DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what's ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It's Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Afghan Update » IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam

IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam

french-multicam

Or is it?

This guy’s clearly wearing MultiCam and has all the high-speed identifiers that a US trooper would wear. I can’t seem to find a high-rez version of this photo, which itself is a mystery, but given the story that surrounds the photo and context of that area of Afghanistan, I’m leaning heavily toward an adoption by at least some groups of French military (their version of the PJs) of MulitCam uniforms.

In this photo released by the French Army, Nato French soldiers evacuate wounded from Tagab, Afghanistan, Monday Nov. 16, 2009. Insurgents fired two rockets Monday into a crowded market northeast of Kabul where the head of French forces in Afghanistan held a meeting with tribal elders. The attack killed at least twelve and wounded 20 other people, the French military said. (AP / HO / ADC Jean-Charles Thorel)

The only thing that makes me pause, is that I reported a while back that USAF PJs were wearing MultiCam combat uniforms in the AO. This guy could be a PJ but I can’t see enough of the helo and am skeptical that an AF bubba would be sporting Rock Star hair and a hillbilly beard. Wouldn’t look too good with the rest of his pals at the Bagram Links.

So help me with this dear readers…who is this guy?

– Christian

Share |

November 18th, 2009 | Afghan Update, Commandos, Door Kickers | 501657 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/imint-french-fashion-mavens-model-multicam/IMINT%3A+French+Fashion+Mavens+Model+MultiCam2009-11-18+14%3A43%3A47christian You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River | Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Solifugid says:
    November 18, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    The stretcher bearers, or at least some of them are wearing regular French camo. Also French forces do not use Blackhawks irrc. It seems to me that he's a Yank after all and needs a shave.

    Reply
    • dan says:
      November 18, 2009 at 7:15 pm

      he is indeed american. Thats an ODA operator

      Reply
  2. Matt says:
    November 18, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    High-Speed gear and a civilian hairdo – Delta?

    Reply
    • Pave-Low5 says:
      November 19, 2009 at 12:18 am

      Don't be a dummy. Delta operators are not the only people who can have civilian hair do's in theater. In fact most special operators do.

      Reply
      • Matt says:
        November 19, 2009 at 6:24 pm

        Ok – I'll stop being dumb if you stop being an ass.

        Reply
        • airborne.adrenaline says:
          December 13, 2009 at 3:52 am

          Matt grow a pair. He is obviously part of the SF community. Not SOF, but SF in particular. SFOD-Delta operators wouldnt allow a camera within miles of their AO.

          Reply
  3. TMB says:
    November 18, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    Looks like he's wearing non-issue boots or even hiking shoes. Also, most conventional army aircrews wear a helmet.

    Reply
  4. Pfeiffer says:
    November 18, 2009 at 11:30 am

    Hard to tell as I’m looking at this grainy picture on m phone, but it looks like he might be wearing low-top shoes. Again hard for me to see, but his shoes look very similar to Salomon Speedcross 2 Trail-Running shoes.
    http://www.rei.com/product/757243
    WFS
    I’ve heard of highspeed high tops but at least to me these could possibly be low-tops. If this holds true then it seems like an unnecessary risk, given the terrain and all. But hey what do I know about risk…

    Reply
    • theo says:
      November 18, 2009 at 4:51 pm

      Hey guys,

      At first this looks like an Italian AF camo uniform. Maybe this guy was MEDEVACed form the It AF Det out of KAIA.

      But because of the low res pic, I started to doubt. I don't recall the Italians having a heli Det over there.

      greetz.

      T

      Reply
      • clowe says:
        November 18, 2009 at 5:58 pm

        I'm pretty sure that's Crye's multicam…if you look closely on your computer, you can see the distinctive knee pads…

        Reply
      • dan says:
        November 18, 2009 at 8:14 pm

        http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/world/asia/17af...

        Its Multicam

        Reply
      • dan says:
        November 18, 2009 at 8:15 pm

        http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/world/asia/17af...

        Reply
    • clowe says:
      November 18, 2009 at 5:58 pm

      They look to me like wrestling shoes…

      Reply
  5. Caleb says:
    November 18, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    Looks like an American operator imbedded with the French.

    Reply
  6. Charles says:
    November 18, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    We should just call the category "military fashionistas". I can only imagine military "Fashion Week" with people in the various uniforms of the world showing off the new digs that come out of the design labs every ten weeks or so.

