<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: There’s Concern, but Where’s the Action?</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: hr4555656</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-194849</link> <dc:creator>hr4555656</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:06:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-194849</guid> <description>ya mahdi adrekni  hello world . oo khahad amad. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya mahdi adrekni  hello world . oo khahad amad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben G</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93595</link> <dc:creator>Ben G</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93595</guid> <description>Standardizing your systems is actually a double-edged sword - on the one hand, you have fewer systems to monitor and maintain; on the other, the enemy hacks or compromises that OS, you&#039;ve got more machines at risk.  You have the same problem if you network all your systems - more info sharing, but more vulnerability. A better indication that the AF is serious is the institutional muscle it&#039;s putting behind cyber with a Numbered AF and formal doctrine.  Although there&#039;s still a looong way to go. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standardizing your systems is actually a double-edged sword — on the one hand, you have fewer systems to monitor and maintain; on the other, the enemy hacks or compromises that OS, you’ve got more machines at risk.  You have the same problem if you network all your systems — more info sharing, but more vulnerability.<br /> A better indication that the AF is serious is the institutional muscle it’s putting behind cyber with a Numbered AF and formal doctrine.  Although there’s still a looong way to go.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Auto Tool Shop</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93593</link> <dc:creator>Auto Tool Shop</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93593</guid> <description>US army is the strongest but the solder&#039;s life is precious. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US army is the strongest but the solder’s life is precious.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cannon Fodder</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93592</link> <dc:creator>Cannon Fodder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:22:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93592</guid> <description>Sgt Oblat, obviously you are clueless when it comes to IT tech, so I will try to explain it in simple terms. When you &quot;standardize&quot; you make all of your equipment similar so you can keep better control of it. You no longer have Windows 95, 98, Vista, Linux, 2000 and Vista on different machines. You have the same level software across the board. This closes many open doors. Vista isn&#039;t perfect, but it is a whole heck of a lot more secure than Windows 98. So, please try to keep your clueless comments to other pro-liberal wingnut sites, and leave this blog for the big boys. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sgt Oblat, obviously you are clueless when it comes to IT tech, so I will try to explain it in simple terms.<br /> When you “standardize” you make all of your equipment similar so you can keep better control of it. You no longer have Windows 95, 98, Vista, Linux, 2000 and Vista on different machines. You have the same level software across the board. This closes many open doors. Vista isn’t perfect, but it is a whole heck of a lot more secure than Windows 98.<br /> So, please try to keep your clueless comments to other pro-liberal wingnut sites, and leave this blog for the big boys.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sgt Oblat</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93591</link> <dc:creator>Sgt Oblat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:43:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93591</guid> <description>&gt;The Air Force has standardized their over 500,000 workstations So upgrading to vista is cyberwar </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;The Air Force has standardized their over 500,000 workstations<br /> So upgrading to vista is cyberwar</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ptsfp</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93590</link> <dc:creator>Ptsfp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:38:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93590</guid> <description>Guys you can laugh all you want, but this is a real threat. The fact is that our government and military leaders are taking this very seriously, especially the Air Force. According to an Air Force Integrator article, over 100 million has been spent this year alone in beefing up the security on the grid. The Air Force has standardized their over 500,000 workstations and even started up a Cyberspace Operations Executive Course at Maxwell Air Force Base. The government is getting the message, slow but sure, and is taking steps in securing our nation. http://integrator.hanscom.af.mil/2009/June/06042009/06042009-15.htm Daniel Dieterle </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys you can laugh all you want, but this is a real threat. The fact is that our government and military leaders are taking this very seriously, especially the Air Force.<br /> According to an Air Force Integrator article, over 100 million has been spent this year alone in beefing up the security on the grid. The Air Force has standardized their over 500,000 workstations and even started up a Cyberspace Operations Executive Course at Maxwell Air Force Base.<br /> The government is getting the message, slow but sure, and is taking steps in securing our nation.<br /> <a href="http://integrator.hanscom.af.mil/2009/June/06042009/06042009-15.htm" rel="nofollow">http://integrator.hanscom.af.mil/2009/June/06042009/06042009–15.htm</a><br /> Daniel Dieterle</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ned</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93589</link> <dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:38:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93589</guid> <description>WHAT IS GETTING OLD ARE THOSE WHO MAKE POSTS TRASH - Keep it professional.  Intelligent discussions seem to be too high of a goal for several people on here! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT IS GETTING OLD ARE THOSE WHO MAKE POSTS TRASH — Keep it professional.  Intelligent discussions seem to be too high of a goal for several people on here!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sgt Oblat</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93587</link> <dc:creator>Sgt Oblat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:36:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93587</guid> <description>We</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: KragCulloden</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93586</link> <dc:creator>KragCulloden</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93586</guid> <description>The sock puppet parade after every one of your posts is getting real old, Kevin. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sock puppet parade after every one of your posts is getting real old, Kevin.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Frank</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93585</link> <dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:44:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/09/21/theres-concern-but-wheres-the-action/#comment-93585</guid> <description>Kevin   you really rock!!!  Your previous post was about the State Department needing to take the lead.  Within 2 weeks the following came out today (September 21st, 2009) Brown professor to advise State Department on cyber affairs http://www.physorg.com/wire-news/15004837/brown-professor-to-advise-state-department-on-cyber-affairs.html John Savage, professor of computer science, is Brown&#039;s first Jefferson Science Fellow and the first computer scientist to serve in that capacity. He will advise the State Department on cyber affairs. You have their ear and without question you have the insight to chart where things are going in cyber warfare.  No wonder Harvard had you lecture.  Keep up the great work. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin   you really rock!!!  Your previous post was about the State Department needing to take the lead.  Within 2 weeks the following came out today (September 21st, 2009)<br /> Brown professor to advise State Department on cyber affairs<br /> <a href="http://www.physorg.com/wire-news/15004837/brown-professor-to-advise-state-department-on-cyber-affairs.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/wire-news/15004837/brown-professor-to-advise-state-department-on-cyber-affairs.html</a><br /> John Savage, professor of computer science, is Brown’s first Jefferson Science Fellow and the first computer scientist to serve in that capacity. He will advise the State Department on cyber affairs. You have their ear and without question you have the insight to chart where things are going in cyber warfare.  No wonder Harvard had you lecture.  Keep up the great work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 04:46:03 -->
