Comments on: Land-Based SM-3 Seen as Frontrunner

By: GHD Straighteners

GHD Straighteners — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:59:28 +0000

buy cheap nokia n95 experience without nokia mobile learning is better than learning without excperi-ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose headphones is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the apple touch past. http://www.leadsoftstore.com/

By: GHD Straighteners

GHD Straighteners — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:56:39 +0000

By: Byron Skinner

Byron Skinner — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:37:02 +0000

Good Evening justbill,
If your interested in a job, speak, read and write Russia, and have experience in security systems management, give DynCorp International a call.
Thats about all that I can say.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

By: Oblat

Oblat — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:06:49 +0000

The idea that the polish base is about missile defense is a joke it’s just a way to put a US base in Poland.
You’d think the Poles were experienced enough at foreign occupation not to fall for it.

By: justbill

justbill — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:10:21 +0000

Byron Skinner wrote: “Russian nuclear weapons by the way are guarded by and American contractor.“
Could you provide a verifiable source that Americans are physically providing security for Russian warheads? Nunn-Lugar doesn’t appear to have such a provision and I find it hard to believe that a strong nationalist like Putin would allow foreigners to secure Russian nukes. If there is verifiable proof, please accept my apology in advance.

By: Byron Skinner

Byron Skinner — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:23:06 +0000

Good Morning Folks,
For Jeff. Interesting rebuttal. I’m not quite sure how a Missile Radar System based in what was once Eastern Europe could detect the launch of Russian or Chinese ICBM’s that by range restrictions would have to be launched from the Norther area of Russia or China for an over the Pole attack on North America.
Neither the Topil systems from Russia or the DF-31–41 from China will have the capacity to reach North America from current launch sites in either country, neither of which by the way are operational.
Both countries have put their liquid fueled ICBMs into storage with their warheads stored at separate facilities. It would appear that Russia and China have greater concerns of internal unrest and the security of nuclear weapons the an attack by the United States. Russian nuclear weapons by the way are guarded by and American contractor. Putin doesn’t trust his own Army with out some justification, Jeff.
Just one more question Jeff, is not the Alaska based Radar to be able to track all incoming over the pole from Russia and China, or is there a flaw in the system that the American taxpayer who has thrown hundreds of billion of dollars in the rat hole called missile doesn’t know about.
You whole response has kinda a fishy smell to it , Jeff. Could you enlighten us why the Alaska system needs a back up in Europe?
Also Rumsfeld’s quote about the system serving as a deterrent, from who Jeff?
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

By: STemplar

STemplar — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:34:11 +0000

Where and what to base isn’t really an issue in my mind. Developing the capability is. Ballistic missile technology is proliferating. Nukes will as well. The whole “we want to pursue diplomacy” is a nice thought, but it ain’t working. We can’t bomb and invade every country that is sideways of us in this world that may develop or already has these capabilities. We aren’t left with much of an option in my opinion other than pursuing promising systems.

By: Jeff M

Jeff M — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:50:33 +0000

Byron Skinner,
If they’re not much use for protecting Europe they’ll be more use intercepting a Russian ICBM, even if it is headed over the north pole. Perhaps that’s the real intent. The missile radars come with a batch of pac-3 interceptors if I remember correctly.
I think your know-it-all attitude is getting in the way here. The purpose of the missile defense is plastered all over the SMD agency website, a quote from Rumsfeld, something about “by their very existence they serve as a deterrent”.
–Jeff

By: elgatoso

elgatoso — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:51:35 +0000

the Cenobyte: you are soooo right.MY toughs really

By: stephen russell

stephen russell — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:20:24 +0000

Send a wing of SM-3s to HI for counter Korean missiles & any TransPac Iranian strike.
Or Iran strike by cargo ship Launch site.
Must expand SM-3s to HI alone.
& or CA State, OR