DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Body Armor Blues » FSAPV-​​E and X Don’t Meet Expectations

FSAPV-​​E and X Don’t Meet Expectations

PEO-soldier-presser-with-dr.jpg

Well, there’s more to the GAO report on Army ESAPI plate test­ing than meets the eye.

With only a cou­ple ref­er­ences thrown in early on, it’s easy to miss it. But a sharp eyed researcher at the Project on Government Oversight who called me today to ask a few ques­tions did my job bet­ter than I and raised an issue I should have pounced on.

It turns out, the Army did its ESAPI tests at Aberdeen instead of HP White not because DOT&E requested it, but because “one man­u­fac­turer of flex­i­ble small arms pro­tec­tive vests, which had failed pre­vi­ous test­ing con­ducted for the Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier at an NIJ-​​certified facil­ity, made alle­ga­tions that the PEO Soldier and the facil­ity had wrongly failed its designs.”

Okay folks, who do you think that is?

So it turns out our report­ing in October of ’08 was spot on that the Army deemed the tech­nol­ogy too imma­ture to field deploy­able Flexible-​​SAP sys­tems. The GAO fills in some blanks, say­ing (not sure how many) ven­dors sent in sam­ples of a Flexible Small Arms Protective Vest-​​Enhanced and FSAPV-​​X and shot them at Aberdeen between February and June of ’08.

In October 2008, on the basis of the Preliminary Design Model test­ing results, the Army awarded four 5-​​year indef­i­nite delivery/​indefinite quan­tity con­tracts at a total of over $8 bil­lion for the pro­duc­tion of the ESAPI and the XSAPItwo cat­e­gories of ceramic plates. No FSAPV-​​E or FSAPV-​​X solu­tions passed the test­ing.

Now this gets back to our boy Allan Bain’s con­tention that flex­i­ble sys­tems need a whole new test method­ol­ogy dif­fer­ent from the Army’s cur­rent one (that failed the FSAPs in ’08)…but that’s a debate for another post.

(Gouge: MS)

– Christian

Share |

October 21st, 2009 | Body Armor Blues | 461715 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/10/21/fsapv-e-and-x-dont-meet-expectations/FSAPV-E+and+X+Don%27t+Meet+Expectations2009-10-21+20%3A24%3A26lowe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Hush Hush…The Ospreys Are Coming | USAF Launches Major Technology Review » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jones says:
    October 21, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    One sin­gle look at this lard assed shit­head is enough to make a sol­dier vomit.
    This pot bel­lied swine couldn’t do a sin­gle chin up if his life depended on it!
    Yet we see him giv­ing a lec­ture about a FSAFV-​​e and x.
    What ever in the hell they are.
    This fat assed, puss gut shit­head should be sent to some­place where the food is less, and the excer­cise is more!
    Is it any won­der that the US Army is get­ting its ass kicked around?
    The USA is a laugh­ing stock.
    And with good rea­son.
    For Christ’s sake, just take a look at this pathetic dork?
    He, on his best day, just might qual­ify to be an assis­tant cub scout den mother.
    Yet, this hor­rid hip­po­ti­mous bel­lied leg, is an offi­cer in the US Army?
    Jesus H. Christ.

    Reply
  2. Jimbo says:
    October 22, 2009 at 4:02 am

    Coming from the UK and hav­ing over the years seen how many times the GAO have been flat out wrong (mean­ing there reports on nearly every major weapon sys­tem were flat wrong) does any­one actu­ally take this seri­ously?
    Seems to me that a GAO report that attacks a sys­tem tends to mean the sys­tem is actu­ally very very good, see GAO F-​​16, M1 Tank, AH-​​64, M-​​2 Bradley reports for exam­ples.
    In short: the GAO seem to be a bunch of idiots and I for one wouldn’t believe a wrod theat came out of their mouths!

    Reply
  3. Charles says:
    October 22, 2009 at 6:48 am

    Out of uni­form he doesn’t look so sol­dierly to me. :/​
    Then again, I don’t think all the famous gen­er­als of WW2 were fit­ness studs in old age, were they? But at least Eisenhower didn’t have a beer belly.
    Even so, why do flex­i­ble plates deserve a dif­fer­ent met­ric? Are the tests so inher­ently biased? Are they lit­tle more than “shoot the plates and see if they break”, which is what they are expected to do in the battlefield?

    Reply
  4. Charles says:
    October 22, 2009 at 8:34 am

    They should just do what Walter Christie did in the ‘30s…sell your tech­nol­ogy to some­one else (in Christies case, the Russians. For Dragon Skin, who knows?). Is it trea­son if your gov­ern­ment rejects it as unim­por­tant?
    The weight issue is com­pli­cated, but I sup­pose a hybrid sys­tem is pos­si­ble where the scales only cover spe­cific por­tions of the body, or one uses lighter scales in areas unlikely to be hit, and heav­ier scales in areas likely to be hit.
    Dragon Skin is try­ing to be more flex­i­ble and have more cov­er­age than the tra­di­tional BPV + plate. It might be worth it from a first-​​generation engi­neer­ing stand­point to pick one of the two and run with it.

    Reply
  5. Dennis says:
    October 22, 2009 at 8:48 am

    Jones, thank you.
    The photo doesn’t speak a thou­sand words, only at phrase “WTF?“
    What were you think­ing? Dressing that offi­cer up in a Combat uni­form and hav­ing him explain test­ing short­falls of body armor before live press has got to qual­ify for the Darwin award.
    There was a time, not that long ago, that this offi­cer was pro­moted while other fully qual­i­fied and phys­i­cally fit offi­cers and sol­diers were given dis­charges for fail­ing to meet height/​weight stan­dards or appear­ance. This is sad.

    Reply
  6. Vitor says:
    October 22, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Hey Christian,
    Any updates on the Evolution Skaalar armor designed by Alla Bain?

    Reply
  7. nraddin says:
    October 22, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    I know guys that are WAY more fat than that guy that have no prob­lem pass­ing all the PT require­ments. They never pass the weight test and have issues with the tape test, but that does not mean they are out of shape. Having extra Fat and not being phys­i­cally fit are not mutu­ally exclu­sive.
    Oh and how many times have you seen a skinny guy fail the PT test? Me per­son­ally I have seen it more often from the guys that look like they are in shape than then guys that don’t.
    Oh and for all you know this guy in 60yrs old and passes all the tape test no prob­lem because his height weight requirments are so much lower.

    Reply
  8. TDS4S says:
    October 22, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    You don’t put pigs out to pas­ture. That’s horses. And some of you all need to get a grip. Does the briefer owe you money or some­thing? For all you know he’s a Reservist or some Acquisition Corp desk jockey… not every­one is Cav by God! (Which means that not every­one is the stone cold, rock hard, steely eyed spec­i­men of pure man­hood that Jones and Zandor surely are).

    Reply
  9. gsak says:
    October 22, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    Is that General Mark Brown? I’ve seen him speak, and I don’t trust that guy any far­ther than I could throw him.

    Reply
  10. Dennis says:
    October 23, 2009 at 7:50 am

    Not to dis­agree with you all, but I am am going to.
    On the Fat issue.
    General Groves in the 40’s was a fat turd. But they let it slide since he was an amaz­ing orga­nizer.
    Who is General Groves? Organizer of the Manhattan project.
    On the plate issue, we all know the fix was in. When your giv­ing bil­lions out in grants peo­ple call you and whis­per sweet things in your ear about after retirement.…..

    Reply
  11. Dennis says:
    October 23, 2009 at 11:10 am

    The mes­sage on General Groves is from some other Dennis.
    General Groves was in the mil­i­tary when we had an 8 mil­lion man Army. Today the active force is less than 540,000. General Groves didn’t give press con­fer­ences. By and large, pho­tos of General Groves are of him in Class B or bet­ter uni­form. I have a great deal of respect for those who served in “The great­est gen­er­a­tion”. I have a lot less respect for those offi­cers who sur­vived the draw­downs of the 80’s and 90’s. I served with many of them and the best and bright­est were told to walk or quit out of dis­gust.
    That may well be a fine man­ager, but the US Army has always depended on fine lead­ers. The process that put him on stage to explain to the press needs seri­ous review.
    I am no longer the steely eyed killer that I once was, but god help me, I don’t look like that.

    Reply
  12. TSD4S says:
    October 23, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    “That may well be a fine man­ager, but the US Army has always depended on fine lead­ers. The process that put him on stage to explain to the press needs seri­ous review.“
    I’ll drink to that (at least in the abstract… I don’t per­son­ally know this par­tic­u­lat guy). I got out after my first expo­sure to General offi­cer lead­er­ship. The process that puts stars (and birds) on peo­ple needs work.

    Reply
  13. Zandor says:
    October 24, 2009 at 8:57 am

    If, as Napoleon said: ” the Army moves on its stom­ach “, and this brief­ing nerd is an exam­ple of the US Army, then the US Army must be the fastest mov­ing thing on the planet.

    Reply
  14. Davesmom says:
    October 24, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    For fcks sake, stop dis­cussing ‘fatty the sol­dier’ and com­ment on the article.

    Reply
  15. Scott says:
    November 21, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    FINALLY, a com­ment worth read­ing. Comment on the sub­ject of the body armor and pick some other related arti­cle to post this crap. ALL it does is seem to say you know absolutely noth­ing about body armor so you attack the mes­sen­ger.
    How do you mod­ify the test when the goal is the same, stop pen­e­tra­tion of the round. The hard plates either flex­i­ble or non-​​flexible still are mainly meant to stop the pro­jec­tiles from rifles. The soft armor is meant to stop the shrap­nel. The armor needs to be able to stop mul­ti­ple hits and not fall aprt while wear­ing it up to the time it per­forms it’s intended job.
    AND hav­ing just retired in 06, I pre­fer to see this guy that can man­age the pro­gram just where he is. IF we can keep him there and NOT have a fit and trim offi­cer pulled OFF the line to per­form this mis­sion great. Maybe ya’ll for­got but there are a few wars going on and using him for his brain is the mis­sion he is per­form­ing. NOW, if you don’t think he has the brain to per­form the mis­sion is another thing but his weight does not affect the per­for­mance of THIS mission.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Artistically a very "nice" picture to look...
      Gus Claassens
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      You seem to have a problem with pictures of soldiers..
      MIKE
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Easy Young Zandor, suppose this is just a photo op.. actually,...
      MIKE
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Easy Young Zandor, suppose this is just a photo op.. actually,...
      MIKE
    • FSAPV-E and X Don’t Meet Expectations
      FINALLY, a comment worth reading. Comment on the...
      Scott
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Yes,Charles,Phantom Works is Boeing.
      elgatoso
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage