DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Gadgets and Gear » Another Wanat Takeaway — Purify NOW

Another Wanat Takeaway — Purify NOW

soldier-filtration.jpg

I’ve energized the grid, so to speak, on this small arms at Wanat issue, but another interesting finding in the draft report is this forceful demand for water purification solutions for troops from the individual to the small unit:

The absence of effective crew (squad or platoon) water purification and individual soldier water purification equipment adversely constrained operations at COP Kahler. After 235 years of U.S. Army combat and field operations, it is inexcusable that the U.S. Army still lacks the ability for deployed soldiers to sterilize their own drinking water in sufficient quantities in hot weather climates utilizing a man-portable, hand-carried, lightweight, reliable and effective water purification system.

The author suggested the individual SteriPen system, which purifies water using UV light, and other easily portable solutions that can purify water in high volumes that are readily available on the commercial market. Never once in the field have I seen a camping type water purifier unless it was a piece of personal equipment.

The only program I’ve been able to find on the subject from PEO Soldier is the Individual Soldier Hydration program which is purchasing canteens and CamelBaks…no purification other than the old school tabs is mentioned.

All soldiers going on detached, isolated service in a semi-arid environment must be habitually equipped with adequate individual water-purification equipment; and a squad/platoon capable water purification system that can be carried in a HMMWV (but that doesn’t require an entire HMMWV to transport the system!) must be fielded by the U.S. Army. Had such a capability been present at Wanat, the Platoon could have utilized the large quantity of water available at Wanat (as the ANA did). This glaring deficiency needs to be immediately addressed by the U.S. Army Program Executive Officer-Soldier, at both a crew (squad or platoon) and individual soldier level.

– Christian

Share |

October 12th, 2009 | Gadgets and Gear | 476126 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/10/12/another-wanat-takeaway-purify-now/Another+Wanat+Takeaway+--+Purify+NOW2009-10-12+20%3A24%3A58jimmy_wu You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Small Arms Failures Contributed to Wanat Debacle | US Army Aviation Plots Its Future » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Valcan says:
    October 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    This is rediculess this is what happens when you become dependent on everything happening in large amounts. Its almost as if nothing in the army happens anymore unless it involves an entire company.
    Seriously people the world is laughing at us.

    Reply
  2. Preston Gross-Rhode says:
    October 12, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    civi backpacker checking in again,
    MSR says this is already used by the military, guess not, at least where it matters. A single battery life (small camera batteries) filters ~200 liters, that’s a lot for something the size of a marker.
    http://​cascadedesigns​.com/​m​s​r​/​w​a​t​e​r​-​t​r​e​a​t​m​e​n​t​-​a​n​d​-​h​y​d​r​a​t​i​o​n​/​e​x​p​e​d​i​t​i​o​n​-​w​a​t​e​r​-​t​r​e​a​t​m​e​n​t​-​a​n​d​-​h​y​d​r​a​t​i​o​n​/​m​i​o​x​-​p​u​r​i​f​i​e​r​/​p​r​o​d​uct

    Reply
  3. atacms says:
    October 12, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    I’m sorry, but what the HECK is PEO Soldier and the Rapid Equipping Force Office doing? Why don’t they have their officers and program managers send someone out to Afghanistan, live amongst the troops, get in some firefights. Then after interviewing soldiers compile their thoughts together with the Program manager’s experience to make sure our troops have what they need!
    We’re eight years into this war and the REF has been doing this for how long that we still don’t have this equipment for our troops?
    Oh I know, it’s because this isn’t as glamourous as the FCS.

    Reply
  4. CJ says:
    October 12, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    Yup, the Lifesave Bottle system (which is available in large capacity drums), was the first thing that came to mind. It seems pretty amazing and it’s ridiculous the army doesn’t have anything like it.

    Reply
  5. CJ says:
    October 12, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    Oops, typo. That would be LifesaveR Bottle
    http://​www​.lifesaversystems​.com/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​tml

    Reply
  6. Think Defence says:
    October 12, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Or the DoD could just whip out the credit card and go shopping
    http://​www​.surviva​-pure​.co​.uk/​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​s​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.bwtechnologies​.com/​i​q​s​/​s​i​d​.​0​6​1​2​9​9​4​0​0​5​3​6​1​2​1​2​8​7​0​5​6​5​4​/​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​_​w​a​t​e​r​_​f​i​l​t​r​a​t​i​o​n​.​h​tml

    Reply
  7. Rob says:
    October 12, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    Um…how about iodine tablets. Never went thirsty in 26 years in the Army, as long as I could find something that resembled water to put in a canteen.

    Reply
  8. Charles says:
    October 12, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    “no purification other than the old school tabs is mentioned.“
    I suppose they want something other than iodine tabs.
    Also:
    ”…the Platoon could have utilized the large quantity of water available at Wanat (as the ANA did).“
    Is it safe to assume that the ANA simply didn’t bother purifying the water and just drank it up?

    Reply
  9. Cory says:
    October 13, 2009 at 7:27 am

    I’m also curious about the MIOX pen. Apparently there IS a military version (and I believe DARPA was involved in the development). It wouldn’t have any real effectiveness against particulate matter, but I gather that it is very effective at killing anything that might cause harm (and is even effective against some chemical agents).

    Reply
  10. Charles says:
    October 13, 2009 at 9:58 am

    Quick question: Are Camelbaks bulletproof? I can imagine a Camelbak might get torn in a firefight, either from shrapnel, a grazing shot, rocks, etc., and this would have long-term consequences.

    Reply
  11. Ed says:
    October 13, 2009 at 10:40 am

    First to Charles, no the Camelback is not bulletproof but it probably can take a small level of punishment. The inner bladder is pretty thick and seems very resilient to me and I have used them during exercises and also when on camping or outdoors trips. As for it being hit, you wear it on your back so if it gets hit, you are most likely leaving the fight or pulling back, in which case water is the least of your concerns at that point.
    As far as the filtering system that was supposed to be HMMWV mounted, it still needs to be at the river to work, were our troops positioned to be able to utilize that resource or did the commander forget to plan for its usage and simply relied on the supply chain to bring him what he needed? I am not faulting the commander just so everyone knows. I just don’t know the terrain and where our forces were arrayed.
    As was also said, the ANA had plentiful drinking water, but of what quality, or did they know something we didn’t? It was also stated that the ANA pulled out of the place during the fight. They left either because they were tipped off or simply were unwilling to fight.

    Reply
  12. Eric Daniel says:
    October 13, 2009 at 11:26 am

    I think one of the underlying issues here is the fact that the military made a conscious decision years ago to scale back on such things as field water purification.
    In

    Reply
  13. Charles says:
    October 13, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    Well, that’s a consequence of when peacetime things like “palate” take precedence over pragmatism.
    Remember the ‘90s when the biggest controversy was about how to make the MREs flavorful?
    And now it’s back to meat and potatoes. How to kill the enemy.
    Of course, some things don’t change… (like our small arms?)

    Reply
  14. Charles says:
    October 13, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    Also:
    http://​www​.canada​.com/​t​o​p​i​c​s​/​n​e​w​s​/​s​t​o​r​y​.​h​t​m​l​?​i​d​=​7​a​a​8​1​6​6​b​-​7​1​8​6​-​4​d​6​8​-​8​b​1​4​-​f​9​4​d​2​a​0​d​0​354
    An ominous warning on the failures of KBR and water supply contracts:
    http://​www​.khou​.com/​t​o​p​s​t​o​r​i​e​s​/​s​t​o​r​i​e​s​/​k​h​o​u​0​9​0​5​1​1​_​t​n​t​_​w​a​t​e​r​-​s​h​o​r​t​a​g​e​s​-​i​r​a​q​-​s​o​l​d​i​e​r​s​.​1​6​e​b​b​a​1​d​.​h​tml
    A yahoo answers claims that the water is donated. Even so, it’s still a transport burden (and I’m skeptical about donation of water).
    http://​answers​.yahoo​.com/​q​u​e​s​t​i​o​n​/​i​n​d​e​x​?​q​i​d​=​2​0​0​6​1​0​0​5​1​2​4​2​3​8​A​A​P​S​HsB

    Reply
  15. NV Smith says:
    October 14, 2009 at 7:29 am

    I’m surprised although I probably shouldn’t be. I remember being issued purification inserts that fit our canteens and replaced the cap. Pour water, as clear as possible, in and suck/squeeze purified water out. Supply also had purification straws. I know that DARPA has worked on this. In most cases the trick is to get water as clear as possible. This wouldn’t have helped much in Wanat, but putting clear water into clear bottles and then letting them sit in the sun for a few hours does the same thing the UV lights do. We always had water purification devices when heading out; either issue or commercial.

    Reply
  16. Jean D says:
    October 14, 2009 at 8:00 am

    What about
    http://​www​.seldontechnologies​.com/
    ?
    In their “markets” section, they claim to be working with the Air Force and the Special Ops to include both their “WaterStick” (on the Camelback) and their “WaterBox” (at the platoon level) into their equipment. Is the Army this isolated for the other forces?
    Jean

    Reply
  17. Michael says:
    October 14, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    Restrooms in some Sierra range parks such as at Devil’s Postpile in from Bishop have signs posted alerting users to check ones’ urine color. Clear or slightly yellow indicates sufficient water intake. Darker urine can be a signal of dyhydration although some vitamins can darken urine. The military is very aware of this in Iraq and Afghanistan. I carry a liter bottle everywhere now but I recall when I was a kid that most gas stations had a drinking fountain besides a working clock to be seen from the street.

    Reply
  18. Dennis says:
    October 15, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    I guess boiling water for 30 minutes is no longer an approved solution? There was a bladder of fuel and five (six?) vehicles there, a river nearby, troops working 10 minutes on and fifty minutes off, and no one could boil water? Homeland Security and FEMA recommend boiling drinking water in emergencies, doesn’t the Army have the same faith in that method?
    From a previous post, the Water Filtration unit was available, but not used as it would creat an accountability problem… That would be funny if it weren’t so sick…

    Reply
  19. Sam Rod says:
    October 16, 2009 at 12:32 am

    In addition to my earlier comment on the LWPS (Light Water Purification System),that the sister unit had, but never implaced, being scare for the accountability of components, and who would had signed for, TF Rock deployed with 5ea M149 Water Buffalo, that can hold 400Galons of potable water. But just like the LWPS, they stayed must of the deployment parked in Jalalabad collecting dust. Even 1 galon of water per day, per soldier, a full Water Buffalo, could had lasted 1 week for the entire PLT, plenty of time to rotate a second one in.

    Reply
  20. nraddin says:
    October 18, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    I had no idea that there was no unit sized water systems in the US military. Something small that could be clean water from any river, pond, lake or tap would be good to have for small OPs and FOBs. Anything you can do to reduce your dependence on supply chains is good.
    In Afghanistan on FOB Wilson they have been on 2 meals a day 6 days a week for a while now, giving rise to the term starvation Tuesday for the one day a week they get no food. These poor guys go outside the wire and fight it out day after day without the food they need. It makes me wonder if the military had done a better job with water supply if the supply of food would be a little better.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
    • Cancel Cyber Command
    • Rough Week for F-35
    • Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer (Part 3)
    • China’s Military Spending Slows
    • Army React To NLOS-LS Missile Miss
    • Is the F-35 Militarily Vital?
    • Quote Of the Week
    • Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer (Part 2)
    Recent Comments
    • Fix Bayonets!
      meant to say are NOT.. my bad. proofreading not done.
      chris king
    • Fix Bayonets!
      The scope, the bayonet, all of it should bear "God Bless...
      chris king
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
      I hope they doing something so the guys ridding...
      The Seer
    • Cancel Cyber Command
      I keep telling people if a computer is hooked to the Internet it...
      KevinInTac
    • Rough Week for F-35
      But the F-22 is Air Force only, not for export, and would almost...
      DualityOfMan
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
      Nitpicking a little more: the Abrams with all the...
      TMB
    • Cancel Cyber Command
      Where does Obama and crew find these people, a first year IT...
      KevinInTac
    • Army React To NLOS-LS Missile Miss
      Having been present for one of those spit storms,(...
      KevinInTac
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
      Actually, to refine my previous thought....
      Armchair Warlord
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
      It would be nice if these vehicles were...
      Mad Mike Weber
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage