<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaylord Focker</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-225075</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaylord Focker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-225075</guid>
		<description>your all nerds </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your all nerds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penis</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-225074</link>
		<dc:creator>penis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-225074</guid>
		<description>i lve youu </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i lve youu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elgatoso</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-188724</link>
		<dc:creator>elgatoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-188724</guid>
		<description>Yes,Charles,Phantom Works is Boeing. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,Charles,Phantom Works is Boeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-188683</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-188683</guid>
		<description>Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? 
 
I dunno what Northrop&#039;s equivalent is. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? </p>
<p>I dunno what Northrop’s equivalent is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-188487</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-188487</guid>
		<description>agreed .. I&#039;m trying the positive reinforcement approach though.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed .. I’m trying the positive reinforcement approach though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-188486</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-188486</guid>
		<description>definitely true about NG .. the F-20 being a much earlier example (well pre UAVs).  I think - as far as complete operational military vehicles funded by internal capital go - they are well ahead of the other two (?). Boeing, perhaps, thinks the airliner biz is risky enough.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely true about NG .. the F-20 being a much earlier example (well pre UAVs).  I think — as far as complete operational military vehicles funded by internal capital go — they are well ahead of the other two (?). Boeing, perhaps, thinks the airliner biz is risky enough..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMSgt Mac</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-188450</link>
		<dc:creator>SMSgt Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-188450</guid>
		<description>NG has been proactive in UAVs for years. Fire Scout was BORN as a company initiative, and IMHO they won the UCAS Demonstrator based upon their sinking their own $ into the X-47A Pegasus and demostrating key competencies.  
NG is not alone in the efforts either. Skunkworks and  Phantomworks are among the best known of other incubators of Tech (successful and unsuccessful all). The contractor&#039;s know they have to invest to maintain the capabilities they need. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NG has been proactive in UAVs for years. Fire Scout was BORN as a company initiative, and IMHO they won the UCAS Demonstrator based upon their sinking their own $ into the X-47A Pegasus and demostrating key competencies.<br />
NG is not alone in the efforts either. Skunkworks and  Phantomworks are among the best known of other incubators of Tech (successful and unsuccessful all). The contractor’s know they have to invest to maintain the capabilities they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-188447</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-188447</guid>
		<description>Still kind of nervous about how much time DefTech spends on military fashion </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still kind of nervous about how much time DefTech spends on military fashion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-188446</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-188446</guid>
		<description>I no longer trust the Navy&#039;s ability to build a new ship without it costing more than it&#039; weight in platinum or palladium (which costs more than gold) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I no longer trust the Navy’s ability to build a new ship without it costing more than it’ weight in platinum or palladium (which costs more than gold)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/18/northrop-invests-own-money-in-fire-scout/#comment-188433</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5022#comment-188433</guid>
		<description>its always nice to see aerospace corp put their money where their mouth is .. congrats to NG for being gutsy enough to bring the Fire Scout program forward on their own (believing in their product and their engineers).. and congrats to defense tech for the good defense technology related articles (recently).. I might have to retract my earlier &#039;defenserumor.org&#039; comment :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its always nice to see aerospace corp put their money where their mouth is .. congrats to NG for being gutsy enough to bring the Fire Scout program forward on their own (believing in their product and their engineers).. and congrats to defense tech for the good defense technology related articles (recently).. I might have to retract my earlier ‘defenserumor.org’ comment :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

