DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Armor » Romulans Look Out, Here Come Cloaked Abrams

Romulans Look Out, Here Come Cloaked Abrams

predator-invisible.jpg

Imagine planes invis­i­ble — lit­er­ally — to radar; a sub slip­ping beneath the waves hid­den com­pletely from any attempt at a sonar ping; a tank imper­vi­ous to infrared sensors.

According to an arti­cle in Science Daily, this could be pos­si­ble — but not in the way we’ve seen in recent attempts.

With planes it’s geom­e­try and mate­ri­als. With subs its mate­ri­als, tac­tics and sound alle­vi­a­tors. With tanks — well, we haven’t got­ten there yet. But sci­en­tists have suc­cess­fully tested active cloak­ing from cer­tain types of radi­a­tion, includ­ing microwaves.

“It’s a brand new method of cloak­ing,” Milton adds. “It is two-​​dimensional, but we believe it can be extended eas­ily to three dimen­sions, mean­ing real objects could be cloaked. It’s called active cloak­ing, which means it uses devices that actively gen­er­ate elec­tro­mag­netic fields rather than being com­posed of ‘meta­ma­te­ri­als’ [exotic metal­lic sub­stances] that pas­sively shield objects from pass­ing elec­tro­mag­netic waves.”

Milton says his pre­vi­ous research involved “just cloak­ing clus­ters of small par­ti­cles, but now we are able to cloak larger objects.”

For exam­ple, radar microwaves have wave­lengths of about four inches, so Milton says the study shows it is pos­si­ble to use the method to cloak from radar some­thing 10 times wider, or 40 inches. That raises hope for cloak­ing larger objects. So far, the largest object cloaked from microwaves in actual exper­i­ments was an inch-​​wide cop­per cylin­der.

According to the report, this method could be more effec­tive across a wider range of band­widths. In other words, one active cloak­ing mod­ule could ren­der the object invis­i­ble to many sources of emis­sions. Previous iter­a­tions involved mate­ri­als that cloak against a sin­gle band­width or wavelength.

“The prob­lem with meta­ma­te­ri­als is that their behav­ior depends strongly on the fre­quency you are try­ing to cloak from,” he adds. “So it is dif­fi­cult to obtain broad­band cloak­ing. Maybe you’d be invis­i­ble to red light, but peo­ple would see you in blue light.”

Most pre­vi­ous research used inte­rior cloak­ing, where the cloak­ing device envelops the cloaked object. Milton says the new method “is the first active, exte­rior cloak­ing” tech­nique: cloak­ing devices emit sig­nals and sit out­side the cloaked object.

Be sure to read the sci­en­tists’ arti­cle in Optics Express jour­nal HERE and watch the demon­stra­tion video. Can it cloak me from my boss, I won­der?

Broadband exte­rior cloak­ing from Fernando Guevara Vasquez on Vimeo.

(Gouge: MP)

– Christian

Share |

August 19th, 2009 | Armor | 469033 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/08/19/romulans-look-out-here-come-cloaked-abrams/Romulans+Look+Out%2C+Here+Come+Cloaked+Abrams2009-08-19+12%3A12%3A11jnoonan You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « More Bombs Less Butter | I fear Russians, even when they bear gifts » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. The Cenobyte says:
    August 19, 2009 at 10:44 am

    Nothing really that new. They have found ways to bend microwaves and block some kinds of reflex­tions and emis­sions but it really hasn’t come close to prac­ti­cal yet.
    When it comes to tanks, the really issue is not being able to see it with your eyes but being able to see it in a ther­mal. Infrared does not pass well through most glass so it’s easy to block. However the prob­lem with this is that infrared is caused by heat in a mate­r­ial. So if the glass heats up it will start to emit infrared, or if the air or ground around the tank heats up it will emit infrared (In a spe­cific waveleg­nth based on the amount of heat).
    As a result of infrared you need some­thing that not only blocks the EM from the tank itself, it also needs to block the air and ground around the tank as well as not heat up itself and emit EM.

    Reply
  2. esmoore5 says:
    August 19, 2009 at 10:46 am

    Using elec­tro­mag­netic waves for cloak­ing, instead of meta­ma­te­ri­als?
    Now we’re get­ting into “Philadelphia Experiment” territory.

    Reply
  3. Anthony says:
    August 19, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    im assum­ing that the higher the fre­quency the harder it would be to cloak. On the issue of heat, Infra red has a shorter wave­length than microwaves, but Longer than vis­i­ble light. So by the time they get the tech down to make it invis­i­ble to our eyes, it would have already made it invis­i­ble to infra red. i think
    And while i was at it i just thought of a new tech­nol­ogy for another app.
    first, start­ing with the high­est fre­quency — gamma>xray>Ultra violet>visible light> Infra red> Microwave>radio wave.….i think i got that .
    Now ! if they can make some­thing “invis­i­ble” to our eyes , wouldn’t the same tech­nol­ogy be applic­a­ble to NASA, say mak­ing the manned mars ship “invis­i­ble” to UV, X, And Gamma radi­a­tion. That would solve the prob­lem of pro­tect­ing astro­nauts from the dan­ger­ous radi­a­tion in space, with­out all that extra lead!
    Its expo­nen­tially harder and harder as the fre­quency increases, but cloaks could be used in many areas of sci­ence, not just the sweet awe­some area of being invis­i­ble, jump­ing from tree to tree, hunt­ing ene­mies down, and using shoul­der mounted plasma can­nons and razor claws to maul them. watch out for that tri­an­gle laser tar­get lol

    Reply
  4. arabyana says:
    August 19, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    Thank you for the great post
    http://​sites​.fatakat​.com
    http://​arabyana​.com
    http://​food​.fatakat​.com

    Reply
  5. stephen russell says:
    August 19, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    Imagine this for the White House limo or AF1 to be “cloaked” aside AF & Navy jets alone.
    Or tankers.
    Later GIs can hide with dual cam suits: 1 for nat­ural camo 2. for cloak­ing.
    Radical.
    Star Trek Romulan, Klingon tech has arrived.
    Or 007s invis­i­ble Aston Martin?

    Reply
  6. Sgt Mac says:
    August 20, 2009 at 12:44 am

    It seems to me we have to take into con­sid­er­a­tion the energy fields cre­ated around per­son­nel and the detri­men­tal effect it would have on them. Perhaps it will be con­fined to unmanned vehi­cles.
    Food for thought.
    At some point they will be able to do it to an object large enough as to con­tain a mam­mal within the object and the con­fines of the field. It won’t be a good day for the mam­mal, I assure you.

    Reply
  7. Wembley says:
    August 20, 2009 at 7:47 am

    As the arti­cle makes clear, this tech­nique can­not be used to shield macro objected (likes tanks, planes or peo­ple) from any­thing shorter than microwaves of sev­eral cen­time­tres. So no invis­i­b­lity in vis­i­ble, infra-​​red, or short-​​wavelength radar.

    Reply
  8. Retiredd says:
    August 20, 2009 at 9:21 am

    Great expla­na­tion. Between this, Popular Science, Popular Mechanics ads etc. lets make it easy for those who spy on us or need to make a counter to all of this to ren­der it use­less.
    I’m all for an open soci­ety, but screen doors on sub­marines are counter pro­duc­tive. At least make the bad guys work to have to find this out.
    What ever hap­pened to “Need to know.”??

    Reply
  9. John Adams says:
    August 20, 2009 at 11:03 am

    as soon as the DOD or whichever agency comes up with an effec­tive method­ol­ogy, will the NY or LA Times divulge this tech­nol­ogy under head­lines on page one or will it be CBS?

    Reply
  10. sfcham1962 says:
    August 20, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Great!! When will the Chinese start build­ing it!!! and when do we start sell­ing it to our enemies.

    Reply
  11. John says:
    August 20, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    Interesting the­o­ret­i­cal bits, thanks.

    Reply
  12. John says:
    August 20, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    Interesting bits, thanks.

    Reply
  13. Manny dj says:
    August 20, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    Please, can we cloak our politi­cians. So we don’t have to see them wast­ing our money,oink-oink.
    Politics (poli, we know what that means#
    tics #we know what they do)

    Reply
  14. Rhyno327 says:
    August 20, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    Are we buy­ing the com­po­nents from the Chi-​​coms?? Hell, they make everything-​​from soup to nuts.

    Reply
  15. CENSUSGUYz says:
    August 21, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    when every elec­tronic sig­na­ture has a coun­ter­mea­sure the emp or an air­burst makes it the most inpor­tant sopen­ing shot in bat­tle and returns the king of the bat­tle field to prominence-​​the infrantry– cus if you aint inf. …

    Reply
  16. Lothar says:
    August 25, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Instead of try­ing to make tanks invis­i­ble why not use the same money to make tanks them­selves obso­lete? Hint: we already con­trol the space industry.

    Reply
  17. tiffany bangles says:
    September 11, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    buy cheap dig­i­tal cam­erasAre you sure?I can buy
    high-​​difinition cam­erasand dis­count­dig­i­tal cam­cordersI am first to find high per­for­mance dig­i­tal camcorderswhat’s more! beau­ti­ful dig­i­tal pic­ture frame­Jew­elry is of women’s beauty,buy cheap tiffany
    buy cheap link of lon­donYou will get more and more beau­ti­ful!
    fash­ion tiffany on sale
    tiffany rings

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      batvette: A lot of JSF money was spent before the meltdown....
      Charles
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? I dunno what...
      Charles
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Senator McCain says, “ Sticks and stones may break my bones...
      Alton
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Jimbo thats pretty much all the british government...
      Valcan
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      I hope so; flexible armor may save lives because...
      Marcase
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage