….. lets just say not the “easiet guy to figure out.” I got a note tonite from a company asking me if I had a “learning disability?<br /> I answered them.….… I said of course I do! I got my diploma, pissed on it and asked em if they liked the smell.….. :)<br /> “f*ck peace!“<br /> An American Bad Ass, Outcomm.……</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Subby</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91850</link> <dc:creator>Subby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:10:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91850</guid> <description>Normal airbags in cars are already expensive, and the are ubiquitious. This anti explosion, faster than light anti blast airbag cost will be astronomical. Compare this to standard armour on vehicles in cost. All this is nothing but some senator/general and greedy corporations idea to waste taxpayers dollars. Its ludicrous. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normal airbags in cars are already expensive, and the are ubiquitious. This anti explosion, faster than light anti blast airbag cost will be astronomical. Compare this to standard armour on vehicles in cost.<br /> All this is nothing but some senator/general and greedy corporations idea to waste taxpayers dollars. Its ludicrous.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kristina Tyler</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91849</link> <dc:creator>Kristina Tyler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:54:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/08/04/air-bag-armor-in-the-works/#comment-91849</guid> <description>I think its not very far away before IRON MAN becomes a possibility. The amount of technology we see these days is making war more and more one sided. The technology should be safeguarded first so that it doesn&#039;t fall in wrong hands. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its not very far away before IRON MAN becomes a possibility. The amount of technology we see these days is making war more and more one sided. The technology should be safeguarded first so that it doesn’t fall in wrong hands.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:50:56 -->
