<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Petting Zoo of Death</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: AMMO</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94136</link> <dc:creator>AMMO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:35:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94136</guid> <description>Flood the black market with faulty blasting caps. The only people using them will be people that shouldn&#039;t be, and in the case of a blasting cap, the explosion will be small, only enough to injure or kill the guy holding it. It wouldn&#039;t be difficult, blasting caps are very sensitive. By the way, my cousin was involved in that firefight. Keep them in your prayers. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flood the black market with faulty blasting caps. The only people using them will be people that shouldn’t be, and in the case of a blasting cap, the explosion will be small, only enough to injure or kill the guy holding it. It wouldn’t be difficult, blasting caps are very sensitive.<br /> By the way, my cousin was involved in that firefight. Keep them in your prayers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: freefallingbomb</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94135</link> <dc:creator>freefallingbomb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:36:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94135</guid> <description>To the poster &quot;Zandor&quot;: You wrote: &quot;My, isn&#039;t it nice to see that all of the techno nerds who spend hours here on differentiating about the minutea between different styles of camo clothing, seem to not take into account that 10 US soldiers got iced yesterday.&quot; Negative news is forbidden here on &quot;Defensetech&quot;. The U.S.A. is winning this war. Change subject. Did you hear about D.A.R.P.A.&#039;s last wonder weapon, the V3 ? It is going to save us from the terrorists! &quot;Israel&quot; is our ally. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the poster “Zandor”:<br /> You wrote: “My, isn’t it nice to see that all of the techno nerds who spend hours here on differentiating about the minutea between different styles of camo clothing, seem to not take into account that 10 US soldiers got iced yesterday.“<br /> Negative news is forbidden here on “Defensetech”. The U.S.A. is winning this war. Change subject. Did you hear about D.A.R.P.A.‘s last wonder weapon, the V3 ? It is going to save us from the terrorists!<br /> “Israel” is our ally.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94134</link> <dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:33:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94134</guid> <description>I think that Jim has a great idea. Why don&#039;t we reverse engineer all of the Russian nukes? But then again, why stop there? Lets reverse engineer the rifle, the sword, fire, etc. Jesus H. Christ! The US Navy has been reverse engineering things for decades. They now have designed and built a ship that won&#039;t float. They refer to it as their Stealth ship. It looks exactly like the USS Arizona, but without the museum on top. Go Navy! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Jim has a great idea.<br /> Why don’t we reverse engineer all of the Russian nukes?<br /> But then again, why stop there?<br /> Lets reverse engineer the rifle, the sword, fire, etc.<br /> Jesus H. Christ!<br /> The US Navy has been reverse engineering things for decades.<br /> They now have designed and built a ship that won’t float.<br /> They refer to it as their Stealth ship.<br /> It looks exactly like the USS Arizona, but without the museum on top.<br /> Go Navy!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94133</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:46:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94133</guid> <description>Well, concerning IED&#039;s, I&#039;ve posted on the boards many times about this. How about a REIED (a &quot;reverse-engineered&quot; IED? It may be time to &quot;fight fire with fire.&quot; And, it would seem at least to me that they have a lot more to fear from IED&#039;s (especially the ones that unknown to them the detonators have been altered to &quot;prematurely&quot; detonate at a most inopportune time from an insurgents&#039; perspective) than we do. When I say &quot;reverse-engineer&quot; I&#039;m referring maybe more to a concept (an idea) more than a simple device. You might focus on the detonators (the device buried in the explosive charge), with a reverse-engineered alteration designed to cause the charge to explode when it is &quot;set&quot; (initially buried) by the insurgents. From that point backwards you may reverse-engineer a strategy to bring about an effective counter-insurgency strategy. Of course, there&#039;s no &quot;miracle cure&quot; to this problem and what&#039;s needed more is an effective counter strategy. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, concerning IED’s, I’ve posted on the boards many times about this. How about a REIED (a “reverse-engineered” IED? It may be time to “fight fire with fire.” And, it would seem at least to me that they have a lot more to fear from IED’s (especially the ones that unknown to them the detonators have been altered to “prematurely” detonate at a most inopportune time from an insurgents’ perspective) than we do. When I say “reverse-engineer” I’m referring maybe more to a concept (an idea) more than a simple device. You might focus on the detonators (the device buried in the explosive charge), with a reverse-engineered alteration designed to cause the charge to explode when it is “set” (initially buried) by the insurgents. From that point backwards you may reverse-engineer a strategy to bring about an effective counter-insurgency strategy. Of course, there’s no “miracle cure” to this problem and what’s needed more is an effective counter strategy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: paul</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94131</link> <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:05:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/10/02/the-petting-zoo-of-death/#comment-94131</guid> <description>Strange how they can use:So called &quot;ignorance&quot; in Afghan but not in Iraq? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange how they can use:So called “ignorance” in Afghan but not in Iraq?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 688/692 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:13:21 -->
