This article first appeared in Aerospace Daily & Defense Report.
Northrop Grumman is developing a common autonomous airborne sense-and-avoid system for both the U.S. Air Force RQ-4B Global Hawk high-altitude long-endurance unmanned aircraft and its U.S. Navy RQ-4N Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) derivative.
Originally the services were pursuing separate solutions for operating the aircraft in national airspace, but the Navy has announced its intention to award Northrop Grumman a sole-source contract to develop a common system that also will be scalable to medium-altitude unmanned aircraft.
The development effort will bring together work that was already under way on a sense-and-avoid system for Global Hawk and a “due regard” system for BAMS. “They have both put funds in a bucket, basically, that they have allocated to us,” says George Guerra, Global Hawk vice president.
“For the Air Force we were continuing to look at what the opportunities were for a sense-and-avoid system, while the BAMS program actually proposed a due-regard system,” he says. “What they did is say lets go understand what systems you are looking at on the Air Force side and share with you what [the Navy] has done on due regard.“
Guerra says Northrop Grumman was awarded a 5–6 month study earlier this year to understand the requirements of both services, how well the systems being studied would meet them, and to plan a way forward. “Our plan is to come out with a single system that satisfies the needs of both services,” he said.
Under contract to the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Northrop Grumman has been flight-testing a multisensor autonomous see-and-avoid system on a Calspan-operated Learjet 25 acting as a surrogate for the Global Hawk. This includes electro-optical (EO) sensors and an air-to-air radar similar to that originally proposed for BAMS.
Read the rest of this story, see how the US/Pak relationship is more like a sitcom, check out the new Sabra UGV and see if Stryker comms are Lima Charlie from our friends at Aviation Week, exclusively on Military.com.
– Christian
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
does anybody have a short executive summary on what the differences between a “due regard” and a “sense and avoid” system might be? i know they don’t *sound* anything alike, but what are they supposed to *do* alike (and not alike)?
RE: differences between a “due regard” and a “sense and avoid” systems.
It is a matter of definition, degree, and compliance with standards. ‘Due Regard’ gets its name from an international agreement on flying outside national airspaces and the need to ensure safe flight for any aircraft not operating as an international commercial flight (ie not covered by ICAO rules), and is referenced in paragraph 6.3.2.2 of a DoD directive. See it at: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/454001p.pdf.
Sense and Avoid OTOH, has roots as a DOT/FAA (US only) UAV-specific concern and initiative.
Makes sense for drones, IE cost per unit.
& avoid any collisions with manned planes.
http://www.wholesale-retailer.com/
Recently, more and more people choose to imitation as a gift. The purchase of imitation into a cool, very trendy thing. The quality of products, increased at the same time.