<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Revealed: The Army’s New Camo</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: alex</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-246048</link> <dc:creator>alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:43:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-246048</guid> <description>personaly though I like our new multicam uniforms eventhough this one is prety sexy I wasn&#039;t ever issued it </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personaly though I like our new multicam uniforms eventhough this one is prety sexy I wasn’t ever issued it</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alex</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-246047</link> <dc:creator>alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:40:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-246047</guid> <description>depending on where you are the acu blends quite well compared to the new one. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>depending on where you are the acu blends quite well compared to the new one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zack</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-234829</link> <dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-234829</guid> <description>The Marine Corps own the rights to MARPAT. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Marine Corps own the rights to MARPAT.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PFC. Posada</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-231525</link> <dc:creator>PFC. Posada</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-231525</guid> <description>HELL no !!!!! MarPat is made only For Marines .... the Army should keep wearing their gray Pajamas... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELL no !!!!! MarPat is made only For Marines .… the Army should keep wearing their gray Pajamas…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steven</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-225145</link> <dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:38:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-225145</guid> <description>It looks like somebody was wearing ACUs and then a giant took a dump on him. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like somebody was wearing ACUs and then a giant took a dump on him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mac</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-224928</link> <dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:12:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-224928</guid> <description>UCP was awfull to begin with, this stuff is just as bad ! I&#039;v seen UCP in the jungle in in the desert and it just doesn&#039;t work ! The only place I ever saw it work was in a gravel parking lot. As a Marine I was issued MARPAT, it works well enough. even better once it lighten&#039;s up a little. When UCP lighten&#039;s up it just get brighter ! There is a simple solution to all of the stupidity.... MULTICAM, it works just about anywhere, and the troop&#039;s know this and they want it , holds it&#039;s shadeing pretty good too. Most higher ranking officers though are to pridefull to ever addmit to makeing a huge mistake like UCP. Get MULTICAM to our troop&#039;s !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UCP was awfull to begin with, this stuff is just as bad ! I’v seen UCP in the jungle in in the desert and it just doesn’t work ! The only place I ever saw it work was in a gravel parking lot. As a Marine I was issued MARPAT, it works well enough. even better once it lighten’s up a little. When UCP lighten’s up it just get brighter ! There is a simple solution to all of the stupidity.… MULTICAM, it works just about anywhere, and the troop’s know this and they want it , holds it’s shadeing pretty good too. Most higher ranking officers though are to pridefull to ever addmit to makeing a huge mistake like UCP. Get MULTICAM to our troop’s !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-218406</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:54:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-218406</guid> <description>Im preaty sure the officer that even considered this design ,is the same guy that makes us were clear eyepro every were and that stupid p.t. belt. Yes I understand the impotents of concealing ones silhouette, But come on that looks stupid, ask a marine if he&#8217;d put that on, he&#8217;d tell you no, most likely with a couple curse words too, That&#8217;s because they have pride.. that is why people join the core because they look good and there proud. sure inset for the benefits or the sign on bonuses. The army was like that when we had BDU&#039;s and DCU&quot;s but once we got Velcro we became the stupid kid in the back of the class room. .So stop wasting money on stupid stuff and spend it on some good stuff like a weapon that doesn&#8217;t jam when you look at it wrong,  non rusted bullets or a hmmvee that doesn&#8217;t explode every 20 feet because there&#8217;s no parts in Iraq. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im preaty sure the officer that even considered this design ‚is the same guy that makes us were clear eyepro every were and that stupid p.t. belt. Yes I understand the impotents of concealing ones silhouette, But come on that looks stupid, ask a marine if he’d put that on, he’d tell you no, most likely with a couple curse words too, That’s because they have pride.. that is why people join the core because they look good and there proud. sure inset for the benefits or the sign on bonuses. The army was like that when we had BDU’s and DCU“s but once we got Velcro we became the stupid kid in the back of the class room. .So stop wasting money on stupid stuff and spend it on some good stuff like a weapon that doesn’t jam when you look at it wrong,  non rusted bullets or a hmmvee that doesn’t explode every 20 feet because there’s no parts in Iraq.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-218149</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:11:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-218149</guid> <description>I don&#039;t see my the Army didn&#039;t just keep the uniforms that the Marines have now... the Army did design them after all </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t see my the Army didn’t just keep the uniforms that the Marines have now… the Army did design them after all</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SPC Bratton</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-213270</link> <dc:creator>SPC Bratton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-213270</guid> <description>Served in the Army for 3 years, looks damn good to me, gave it some charcter, needed some brown!! Also if you have not served and never will why do you comment it does not matter cause you will never wear it, so shut up!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Served in the Army for 3 years, looks damn good to me, gave it some charcter, needed some brown!! Also if you have not served and never will why do you comment it does not matter cause you will never wear it, so shut up!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-210042</link> <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:56:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/15/revealed-the-armys-new-camo/#comment-210042</guid> <description>I&#039;m with Jack .... The digital uniforms the marines have are perfect ... Why not look the same ... Heck were on the same side.... That tent of tan and brown is right on the money with the marines uniforms!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m with Jack .… The digital uniforms the marines have are perfect … Why not look the same … Heck were on the same side.… That tent of tan and brown is right on the money with the marines uniforms!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:54:10 -->