    Reply
  7. pleuris says:
    November 18, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    My guess is that the boots are 'enhanced' with add on zippers, instead of laces.
    I had them when I was on alert with the incident responce team (IRT) in Bosnia. When the alarm went I was out of my bed and in gear in about 20 secs.
    But I don't know from what unit that man is, maybe a combat life saver from some spec ops unit?

    Reply
  8. chrisram says:
    November 18, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    This is Tech related how???

    Reply
  9. Greg says:
    November 18, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    That's what I was thinking! They must not have much to write about these days.

    Reply
    • clowe says:
      November 18, 2009 at 8:20 pm

      So, what troops wear in combat and the technology that goes into that equipment isn't "tech-related"…? someone's tone deaf here.

      Reply
  10. Zandor says:
    November 18, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    It seems as though pictures of soldiers wearing cammo gets a lot of the posters here extremely excited.

    I will leave the reason for this peculiar fashion and style interest /excitement up to the reader.

    Reply
  11. Zandor says:
    November 18, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    Dear Dan;

    What exactly does an ODA operator do?

    Reply
  12. Ndgt says:
    November 18, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    http://www.defense.gouv.fr/ema/operations_exterieures/afghanistan/breves_et_photos/afghanistan_tirs_de_roquettes_sur_le_marche_de_tagab_video

    Un Cougar français a déposé une équipe médicale sur place pour procéder au triage et à l’évacuation des blessés. Avec trois hélicoptères américains MEDEVAC

    So that’s 1 french Cougar and 3 US MEDEVAC; the cougar as you can see on the link photos is gray. SO it got to be one of the US Helicopter, hence the guy is american

    Reply
  13. Ndgt says:
    November 18, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    If you click on the first link
    16/11/09 – Afghanistan : tirs de roquettes sur le marché de Tagab (vidéo)
    at the very end you will see the opposite angle of that photos and 2 BLackHawks taking off.

    Reply
    • clowe says:
      November 18, 2009 at 8:25 pm

      good spot Ndgt…thanks!

      Reply
  14. Charles says:
    November 18, 2009 at 8:45 pm

    That's putting the definition of technology to the test. Recalling the original motto of defense tech: "The future of
    the military, law enforcement, and national security."

    So the future is in deciding our combat wardrobe? Even the ARES blog is keeping up with the tech tradition; as per the constant links to it.

    Reply
    • TMB says:
      November 19, 2009 at 5:29 am

      Camouflage is one of the oldest forms of military technology in the history of conflict. After the sharpened rock was invented, dude probably thought to himself "if only I could throw this without being seen." Something doesn't have to take batteries and cost 6 figures to be called defense technology.

      Reply
      • The Boogy Man says:
        November 19, 2009 at 6:08 pm

        You know you only like things that are battery operated.

        Reply
    • DualityOfMan says:
      November 19, 2009 at 3:47 am

      Yes, the uniform is part of the future. Do you think soldiers will be wearing the ACU forever?

      Reply
  15. Charles says:
    November 18, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    Special Forces isn't the same thing as Delta?

    Reply
    • Will says:
      November 18, 2009 at 10:12 pm

      The unit that is popularly referred to as Delta Force is a small part of US Army Special Forces, aka the Green Berets. The Green Berets are a part of US Army Special Operations Command. Army SOC is part of the joint US SOC. Read up in Wikipedia & GlobalSecurity.org

      Reply
      • Charles says:
        November 19, 2009 at 2:51 pm

        I hope wiki and globalsec aren't your only sources…

        Reply
      • airborne.adrenaline says:
        December 13, 2009 at 3:56 am

        not true at all. delta takes from the rangers and sf but is a counter terrorism / hostage rescue team. the army special forces operators teach guerilla warfare to indigenous forces. two ery different groups

        Reply
    • dan says:
      November 18, 2009 at 10:23 pm

      No Special Forces not the same as Delta Force. Delta Force mainly comprises of people with a background in SF or a Ranger Batt. Delta Force is designed as a Counter- Terrorist Unit.

      Reply
  16. Pete says:
    November 19, 2009 at 12:09 am

    It’s absolutely amazing! I have watched several Taliban videos of their successful attack on the Wanat base. Their soldiers had like anti-camouflage. They were so conspicuous in their white tennis boots and other high visibility clothing it was absolutely incredible! They seemed to break every logical rule in the book regarding concealment. They were even sitting on top of ridgelines less than 1.2km from the base in broad daylight.

    Even their truck was painted in clown colors. It seems to me that the coalition forces think that this so called ‘Global War on Terror’ is going to be decided on who has the latest camouflage fashion. Sexy clothing a great policy for going out night clubbing to impress the girls, but as the Taliban proved, courage and determination is more important in a soldier than how he is dressed. It’s meant to be war gentlemen, not a fashion parade.

    Reply
    • Kevin says:
      November 19, 2009 at 5:56 pm

      Correct me if I'm wrong. The taliban were wearing camo as well. They were enemy militia disguised as civilian population. That is how they blend in to their surroundings. As far as sitting atop a ridge, why should they hide if our ROE prevent us from engaging them before being attacked.

      Reply
  17. Alex says:
    November 19, 2009 at 12:13 am

    Christian you can't see you enough of the helo ? Would it help if Sikorsky was painted on the side its pretty obvious that its a Blackhawk . Knowing this stuff is how you supposedly how you make your living ? You might want to work on improving your aircraft identification skills.

    Reply
    • clowe says:
      November 19, 2009 at 6:36 pm

      Alex, what a GIANT help you are! Thank you so much not only for so graciously holding my hand on the helicopter ID but also being an insulting boob to top it off! Now, here's my question…can YOU ID every Soviet-era, NATO, ASEAN and US helicopter operational in the AO with merely a partial side panel in a low rez shot? I'm sure you can since it's probably how you make your living as a video game tester. Have fun in your airsoft league.

      Reply
  18. Alex says:
    November 19, 2009 at 12:16 am

    More about the story behind this picture

    "A French captain, identified only as Michel, said that three of the dead were children. Three American Black Hawks and a French Caracal helicopter evacuated the most seriously wounded to a military hospital at Bagram airbase."

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/Afgha...

    Reply
  19. Pete says:
    November 19, 2009 at 12:25 am

    Christian, You're kind of an idiot when it come to this stuff. Please stick with the tech side of things.

    Reply
    • The Boogy Man says:
      November 19, 2009 at 6:15 pm

      i dont know if he is a idiot, but he looooves to talk tacticool.

      Reply
      • clowe says:
        November 19, 2009 at 6:41 pm

        …oh boogyman, you're so BTDT…

        Reply
    • clowe says:
      November 19, 2009 at 6:32 pm

      I don't understand what you're saying Pete…please explain yourself to this "idiot"…do you know where this guy is from based on his equipment and uniform?

      Reply
  20. dan says:
    November 18, 2009 at 8:13 pm

    an Operational Detachment Alpha.. or Special Forces A team. i.e. Green Berets. Im saying that he probably is part of one or as some of you say Delta.

    Reply
    • Zandor says:
      November 18, 2009 at 9:16 pm

      Dear Dan;

      Thank you for the clarification.

      Reply
      • Pave-Low5 says:
        November 19, 2009 at 12:22 am

        Dan is correct.

        Reply
  21. freefallingbomb says:
    November 19, 2009 at 2:55 am

    The bearded guy doesn't look like a 100 % U.S. American, even bearing in mind what awful mixtures result from the Melting Pot…

    Reply
  22. REB says:
    November 19, 2009 at 10:12 am

    Thats a US Blackhawk, so I thinking US Military responding to the French in contact.

    Reply
  23. guest says:
    November 19, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    Being that the ISAF(euro) has very limited air assets and make us of US' my guess is he's an american. COuld even be a contractor(GASP!!)

    Reply
  24. REB says:
    November 19, 2009 at 11:30 am

    I myself am a (gasp) contractor here in A-Stan.

    Reply
  25. JimboJones says:
    November 19, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    Have these French personel left Afghanistan yet after the rocket attack against them? I'm genuinly curious and not flaming!

    Reply
    • freefallingbomb says:
      November 20, 2009 at 2:40 am

      Part I :

      "To that end, French NATO forces, steeped in counterinsurgency, say they are treating sick children rather than bombing Taliban positions and focusing on intelligence-gathering rather than major ground offensives.
      …

      The French example could serve as a test case for that strategy.
      'Let's not gloat about a so-called 'French touch,' ' said Col. Benoit Durieux, the commander of the elite Foreign Legion battalion overseeing the Surobi area east of Kabul, where nearly a third of the 3.000 French troops in Afghanistan are stationed.
      Success can be fleeting in counterinsurgency warfare, and if the French leave, the Taliban could return.
      …

      (Continued)

      Reply
    • freefallingbomb says:
      November 20, 2009 at 2:40 am

      Part II :

      Still, there are signs of progress. A year ago, the Uzbeen Valley, about 30 miles northeast of Kabul, was entirely in Taliban hands.
      Now the Foreign Legion holds two-thirds of the valley, overseeing about half of Uzbeen's population of 25.000. Rocco, the outpost they established in August, has been directly attacked only once.
      …

      The French estimate they've killed or wounded at least a dozen insurgents during the small-scale clashes they've had in recent weeks. But killing the Taliban isn't as important as sidelining them, Durieux says. His goal in the months ahead is to peel off local, part-time fighters from the hard-line Taliban.
      …

      'It's all a question of social pressure, we're there until villagers get the insurgents to quit or leave', said Durieux, adding his troops are willing to offer amnesty and protection to small-timers who renounce violence."

      http://www.montereyherald.com/news/ci_13753086?nc...

      Reply
  26. Secret Squirrel says:
    November 19, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    In Afghanistan helo medivacs the flight medic is required to be a battalion surgeon or a 18D (special forces medic). A SFOD medic falls under this specification as i am sure PJ medics go throught the same SF training program. As for the his gear those are asolo boots. As for Multi-Cam the only U.S. army soldiers wearing them right now are SFOD, Regular SF, Ranger Batt has a variant of multicam, and the one regular army battalion that is stationed in Northern Afghanistan has been issued some.

    As for the helocopter post a comparison of a side view of a blackhawk. Notice the wheel placement is toward the rear of the photo. Toward the front of the photo is the sliding door opening away from the wheels. The gunners window is closed. Also Blackhawk tell tell sign is the U-shaped bar the protrudes form side of helicopter next to gunners window. It is my belief this is a blackhawk.

    Reply
    • clowe says:
      November 19, 2009 at 6:38 pm

      Now Secret Squirrel, THIS is a comment I appreciate…thanks for the ID and insight!

      Reply
  27. REB says:
    November 19, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    The french are IN the Fight and doing a great Job!

    Reply
    • JimboJones says:
      November 20, 2009 at 3:30 pm

      Thouhg in very small numbers and making no difference to the conficts overall outcome, a token gesture you might say… (like most of the Euro nations there)
      I'll take them seriously when they buck their numbers up though that'll obviously never happen.

      Reply
  28. REB says:
    November 19, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    The “protruding bars” are HF antanas.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Hot Topics
    • Bye Bye HUMVEE
    • Corps Keeps Buying Growlers (The Jeep Kind)
    • Russian F-22 (PAK-FA) First Test Flight Revealed
    • Air Force Loses 12 Reaper/Predators, Buys WASPs
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Bayonets Hit the Mark
    • FRES Vehicle a Shambles
    • Bushmaster Adaptive Combat Rifle
    • FBI Stings SHOT Show
    • Fix Bayonets!
    Recent Comments
    • Sea Drones in the Works
      It was the Simpsons episode with Bart and Lisa at a military school.
      TMB
    • Sea Drones in the Works
      I think there was a quote from Futurama where Zapp is addressing the...
      Brian
    • Iran Launch Could Mean EMP Weapon
      Well, chances are if Iran tried to ever use any sort of...
      Guest
    • Our Oscar Vote
      What, no love for Up in the Air? I guess if you're not an Oscars...
      Jeanette K.
    • Sea Drones in the Works
      Anyone remember the Sea Shadow? http://upload.wikimedia.org...
      koakai
    • Oodles of Grenade Guns for Joes in 2011
      Have not fired the M320, but have used the M203 with...
      Guest
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was with B, Co 6/31, fro mm 1983 to 1986 CS 235 India. Does any one...
      Luis
    • Sea Drones in the Works
      Since it's unmanned, maybe it can be programmed to submerge or do...
      Dave
    • Bayonets Hit the Mark
      Brian, you sound like a fuckin fag! too scared to face to face with the...
      Mark
    • The Keating Report (Where is it?)
      Could someone repost this and hang a link to it? Army...
      JOS
    Recent Articles
    • Murtha Dead at 77
    • Sea Drones in the Works
    • The Keating Report (Where is it?)
    • COP Keating Report Complete
    • Asia-Pacific Recapitalizes its Fighter Fleets
    • Air Force Loses 12 Reaper/Predators, Buys WASPs
    • Our Oscar Vote
    • JSF Chief’s Career Crashes, Another Plane Takes Off
    • Corps Keeps Buying Growlers (The Jeep Kind)
    • COIN Attack Plane Not Til Next Year
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2010 Military Advantage