<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Piracy Blooms Anew</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189430</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189430</guid>
		<description>My understanding is that pirates have been avoided ships registered in the US.  Good enough for me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that pirates have been avoided ships registered in the US.  Good enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DualityOfMan</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189356</link>
		<dc:creator>DualityOfMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189356</guid>
		<description>What Somali government? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Somali government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ter</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189352</guid>
		<description>It is a surprise that those pirates caught could not be charge as there are not international law governing it. 
Those navies patrolling the area should just sink them or blow them out of the water as soon as they can confirm that they are pirates. 
They should not be allowed to go scot free and no point in handling them back to Somali government as they will be back to business as usual the next day. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a surprise that those pirates caught could not be charge as there are not international law governing it.<br />
Those navies patrolling the area should just sink them or blow them out of the water as soon as they can confirm that they are pirates.<br />
They should not be allowed to go scot free and no point in handling them back to Somali government as they will be back to business as usual the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Skinner</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189339</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189339</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Folks,

I see the sillies have got into this discussion which is a strong indicator of lack of any real interest in the topic, maybe Joe and Christian  you should give Pyracy off Somalia a rest. 

Before you do though, I will  suggest something that has been over looked in dealing with these Pyrates, and that is changing the laws of the sea. As the law stands the only time a Pyrates can be taken into custody is if they are caught in the act. If they haven&#039;t started boarding a ship simply by chucking their weapons over the side they are safe. If the Pyrates have  already have started the boarding process then it&#039;s most likely to late to engage them with out putting the boarded ships crew at risk.

If the laws of the sea were changed and exclusive uses shipping lanes were created for merchant vessels, where fishing boats, private yachts, and other non merchant ships would be prohibited from entering. These lanes could be made narrow enough to be patrolled efficiently by the worlds militaries. Any non merchantmen in one of these lanes could be boarded and the crews taken into custody and their vessels confiscated.

This idea lacks the drama, noise, weapons and all the romance of dealing with Pyracy, but it might start to deal with the problem. Right now it&#039;s nothing more then a stand between $ billion war ships with millions of dollars a week in operating cost and a few drugged teenagers with small arms and a hand full of ready for the junk yard fishing boats. 

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Folks,</p>
<p>I see the sillies have got into this discussion which is a strong indicator of lack of any real interest in the topic, maybe Joe and Christian  you should give Pyracy off Somalia a rest. </p>
<p>Before you do though, I will  suggest something that has been over looked in dealing with these Pyrates, and that is changing the laws of the sea. As the law stands the only time a Pyrates can be taken into custody is if they are caught in the act. If they haven’t started boarding a ship simply by chucking their weapons over the side they are safe. If the Pyrates have  already have started the boarding process then it’s most likely to late to engage them with out putting the boarded ships crew at risk.</p>
<p>If the laws of the sea were changed and exclusive uses shipping lanes were created for merchant vessels, where fishing boats, private yachts, and other non merchant ships would be prohibited from entering. These lanes could be made narrow enough to be patrolled efficiently by the worlds militaries. Any non merchantmen in one of these lanes could be boarded and the crews taken into custody and their vessels confiscated.</p>
<p>This idea lacks the drama, noise, weapons and all the romance of dealing with Pyracy, but it might start to deal with the problem. Right now it’s nothing more then a stand between $ billion war ships with millions of dollars a week in operating cost and a few drugged teenagers with small arms and a hand full of ready for the junk yard fishing boats. </p>
<p>ALLONS,<br />
Byron Skinner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead.bolt.dad</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189331</link>
		<dc:creator>dead.bolt.dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189331</guid>
		<description>How about a secure &quot;battle bridge&quot; with quarters that the crew can run the ship from if they are attacked? 
 
If you can&#039;t get to my crew and they are safe, and I control where the ship goes and how we get there, you&#039;re going to be in a bad way when my ship rendezvous with either a friendly armed merchant ship or warship. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a secure “battle bridge” with quarters that the crew can run the ship from if they are attacked? </p>
<p>If you can’t get to my crew and they are safe, and I control where the ship goes and how we get there, you’re going to be in a bad way when my ship rendezvous with either a friendly armed merchant ship or warship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DualityOfMan</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189309</link>
		<dc:creator>DualityOfMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189309</guid>
		<description>Who are &quot;our own?&quot; These ships are owned in one country, registered in another, and crewed by sailors from several more yet. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are “our own?” These ships are owned in one country, registered in another, and crewed by sailors from several more yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinsteinGotFired</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189284</link>
		<dc:creator>EinsteinGotFired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189284</guid>
		<description>Remembering Fort Hood is getting to be like Remembering the Alamo.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remembering Fort Hood is getting to be like Remembering the Alamo.…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinsteinGotFired</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189283</link>
		<dc:creator>EinsteinGotFired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189283</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be careful what and who&#039;s backing what, because notoriously backing America&#039;s enemies is getting to be a very, very  good temptation for the &quot;evildoers.&quot;  And, not having the right information, well, you might be declaring more than humbling America&#039;s enemies. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d be careful what and who’s backing what, because notoriously backing America’s enemies is getting to be a very, very  good temptation for the “evildoers.”  And, not having the right information, well, you might be declaring more than humbling America’s enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinsteinGotFired</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189282</link>
		<dc:creator>EinsteinGotFired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189282</guid>
		<description>Though, there are VFW members that are still wondering why the National Anthem is considered to be hated by GOD.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though, there are VFW members that are still wondering why the National Anthem is considered to be hated by GOD.…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinsteinGotFired</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/24/piracy-blooms-anew/#comment-189281</link>
		<dc:creator>EinsteinGotFired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5078#comment-189281</guid>
		<description>And no Virginia, there is no Santa Claus, Psalm 34, 36....... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And no Virginia, there is no Santa Claus, Psalm 34, 36.……</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

