<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Camo Pattern on the Block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEAL76</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-197332</link>
		<dc:creator>SEAL76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-197332</guid>
		<description>I agree. Camo doesn&#039;t make our troops invisible or more importantly bullet proof. I fought the VC and NVA in Vietnam and they had minimal if any camo and did rather well inflicted casualties on our troops. The current bad guys don&#039;t wear camo and also do reasonably well killing our people. I personally believe that camo is highly over rated. As a USN SEAL in RVN we  wore pretty much what we wanted. I wore a Tiger stripe boonie hat, an ERDL camo shirt and Levi&#039;s 501 jeans. Other wore the jungle greens dyed black. Some wore the whole ERDL thing. I knew guys who wore 501&#039;s and a green or Blue and Gold (blue side out) t shirt. Head gear ranged from none to bandanas. boonie hats, and head bands. We didn&#039;t wear helmets or body armor in the field. We did pretty well too. I would say screw the camo and work on body armor. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Camo doesn’t make our troops invisible or more importantly bullet proof. I fought the VC and NVA in Vietnam and they had minimal if any camo and did rather well inflicted casualties on our troops. The current bad guys don’t wear camo and also do reasonably well killing our people. I personally believe that camo is highly over rated. As a USN SEAL in RVN we  wore pretty much what we wanted. I wore a Tiger stripe boonie hat, an ERDL camo shirt and Levi’s 501 jeans. Other wore the jungle greens dyed black. Some wore the whole ERDL thing. I knew guys who wore 501’s and a green or Blue and Gold (blue side out) t shirt. Head gear ranged from none to bandanas. boonie hats, and head bands. We didn’t wear helmets or body armor in the field. We did pretty well too. I would say screw the camo and work on body armor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-194804</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-194804</guid>
		<description>Zandor,  
Ever heard of &quot;keeping your head on a swivel&quot;? Kinda tough when your cheek is stuck to your but stock. Every &quot;well trained&quot; soldier, marine and swat operator knows to keep scanning with your head and eyes not the gun. You get tunnel vision and you are slower to react to oblique threats, that is if you don&#039;t miss them completly.   
You may have taken the advice of some guy you believed was an expert and you are probably preaching his method to everyone you know.  Unfortunately he was wrong. 
-mp / swat op </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zandor,<br />
Ever heard of “keeping your head on a swivel”? Kinda tough when your cheek is stuck to your but stock. Every “well trained” soldier, marine and swat operator knows to keep scanning with your head and eyes not the gun. You get tunnel vision and you are slower to react to oblique threats, that is if you don’t miss them completly.<br />
You may have taken the advice of some guy you believed was an expert and you are probably preaching his method to everyone you know.  Unfortunately he was wrong.<br />
–mp / swat op</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-194803</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-194803</guid>
		<description>Zandor, 
Ever heard of &quot;keeping your head on a swivel&quot;?  Kinda tough when your cheek is stuck to your but stock.  Every soldier, marine and swat operator knows to keep scanning with your head and eyes not the gun.  You get stuck in tunnel vision and you are slower to react to oblique threats.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zandor,<br />
Ever heard of “keeping your head on a swivel”?  Kinda tough when your cheek is stuck to your but stock.  Every soldier, marine and swat operator knows to keep scanning with your head and eyes not the gun.  You get stuck in tunnel vision and you are slower to react to oblique threats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-194719</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-194719</guid>
		<description>shut up zander... if you have a problem with America move to afghanistan and join them for man butt thursdays... i&#039;m sure you&#039;ll fit in.  Maybe instead of bitching you could join your country and actually contribute.  For you to run your stupid mouth and say that the US is not taking care of terrorist then you should be smacked in your dumb mouth,  because there are Americans over there who are losing their lifes keeping you iggnorant ass safe 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shut up zander… if you have a problem with America move to afghanistan and join them for man butt thursdays… i’m sure you’ll fit in.  Maybe instead of bitching you could join your country and actually contribute.  For you to run your stupid mouth and say that the US is not taking care of terrorist then you should be smacked in your dumb mouth,  because there are Americans over there who are losing their lifes keeping you iggnorant ass safe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Face Jacket rr</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-190115</link>
		<dc:creator>North Face Jacket rr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-190115</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huxhbuy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;North Face Jacket&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huxhbuy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;North Face&lt;/a&gt;   
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huxhbuy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The North Face&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Discount North Face&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cheap North Face Jacket&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cheap North Face&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Discount North Face Jacket&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.huxhbuy.com/" rel="nofollow">North Face Jacket</a><br />
<a href="http://www.huxhbuy.com/" rel="nofollow">North Face</a><br />
<a href="http://www.huxhbuy.com/" rel="nofollow">The North Face</a><br />
<a href="http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html" rel="nofollow">Discount North Face</a><br />
<a href="http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html" rel="nofollow">Cheap North Face Jacket</a><br />
<a href="http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html" rel="nofollow">Cheap North Face</a><br />
<a href="http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html" rel="nofollow">Discount North Face Jacket</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ral</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-189398</link>
		<dc:creator>ral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-189398</guid>
		<description>I remember back in the 90&#039;s there was a pattern, the ASAT, that was very good, a leas for hunting, in the various environment of USA.  What happened to that? 
anyone know? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember back in the 90’s there was a pattern, the ASAT, that was very good, a leas for hunting, in the various environment of USA.  What happened to that?<br />
anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onely</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-189322</link>
		<dc:creator>onely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-189322</guid>
		<description>Not to be glib, but it looks like the Army has finally found Photoshops &quot;water color&quot; filter.  One has to wonder how these systems are actually developed?  That said it looks quite interesting. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be glib, but it looks like the Army has finally found Photoshops “water color” filter.  One has to wonder how these systems are actually developed?  That said it looks quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarScientist</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-189262</link>
		<dc:creator>WarScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-189262</guid>
		<description>where i said usefull in that last sentence, i actually meant ignorant, badly thought-out, annoying and any other negative word you can think of. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where i said usefull in that last sentence, i actually meant ignorant, badly thought-out, annoying and any other negative word you can think of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarScientist</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-189261</link>
		<dc:creator>WarScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-189261</guid>
		<description>Ill do it for you: 
 
Here are the 5 geopolitical objectives for the grand strategy of the United States of America: 
 
1) The complete domination of north america by the united states army. 
2) The elimination of any threat to the united states by any power in the western hemisphere. 
3) Complete control of the maritime approaches to the united states by the navy to preclude any possibility of invasion. 
4) Complete domination of the world&#039;s oceans to further secure U.S. physical safety and guarantee control over the international trading system. 
5) The prevention of any other nation from challenging U.S. global naval power. 
 
Might i add, this was written by a man much much smarter than you or i (George Friedman). You can choose to do with this information what you will. You can study it and learn something from it, or you can keep spamming the forums with your inane, usefull and wastefull posts. 
 
Over &amp; out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ill do it for you: </p>
<p>Here are the 5 geopolitical objectives for the grand strategy of the United States of America: </p>
<p>1) The complete domination of north america by the united states army.<br />
2) The elimination of any threat to the united states by any power in the western hemisphere.<br />
3) Complete control of the maritime approaches to the united states by the navy to preclude any possibility of invasion.<br />
4) Complete domination of the world’s oceans to further secure U.S. physical safety and guarantee control over the international trading system.<br />
5) The prevention of any other nation from challenging U.S. global naval power. </p>
<p>Might i add, this was written by a man much much smarter than you or i (George Friedman). You can choose to do with this information what you will. You can study it and learn something from it, or you can keep spamming the forums with your inane, usefull and wastefull posts. </p>
<p>Over &amp; out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarScientist</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/20/new-camo-pattern-on-the-block/#comment-189151</link>
		<dc:creator>WarScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5048#comment-189151</guid>
		<description>LOL. 
 
That&#039;s so retarded it&#039;s actually funny. 
 
Other than buying the Pencott Camo licence or replacing everything with multiglam i really dont see any way that american infantry soldiers can avoid walking around in their &quot; HEY LOOK AT ME IM OVER HERE TRYING TO HIDE BEHIND THIS BUSH&quot; uniforms. 
 
The worst thing about ACU is that it lights up like a friggin christmas tree at night-time, Its almost as if they never even tested it (or the natick guys had been drinking quite heavily during the tests) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. </p>
<p>That’s so retarded it’s actually funny. </p>
<p>Other than buying the Pencott Camo licence or replacing everything with multiglam i really dont see any way that american infantry soldiers can avoid walking around in their ” HEY LOOK AT ME IM OVER HERE TRYING TO HIDE BEHIND THIS BUSH” uniforms. </p>
<p>The worst thing about ACU is that it lights up like a friggin christmas tree at night-time, Its almost as if they never even tested it (or the natick guys had been drinking quite heavily during the tests)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

