Comments on: BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed

By: infantry

infantry — Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:08:46 +0000

isnt that the same exact camo they had before?

By: Eugenia Nockai

Eugenia Nockai — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:24:16 +0000

The style of writing is very familiar . Have you written guest posts for other blogs? I mean very pleasant for me

By: greg stocks

greg stocks — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:22:00 +0000

gee lets forget about winning a war as long as we look good? right these thing must have been made in china like everthing else we get from them it don’t work!!!!!!

By: WarScientist

WarScientist — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:25:47 +0000

The best to get good camo is to find a nice puddle, jump face-first into it and roll around a bit.

Then again under the outrageously stupid “must-look-cool” uniform regulations the US army has, that would probably only be allowed if said person happened to be on fire.

Oh wait, your uniforms are fire-retarded (hey, had to get that joke in here somehow), in that case hell just have to wait until the fire dies down, after which hell be forced to change into his spare set of fresh, new, super-bright ACU’s with added reflector stripes and neon lighting system.

By: Takkelmaggot

Takkelmaggot — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:13:22 +0000

I know! It’s not as if they field test them or anything, right?

By: Big Daddy

Big Daddy — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:02:19 +0000

Yes this whole cammo thing is a joke. A joke on the American taxpayer. Cammo doesn’t work.

I used to laugh at the guys dressed in their BDU’s and face paint as they stuck-out like a sore thumb behind any so called concealment. Black is not a natural color and made them stick-out badly. These uniforms they keep coming up with are a joke and do not work.

The Israelis do not use cammo because it doesn’t work. Simple olive drab and/or a tan color works best, like the uniforms of WWII. Too many armchair commandos in the Pentagon worried about what looks slick, cool, sexy and dramatic. While we wonder how to pay our mortgages they wonder how to dress their Barbie’s, Ken’s and G.I. Joe’s.

By: booms

booms — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:11:23 +0000

I ment to add in response to the news post:
No, I can’t see the Multicam hydration carrier. It must be camo’d too well against the similar color’d terrain, and my eyes were automatically drawns to the whitish/grey uniform that sticks out like a sore thumb.

I did note that the only part that sort of matched the terrain is the worn-out elbow area (okay, and the hydration carrier).

By: booms

booms — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:07:04 +0000

But Oble… winning will mean nothing when the world sees the ragged, clearly no-label attire they are wearing. They should at the very least wear Calvin and Klein lunghis.

By: Oble

Oble — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:52:57 +0000

All these posts about fashion and nothing about matching accessories, the latest in shoes or personal fragrances.

Of course it’s still a lot better then those horribly unfashionable Taliban — who are currently too busy winning the latest afghan war to be bothered with this seasons colors.

The number of specialists who comment that they’d rather be seen dead than in tan — and get shipped home in a box the next week, must be of concern.