DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Body Armor Blues » FSAPV-E and X Don’t Meet Expectations

FSAPV-E and X Don’t Meet Expectations

PEO-soldier-presser-with-dr.jpg

Well, there’s more to the GAO report on Army ESAPI plate testing than meets the eye.

With only a couple references thrown in early on, it’s easy to miss it. But a sharp eyed researcher at the Project on Government Oversight who called me today to ask a few questions did my job better than I and raised an issue I should have pounced on.

It turns out, the Army did its ESAPI tests at Aberdeen instead of HP White not because DOT&E requested it, but because “one manufacturer of flexible small arms protective vests, which had failed previous testing conducted for the Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier at an NIJ-certified facility, made allegations that the PEO Soldier and the facility had wrongly failed its designs.”

Okay folks, who do you think that is?

So it turns out our reporting in October of ’08 was spot on that the Army deemed the technology too immature to field deployable Flexible-SAP systems. The GAO fills in some blanks, saying (not sure how many) vendors sent in samples of a Flexible Small Arms Protective Vest-Enhanced and FSAPV-X and shot them at Aberdeen between February and June of ’08.

In October 2008, on the basis of the Preliminary Design Model testing results, the Army awarded four 5-year indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts at a total of over $8 billion for the production of the ESAPI and the XSAPItwo categories of ceramic plates. No FSAPV-E or FSAPV-X solutions passed the testing.

Now this gets back to our boy Allan Bain’s contention that flexible systems need a whole new test methodology different from the Army’s current one (that failed the FSAPs in ’08)…but that’s a debate for another post.

(Gouge: MS)

– Christian

Share |

October 21st, 2009 | Body Armor Blues | 461715 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/10/21/fsapv-e-and-x-dont-meet-expectations/FSAPV-E+and+X+Don%27t+Meet+Expectations2009-10-21+20%3A24%3A26lowe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Hush Hush…The Ospreys Are Coming | USAF Launches Major Technology Review » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jones says:
    October 21, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    One single look at this lard assed shithead is enough to make a soldier vomit.
    This pot bellied swine couldn’t do a single chin up if his life depended on it!
    Yet we see him giving a lecture about a FSAFV-e and x.
    What ever in the hell they are.
    This fat assed, puss gut shithead should be sent to someplace where the food is less, and the excercise is more!
    Is it any wonder that the US Army is getting its ass kicked around?
    The USA is a laughing stock.
    And with good reason.
    For Christ’s sake, just take a look at this pathetic dork?
    He, on his best day, just might qualify to be an assistant cub scout den mother.
    Yet, this horrid hippotimous bellied leg, is an officer in the US Army?
    Jesus H. Christ.

    Reply
  2. Jimbo says:
    October 22, 2009 at 4:02 am

    Coming from the UK and having over the years seen how many times the GAO have been flat out wrong (meaning there reports on nearly every major weapon system were flat wrong) does anyone actually take this seriously?
    Seems to me that a GAO report that attacks a system tends to mean the system is actually very very good, see GAO F-16, M1 Tank, AH-64, M-2 Bradley reports for examples.
    In short: the GAO seem to be a bunch of idiots and I for one wouldn’t believe a wrod theat came out of their mouths!

    Reply
  3. Charles says:
    October 22, 2009 at 6:48 am

    Out of uniform he doesn’t look so soldierly to me. :/
    Then again, I don’t think all the famous generals of WW2 were fitness studs in old age, were they? But at least Eisenhower didn’t have a beer belly.
    Even so, why do flexible plates deserve a different metric? Are the tests so inherently biased? Are they little more than “shoot the plates and see if they break”, which is what they are expected to do in the battlefield?

    Reply
  4. Charles says:
    October 22, 2009 at 8:34 am

    They should just do what Walter Christie did in the ‘30s…sell your technology to someone else (in Christies case, the Russians. For Dragon Skin, who knows?). Is it treason if your government rejects it as unimportant?
    The weight issue is complicated, but I suppose a hybrid system is possible where the scales only cover specific portions of the body, or one uses lighter scales in areas unlikely to be hit, and heavier scales in areas likely to be hit.
    Dragon Skin is trying to be more flexible and have more coverage than the traditional BPV + plate. It might be worth it from a first-generation engineering standpoint to pick one of the two and run with it.

    Reply
  5. Dennis says:
    October 22, 2009 at 8:48 am

    Jones, thank you.
    The photo doesn’t speak a thousand words, only at phrase “WTF?“
    What were you thinking? Dressing that officer up in a Combat uniform and having him explain testing shortfalls of body armor before live press has got to qualify for the Darwin award.
    There was a time, not that long ago, that this officer was promoted while other fully qualified and physically fit officers and soldiers were given discharges for failing to meet height/weight standards or appearance. This is sad.

    Reply
  6. Vitor says:
    October 22, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Hey Christian,
    Any updates on the Evolution Skaalar armor designed by Alla Bain?

    Reply
  7. nraddin says:
    October 22, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    I know guys that are WAY more fat than that guy that have no problem passing all the PT requirements. They never pass the weight test and have issues with the tape test, but that does not mean they are out of shape. Having extra Fat and not being physically fit are not mutually exclusive.
    Oh and how many times have you seen a skinny guy fail the PT test? Me personally I have seen it more often from the guys that look like they are in shape than then guys that don’t.
    Oh and for all you know this guy in 60yrs old and passes all the tape test no problem because his height weight requirments are so much lower.

    Reply
  8. TDS4S says:
    October 22, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    You don’t put pigs out to pasture. That’s horses. And some of you all need to get a grip. Does the briefer owe you money or something? For all you know he’s a Reservist or some Acquisition Corp desk jockey… not everyone is Cav by God! (Which means that not everyone is the stone cold, rock hard, steely eyed specimen of pure manhood that Jones and Zandor surely are).

    Reply
  9. gsak says:
    October 22, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    Is that General Mark Brown? I’ve seen him speak, and I don’t trust that guy any farther than I could throw him.

    Reply
  10. Dennis says:
    October 23, 2009 at 7:50 am

    Not to disagree with you all, but I am am going to.
    On the Fat issue.
    General Groves in the 40’s was a fat turd. But they let it slide since he was an amazing organizer.
    Who is General Groves? Organizer of the Manhattan project.
    On the plate issue, we all know the fix was in. When your giving billions out in grants people call you and whisper sweet things in your ear about after retirement.…..

    Reply
  11. Dennis says:
    October 23, 2009 at 11:10 am

    The message on General Groves is from some other Dennis.
    General Groves was in the military when we had an 8 million man Army. Today the active force is less than 540,000. General Groves didn’t give press conferences. By and large, photos of General Groves are of him in Class B or better uniform. I have a great deal of respect for those who served in “The greatest generation”. I have a lot less respect for those officers who survived the drawdowns of the 80’s and 90’s. I served with many of them and the best and brightest were told to walk or quit out of disgust.
    That may well be a fine manager, but the US Army has always depended on fine leaders. The process that put him on stage to explain to the press needs serious review.
    I am no longer the steely eyed killer that I once was, but god help me, I don’t look like that.

    Reply
  12. TSD4S says:
    October 23, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    “That may well be a fine manager, but the US Army has always depended on fine leaders. The process that put him on stage to explain to the press needs serious review.“
    I’ll drink to that (at least in the abstract… I don’t personally know this particulat guy). I got out after my first exposure to General officer leadership. The process that puts stars (and birds) on people needs work.

    Reply
  13. Zandor says:
    October 24, 2009 at 8:57 am

    If, as Napoleon said: ” the Army moves on its stomach “, and this briefing nerd is an example of the US Army, then the US Army must be the fastest moving thing on the planet.

    Reply
  14. Davesmom says:
    October 24, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    For fcks sake, stop discussing ‘fatty the soldier’ and comment on the article.

    Reply
  15. Scott says:
    November 21, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    FINALLY, a comment worth reading. Comment on the subject of the body armor and pick some other related article to post this crap. ALL it does is seem to say you know absolutely nothing about body armor so you attack the messenger.
    How do you modify the test when the goal is the same, stop penetration of the round. The hard plates either flexible or non-flexible still are mainly meant to stop the projectiles from rifles. The soft armor is meant to stop the shrapnel. The armor needs to be able to stop multiple hits and not fall aprt while wearing it up to the time it performs it’s intended job.
    AND having just retired in 06, I prefer to see this guy that can manage the program just where he is. IF we can keep him there and NOT have a fit and trim officer pulled OFF the line to perform this mission great. Maybe ya’ll forgot but there are a few wars going on and using him for his brain is the mission he is performing. NOW, if you don’t think he has the brain to perform the mission is another thing but his weight does not affect the performance of THIS mission.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I reckon that the J-10 would be a good bet. Y'all...
      Chimp
    • Raptor Down (58-40)
      This story never gets old. This plane was never meant to be this...
      DeepThinker
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      um… they already have them. Hunters and...
      Buongi
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Interesting, though, from my experience, many...
      Buongi
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Not completely true-remember the Navy can be very picky...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I think by the end of the year some of those flags are...
      Tom
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I am not advocating non use of F22s&F35s in daylight...
      Chops
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Guys this platform is about CAS but not in the...
      ANGRYTACP
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Blaming the contractors for a development system created...
      G Lof
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage