<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Avic Defense To Expand Civil Work</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/avic-defense-to-expand-civil-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/avic-defense-to-expand-civil-work/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:57:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Valcan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/avic-defense-to-expand-civil-work/#comment-189348</link> <dc:creator>Valcan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:44:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5075#comment-189348</guid> <description>Vstress, &quot;Providing we force them to use our manufacturing sites, I have no issue. No point exporting our manufacturing skills though, that would be a really big mistake! &quot; Couldnt agree more.......though we probably will and it will be haled as a good thing by a select group of retards. Byron, Oh come on not the Neocons!! thing again. Neoconservative is sucha stupid word. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism&lt;/a&gt; So what is so evil about neoconservatism? Seems to use both elements of right and left. Seems to be the middle ground to me. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vstress,</p><p>“Providing we force them to use our manufacturing sites, I have no issue. No point exporting our manufacturing skills though, that would be a really big mistake! ”</p><p>Couldnt agree more.……though we probably will and it will be haled as a good thing by a select group of retards.</p><p>Byron,</p><p>Oh come on not the Neocons!! thing again. Neoconservative is sucha stupid word.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism</a></p><p>So what is so evil about neoconservatism?</p><p>Seems to use both elements of right and left. Seems to be the middle ground to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vstress</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/avic-defense-to-expand-civil-work/#comment-189257</link> <dc:creator>Vstress</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5075#comment-189257</guid> <description>I agree with Byron.No point blocking export sales if we can!  To be fair, the Chinese are never good at designing and building, so most of the design work will probably be done abroad too.It&#039;s a commercial aircraft, so all the important systems that are sensitive, in regards to defence, they aren&#039;t included.Providing we force them to use our manufacturing sites, I have no issue.  No point exporting our manufacturing skills though, that would be a really big mistake!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Byron.</p><p>No point blocking export sales if we can!  To be fair, the Chinese are never good at designing and building, so most of the design work will probably be done abroad too.</p><p>It’s a commercial aircraft, so all the important systems that are sensitive, in regards to defence, they aren’t included.</p><p>Providing we force them to use our manufacturing sites, I have no issue.  No point exporting our manufacturing skills though, that would be a really big mistake!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Byron Skinner</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/avic-defense-to-expand-civil-work/#comment-189160</link> <dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:54:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5075#comment-189160</guid> <description>Good Morning Folks,For you neo-con. China watchers don&#039;t get to excited about this, the aircraft being build is a 70-100 passenger business/regional commuter plane. Avic is basically assembling this aircraft, over 75% of the parts are imported (Russia, Canada, France, Brazil, Germany) and manufactured outside China, two thirds of the imported parts including the engines come from the United States.This plane is not as of yet certified for international sales and most likely will be built in small numbers, 100-200 and serve on short haul domestic Chinese routs. It&#039;s military value is negligible.ALLONS, Byron Skinner</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Folks,</p><p>For you neo-con. China watchers don’t get to excited about this, the aircraft being build is a 70–100 passenger business/regional commuter plane. Avic is basically assembling this aircraft, over 75% of the parts are imported (Russia, Canada, France, Brazil, Germany) and manufactured outside China, two thirds of the imported parts including the engines come from the United States.</p><p>This plane is not as of yet certified for international sales and most likely will be built in small numbers, 100–200 and serve on short haul domestic Chinese routs. It’s military value is negligible.</p><p>ALLONS,<br /> Byron Skinner</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sfgsf</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/avic-defense-to-expand-civil-work/#comment-189070</link> <dc:creator>sfgsf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:57:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5075#comment-189070</guid> <description>irony. american managers managed it out to get Boing jet parts from state-owned chinese defense com&#173;pany. i will not wounder when they will pop up with designs like mixture of A380 and B787 bodies running by X-box computers. --allow for&#173;eign air&#173;line exec&#173;u&#173;tives to enter sites that main&#173;tain Chinese com&#173;bat aircraft-- yeahh and for this dangerous moment in China we should let them own the gras around the White House. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>irony. american managers managed it out to get Boing jet parts from state-owned chinese defense com­pany. i will not wounder when they will pop up with designs like mixture of A380 and B787 bodies running by X-box computers.<br /> –allow for­eign air­line exec­u­tives to enter sites that main­tain Chinese com­bat aircraft–</p><p>yeahh and for this dangerous moment in China we should let them own the gras around the White House.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/avic-defense-to-expand-civil-work/#comment-189047</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:58:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5075#comment-189047</guid> <description>Be unique &amp; drive BizJet competition alone. Very cool investments for the US &amp; for TransPac use alone IF jet has range. Co produce in US? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be unique &amp; drive BizJet competition alone.<br /> Very cool investments for the US &amp; for TransPac use alone IF jet has range.<br /> Co produce in US?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 688/692 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-09 19:16:15 -->
