Comments on: The Non-lethal Claymore

By: red

red — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:13:26 +0000

There is a non lethat weapon put out by laser energitics name daser laser. range up to 2400 meters, No ill effects. and can be used over and over.

By: Charles

Charles — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:30:01 +0000

Mang: Quick google for more info
http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_en-USUS291US303&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=LRAD+Pittsburgh
Be an interesting article if you developed it to its fullest.

By: Mang

Mang — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:23:12 +0000

Christian, speaking of non-lethal weapons, why is the first domestic deployment of the LRAD not on your site? We got zapped here in Pittsburgh during the G-20 last Thursday, and the first use of this technology on US citizens on our own soil is *certainly* germane to Defense Tech. The possible consequences are worth discussing. I’ve been trying to round up accounts of how it felt.

By: Cenobyte is an Idiot

Cenobyte is an Idiot — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:15:29 +0000

So apparently you have no answer as to the liability of allowing a motorist to exit their vehicle during a traffic stop. Or that a traffic stop is the wrong place to plead your case. All you are doing is twisting the facts to suit your purpose. The woman was not tased for wanting to see the officers radar, she was tased for Failure to Obey the Orders of a Police Officer, and resisting the subsequent arrest. Which unlike your imaginary "legal rights" is an actual law. You also fail to address the tens of thousands of officers that are tased each year during certification without any deaths or injuries. I'm sure at least 300 people have fallen off ladders and and died during the time period you specified. Should we outlaw those too? The only thing you seem willing to address is that you didn't even know that it's a Taser and not "tazer". Hardly a typo since you typed it so many times. I'm quite the adult, I just have no patience for idiots like you with the whole "cops are so bad to everyone" whining. Next time you need help or someone steals your shit call somebody else. People like you are the ones that end up getting Tased and arrested because you cant follow simple instructions and you feel the need to argue because your ego gets bruised by being told that you can't do something. And I have no need to look up statistics on Taser related deaths or injuries, as I am an instructor and Taser sends them to us. I assure you I am more familiar with the actual details of all the stories you read a paragraph about on the internet than you are. I can only dream of reading a similar story about you one day, but I doubt that will happen as you probably only act tough on the internet.

By: Cenobyte is an Idiot

Cenobyte is an Idiot — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:15:08 +0000

By: The Cenobyte

The Cenobyte — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:44:17 +0000

Oh and just so this is covered for everyone that doesn’t get it. You have the legal right to ask the officer anything you want. He does not necessarily need to show you the radar read out. (However some places require it, like where I live), but you have the right to ask anything you want. Getting shocked because you ask something can’t be seen as anything but abuse.

By: The Cenobyte

The Cenobyte — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:35:53 +0000

If you are to lazy to look up the stats on Taser deaths, that’s not my fault. Look them up yourself, hell just type ‘death by taser’ into google and you will find dozens and dozens are reported deaths. Easy as that. I am sorry you don’t like the facts, but it doesn’t make them any less the facts.
As to spelling, I typo’ed or made a mistake, either way if your only point is that I spelled something wrong but can’t make a point about the topic, then maybe you shouldn’t write anything at all. I am not hear to pick on or worry about spelling, grammer or punctuation (Something apparently both of us need work on), I am here to write and discuse the topic at hand. Maybe we could go back to that.
Anyone want to contest the facts I listed in my earlier post. You have something that tells me I am wrong I would love to see it.
Thanks for all you being so adult about this.

By: Cenobyte is an Idiot

Cenobyte is an Idiot — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:37:57 +0000

Cenobyte, You are a complete idiot. Please quote the law or statute that gives someone the "legal right" to see a police officers radar. Since one dosen't exist I'm sure you'll make one up, like the rest of your "facts". The only place that the citation has to be proven is in court. You seriously think that the side of the road or highway is the proper place to debate a speeding ticket? That's what court is for. For every one of your dumbass comments and I can give you a common sense response. Suppose the person who gets out of their vehicle to look at the officer's radar gets hit by a car? Who's fault is that? You dont think that the department and City/ State will be held liable or that they wont be forced to spend a tremendous ammount of money (your tax dollars) trying to defend against the lawsuit? It's obvious that you havent got the nuts to put yourself in harms way for the protection of others, and that you have an axe to gring against cops for whatever reason. Maybe you got beat up in school or your wife left your for a man that does more than run his yap on the internet. Who knows. I've got grown up work to do so I'll let you get back to playing on the internet all day pretending to be high speed.

By: JMB

JMB — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:12:37 +0000

“Don’t taze me bro!!” wasn’t tazed because he asked a question somebody didn’t like, he was tazed because he was resisting.
Resisting arrest is in itself a crime, if a police officer is trying to arrest somebody they always have recourse if they were falsely arrested. However if they resist the put the police in a bad situation where they either give up 100% of their authority by taking away their ability to actually arrest somebody or they have to use force to subdue the person they are trying to arrest. In cases were people resist arrest your options are tazer, stick, or gun. Seriously, which of these do you think is the safest?

By: flying fart proudly joyned

flying fart proudly joyned — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:32:40 +0000

Taser reps tell DT that the system has been tested at full power on a pig who had no ill effects—
so why we dont see this loser not testing on himself? no ill efects no problem or?